切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 493 -497. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2019.04.018

所属专题: 文献

临床经验

内轴膝置换治疗膝骨关节炎的满意度分析及初步疗效
陈雪燕1, 李振兴1, 李莉2, 陈成旺2, 薛恩兴2, 郑文娴1, 张宇1, 樊沛1,()   
  1. 1. 325027 温州医科大学附属第二医院、育英儿童医院骨科;325027 温州,浙江省骨科学重点实验室
    2. 325027 温州医科大学附属第二医院、育英儿童医院麻醉科;325027 温州,浙江省麻醉学重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-02 出版日期:2019-08-01
  • 通信作者: 樊沛
  • 基金资助:
    温州市科技局项目(Y20180029)

Satisfaction and short-term clinical outcome of total knee arthroplsty using medial pivot knee for knee osteoarthritis

Xueyani Chen1, Zhenxing Li1, Li Li2, Chengwang Chen2, Enxin Xue2, Wenxian Zheng1, Yu Zhang1, Pei Fan1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China; Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Orthopaedics, Wenzhou 325027, Chin
    2. Department of Anesthesia, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China; Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Anesthesia, Wenzhou 325027, China.
  • Received:2018-11-02 Published:2019-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Pei Fan
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Fan Pei, Email:
引用本文:

陈雪燕, 李振兴, 李莉, 陈成旺, 薛恩兴, 郑文娴, 张宇, 樊沛. 内轴膝置换治疗膝骨关节炎的满意度分析及初步疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(04): 493-497.

Xueyani Chen, Zhenxing Li, Li Li, Chengwang Chen, Enxin Xue, Wenxian Zheng, Yu Zhang, Pei Fan. Satisfaction and short-term clinical outcome of total knee arthroplsty using medial pivot knee for knee osteoarthritis[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(04): 493-497.

分析内轴膝假体置换术后疗效,评估患者满意度。

方法

对温州医科大学附属第二医院关节外科单一术者2016年8月至2017年10月期间使用内轴膝假体进行膝关节置换的患者进行至少1年随访,对患者的满意度及不满意原因进行调查和分析,并调查患者膝关节疼痛程度及关节活动度。

结果

52例患者纳入此研究,手术时平均年龄(73±6)岁,随访时间(13.9±1.4)个月。内轴膝假体总体满意度达到90.38%,其中不满意的原因最主要是持续性膝关节疼痛,内轴膝假体置换后患者疼痛数字评分中位数M为0,四分位数间距为0,膝关节活动度为(93±12)°。

结论

内轴膝置换治疗终末期膝骨性关节炎疗效确切,患者满意度高,术后膝关节持续性疼痛仍然是患者不满意最主要的原因。

Objective

To investigate clinical outcome of medial pivot(MP) knee prosthesis, the satisfaction rate and the causes of the dissatisfaction.

Methods

A survey was used for collecting information from patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using MP prosthesis from August 2016 to October 2017. The minimum follow-up time was at least one year. The satisfaction and the causes of dissatisfaction were analyzed while the pain numeric rating scales(NRS) and range of motion were investigated.

Results

Fifty-two patients performed TKA using this prosthesis were enrolled in this study, the average age was (73±6) years and the average follow-up time was (13.9±1.4)months. The satisfaction rate of MP prosthesis reached 90.38%. The most common cause of dissatisfaction was persistent pain around knee. The median of NRS score was 0, the inter-quartile range was 0. The range of motion was(93±12)°.

Conclusion

TKA using MP prosthesis achieves clinical good results and has a high satisfaction rate, yet persistent pain around knee after TKA is still the most common reason for dissatisfaction.

