切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (03) : 368 -375. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2023.03.011

综述

3D打印脱细胞的细胞外基质修复软骨缺损的研究进展
钱嘉天, 符培亮†()   
  1. 200003 上海市长征医院关节外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-05 出版日期:2023-06-01
  • 通信作者: 符培亮

Research progress of 3D printing based on decellularized extracellular matrix in cartilage defect repair

Jiatian Qian, Peiliang Fu†()   

  1. Joint Divison of Orthopedic Department, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China
  • Received:2020-11-05 Published:2023-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Peiliang Fu
引用本文:

钱嘉天, 符培亮. 3D打印脱细胞的细胞外基质修复软骨缺损的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 368-375.

Jiatian Qian, Peiliang Fu. Research progress of 3D printing based on decellularized extracellular matrix in cartilage defect repair[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(03): 368-375.

局灶性的关节软骨缺损在临床上很常见,会引起长期疼痛、关节功能障碍,甚至进展为骨关节炎。关节软骨组织自我修复能力差,而目前常用的修复方案,如微骨折术、骨软骨镶嵌成形术、自体软骨细胞移植等,均难以生成足量且生物学功能良好的透明软骨,远期效果有限。脱细胞的细胞外基质(dECM)是动态且复杂的三维(3D)微环境,具有优秀的生物力学、生物物理和生物化学特性,可以直接或间接调节细胞行为,包括增殖、黏附、迁移和分化。干细胞来源的dECM更具有低免疫原性、高组织相容性和高分化潜力的优势,且与天然ECM微环境的相似度更高,在组织工程研究中常作为生物支架应用于软骨修复。结合3D生物打印技术,将dECM同其他生物分子甚至细胞组合作为生物墨水,打印生成的生物支架可以重构软骨细胞存活和增殖所需的物理和机械微环境。通过讨论总结dECM的生物学功能、dECM在修复软骨损伤中的作用机制、3D生物打印dECM支架的技术特点,以及现阶段存在的挑战和不足,能够为软骨缺损修复提供新的研究方向。

Focal articular cartilage defects are commonly detected in clinical practice, which can cause long-term pain, joint dysfunction, and even aggravate to osteoarthritis. Articular cartilage tissues are featured by a poor self-repair ability. Current repairs of articular cartilage defects, including microfracture, osteochondral mosaicplasty and autologous chondrocyte transplantation are unable to produce sufficient hyaline cartilages with good biological functions, and the long-term outcome is unsatisfactory. The decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) constitutes a dynamic and complex three-dimensional (3D) microenvironment, which provides excellent biomechanical, biophysical and biochemical properties. Importantly, dECM can directly or indirectly regulate cell behaviors, including proliferation, adhesion, migration and differentiation. Stem cell-derived dECM has numerous advantages, such as low immunogenicity, high histocompatibility, and high differentiation potential. The microenvironment of stem cell-derived dECM is extremely similar to that of the natural ECM. As a result, it is usually used as a biological scaffold for cartilage repair in tissue engineering field. Using 3D bioprinting technology, dECM, alongside other biomolecules and even cells are utilized as bio-inks, and the printed bio-scaffold can reconstruct the physical and mechanical microenvironment required for the survival and proliferation of chondrocytes. Through a comprehensive summarizing of biological functions of dECM, the mechanism of dECM in repairing cartilage defects, technical characteristics of 3D bioprinting of dECM scaffolds, and their potential challenges and shortcomings, it is conductive to guide novel research directions for cartilage defect repair.

