切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华关节外科杂志(电子版)

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (06) : 882 -888. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2023.06.019

临床经验

胫骨高位截骨与单髁置换的早期疗效比较
李善武, 叶永杰†(), 王兵, 王子呓, 银毅, 孙官军, 张大刚   
  1. 638500　四川大学华西广安医院，广安市人民医院骨与关节外科
    610000　成都中医药大学附属第五人民医院，成都市第五人民医院关节外科
    637000　南充，川北医学院
    629000　遂宁市中心医院
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-06 出版日期:2023-12-01
  • 通信作者: 叶永杰
  • 基金资助:
    成都市医学科研项目(2022034)

Early efficacy comparison of open wedge high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Shanwu Li, Yongjie Ye†(), Bing Wang, Ziyi Wang, Yi Yin, Guanjun Sun, Dagang Zhang   

  1. Department of Bone and Joint Surgery, Guang'an People 's Hospital, West China Guang'an Hospital, Sichuan University, Guang’an 638500, China
    Fifth People 's Hospital Affiliated to Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Department of Joint Surgery, Fifth People' s Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu 610000, China
    North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, China
    Suining Central Hospital, Suining 629000, China
  • Received:2023-05-06 Published:2023-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Yongjie Ye
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

李善武, 叶永杰, 王兵, 王子呓, 银毅, 孙官军, 张大刚. 胫骨高位截骨与单髁置换的早期疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 882-888.

Shanwu Li, Yongjie Ye, Bing Wang, Ziyi Wang, Yi Yin, Guanjun Sun, Dagang Zhang. Early efficacy comparison of open wedge high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 882-888.

目的

对比内侧开放楔形胫骨高位截骨术(OWHTO)与内侧单髁置换术(UKA)治疗膝关节内侧单间室骨关节炎合并胫骨近端畸形的疗效。

方法

回顾分析遂宁市中心医院2016年1月至2020年1月收治的膝骨关节炎患者临床疗效。按患者手术类型分为单髁置换组、胫骨高位截骨组，收集分析手术前后的OKS评分和Lysholm功能评分、失血量、手术时间及住院时间等。符合正态分布的计量资料组间比较采用t检验或重复测量方差分析；计数资料以构成比表示，采用卡方检验。

结果

共41例患者，UKA组21例，OWHTO组20例，所有患者至少随访1年。围术期：UKA组显性失血量更少(t＝13.849，P<0.05)，OWHTO手术时间更短(t＝2.263，P<0.05)；术后住院时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后3、6个月和1年Lysholm功能评分、OKS评分较术前均有改善。在术后3、6个月时，UKA组Lysholm功能评分、OKS评分优于OWHTO组(t＝－4.471、－2.117、10.076、2.689，均为P<0.05)。术后1年时，两组Lysholm膝关节功能评分、OKS评分组间比较差异无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)。术后两组患者胫股角同术前比较均减小(t＝13.937、22.331，均为P<0.05)，OWHTO组胫股角纠正情况优于UKA组(t＝6.952，P<0.05)。随访期间UKA组1例患者在术后1年发生聚乙烯衬垫脱位，1例患者术后出现手术切口周围及小腿前内侧麻木。OWHTO组未观察到相关并发症发生。

结论

对于膝关节内侧间室骨关节炎合并胫骨近端畸形的患者，UKA与OWHTO术后早期均能取得较好疗效，UKA术后功能改善更迅速，OWHTO能更好地纠正膝内翻。

关键词: 关节成形术，置换，膝, 胫骨, 截骨术, 骨关节炎，膝, 治疗学
Objective

To compare the efficacy of medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) and medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in the treatment of medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee combined with proximal tibial deformity.

Methods

The clinical efficacy of patients with knee osteoarthritis admitted to Suining Central Hospital from January 2016 to January 2020 was retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into unicompartmental knee arthroplasty group and high tibial osteotomy group according to the type of surgery. Oxford knee score (OKS), Lysholm function score, blood loss, operation time and hospital stay length were collected and analysed. The measurement data in accordance with normal distribution were compared between groups by t test or repeated measures analysis of variance; the enumeration data were expressed as constituent ratio and chi-square test was used.

Results

There were 41 patients, 21 in the UKA group and 20 in the OWHTO group, and all the patients were followed for at least one year. Before operation, in UKA group, blood loss in less(t=13.849, P<0.05)and shorter OWHTO operation time (t=2.263, P <0.05); no statistically significant difference was found in postoperative hospital stay (P >0.05). Lysholm function score and OKS score at three, six months and one year after operation were improved compared with those before operation. At three and six months after surgery, the Lysholm function score and OKS score in the UKA group were better than those in the OWHTO group (t=-4.471, -2.117, 10.076, 2.689, all P<0.05). One year after surgery, there was no significant difference in Lysholm knee function score and OKS score between the two groups (all P>0.05). The tibiofemoral angle in both groups decreased after operation compared with that before operation (t=13.937, 22.331, both P<0.05), and the correction of tibiofemoral angle in OWHTO group was better than that in UKA group (t=6.952, P <0.05). During the follow-up, one patient in the UKA group developed polyethylene liner dislocation one year after surgery, and one patient developed numbness around the surgical incision and anteromedial leg after surgery. No relevant complication was observed in the OWHTO group.

