切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (04) : 592 -596. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2023.04.021

临床经验

自体膝关节骨软骨移植治疗距骨骨软骨损伤的临床疗效
余泽俊, 苏松川, 付燕, 黄文凭()   
  1. 400010 重庆市中医骨科医院足踝外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-13 出版日期:2023-08-01
  • 通信作者: 黄文凭

Clinical efficacy of osteochondral lesion of talus treated by autogenous knee osteocartilage transplantation

Zejun Yu, Songchuan Su, Yan Fu, Wenping Huang()   

  1. Chongqing Orthopaedic Hospital of TCM, Chongqing 400010, China
  • Received:2022-11-13 Published:2023-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Wenping Huang
引用本文:

余泽俊, 苏松川, 付燕, 黄文凭. 自体膝关节骨软骨移植治疗距骨骨软骨损伤的临床疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 592-596.

Zejun Yu, Songchuan Su, Yan Fu, Wenping Huang. Clinical efficacy of osteochondral lesion of talus treated by autogenous knee osteocartilage transplantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 592-596.

目的

探讨自体膝关节骨软骨移植术(OAT)治疗距骨骨软骨损伤(OLT)Hepple Ⅴ型20例患者的临床疗效。

方法

采用回顾性病例系列研究分析2018年9月至2021年9月重庆市中医骨科医院足踝外科收治的HeppleⅤ型OLT患者的临床资料20例。记录术前、术后6个月及末次(≥12个月)回访疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、美国足踝外科协会(AOFAS)踝-后足评分、膝关节Lysholm评分。通过VAS、AOFAS、Lysholm等术前、术后评分对踝和膝关节进行疼痛及功能评价。根据CT或MRI表现评估截骨区域、骨软骨移植区域的愈合情况、记录并发症情况。

结果

采用重复测量方差分析、LSD-t检验、Friedman检验、Wilcoxon秩和检验等进行分析。结果 本组20例HeppleⅤ型OLT患者均获得随访,末次随访CT/MRI显示,植骨与周围骨质结合良好。VAS评分由术前6.5(6.0,8.0)分别降为术后6个月2.0(2.0,3.0)分及末次随访2.0(2.0,3.0)分,AOFAS踝-后足评分由术前59.0(48.0,64.0)分别增为术后6个月88.5(87.0,90.0)分及末次随访90.0(88.0,90.0)分(χ2=33.78、33.56,均为P<0.05)。末次随访VAS评分、AOFAS踝-后足评分与术后6个月比较差异均无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)。术后6个月、末次随访Lysholm评分与术前比较以及末次随访与术后6个月比较,差异均无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)。AOFAS踝-后足评分术后6个月随访优良率为95%,所有患者术后均无相关并发症。

结论

自体骨软骨移植术(OAT)治疗HeppleⅤ型OLT,可明显减轻踝关节疼痛,改善功能,疗效满意,膝关节供区风险可控,有一定的临床实用价值。

Objective

To investigate the clinical effect of 20 patients with osthondral lesion of the talus (OLT) of Hepple type Ⅴ treated with autogenous knee osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT).

Methods

A retrospective case series study was used to analyze the clinical data of 20 patients with OLT of Hepple type Ⅴ admitted to the Foot and Ankle Surgery Department of Chongqing Orthopaedic Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from September 2018 to September 2021. Visual analogue scale (VAS), American Association of Foot and Ankle Surgery (AOFAS) ankle-posterior foot score and knee Lysholm score were recorded before surgery, six months after surgery and at the last visit (≥12 months). Preoperative and postoperative scores such as VAS, AOFAS and Lysholm were used to evaluate ankle and knee pain and function. CT or MRI findings were used to evaluate the healing of the osteotomy area and the osteochondral graft area, and to record the complications. Repeated measure ANOVA, LSD-t test, Friedman test and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used for analysis.

Results

Twenty patients with OLT of Hepple type Ⅴ were followed up, and CT/MRI at the last follow-up showed that the bone graft was well integrated with the surrounding bone. VAS score decreased from 6.5 (6.0, 8.0) before surgery to 2.0 (2.0, 3.0) at six months after surgery and 2.0 (2.0, 3.0) at the last follow-up, respectively. AOFAS ankle-posterior foot score increased from 59.0 (48.0, 64.0) before surgery to 88.5(87.0, 90.0) at six months after surgery and 90.0(88.0, 90.0) at the last follow-up (χ2=33.78, 33.56, both P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in VAS score and AOFAS score between the last follow-up and six months after surgery (all P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in Lysholm score between six months after surgery and the last follow-up or between the data before operation and after operation (all P>0.05). The excellent rate of AOFAS ankle-posterior foot score at six months after operation was 95%, and no postoperative complication was observed.