[1]
Widuchowski W, Widuchowski J, Trzaska T. Articular cartilage defects: study of 25, 124 knee arthroscopies[J]. Knee, 2007, 14(3): 177-182.
[2]
Widuchowski W, Lukasik P, Kwiatkowski G, et al. Isolated full thickness chondral injuries. Prevalance and outcome of treatment. A retrospective study of 5233 knee arthroscopies[J]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, 2008, 75(5): 382-386.
[3]
Kwon H, Brown WE, Lee CA, et al. Surgical and tissue engineering strategies for articular cartilage and meniscus repair[J]. Nat Rev Rheumatol, 2019, 15(9): 550-570.
[4]
Kowalczuk M, Musahl V, Fu FH. Cochrane in CORR®:surgical interventions (microfracture, drilling, mosaicplasty, and allograft transplantation) for treating isolated cartilage defects of the knee in adults[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2018, 476(1): 16-18.
[5]
Andriolo L, Reale D, di Martino A, et al. High rate of failure after matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation in osteoarthritic knees at 15 years of follow-up[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2019, 47(9): 2116-2122.
[6]
Belk JW, McCarty E. Editorial commentary: autologous chondrocyte implantation versus microfracture for knee articular cartilage repair: we should focus on the latest autologous chondrocyte implantation techniques[J]. Arthroscopy, 2020, 36(1): 304-306.
[7]
Phull AR, Eo SH, Abbas Q, et al. Applications of chondrocyte-based cartilage engineering: an overview[J/OL]. Biomed Res Int, 2016, 2016: 1879837. DOI: 10.1155/2016/1879837.
[8]
Li J, Narayanan K, Zhang Y, et al. Role of lineage-specific matrix in stem cell chondrogenesis[J/OL]. Biomaterials, 2020, 231: 119681. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119681.
[9]
Pei M, He F. Extracellular matrix deposited by synovium-derived stem cells delays replicative senescent chondrocyte dedifferentiation and enhances redifferentiation[J]. J Cell Physiol, 2012, 227(5): 2163-2174.
[10]
Ravindran S, Kotecha M, Huang CC, et al. Biological and MRI characterization of biomimetic ECM scaffolds for cartilage tissue regeneration[J]. Biomaterials, 2015, 71: 58-70.
[11]
Lu H, Hoshiba T, Kawazoe N, et al. Cultured cell-derived extracellular matrix scaffolds for tissue engineering[J]. Biomaterials, 2011, 32(36): 9658-9666.
[12]
Yang Y, Lin H, Shen H, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular matrix enhances chondrogenic phenotype of and cartilage formation by encapsulated chondrocytes in vitro and in vivo[J]. Acta Biomater, 2018, 69: 71-82.
[13]
Sun X, Yin H, Wang Y, et al. In situ articular cartilage regeneration through endogenous reparative cell homing using a functional bone marrow-specific scaffolding system[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2018, 10(45): 38715-38728.
[14]
Huang Z, Godkin O, Schulze-Tanzil G. The challenge in using mesenchymal stromal cells for recellularization of decellularized cartilage[J]. Stem Cell Rev Rep, 2017, 13(1): 50-67.
[15]
Murphy SV, De Coppi P, Atala A. Opportunities and challenges of translational 3D bioprinting[J]. Nat Biomed Eng, 2020, 4(4): 370-380.
[16]
Nam SY, Park SH. ECM based bioink for tissue mimetic 3D bioprinting[M]//Noh I. Biomimetic Medical Materials. Singapore: Springer, 2018: 335-353.
[17]
Jung CS, Kim BK, Lee J, et al. Development of printable natural cartilage matrix bioink for 3D printing of irregular tissue shape[J]. Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2018, 15(2): 155-162.
[18]
Pati F, Cho DW. Bioprinting of 3D tissue models using decellularized extracellular matrix bioink[M]// 3D Cell Culture. NewYork: Humana Press, 2017: 381-390.
[19]
Porzionato A, Stocco E, Barbon S, et al. Tissue-engineered grafts from human decellularized extracellular matrices: a systematic review and future perspectives[J/OL]. Int J Mol Sci, 2018, 19(12): 4117. DOI: 10.3390/ijms19124117.
[20]
Aamodt JM, Grainger DW. Extracellular matrix-based biomaterial scaffolds and the host response[J]. Biomaterials, 2016, 86: 68-82.
[21]