Conclusions

Both UKA and OWHTO are effective in the early postoperative period in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee combined with proximal tibial deformity, and the function of UKA is improved more rapidly. OWHTO can correct genu varus better.

Key words: Arthroplasty, replacement, knee, Tibia, Osteotomy, Osteoarthritis, knee, Treatment outcome
表1 一般资料
Table 1 General information
组别Groups 例数Case number 性别(男/女)Gender(male/female) 年龄[岁，(±s)]Age(year) BMI[kg/m2，(±s)] 手术侧(左/右)Surgical side(left/right) K-L分级(Ⅲ/Ⅳ)
UKA组 21 9/12 60±5 25±4 8/13 12/9
OWHTO组 20 7/13 59±4 24±4 8/12 13/7
统计值Statistical value   χ2＝0.266 t＝0.449 t＝0.381 χ2＝0.016 χ2＝0.266
P值   >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05
表2 两组患者术中出血量、手术时间、术后住院时间(±s)
Table 2 Intraoperative blood loss, operation time and postoperative hospital stay of two groups
组别Groups 例数Case number 术中出血量(ml)Intraoperative blood loss 手术时间(min)Operation duration 住院时间(d)Hospitalization time
UKA组 21 246.2±24.4 80.6±7.5 6.8±1.6
OWHTO组 20 356.7±30.3 75.4±7.2 7.4±1.8
t值   13.849 2.263 1.129
P值   <0.001 0.030 >0.05
表3 两组Lysholm评分比较(±s)
Table 3 Comparison of Lysholm scores between the two groups
组别Groups 例数Case number 术前Before operation 术后3个月Three months after operation 术后6个月Six months after operation 术后12个月Twelve months after operation F值 P值
UKA组 20 62.1±8.9 71.7±7.1a 85.3±5.4ab 90.5±2.7abc 组别效应10.345 0.003
OWHTO组 21 61.8±8.6 80.6±5.7a 88.5±4.1ab 91.2±2.1abc 测试次数效应188.074 <0.001
t值   0.124 －4.417 －2.117 －0.859 交互效应4.805 0.009
P值   >0.05 <0.001 0.041 >0.05    
表4 两组OKS评分比较(±s)
Table 4 Comparison of OKS scores between the two groups
组别Groups 例数Case number 术前Before operation 术后3个月Three months after operation 术后6个月Six months after operation 术后12个月Twelve months after operation F值 P值
UKA组 20 44.1±4.8 36.3±3.3a 25.1±3.1ab 20.3±1.9abc 组别主效应44.866  
OWHTO组 21 45.2±4.6 26.2±3.1a 22.6±2.9ab 19.2±1.7abc 测试次数主效应415.990 均为<0.001
t值   －0.748 10.076 2.698 1.861 交互效应20.637  
P值   >0.05 <0.001 0.010 >0.05    
图1 UKA(单髁置换)组与OWHTO(开放式楔形胫骨高位截骨)组OKS评分(牛津膝关节评分)
Figure 1 OKS score in UKA and OWHTO groups
图2 UKA(单髁置换)组与OWHTO(开放式楔形胫骨高位截骨)组Lysholm功能评分
Figure 2 Lysholm function score in UKA and OWHTO groups
表5 术前与末次随访胫股角(±s)
Table 5 Tibiofemoral angle at before operation and last follow-up
组别Groups 例数Case number 术前Before operation 术后After operation t值 P值
UKA组 20 183.5±1.6 176.4±1.7 13.937 <0.001
OWHTO组 21 184.3±1.5 172.6±1.8 22.331 <0.001
t值   1.649 6.952    
P值   0.107 <0.001    
图3 KOA(膝骨关节炎)病例行右膝UKA(单髁置换)手术前后X线片。图A为术前右膝关节正侧位片，示膝内侧间室骨关节炎；图B术后右膝关节正侧位片，示单髁假体位置良好；图C为术前下肢全长正位片，示右膝内翻，力线异常；图D为术后下肢下肢全长正位片，示右膝力线获得部分矫正
Figure 3 X ray images of right knee with osteoarthritis before and after UKA. A is anteroposterior and lateral views of right knee before surgery, showing osteoarthritis of medial compartment; B is anteroposterior and lateral views of right knee after surgery, showing prosthesis in good position; C is full length image of lower limbs before surgery, showing varus genum of right knee and abnormal alignment; D is full length image of lower limbs after surgery, showing varus genum of right knee had been corrected partly
图4 KOA(膝骨关节炎)病例行左膝OWHTO(开放式楔形胫骨高位截骨)治疗前后X线片。图A为术前左膝关节正侧位片，示膝内侧间室骨关节炎；图B为术后膝关节正侧位片，示截骨后钢板位置良好；图C为术前下肢全长正位片，示左膝内翻，力线异常；图D为术后下肢下肢全长正位片，示左膝力线获得矫正
Figure 4 X ray images of left knee with osteoarthritis before and after UKA. A is anteroposterior and lateral views of left knee before surgery, showing osteoarthritis of medial compartment; B is anteroposterior and lateral views of left knee after surgery, showing prosthesis in good position; C is full length image of lower limbs before surgery, showing varus genum of left knee and abnormal alignment; D is full length image of lower limbs after surgery, showing varus genum of left knee had been corrected
