切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 485 -492. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2019.04.017

所属专题: 文献

临床经验

股骨转子间骨折双柱理论分型和内固定选择
邱海滨1,(), 江军1, Daniel Porter1   
  1. 1. 100016 北京,清华大学第一附属医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2018-02-06 出版日期:2019-08-01
  • 通信作者: 邱海滨

New double-column theoretical classification supporting choice of internal fixation for femoral intertrochanteric fracture

Haibin Qiu1,(), Jun Jiang1, Daniel Porter1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Tsinghua University, Beijing 100016, China
  • Received:2018-02-06 Published:2019-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Haibin Qiu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Qiu Haibin, Email:
引用本文:

邱海滨, 江军, Daniel Porter. 股骨转子间骨折双柱理论分型和内固定选择[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(04): 485-492.

Haibin Qiu, Jun Jiang, Daniel Porter. New double-column theoretical classification supporting choice of internal fixation for femoral intertrochanteric fracture[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(04): 485-492.

目的

探讨股骨转子间骨折双柱理论分型指导内固定治疗的临床效果。

方法

根据正常髋关节影像学资料将股骨转子部分为两柱,以髓腔中线为界,中线以外的大转子部作为外侧柱,中线以内的小转子部作为内侧柱;股骨转子间骨折后根据分量原理:由股骨头颈传导下来的负重应力在股骨转子间分为水平和垂直应力,内侧柱主要分担垂直应力,外侧柱主要分担水平应力。将骨折复位后,连续性恢复,且能有效传导应力的柱定义为稳定柱,反之为不稳定柱;整个转子部,如内外侧两个柱均为稳定柱,就是稳定的转子部(A型);如其中一个柱为稳定柱,另一个柱不稳定,就是部分稳定的转子部(B型),B1型为外侧柱不稳定,B2型为内侧柱不稳定。如内外侧两个柱均为不稳定柱,就是不稳定的转子部(C型)。2011年3月至2014年10月清华大学第一附属医院骨科收治60岁及以上的股骨转子间骨折手术住院患者128例,根据双柱理论分为A型50例,B1型18例,B2型52例,C型8例。然后根据分型结果选择固定方式:A、B1、B2型采用股骨近端防旋螺钉(PFNA)固定,C型采用联合拉力交锁髓内钉系统(Inter-TAN)固定治疗。术后1、2、3、6、12、24个月时进行门诊复诊,通过X线片了解骨折愈合及有无内固定失败情况。术后髋关节功能评价采用Harris评分方法。

结果

128例患者获得随访,随访时间为6~24个月,平均(16.0 ± 0.9)个月。骨折愈合时间为12~26周,平均(14.5 ± 2.0)周,无骨折不愈合病例。无内固定钉松脱,髋内翻,股骨头切割,断钉病例。末次随访时Harris评分为78~96分,平均(88 ± 4)分,其中优76例、良44例、可8例,优良率93.8%。

结论

股骨转子间骨折双柱理论简单易记,有助于选择理想的内固定和获得良好的临床疗效。

Objective

To study the clinical effect of the internal fixation of femoral intertrochanteric fracture guiding by double-column theoretical classification.

Methods

According to the normal anteroposterior X - ray of the hip joint, the femoral trochanter was divided into two columns. The greater trochanter lateral to the midline was defined as the lateral column, and the minor trochanter which medial to the midline was defined as the medial column. After the fracture reduction, the continuity recovered, and can effectively conduct stress column was defined as a stable column, on the contrary for the unstable column. If the medial and lateral columns were stable, this was defined as stable femoral trochanter (type A). If one column was stable, the other column was unstable, that was defined as partial stable femoral trochanter (type B), among which type B1 was unstable lateral column, type B2 was unstable medial column. Both meidal and lateral columns were unstable, it was defined as unstable femoral trochanter (type C). From March 2011 to October 2014, there were 128 patients with intertrochanteric fractures in line with research standards treated in department of orthopedics in First Affiliated Hospital of Tsinghua University. According to the double-column theory classification, the patients were divided into type A(50 cases), type B1(18 cases), type B2 (52 cases), type C(eight cases), and were fixed according to the results of classification: type A, B1, B2 using proximal femoralnail antirotation (PFNA) fixation, type C using Inter-TAN fixation. Regular follow-up was performed on postoperative one, two, three, six, 12, and 24 months. The fracture healing was evaluated and the internal fixation failure was assessed by X-ray films. Harris score was used to evaluate hip function.

