膝关节置换术后康复应用基于保护动机理论的健康教育

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2023.05.023

目的

探讨基于保护动机理论(PMT)的健康教育在全膝关节置换术后患者康复锻炼中的应用效果。

方法

选取2021年7月至2022年2月在广东省第二中医院接受单侧全膝关节置换术的72例膝骨关节炎患者，按随机数字表法分为对照组和实验组各36例。对照组给予常规健康教育，实验组在对照组基础上实施基于PMT的健康教育；比较两组患者康复自我效能评分、康复锻炼依从性评分及膝关节功能评分情况。计量资料采用独立样本t检验，计数资料采用卡方检验。

结果

两组患者干预前的康复自我效能各维度评分、康复锻炼依从性各维度评分及膝关节功能评分比较，差异无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)；干预后实验组患者的康复自我效能各维度评分、康复锻炼依从性各维度评分及膝关节功能评分均高于对照组，差异有统计学意义(t＝4.865、3.984、5.901、5.514、5.304、4.183，均为P<0.05)。

结论

基于PMT的健康教育能提高全膝关节置换术后患者的康复自我效能感和康复锻炼依从性，有效促进术后膝关节功能的恢复。

关键词: 关节成形术，置换，膝, 健康教育, 运动疗法

Objective

To explore the application effect of health education based on protective motivation theory(PMT) in rehabilitation exercise of patients after total knee arthroplasty.

Methods

Seventy-two patients with knee osteoarthritis who underwent unilateral total knee arthroplasty in Guangdong Second Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital from July 2021 to February 2022 were selected and randomized to control group and experimental group according to random number table, 36 patients in each group. The control group received routine health education, while the experimental group received health education based on PMT besides the routine health education. The rehabilitation self-efficacy score, rehabilitation exercise compliance score and knee joint function score of the two groups were compared. The independent sample t test was used for measurement data, and chi square test was used for counting data.

Results

There was no significant difference in the scores of rehabilitation self-efficacy, rehabilitation exercise compliance or knee function between the two groups before intervention (all P>0.05). After intervention, the scores of all dimensions of rehabilitation self-efficacy, rehabilitation exercise compliance and knee joint function of patients in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=4.865, 3.984, 5.901, 5.514, 5.304, 4.183, all P<0.05).

Conclusion

Health education based on PMT can improve the sense of rehabilitation self-efficacy and rehabilitation exercise compliance of patients after total knee arthroplasty, and effectively promote the recovery of knee joint function.

Key words: Arthroplasty, replacement, knee, Health education, Exercise therapy

图1 基于PMT(保护动机理论)的健康教育方案

Figure 1 Health education plan based on PMT

表2 两组患者一般资料比较

Table 2 Comparison of general information between two groups

组别Groups	例数Case number	性别(女/男)Gender(female/male)	年龄Age[岁，(±s)]	身体质量指数Body mass index[kg/cm²，(±s)]	术侧(右/左)Surgical side(right/left)
实验组Experimental group	36	29/7	70±8	26±3	18/18
对照组Control group	36	27/9	69±8	26±4	19/17
统计值		χ²＝0.321	t＝0.548	t＝0.020	χ²＝0.056
P值		0.571	0.585	0.984	0.814
组别Groups	例数Case number	合并症(有/无)Complication(yes/no)	文化程度(例)Education level
组别Groups	例数Case number	合并症(有/无)Complication(yes/no)	小学及以下Primary school and below	高中或中专Senior school or technic school	大专及以上College and above
实验组Experimental group	36	21/15	21	11	4
对照组Control group	36	20/16	24	9	3
统计值		χ²＝0.057	χ²＝0.730
P值		0.812	0.466

