切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (01) : 25 -31. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2026.01.004

临床论著

多学科血液管理对全膝置换术失血及输血率的影响
郭晓琦, 赵爽()   
  1. 150000 哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院群力骨科一病房
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-21 出版日期:2026-02-01
  • 通信作者: 赵爽

Effect of multidisciplinary blood management on blood loss and transfusion rate in total knee arthroplasty

Xiaoqi Guo, Shuang Zhao()   

  1. The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Qunli Orthopaedics Ward 1, Harbin 150000, China
  • Received:2025-05-21 Published:2026-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Shuang Zhao
引用本文:

郭晓琦, 赵爽. 多学科血液管理对全膝置换术失血及输血率的影响[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 25-31.

Xiaoqi Guo, Shuang Zhao. Effect of multidisciplinary blood management on blood loss and transfusion rate in total knee arthroplasty[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(01): 25-31.

目的

分析基于多学科协作的围手术期血液管理方案对人工全膝关节置换术(TKA)中失血量及输血率的影响。

方法

选取哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院2022年3月至2024年2月期间接受TKA治疗的患者,经纳入标准(终末期膝关节疾病行初次TKA、术前血红蛋白≤100 g/L、凝血功能正常)和排除标准(双侧TKA、氨甲环酸过敏或禁忌、血栓高危或病史、严重心脑血管疾病)筛选,最终选取86例为研究对象。采用随机数字表法将参与者分为对照组(给予常规血液管理方案)和观察组(基于多学科协作的围手术期血液管理方案),每组43例。采用t检验、卡方检验等分析并比较两组术中失血量、输血率、手术时间、血红蛋白(Hb)以及并发症,同时评估两组患者满意度。

结果

观察组的术中失血量、围术期输血量少于对照组,输血率低于对照组,手术时间短于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(t=6.197、12.742、5.988,χ2=4.440,均为P<0.05)。术后第3天,两组患者Hb水平均较术前下降,但是观察组Hb水平高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=3.339,P<0.05)。观察组并发症总发生率低于对照组,平均住院时间少于对照组,患者满意度评分高于对照组,两组差异具有统计学意义(χ2=4.440,t=2.917、5.747,均为P<0.05)。

结论

多学科协作的血液管理方案通过精准止血技术、护理团队的动态监测与精准执行及贫血预处理,可减少TKA患者失血与输血需求。护理在执行医嘱、预警并发症及推动早期康复中发挥关键作用,进而加快康复进程,提高患者满意度。

Objective

To analyze the impact of a perioperative blood management program based on multidisciplinary collaboration on blood loss and blood transfusion rate during total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

Patients who underwent TKA in the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from March 2022 to February 2024 were selected. After the inclusion criteria (primary TKA for end-stage knee disease, preoperative hemoglobin≤100 g/L, normal coagulation function) and exclusion criteria (bilateral TKA, tranexamic acid allergy or contraindication, high risk or history of thrombosis, severe cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases) screening, 86 patients were finally enrolled the study. According to the random number table method, the participants were divided into the control group (given routine blood management scheme) and the observation group (perioperative blood management scheme based on multidisciplinary collaboration), with 43 cases in each group. T test, chi square test and other statistical methods were used to analyze and compare the intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion rate, operation time, hemoglobin (Hb) and complications between the two groups, as well as the satisfaction of the two groups.

Results

The intraoperative blood loss and perioperative blood transfusion volume in the observation group were less than those in the control group, the blood transfusion rate was lower than that in the control group, and the operation time was shorter than that in the control group (t=6.197, 12.742, 5.988, χ2=4.440), and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). On the third day after the operation, Hb levels of both groups decreased compared with those before the operation, while Hb level of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=3.339, P< 0.05). The total incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, the average length of hospital stay was shorter than that in the control group, and the patient satisfaction score was higher than that in the control group (χ2=4.440, t=2.917, 5.747), and the differences between the two groups were statistically significant (all P<0.05).