Choudhury D, Tun HW, Wang T, et al. Organ-derived decellularized extracellular matrix: a game changer for bioink manufacturing?[J]. Trends Biotechnol, 2018, 36(8): 787-805.
[22]
Rijal G. The decellularized extracellular matrix in regenerative medicine[J]. Regen Med, 2017, 12(5): 475-477.
[23]
Cramer MC, Badylak SF. Extracellular matrix-based biomaterials and their influence upon cell behavior. Ann Biomed Eng. 2020 Jul;48(7): 2132-2153.
[24]
Bejleri D, Davis ME. Decellularized extracellular matrix materials for cardiac repair and regeneration[J/OL]. Adv Healthc Mater, 2019, 8(5): e1801217. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201801217.
[25]
Rana D, Zreiqat H, Benkirane-Jessel N, et al. Development of decellularized scaffolds for stem cell-driven tissue engineering[J]. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2017, 11(4): 942-965.
[26]
Davis NF, Cunnane EM, O'Brien FJ, et al. Tissue engineered extracellular matrices (ECMs) in urology: evolution and future directions[J]. Surgeon, 2018, 16(1): 55-65.
[27]
Vavken P, Joshi S, Murray MM. TRITON-X is most effective among three decellularization agents for ACL tissue engineering[J]. J Orthop Res, 2009, 27(12): 1612-1618.
[28]
Huleihel L, Hussey GS, Naranjo JD, et al. Matrix-bound nanovesicles within ECM bioscaffolds[J/OL]. Sci Adv, 2016, 2(6): e1600502. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1600502.
[29]
Petersen TH, Calle EA, Colehour MB, et al. Matrix composition and mechanics of decellularized lung scaffolds[J]. Cells Tissues Organs, 2012, 195(3): 222-231.
[30]
Subbiah R, Guldberg RE. Materials science and design principles of growth factor delivery systems in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine[J/OL]. Adv Healthc Mater, 2019, 8(1): e1801000. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201801000.
[31]
Johnstone B, Stoddart MJ, Im GI. Multi-disciplinary approaches for cell-based cartilage regeneration[J]. J Orthop Res, 2020, 38(3): 463-472.
[32]
Fahy N, Alini M, Stoddart MJ. Mechanical stimulation of mesenchymal stem cells: implications for cartilage tissue engineering[J]. J Orthop Res, 2018, 36(1): 52-63.
[33]
Vertelov G, Gutierrez E, Lee SA, et al. Rigidity of silicone substrates controls cell spreading and stem cell differentiation[J/OL]. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 33411. DOI: 10.1038/srep33411.
[34]
Sun M, Chi G, Li P, et al. Effects of matrix stiffness on the morphology, adhesion, proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells[J]. Int J Med Sci, 2018, 15(3): 257-268.
[35]
Wang YK, Chen CS. Cell adhesion and mechanical stimulation in the regulation of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation[J]. JCellMolMed, 2013, 17(7): 823-832.
[36]
Liang Y, Idrees E, Szojka ARA, et al. Chondrogenic differentiation of synovial fluid mesenchymal stem cells on human meniscus-derived decellularized matrix requires exogenous growth factors[J]. Acta Biomater, 2018, 80: 131-143.
[37]
Zhai C, Zhang X, Chen J, et al. The effect of cartilage extracellular matrix particle size on the chondrogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells[J]. Regen Med, 2019, 14(7): 663-680.
[38]
Kleinschmidt EG, Schlaepfer DD. Focal adhesion kinase signaling in unexpected places[J]. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 2017, 45: 24-30.
[39]
Gopal S, Multhaupt HAB, Pocock R, et al. Cell-extracellular matrix and cell-cell adhesion are linked by syndecan-4[J]. Matrix Biol, 2017, 60-61: 57-69.
[40]
Yin H, Wang Y, Sun X, et al. Functional tissue-engineered microtissue derived from cartilage extracellular matrix for articular cartilage regeneration[J]. Acta Biomater, 2018, 77: 127-141.
[41]
Zhang W, Yang J, Zhu Y, et al. Extracellular matrix derived by human umbilical cord-deposited mesenchymal stem cells accelerates chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation potential in vitro[J]. Cell Tissue Bank, 2019, 20(3): 351-365.
[42]
Ecke A, Lutter AH, Scholka J, et al. Tissue specific differentiation of human chondrocytes depends on cell microenvironment and serum selection[J/OL]. Cells, 2019, 8(8): 934. DOI: 10.3390/cells8080934.