Conclusion

Autologous osteochondral transplantation (OAT) for OLT of Hepple type Ⅴcan significantly reduce ankle pain, improve function, achieve satisfactory results, and control the risk of knee joint donor site, which has certain clinical practical value.

图1 OLT(距骨骨软骨损伤)行OAT(自体骨软骨移植术)术中术后情况。图A为术中见距骨内侧病灶软骨明显剥脱;图B血管钳从囊腔取出淡黄色胶冻样液体;图C距骨囊腔中取出含有囊液的硬化骨组织;图D左内踝截骨术后空心螺钉内固定
Figure 1 Surgical images of OLT (osthondral lesion of the talus) treated by OAT(osteochondral autograft transplantation) and X ray images after operation. A is operation process, showing obvious exfoliation of cartilage of the medial talar lesion; B is operation process, showing yellowish jelly-like fluid was removed from the capsular cavity by vascular forceps; C is sclerotic bone tissues containing capsular fluid removed from the talar capsule cavity; D is the anteroposterior and lateral X ray view of right ankle after surgery, showing internal fixation with hollow screws after left medial ankle osteotomy
表1 OLT患者手术前后VAS、AOFAS踝-后足评分、Lysholm评分比较(n=20)
Table 1 Comparison of VAS, AOFAS ankle-hind foot score and Lysholm score before and after surgery in OLT patients
图2 OLT病例HeppleⅤ型术前术后左踝关节CT。图A~C为术前CT图像,示距骨体内侧,软骨下骨板完全破坏,呈椭圆状,边缘硬化,未见骨膜反应,明显囊性变;图D术后12个月CT示,软骨柱与周围骨质结合良好,囊性区域较前明显减小
Figure 2 Pre- and postoperative CT images of OLT(osthondral lesion of the talus) of Hepple type Ⅴ in left ankle. A to C are preoperative CT images of the left ankle joint, showing the medial aspect of the talus, complete destruction of the subchondral bone plate, elliptical shape, sclerotic edges, no periosteal reaction, obvious cystic changes; D is CT image at 12 months after surgery, showing that the cartilage column was well integrated with the surrounding bone, and the cystic area was reduced compared with the previous one
图3 左踝关节OLT病例HeppleⅤ型术前CT及术后MRI情况。图A~B为术前左踝CT,示距骨前内侧明显囊相变,软骨面缺损;图C~D为术后17个月左踝MRI,示软骨修复良好,坏死灶面积明显减少
Figure 3 Preoperative CT and postoperative MRI of OLT(osthondral lesion of the talus) of Hepple type Ⅴ in left ankle. A to B are preoperative CT images of the left ankle, showing obvious cystic phase change in the anteromedial aspect of the talus with cartilage facet defects; C to D are postoperative MRI at 17 months after the operation, showing that the cartilage was well repaired, and the area of necrotic foci had been reduced
[1]
Choi JI, Lee KB. Comparison of clinical outcomes between arthroscopic subchondral drilling and microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the talus[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2016, 24(7): 2140-2147.
[2]
O'Loughlin PF, Heyworth BE, Kennedy JG. Current concepts in the diagnosis and treatment of osteochondral lesions of the ankle[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2010, 38(2): 392-404.
[3]
Natsuhara M K, Sarcon A, Kreulen C, et al. Treatment of osteochondral lesions of talus with extracellular matrix cartilage allografts[J]. Techniques in Foot & Ankle Surgery201818(18): 61-67.
[4]
Thompson MJ, Roukis TS. Osteochondral lesions of the talar dome[J]. Clin Podiatr Med Surg, 2020, 37(3): 533-551.
[5]
尼加提·阿不力米提,周开磊,李纲,等. 双平面截骨加自体骨软骨移植治疗距骨骨软骨损伤合并距骨囊肿的临床效果[J]. 中华外科杂志2020, 58(3): 220-224.
[6]
唐尧,袁成松,陈万,等. 自体胫骨骨膜-骨复合体移植治疗Hepple Ⅴ期距骨骨软骨损伤的中长期随访结果[J]. 中华医学杂志2021, 101(37): 2968-2974.