Conclusions

The multidisciplinary blood management program, through precise hemostasis techniques, dynamic monitoring and precise execution by the nursing team, and anemia pretreatment, can reduce blood loss and blood transfusion requirements in patients with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Nursing plays a crucial role in carrying out medical orders, warning of complications and promoting early rehabilitation, thereby accelerating the rehabilitation process and enhancing patient satisfaction.

图1 双人核查表
Figure 1 Two-person checklist
图2 可视化操作路径图(术前阶段)
Figure 2 Visualized operation path (preoperative stage)
图3 可视化操作路径图(术中阶段)
Figure 3 Visualized operation path (intraoperative stage)
表1 两组患者术中失血量、围术期输血量、输血率及手术时间
Table 1 Intraoperative blood loss, perioperative blood transfusion volume, transfusion rate, and operation time of the two groups
表2 两组患者术前及术后第3天Hb水平[g/L,(±s)]
Table 2 Hb levels of the two groups before surgery and on the third day after surgery
表3 两组并发症、住院时间及患者满意度
Table 3 Complications, length of hospital stay and patient satisfaction of the two groups
[1]
Hoffmeister E. Risk factors for pain a year after total knee arthroplasty[J]. Lippincott’s Bone Jt Newsl, 2021, 27(3): 25-29.
[2]
张莉蓉. 全膝和全髋关节置换术异体输血发生率及危险因素分析[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2021, 21(22): 3761-3763.
[3]
Öztürk R, Ayhan B, Yoğurt SB, et al. The role of preoperative embolization in the management of aneurysmal bone cyst: a comparative analysis[J]. Indian J Orthop, 2023, 57(9): 1401-1408.
[4]
Neef V, König S, Becker H, et al. Red blood cell transfusion in patients undergoing elective primary glioblastoma resection[J]. Blood Transfus, 2025, 23(2): 137-146.
[5]
亚力坤·玉苏甫, 耿锐, 吴飞, 等. 全髋、膝关节置换术围手术期血液管理研究进展[J]. 骨科临床与研究杂志, 2021, 6(3): 184-192.
[6]
赵丽华, 李险峰. 不同输血技术对人工全膝关节置换术患者凝血功能、免疫功能及炎症因子的影响[J]. 医学理论与实践, 2022, 35(9): 1513-1515.
[7]
阮潜瑛, 张彬, 易中梅, 等. 接受全膝关节置换术患者围手术期输血的影响因素分析[J]. 国际输血及血液学杂志, 2023, 46(4): 346-351.
[8]
叶小东, 魏俊杰, 李孛, 等. 膝关节置换围术期不同血液管理的疗效对比[J]. 中国卫生标准管理, 2020, 11(3): 63-65.
[9]
杨育红, 周思彤, 陈进凡, 等. 两种输血方式对人工全膝关节置换术患者凝血功能、免疫功能及炎症因子的影响[J]. 国际检验医学杂志, 2019, 40(9): 1049-1052.
[10]
El-Galaly A, Kappel A, Nielsen PT, et al. Revision risk for total knee arthroplasty converted from medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: comparison with primary and revision arthroplasties, based on mid-term results from the Danish knee arthroplasty registry[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2019, 101(22): 1999-2006.
[11]
高志祥, 赵超, 姚凯, 等. 两种止血药在全髋关节置换术围手术期的应用[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(1): 7-12.
[12]
韩晨曦, 王峻, 葛艳玲. 老年人工全髋关节置换术与全膝关节置换术后隐性失血的相关分析[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2019, 37(11): 110-111.