Results

A total of 128 patients were followed up for six to 24 months with an average of(16.0±0.9)months. Fracture healing time was 12 to 26 weeks, an average of(14.5± 2.0) weeks, no cases of nonunion. No screws or nails loose, no hip varus, no femoral head cut, no screws broken cases. Harris scores at the last follow-up are 78 to 96 points, an average of 88 points, of which 76 cases are excellent, 44 cases are good, 8 cases are fair, excellent and good rate are 93.8%.

Conclusion

The double- column theoretical classification of the femoral intertrochanteric fractures , which was simple and comprehensive, can benefit to internal fixation selection and clinical outcome.

图3 股骨转子外侧壁示意图
表1 双柱理论分型和Evans-Jensen分型对照表[n=21,分,(±s)]
图4 股骨转子间骨折双柱理论分型A型。图A为股骨转子间骨折A型示意图;图B为A型患者术前左髋X线正位片,示左股骨转子间骨折移位,但内外侧柱稳定;图C为A型患者PFNA(股骨近端防旋髓内钉)术后左髋X线正位片,示左股骨转子间骨折复位和内固定位置良好
图5 股骨转子间骨折双柱理论分型B1型。图A、B为股骨转子间骨折B1型顺转子间和逆转子间两种情况示意图;图C为B1型患者术前左髋X线正位片,示右股骨逆转子间骨折移位,内侧柱稳定,外侧柱不稳定;图D为B1型患者PFNA(股骨近端防旋髓内钉)术后左髋X线正位片,示右股骨逆转子间骨折复位和内固定位置良好
图6 股骨转子间骨折双柱理论分型B2型。图A为股骨转子间骨折B2型示意;图B为B2型患者术前左髋X线正位片,示左股骨转子间骨折移位,内侧柱不稳定,外侧柱稳定;图C为B2型患者PFNA(股骨近端防旋髓内钉)术后左髋X线正位片,示示左股骨转子间骨折复位和内固定位置良好
图7 股骨转子间骨折双柱理论分型C型。图A为股骨转子间骨折C型示意图;图B为C型患者术前左髋X线正位片,示左股骨转子间骨折移位,内外侧柱均不稳定;图C为C型患者Inter-TAN(股骨近端联合拉力交锁髓内钉系统)术后左髋X线正位片,示左股骨转子间骨折复位和内固定位置良好
表2 目前常用内固定的力学重建方式
表3 髓内和髓外固定在各型骨折中的力学重建方式和选择
[1]
Ray NF, Chan JK, Thamer M, et al. Medical expenditures for the treatment of osteoporotic fractures in the United States in 1995: report from the National Osteoporosis Foundation[J]. J Bone Miner Res, 1997, 12(1): 24-35.
[2]
Kannus P, Leiponen P, Parkkari J, et al. A sideways fall and hip fracture[J]. Bone, 2006, 39(2): 383-384.
[3]
Cummings SR, Melton LJ. Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures[J]. Lancet, 2002, 359(9319): 1761-1767.
[4]
Scottish IGN.Scottish intercollegiate guideline network management of hip fracture in older people[M]. 2009.
[5]
Watson JT, Moed BR, Cramer KE, et al. Comparison of the compression hip screw with the Medoff sliding plate for intertrochanteric fractures[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1998, 348(348): 79-86.
[6]
Denis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1984, 8(8): 817-831.
[7]
Rikli DA, Regazzoni P. Fractures of the distal end of the radius treated by internal fixation and early function. A preliminary report of 20 cases[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1996, 78(4): 588-592.
[8]
Harty M.The calcar femorale and the femoral neck[J].J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 1957, 39(3):625-630.
[9]
Ul Haq R, Manhas V, Pankaj A, et al. Proximal femoral nails compared with reverse distal femoral locking plates in intertrochanteric fractures with a compromised lateral wall; a randomised controlled trial[J]. Int Orthop, 2014, 38(7): 1443-1449.
[10]
Harris WH.Traumaric arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fracture:treatment by mold arthroplastyan.An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation[J].J Bone Joint Surg(Am),1969,51:737-755.
[11]