[7]
Baltzer AWA, Arnold JP. Bone-cartilage transplantation from the ipsilateral knee for chondral lesions of the talus[J]. Arthroscopy, 2005, 21(2): 159-166.
[8]
McGahan PJ, Pinney SJ. Current concept review: osteochondral lesions of the talus[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2010, 31(1): 90-101.
[9]
Rungprai C, Tennant JN, Gentry RD, et al. Management of osteochondral lesions of the talar dome[J]. Open Orthop J, 2017, 11: 743-761.
[10]
Gu W, Li T, Shi Z, et al. Management of hepple stage V osteochondral lesion of the talus with a platelet-rich plasma scaffold[J/OL]. Biomed Res Int, 2017, 2017: 6525373. DOI: 10.1155/2017/6525373.
[11]
Toale J, Shimozono Y, Mulvin C, et al. Midterm outcomes of bone marrow stimulation for primary osteochondral lesions of the talus: a systematic review[J/OL]. Orthop J Sports Med, 2019, 7(10): 2325967119879127. DOI: 10.1177/2325967119879127.
[12]
Guo C, Li X, Zhu Y, et al. Clinical and MRI donor-site outcomes after autograft harvesting from the medial trochlea for talar osteochondral lesions: minimum 5-year clinical follow-up[J/OL]. Orthop J Sports Med, 2022, 10(9): 23259671221120075. DOI: 10.1177/23259671221120075.
[13]
Hu Y, Guo Q, Jiao C, et al. Treatment of large cystic medial osteochondral lesions of the talus with autologous osteoperiosteal cylinder grafts[J]. Arthroscopy, 2013, 29(8): 1372-1379.
[14]
张成昌,杨柳,段小军. 距骨骨软骨损伤的治疗研究进展[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(4): 466-472.
[15]
Cao Y, Xu Y, Huang Q, et al. Characteristics of osteochondral lesions of the talus in different age groups[J]. Int J Sports Med, 2020, 41(12): 873-878.
[1] 罗旺林, 杨传军, 许国星, 俞建国, 孙伟东, 颜文娟, 冯志. 开放性楔形胫骨高位截骨术不同植入材料的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 818-826.
[2] 李鸿昌, 孙艳宏, 高旺, 张金才, 牛亚清, 张国梁. 滑膜软骨瘤病的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 679-683.
[3] 罗璠, 饶志涛. 机械敏感蛋白Piezo1介导创伤后骨关节炎的作用及机制[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 528-533.
[4] 陈严城, 符培亮. 组织工程技术在骨软骨缺损中应用的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 376-384.
[5] 钱嘉天, 符培亮. 3D打印脱细胞的细胞外基质修复软骨缺损的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 368-375.
[6] 符卓毅, 唐圣成, 卜俏梅, 徐高兵, 吴安平, 蔡巍, 杨明, 谭海涛. 镁在骨关节炎治疗中的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 354-362.
[7] 朱意然, 覃健. 拉曼光谱技术用于监测膝关节炎的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 276-282.
[8] 贾星海, 张超, 林岩. 富血小板血浆对膝软骨损伤术后功能康复的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 141-146.
[9] 杨晓龙, 张立智, 刘晓东. 非侵入性加压负载模型在膝骨关节炎研究中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 86-92.
[10] 姜博庸, 韩长旭. 间充质干细胞外泌体促进软骨再生的潜在机制研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 44-51.
[11] 郝耀, 陈丽, 韩永斌, 高宏, 韩树峰. miRNA在骨骼生长发育和骨性关节炎中的作用[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(01): 73-77.
[12] 蒋鹏飞, 程尼涛. 侵犯左肺及心包的巨大胸壁软骨肉瘤一例[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 296-298.
[13] 曲峰, 孙成宜, 王克涛, 王智, 李鹏飞, 张明珠. 关节镜下后踝三入路切除术治疗疼痛性跟距骨桥[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 106-110.
[14] 苗壮, 刘培来. 富血小板血浆治疗膝骨关节炎的现状与展望[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 1-6.
[15] 易和强, 邓志刚. 13例化脓性肋软骨炎的诊治体会[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(03): 176-179.
阅读次数
全文


摘要