表2 两组患者一般资料比较

Table 2 Comparison of general information between two groups

组别Groups	例数Case number	性别(女/男)Gender(female/male)	年龄Age[岁，(±s)]	身体质量指数Body mass index[kg/cm²，(±s)]	术侧(右/左)Surgical side(right/left)
实验组Experimental group	36	29/7	70±8	26±3	18/18
对照组Control group	36	27/9	69±8	26±4	19/17
统计值		χ²＝0.321	t＝0.548	t＝0.020	χ²＝0.056
P值		0.571	0.585	0.984	0.814
组别Groups	例数Case number	合并症(有/无)Complication(yes/no)	文化程度(例)Education level
组别Groups	例数Case number	合并症(有/无)Complication(yes/no)	小学及以下Primary school and below	高中或中专Senior school or technic school	大专及以上College and above
实验组Experimental group	36	21/15	21	11	4
对照组Control group	36	20/16	24	9	3
统计值		χ²＝0.057	χ²＝0.730
P值		0.812	0.466

表3 两组患者干预前后SER评分比较(±s)

Table 3 Comparison of SER scores before and after intervention between two groups

组别Groups	例数Case number	康复锻炼自我效能Rehabilitation exercise self-efficacy
组别Groups	例数Case number	干预前Before intervention	干预后After intervention	t值	P值
实验组Experimental group	36	31±6	41±4	15.412	<0.001
对照组Control group	36	30±6	36±6	17.744	<0.001
t值		0.597	4.865
P值		>0.05	<0.001
组别Groups	例数Case number	应对自我效能Dealing with self-efficacy
组别Groups	例数Case number	干预前Before intervention	干预后After intervention	t值	P值
实验组Experimental group	36	38±7	52±5	12.467	<0.001
对照组Control group	36	40±8	47±7	12.083	<0.001
t值		0.736	3.984
P值		>0.05	<0.001

表3 两组患者干预前后SER评分比较(±s)

Table 3 Comparison of SER scores before and after intervention between two groups

组别Groups	例数Case number	康复锻炼自我效能Rehabilitation exercise self-efficacy
组别Groups	例数Case number	干预前Before intervention	干预后After intervention	t值	P值
实验组Experimental group	36	31±6	41±4	15.412	<0.001
对照组Control group	36	30±6	36±6	17.744	<0.001
t值		0.597	4.865
P值		>0.05	<0.001
组别Groups	例数Case number	应对自我效能Dealing with self-efficacy
组别Groups	例数Case number	干预前Before intervention	干预后After intervention	t值	P值
实验组Experimental group	36	38±7	52±5	12.467	<0.001
对照组Control group	36	40±8	47±7	12.083	<0.001
t值		0.736	3.984
P值		>0.05	<0.001

表4 两组患者干预前后康复锻炼依从性评分比较(±s)

Table 4 Comparison of rehabilitation exercise compliance scores before and after intervention between two groups

组别Groups	例数Case number	锻炼依从Exercise compliance
组别Groups	例数Case number	干预前Before intervention	干预后After intervention	t值	P值
实验组Experimental group	36	13.3±2.3	17.5±1.1	10.498	<0.001
对照组Control group	36	13.1±2.1	15.4±1.9	7.051	<0.001
t值		0.372	5.901
P值		0.711	<0.001
组别Groups	例数Case number	主动寻求意见依从Actively seeking opinions and compliance
组别Groups	例数Case number	干预前Before intervention	干预后After intervention	t值	P值
实验组Experimental group	36	5.9±1.3	9.9±1.3	17.278	<0.001
对照组Control group	36	6.3±1.3	8.0±1.5	9.950	<0.001
t值		0.996	5.514
P值		0.323	<0.001
组别Groups	例数Case number	锻炼监督依从Exercise supervision compliance
组别Groups	例数Case number	干预前Before intervention	干预后After intervention	t值	P值
实验组Experimental group	36	6.7±1.3	10.3±1.2	12.081	<0.001
对照组Control group	36	6.8±1.4	8.7±1.3	8.774	<0.001
t值		0.433	5.304
P值		0.666	<0.001

表4 两组患者干预前后康复锻炼依从性评分比较(±s)