Evans EM. The treatment of trochanteric fractures of the femur[J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Br),1949,31(2):190-203.
[12]
Jensen JS, Michaelsen M. Trochanteric femoral fracture treated with Mclaughlin osteosynthesis[J]. Acta Orthop Scand, 1975, 46(5): 795-803.
[13]
Mullerler ME, Nazarian S, Koch P. The comprehensive classification of fractures of the long bones[M]. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1990: 118.
[14]
邱海滨,刘明礼,赵学文.股骨转子周围骨折手术相关并发症的原因和处理[J].中华骨科杂志,2008,28(3):197-201.
[15]
Singh M, Nargath AR, Maini PS. Changes in trabecrlar pattern of the upper end of the femur as an index of osteoporosis[J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Am),1970,51:457-467.
[16]
Gotfried Y. Integrity of the lateral femoral wall in intertrochanteric hip fractures: an important predictor of a reoperation[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2007, 89(11): 2552-2553.
[17]
Chang SM, Zhang YQ, Ma Z, et al. Fracture reduction with positive medial cortical support: a key element in stability Reconstruction for the unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2015, 135(6): 811-818.
[18]
严广斌,钱东阳,卢永辉.髓内固定治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的失血量分析[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2012,6(3):50-52.
[19]
陈振沅,李开南,张之玺.股骨转子间六部分骨折分型产生机制的有限元分析[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2015,17(5):433-437.
[1] 康一坤, 袁芃. 三阴性乳腺癌分子遗传学及临床特征研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 290-293.
[2] 王雪菲, 海琳悦, 李立方, 肖春花. Luminal A型乳腺癌的内分泌治疗与化疗[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 294-300.
[3] 娄丽丽, 刘瀚旻. 儿童哮喘易感基因及表观遗传学研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 249-255.
[4] 刘化胜, 王洪霞, 马正, 王磊. 1例复杂的A3型甲状旁腺腺瘤功能亢进的手术治疗[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 705-706.
[5] 范伟强, 林师佈, 孙传伟, 宋奇锋, 李望, 符誉, 陈艾. 不同切除范围的Bismuth-Corlette Ⅲ、Ⅳ型腹腔镜肝门部胆管癌手术临床对比分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 423-426.
[6] 季瑞冬, 卢振权, 罗兵锋, 侯健, 董汝男, 廖苏才, 罗光彦, 梁伟, 张可可, 郭敏姗, 卢捷娜, 吴旻, 杨伟洪. 无创诊断方法在原发性醛固酮增多症分型诊断中的应用及研究进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 186-191.
[7] 王建奇, 陈政良, 刘雨, 俞星新, 耿志达, 姜洪池, 梁英健. 基于160例患者CT三维重建的肝血管解剖变异分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 427-433.
[8] 张东, 耿智敏, 全志伟. 胆囊癌临床分型研究现状及进展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 147-152.
[9] 付佳禄, 张景玮, 金哲川, 张东, 耿智敏. 胆囊癌临床分型的合理性及其与预后关系——单中心486例分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 173-178.
[10] 胡建生, 周佐霖, 孙林梅, 马腾辉. 不同诊断分型的慢性放射性直肠损伤临床治疗转归:85例回顾性分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 466-472.
[11] 吴晓明, 张蕾, 东靖明. "筋骨并重",关注锁骨远端骨韧带复合体整体诊断和治疗[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 97-102.
[12] 秦毓, 杨苗, 畅锴, 王舒宁. 山西省女性人乳头瘤病毒感染现状分析[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 105-108.
[13] 张晓彬, 刘迎娣, 王娟, 孙国辉, 钟立森, 何占娣, 令狐恩强. 孤立性胃静脉曲张临床诊疗经验[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(03): 167-172.
[14] 易和强, 邓志刚. 13例化脓性肋软骨炎的诊治体会[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(03): 176-179.
[15] 周志明, 姜威, 王泽学, 曲博, 梁磊, 张敏. 肋弓骨折手术内固定治疗[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 63-69.
阅读次数
全文


摘要