[43]
Sridharan R, Cameron AR, Kelly DJ, et al. Biomaterial based modulation of macrophage polarization: a review and suggested design principles[J]. Mater Today, 2015, 18(6): 313-325.
[44]
Yamamoto T, Hara H, Iwase H, et al. The final obstacle to successful pre-clinical xenotransplantation?[J/OL]. Xenotransplantation, 2020, 27(5): e12596. DOI: 10.1111/xen.12596.
[45]
Jang J, Kim TG, Kim BS, et al. Tailoring mechanical properties of decellularized extracellular matrix bioink by vitamin B2-induced photo-crosslinking[J]. Acta Biomater, 2016, 33: 88-95.
[46]
Pati F, Jang J, Ha DH, et al. Printing three-dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix bioink[J/OL]. NatCommun, 2014, 5: 3935. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4935.
[47]
Chi H, Chen G, He Y, et al. 3D-HA scaffold functionalized by extracellular matrix of stem cells promotes bone repair[J]. Int J Nanomedicine, 2020, 15: 5825-5838.
[48]
Wang Z, Li Z, Li Z, et al. Cartilaginous extracellular matrix derived from decellularized chondrocyte sheets for the reconstruction of osteochondral defects in rabbits[J]. Acta Biomater, 2018, 81: 129-145.
[49]
Spang MT, Christman KL. Extracellular matrix hydrogel therapies: in vivo applications and development[J]. Acta Biomater, 2018, 68: 1-14.
[50]
Garreta E, Oria R, Tarantino C, et al. Tissue engineering by decellularization and 3D bioprinting[J]. Mater Today, 2017, 20(4): 166-178.
[51]
Hong N, Yang GH, Lee J, et al. 3D bioprinting and its in vivo applications[J]. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2018, 106(1): 444-459.
[52]
Nam SY, ParkSH. ECM based bioink for tissue mimetic 3D bioprinting[J]. AdvExpMedBiol, 2018, 1064: 335-353.
[53]
Maia FR, Carvalho MR, Oliveira JM, et al. Tissue engineering strategies for osteochondral repair[M]//OliveiraJ,Pina S, Reis R, et al. Osteochondral Tissue Engineering. Cham: Springer, 2018: 353-371.
[54]
Critchley SE, Kelly D. Bioinks for bioprinting functional meniscus and articular cartilage[J]. J 3D Print Med, 2017,1(4):263-290.
[55]
Huang GP, Menezes R, Vincent R, et al. *gelatin scaffolds containing partially sulfated cellulose promote mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenesis[J]. Tissue Eng Part A, 2017, 23(17-18): 1011-1021.
[56]
Antich C, de Vicente J, Jiménez G, et al. Bio-inspired hydrogel composed of hyaluronic acid and alginate as a potential bioink for 3D bioprinting of articular cartilage engineering constructs[J]. Acta Biomater, 2020, 106: 114-123.
[57]
Kim BS, Kim H, Gao G, et al. Decellularized extracellular matrix: a step towards the next generation source for bioink manufacturing[J/OL]. Biofabrication, 2017, 9(3): 034104. DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/aa7e98.
[58]
Skardal A, Devarasetty M, Kang HW, et al. A hydrogel bioink toolkit for mimicking native tissue biochemical and mechanical properties in bioprinted tissue constructs[J]. Acta Biomater, 2015, 25: 24-34.
[59]
Rathan S, Dejob L, Schipani R, et al. Fiber reinforced cartilage ECM functionalized bioinks for functional cartilage tissue engineering[J/OL]. Adv Healthcare Mater, 2019, 8(7): 1801501. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201801501.
[60]
Zhang X, Liu Y, Luo C, et al. Crosslinker-free silk/decellularized extracellular matrix porous bioink for 3D bioprinting-based cartilage tissue engineering[J/OL]. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2021, 118: 111388. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111388.
[61]
Lee H, Han W, Kim H, et al. Development of liver decellularized extracellular matrix bioink for three-dimensional cell printing-based liver tissue engineering[J]. Biomacromolecules, 2017, 18(4): 1229-1237.
[62]
Dzobo K, Thomford NE, Senthebane DA, et al. Advances in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering: innovation and transformation of medicine[J/OL]. Stem Cells Int, 2018, 2018: 2495848. DOI: 10.1155/2018/2495848.
[63]