Table 4 Comparison of rehabilitation exercise compliance scores before and after intervention between two groups

组别Groups	例数Case number	锻炼依从Exercise compliance
组别Groups	例数Case number	干预前Before intervention	干预后After intervention	t值	P值
实验组Experimental group	36	13.3±2.3	17.5±1.1	10.498	<0.001
对照组Control group	36	13.1±2.1	15.4±1.9	7.051	<0.001
t值		0.372	5.901
P值		0.711	<0.001
组别Groups	例数Case number	主动寻求意见依从Actively seeking opinions and compliance
组别Groups	例数Case number	干预前Before intervention	干预后After intervention	t值	P值
实验组Experimental group	36	5.9±1.3	9.9±1.3	17.278	<0.001
对照组Control group	36	6.3±1.3	8.0±1.5	9.950	<0.001
t值		0.996	5.514
P值		0.323	<0.001
组别Groups	例数Case number	锻炼监督依从Exercise supervision compliance
组别Groups	例数Case number	干预前Before intervention	干预后After intervention	t值	P值
实验组Experimental group	36	6.7±1.3	10.3±1.2	12.081	<0.001
对照组Control group	36	6.8±1.4	8.7±1.3	8.774	<0.001
t值		0.433	5.304
P值		0.666	<0.001

表5 两组患者干预前后HSS评分比较(±s)

Table 5 Comparison of HSS scores before and after intervention between two groups

组别Groups	例数Case number	干预前Before intervention	干预后After intervention	t值	P值
实验组Experimental group	36	51±4	83±6	24.257	<0.001
对照组Control group	36	52±4	78±4	26.406	<0.001
t值		0.696	4.183
P值		0.489	<0.001

表5 两组患者干预前后HSS评分比较(±s)

Table 5 Comparison of HSS scores before and after intervention between two groups

组别Groups	例数Case number	干预前Before intervention	干预后After intervention	t值	P值
实验组Experimental group	36	51±4	83±6	24.257	<0.001
对照组Control group	36	52±4	78±4	26.406	<0.001
t值		0.696	4.183
P值		0.489	<0.001

[1]	陈可英，李玉，周黎辉，等. 核心肌力训练在全膝关节置换术患者术后康复护理中的应用[J]. 中国实用护理杂志，2022(21): 1626－1632.
[2]	Blasco J, Igual-Camacho C, Blasco M, et al. The efficacy of virtual reality tools for total knee replacement rehabilitation: a systematic review[J]. Physiother Theory Pract, 2021, 37(6): 682－692.
[3]	房晓，苏晴晴，李海燕，等. 全膝关节置换术患者随访护理需求现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中华现代护理杂志，2021, 27(16): 2209－2214.
[4]	Joshi R, Joseph A, Mihandoust S, et al. Understanding key home and community environment challenges encountered by older adults undergoing total knee or hip arthroplasty[J]. Gerontologist, 2021, 61(7): 1071－1084.
[5]	林晓丽，王丹心，谭绍英，等. 基于保护动机理论的脑卒中后疲劳综合干预方案构建[J]. 护理学杂志，2022, 37(11): 28－31.
[6]	郭影，黄彦红，李莉，等. 可视化健康教育对人工膝关节置换术患者康复自我效能及康复训练行为的影响[J]. 中国医药导报，2021, 18(20): 148－151.
[7]	韦丽鹤，王纳，薛娜，等. 基于保护动机理论的健康教育对进展期胃癌患者服药行为、负性心理反应和疾病感知的影响[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志，2022, 30(3): 372－377.
[8]	中华医学会骨科学分会. 骨关节炎诊治指南(2007年版)[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志，2014, 22(3): 287－288.
[9]	王海燕，许燕玲，胡三莲，等. 中文版康复自我效能感量表的信效度评价[J]. 中华现代护理杂志，2014, 20(3): 268－270.
[10]	赵改云，钱会娟，王凡凡，等. 全膝关节置换术患者居家康复训练依从性量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学杂志，2019, 34(12): 94－97.
[11]	郦杭婷，沈娇妮，万昕瑞，等. 髋膝关节置换术患者康复自我效能感在正念与恐动症间的中介效应研究[J]. 中华护理杂志，2022, 57(10): 1177－1183.
[12]	Lindberg MF, Aamodt A, Badawy M, et al. The effectiveness of exercise therapy and education plus cognitive behavioral therapy, alone or in combination with total knee arthroplasty in patients with knee osteoarthritis - study protocol for the multiknee trial[J/OL]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2021, 22(1): 1054. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04924-z.
[13]	林阳阳，李文昌，陈晓玲，等. 髋膝关节置换术后患者居家康复依从性的调查研究[J]. 新医学，2020, 51(10): 747－751.
[14]	蔡立柏，王琳，刘延锦，等. 基于回授法的健康教育在全膝关节置换术恐动症患者中的应用[J]. 中华现代护理杂志，2022, 28(8): 986－991.