[13]
丁星, 赵畅, 蔡道章. 个性化膝关节置换围术期血液管理方案的临床疗效评价[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2018, 26(15): 1350-1355.
[14]
黄云英, 尹东, 黄宇, 等. 血液管理方案在全髋关节置换术围手术期中的实施及效果观察[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2019, 34(8): 724-726.
[15]
袁铭成, 丁子川, 陵廷贤, 等. 人工全髋、膝关节置换术围术期血液管理[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2020, 34(12): 1612-1618.
[16]
曾伟南, 杨静, 沈彬, 等. 华西医院骨科关节置换术加速康复围手术期血液管理临床实践及成效[J]. 川北医学院学报, 2021, 36(9): 1175-1180.
[17]
马雍翔, 赵斌, 涂善志. 膝关节表面置换术中不同止血带应用时间对术后功能恢复影响的临床观察[J]. 骨科临床与研究杂志, 2025, 10(3): 137-143.
[18]
陈正晖, 孙志坚, 李庭. 止血带在骨科手术中的应用[J]. 中国医刊, 2023, 58(5): 484-488.
[19]
惠战强, 贾冬冬, 田宏强, 等. 人工全膝关节置换术患者个性化围术期血液管理方案的临床疗效分析[J]. 中国骨与关节杂志, 2020, 9(10): 737-740.
[20]
李二亮, 王文己, 卢婷婷. 全膝关节置换术的围术期血液管理[J]. 西北国防医学杂志, 2019, 40(7): 456-462.
[21]
周瑶, 罗海燕, 宋慧敏, 等. 围手术期血液保护措施对老年全髋关节置换术患者快速康复的影响[J]. 临床输血与检验, 2020, 22(6): 617-620.
[1] 夏堃, 佘蔡楠, 杨昊天, 陶然, 陆跃, 马洪冬. 膝外翻全膝关节置换术后下肢力线与疗效的相关性[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 677-683.
[2] 杨浩, 杨佩, 刘豪, 曾小超, 许文杰, 张旭, 熊执政. 生物型与骨水泥型单髁假体治疗内侧间室膝关节炎的比较[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 697-707.
[3] 李博, 包金全, 乔成钢, 白毅, 聂继平, 张立茉, 赵文强. 全膝关节置换术后慢性疼痛的非手术相关危险因素[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 615-621.
[4] 王冠乔, 陈波波, 王宏煜, 郭晓祺, 谢海彬, 田野. 全膝关节置换术中血液管理的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 622-629.
[5] 温红英, 陈海波. 子午流注择时穴位贴敷在膝关节置换术后便秘的应用[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 642-645.
[6] 徐晓燕, 石健, 白燕, 杜棣, 徐兰, 余倩娇, 张锐, 徐永清, 浦路桥. 健康行为过程取向预康复在机器人辅助膝关节置换的应用[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 302-308.
[7] 陈晓艳, 张华, 蒋庆梅. 两种麻醉方式在全膝关节置换术后的疼痛控制效果[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 309-314.
[8] 钟永洌, 张杰, 张志奇. 外翻膝术后中立位机械对线的早中期疗效[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 366-373.
[9] 姚舜禹, 樊沛, 张波, 祝杰生. 髋膝关节置换术10年趋势的卫生经济学单中心分析[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 143-150.
[10] 严钰皓, 刘选泽, 包利帅, 赫明亮, 肖国庆. 氨甲环酸不同给药途径在初次全膝关节置换的效果[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 178-184.
[11] 王永祺, 姜俊杰, 赵宇驰. 生物型膝关节假体的临床应用进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 228-235.
[12] 张天成, 王黎杰, 高鹏宇, 刘旺兴, 姜未. 不同方案“鸡尾酒”控制全膝关节置换术后早期疼痛[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 34-38.
[13] 李昭阳, 马童. 膝关节单髁置换术后对侧间室进展性骨关节炎的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-93.
[14] 国家骨科医学中心保膝联盟, 中国老年保健协会骨关节保护与健康分会, 单髁置换术后感染抗生素使用专家共识工作组. 单髁置换术后假体周围感染的抗生素使用专家共识(2025版)[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2025, 20(06): 476-489.
[15] 杨春, 游洋伟, 周宇, 林泽超, 刘亮, 袁堃. 白细胞介素-10 调节辅助性T 细胞17/调节性T 细胞对小鼠输血相关急性肺损伤的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(03): 355-361.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?