图1 上海微创公司的内轴膝垫片。图中可见内轴膝垫片为内侧为轴,前缘垫高的设计,图A为面观;图B为内侧面观
图2 右侧内轴膝关节置换手术前后X线片。膝关节无明显疼痛,膝关节活动度0°~110°。图A为右膝术前正侧位片,示右侧膝关节骨关节炎;图B为双下肢术前全长片;图C为右膝术后正侧位片,示膝关节活动良好;图D为双下肢术后全长片
图3 内轴膝置换术后NRS评分(疼痛数字评分)情况
[1]
Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, et al. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010, 468(1): 57-63.
[2]
Longo UG, Ciuffreda M, Mannering NA, et al. Outcomes of posterior-stabilized compared with cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Knee Surg, 2018, 31(4): 321-340.
[3]
Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR. In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of fixed-bearing total knee replacements[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2003, (410): 114-130.
[4]
Fitch DA, Sedacki K, Yang Y. Mid-to long-term outcomes of a medial-pivot system for primary total knee replacement. A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Bone Joint Res, 2014, 3(10): 297-304.
[5]
Choi YJ, Ra HJ. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty[J]. Knee Surg Relat Res, 2016, 28(1): 1-15.
[6]
Steinbrueck A, Schroeder C, Woiczinski MA, et al. Femorotibial kinematics and load patterns after total knee arthroplasty: An in vitro comparison of posterior-stabilized versus medial-stabilized design[J]. Clinical Biomechanics, 2016, 33: 42-48.
[7]
Digennaro V, Zambianchi F, Marcovigi A, et al. Design and kinematics in total knee arthroplasty[J]. Int Orthop, 2014, 38(2): 227-233.
[8]
Causero A, Di Benedetto P, Beltrame A, et al. Design evolution in total knee replacement: which is the future?[J]. Acta Biomed, 2014, 85 (Suppl 2): 5-19.
[9]
Shimmin A, Martinez-Martos S, Owens JA, et al. Fluoroscopic motion study confirming the stability of a medial pivot design total knee arthroplasty[J]. Knee, 2015, 22(6): 522-526.
[10]
Sabatini L, Risitano S, Parisi G, et al. Medial pivot in total knee arthroplasty: literature review and our first experience[J]. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord, 2018, 11: 1-4.
[11]
Nakamura S, Minoda Y, Nakagawa S, et al. Clinical results of alumina medial pivot total knee arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 10 years[J]. Knee, 2017, 24(2): 434-438.
[12]
Macheras GA, Galanakos SP, Lepetsos P, et al. A long term clinical outcome of the medial pivot knee arthroplasty system[J]. Knee, 2017, 24(2): 447-453.
[13]
Nishitani K, Furu M, Nakamura SA, et al. No differences in patient-reported outcomes between medial pivot insert and symmetrical insert in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized analysis[J]. Knee, 2018, 25(6): 1254-1261.
[14]
Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS. Clinical outcome of medial pivot compared with press-fit condylar sigma cruciate-retaining mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2017, 32(10): 3016-3023.
[15]
Choi NY, In Y, Bae JH, et al. Are midterm patient-reported outcome measures between rotating-platform mobile-bearing prosthesis and medial-pivot prosthesis different? A minimum of 5-year follow-up study[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2017, 32(3): 824-829.
[16]
Lewis GN, Rice DA, Mcnair PJ, et al. Predictors of persistent pain after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2015, 114(4): 551-561.
[17]
Phillips J, Hopwood B, Arthur C, et al. The natural history of pain and neuropathic pain after knee replacement : a prospective cohort study of the point prevalence of pain and neuropathic pain to a minimum three-year follow-up[J]. Bone Joint J, 2014, 96B(9): 1227-1233.
[18]
Heyse TJ, Becher C, Kron N, et al. Patellofemoral pressure after TKA in vitro: highly conforming vs. posterior stabilized inlays[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2010, 130(2): 191-196.
[19]
Tanikawa H, Tada M, Harato K, et al. Influence of total knee arthroplasty on patellar kinematics and patellofemoral pressure[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2017, 32(1): 280-285.
[20]
Lim HA, Song EK, Seon JK, et al. Causes of aseptic persistent pain after total knee arthroplasty[J]. Clin Orthop Surg, 2017, 9(1): 50-56.
[1] 闫文, 谢兴文, 顾玉彪, 雷宁波, 马成, 于文霞, 高亚雄, 张磊. 微小RNA与全膝关节置换术后深静脉血栓的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 842-846.
[2] 王宏宇. 固定与活动平台假体在全膝关节置换术中的应用价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 871-876.
[3] 李善武, 叶永杰, 王兵, 王子呓, 银毅, 孙官军, 张大刚. 胫骨高位截骨与单髁置换的早期疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 882-888.
[4] 李辉, 吴奇, 张子琦, 张晗, 王仿, 许鹏. 日间全膝关节置换术早期疗效及标准化流程探索[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 889-892.
[5] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[6] 邓华梅, 袁札根, 曾德荣, 潘珊珊, 张葆青, 欧爱华, 曹学伟. 全膝关节置换术中气压止血带应用效果与影响因素分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 788-794.
[7] 刘伦, 王云鹭, 李锡勇, 韩鹏飞, 张鹏, 李晓东. 机器人辅助膝关节单髁置换术的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 715-721.
[8] 王桂冠, 徐杰. 运动学对线在全膝关节置换术中的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 726-731.
[9] 杨依琴, 何敏仪, 杜桂菊, 刘欣, 詹文英. 膝关节置换术后康复应用基于保护动机理论的健康教育[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 741-746.
[10] 姚轶超, 张麒, 滕海茂, 黄攀, 吴雷涛, 韩哲. 膝关节置换术后恐动症与康复效果及社会支持的相关性[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 613-618.
[11] 樊绪国, 赵永刚. 全膝关节置换术中髌骨轨迹的研究进展及处理策略[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 701-707.
[12] 邵长杰, 杜晓颖, 徐奎帅, 张靓, 纪岩磊. 住院天数影响全膝关节置换术后下肢深静脉血栓形成[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 588-591.
[13] 周晓强, 金宇杰, 李志强, 徐人杰, 张向鑫, 陈广祥, 虞宵. 运动学与机械学对线在全膝关节置换中的比较研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 554-559.
[14] 李博, 张立茉, 乔成钢, 包金全, 白志刚, 赵文强. 全膝关节置换术下肢力线的影响因素[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 398-403.
[15] 刘亚茹, 毛彦杰, 张仁波, 何阿祥, 张先龙, 刘万军. 全膝关节置换术行髌骨置换的疗效及其影响因素[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 201-208.
阅读次数
全文


摘要