[1]
中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组. 骨关节炎诊疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中华骨科杂志，2018, 38(12): 705－715.
[2]
乐意，金荣疆，阳杨，等. 从下肢生物力学来解析膝骨关节炎[J]. 中国康复理论与实践，2013, 19(6): 505－509.
[3]
中华医学会骨科分会关节外科学组，吴阶平医学基金会骨科学专家委员会. 膝骨关节炎阶梯治疗专家共识(2018年版)[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(1): 124－130.
[4]
李振科，匡光志，冯华杰，等. 单髁与全膝置换治疗膝关节单间室骨关节炎的近中期疗效[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(4): 503－508.
[5]
王长海，王永成，李华，等. 胫骨高位截骨术与单髁置换术的早期疗效及费用比较[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(3): 314－319.
[6]
Cao Z, Mai X, Wang J, et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty vs high tibial osteotomy for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2018, 33(3): 952－959.
[7]
Wu L, Lin J, Jin Z, et al. Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes between opening-wedge and closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a comprehensive meta-analysis[J/OL]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(2): e0171700. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171700.
[8]
中国研究型医院学会关节外科学专业委员会膝关节部分置换研究学组，张启栋，曹光磊，等．膝关节单髁置换术围手术期管理专家共识[J]．中华骨与关节外科杂志，2020，13(4)：265－271.
[9]
黄野，柳剑，王兴山，等. 胫骨高位截骨术适应证解析[J]. 中华外科杂志，2020, 58(6): 420－424.
[10]
Schaible HG. Osteoarthritis pain. recent advances and controversies[J]. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care, 2018, 12(2): 148－153.
[11]
Lee OS, Lee SH, Mok SJ, et al. Comparison of the regeneration of cartilage and the clinical outcomes after the open wedge high tibial osteotomy with or without microfracture: a retrospective case control study[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2019, 20(1): 267.
[12]
王剑，韩昶晓，田向东，等. 胫骨高位截骨术后二次镜下探查软骨修复情况[J]. 中国骨伤，2020，33(5): 465－469.
[13]
张润杰，王浩浩，芦升升，等. 胫骨高位截骨术后软骨再生影响因素的研究进展[J]. 实用骨科杂志，2021, 27(2): 153－156.
[14]
李立，徐卫东. 膝关节单髁置换术的并发症及防治[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(3): 385－389.
[1] 闫文, 谢兴文, 顾玉彪, 雷宁波, 马成, 于文霞, 高亚雄, 张磊. 微小RNA与全膝关节置换术后深静脉血栓的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 842-846.
[2] 王宏宇. 固定与活动平台假体在全膝关节置换术中的应用价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 871-876.
[3] 夏传龙, 迟健, 丛强, 连杰, 崔峻, 陈彦玲. 富血小板血浆联合关节镜治疗半月板损伤的临床疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 877-881.
[4] 李辉, 吴奇, 张子琦, 张晗, 王仿, 许鹏. 日间全膝关节置换术早期疗效及标准化流程探索[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 889-892.
[5] 邓华梅, 袁札根, 曾德荣, 潘珊珊, 张葆青, 欧爱华, 曹学伟. 全膝关节置换术中气压止血带应用效果与影响因素分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 788-794.
[6] 刘瀚忠, 黄生辉, 万俊明, 李家春, 舒涛. 髌上入路和髌旁外侧入路髓内钉治疗胫骨骨折疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 795-801.
[7] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[8] 罗旺林, 杨传军, 许国星, 俞建国, 孙伟东, 颜文娟, 冯志. 开放性楔形胫骨高位截骨术不同植入材料的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 818-826.
[9] 李培杰, 乔永杰, 张浩强, 曾健康, 谭飞, 李嘉欢, 王静, 周胜虎. 细菌培养阴性的假体周围感染诊治的最新进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 827-833.
[10] 姚轶超, 张麒, 滕海茂, 黄攀, 吴雷涛, 韩哲. 膝关节置换术后恐动症与康复效果及社会支持的相关性[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 613-618.
[11] 杨国栋, 张辉, 郭珈, 曲迪, 张静, 戚超. 外侧半月板后角撕裂是否修复的术后疗效对比[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 619-624.
[12] 夏效泳, 王立超, 朱治国, 丛云海, 史宗新. 深度塌陷性胫骨平台骨折的形态特点和治疗策略[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 625-632.
[13] 张中斌, 付琨朋, 朱凯, 张玉, 李华. 胫骨高位截骨术与富血小板血浆治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 633-641.
[14] 陈宏兴, 张立军, 张勇, 李虎, 周驰, 凡一诺. 膝骨关节炎关节镜清理术后中药外用疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 663-672.
[15] 樊绪国, 赵永刚. 全膝关节置换术中髌骨轨迹的研究进展及处理策略[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 701-707.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号