Ozbolat IT, Hospodiuk M. Current advances and future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting[J]. Biomaterials, 2016, 76: 321-343.
[64]
Messaoudi O, Henrionnet C, Bourge K, et al. Stem cells and extrusion 3D printing for hyaline cartilage engineering[J/OL]. Cells, 2020, 10(1): 2. DOI: 10.3390/cells10010002.
[65]
Ahn G, Min KH, Kim C, et al. Precise stacking of decellularized extracellular matrix based 3D cell-laden constructs by a 3D cell printing system equipped with heating modules[J/OL]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 8624. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-09201-5.
[66]
Costantini M, Idaszek J, Szöke K, et al. 3D bioprinting of BM-MSCs-loaded ECM biomimetic hydrogels for in vitro neocartilage formation[J/OL]. Biofabrication, 2016, 8(3): 035002. DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035002.
[67]
Sakai S, Ueda K, Gantumur E, et al. Drop-on-drop multimaterial 3D bioprinting realized by peroxidase-mediated cross-linking[J/OL]. Macromol Rapid Commun, 2018, 39(3). DOI: 10.1002/marc.201700534.
[68]
Hölzl K, Lin S, Tytgat L, et al. Bioink properties before, during and after 3D bioprinting[J/OL]. Biofabrication, 2016, 8(3): 032002. DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/032002.
[69]
Chen P, Zheng L, Wang Y, et al. Desktop-stereolithography 3D printing of a radially oriented extracellular matrix/mesenchymal stem cell exosome bioink for osteochondral defect regeneration[J]. Theranostics, 2019, 9(9): 2439-2459.
[70]
Lam T, Dehne T, Krüger JP, et al. Photopolymerizable gelatin and hyaluronic acid for stereolithographic 3D bioprinting of tissue-engineered cartilage[J]. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2019, 107(8): 2649-2657.
[71]
Liu W, Zhang YS, Heinrich MA, et al. Rapid continuous multimaterial extrusion bioprinting[J/OL]. AdvMater, 2017, 29(3):10.1002/adma.201604630. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201604630.
[72]
Idaszek J, Costantini M, Karlsen TA, et al. 3D bioprinting of hydrogel constructs with cell and material gradients for the regeneration of full-thickness chondral defect using a microfluidic printing head[J/OL]. Biofabrication, 2019, 11(4): 044101. DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab2622.
[1] 苏介茂, 齐岩松, 王永祥, 魏宝刚, 马秉贤, 张鹏飞, 魏兴华, 徐永胜. 关节镜手术在早中期膝骨关节炎治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 646-652.
[2] 陈松, 黄玲巧, 余清卿, 魏志鑫, 付琰. 单细胞RNA测序技术在骨关节炎软骨中的研究应用[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 363-371.
[3] 李朋, 苗立帅, 朱智奇. 四氢嘧啶对大鼠关节软骨细胞的保护作用[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 69-77.
[4] 金鑫, 谢卯, 刘芸, 杨操, 杨述华, 许伟华. 个性化股骨导向器辅助初次全髋关节置换的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 780-787.
[5] 李鸿昌, 孙艳宏, 高旺, 张金才, 牛亚清, 张国梁. 滑膜软骨瘤病的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 679-683.
[6] 关丁丁, 李伟, 孔维诗, 包郁露, 孙瑜. 负载干细胞的光交联蛋白基水凝胶在组织工程中应用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 447-452.
[7] 王湘滔, 张爱娟, 王万春, 王芳萍, 徐颖婕, 孟洋. 中药白及在口腔疾病中的研究与应用[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 371-375.
[8] 钟文文, 李科, 刘碧好, 蔡炳, 脱颖, 叶雷, 马波, 瞿虎, 汪中扬, 王德娟, 邱剑光. 不同比例聚乳酸/丝素蛋白复合支架在兔尿道缺损修复中的疗效[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 516-522.
[9] 朱苗娟, 杜聃, 廖慧斌, 陈毅斐, 杨炯. 以呼吸道症状为首发表现的复发性多软骨炎一例[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 335-337.
[10] 万周程, 钟章锋, 钟侨霖, 王景浩, 刘婷, 王华军, 郑小飞. 中药有效成分结合生物材料在骨组织工程中作用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 249-253.
[11] 郭煦妍, 罗志嵘, 薛琦, 王林猛, 吉运华, 张波. 3D生物打印在肾脏再生领域的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 181-185.
[12] 李尚哲, 杨珖, 陈仁杰, 张海龙, 鲁谊. 肱骨远端关节软骨的三维分布及双侧配准研究[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 330-337.
[13] 李玺, 蔡芸莹, 张永红, 苏恒. 假性软骨发育不全合并1型糖尿病一例[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 518-520.
[14] 魏贤杰, 黄河溯源, 张克石, 关振鹏. 山奈素通过抑制NF-κB减弱类风湿关节炎大鼠模型软骨细胞炎症及基质降解[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 375-382.
[15] 郭楠, 徐学俊. 富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯在慢性乙型肝炎患者中诱导的范科尼综合征并低磷软骨病一例[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 173-177.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?