[1]	任俊筱, 浦路桥, 王志豪, 施洪鑫, 刘爱峰, 齐保闯, 徐永清, 李川. 机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的临床疗效对照研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 469-476.
[2]	许亚龙, 巩栋, 陈晓涛. 超前镇痛在全膝关节置换术中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 517-523.
[3]	丁莹莹, 宋恺, 金姬延, 田华. 机器人辅助膝髋关节置换术后精细化临床护理[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 553-557.
[4]	王冰, 孙海宁, 于秀淳, 周珂, 翟凯, 苗族康. 膝骨关节炎的活动衬垫型单髁置换疗效与假体生存率[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 337-345.
[5]	张江礼, 刘金辉, 潘西庆, 刘光源, 范虓. 全膝关节置换应用智能辅助手术导航系统治疗膝骨关节炎[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 346-351.
[6]	杨士慷, 曹光磊. 膝骨关节炎三种术式患者满意度的术前影响因素[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 390-397.
[7]	王啸, 李一凡, 沈素红, 曹国瑞, 史小涛, 袁彦浩, 谭红略. 全膝关节置换术后早期下肢深静脉血栓形成的时空规律[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 414-420.
[8]	刘浩, 郑清源, 程龙, 辛鹏, 吴博, 任鹏, 张国强. 全膝关节置换术中选择窄版股骨假体的影响因素[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 193-200.
[9]	郝鑫, 贾健, 任雨昊, 成凯, 王小虎. 膝关节骨关节炎的运动学疗法[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 264-270.
[10]	卢芳连, 汤莉, 何河北, 李建云, 欧栓机, 陈燕, 陈娇妹. 责任护士主导的疼痛管理在膝关节置换术后的应用[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 285-289.
[11]	赵锦伟, 李晓军, 刘桂宇, 荣晓玲, 黄明利, 宋文静, 高广凌, 鞠昌军. 固定平台假体膝关节单髁置换术中止血带应用策略研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 39-47.
[12]	邓华梅, 袁札根, 曾德荣, 潘珊珊, 张葆青, 欧爱华, 曹学伟. 全膝关节置换术中气压止血带应用效果与影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 788-794.
[13]	徐来英, 程效, 戴亨纷, 侯俊凉, 苏怡林, 张彦. 药物联合个体化精准恒定功率运动疗法治疗心肌梗死术后频发室性早搏一例[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 176-179.
[14]	臧燕, 花红霞, 赵康, 梁辉, 杨宁琍. 同伴教育联合家庭康复指导在青少年减重代谢术后患者延续性护理中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 40-44.
[15]	刘胜锋, 陈云强. 不同强度改良强制性运动疗法对脑卒中患者上肢肌肉形态及表面肌电的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 224-229.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Application of health education based on protective motivation theory in rehabilitation exercise after total knee arthroplasty

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Application of health education based on protective motivation theory in rehabilitation exercise after total knee arthroplasty