切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华关节外科杂志(电子版)

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (04) : 412 -418. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2022.04.005

临床论著

双侧分别行髋臼周围截骨和全髋关节置换术后的功能比较
马云青1, 丁云鹏1, 罗殿中1, 张洪1,†()   
  1. 1. 100037　北京，解放军总医院第四医学中心骨科学部关节外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-09 出版日期:2022-08-01
  • 通信作者: 张洪

Functional outcomes comparison following simultaneously bilateral periacetabular osteotomy and total hip arthroplasty

Yunqing Ma1, Yunpeng Ding1, Dianzhong Luo1, Hong Zhang1,†()   

  1. 1. The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital joint surgery department, Beijing 100037, China
  • Received:2020-05-09 Published:2022-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Hong Zhang
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

马云青, 丁云鹏, 罗殿中, 张洪. 双侧分别行髋臼周围截骨和全髋关节置换术后的功能比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 412-418.

Yunqing Ma, Yunpeng Ding, Dianzhong Luo, Hong Zhang. Functional outcomes comparison following simultaneously bilateral periacetabular osteotomy and total hip arthroplasty[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(04): 412-418.

目的

探讨双侧分别接受髋臼周围截骨术(PAO)和全髋关节置换术(THA)的发育性髋关节发育不良(DDH)患者术后自评关节功能的差异及对手术倾向的影响。

方法

回顾性分析解放军总医院第四医学中心关节外科2010年6月至2017年5月双侧髋关节一侧行PAO治疗对侧行THA治疗的患者，纳入标准为术前诊断为双侧DDH，且同一名患者双侧髋关节术前DDH分型相同，患者仅接受单纯PAO手术和THA手术。采用方差分析比较手术时间，术中出血量和围手术期并发症等手术相关数据，采用独立样本t检验比较术后早期和1年后随访视觉疼痛评分、髋关节Harris功能评分、患者自我功能评分(简化国际髋关节评分问卷量表)和手术倾向性。

结果

共有12例患者(24髋)纳入研究，其中男性2例，女性10例，首次手术平均年龄为(35±4)岁，两次手术间隔(17±11)月。术后3个月THA侧Harris髋关节评分明显改善(t＝－15.222，P<0.001)，PAO侧则较术前下降(t＝3.927，P＝0.001)，至术后1年随访双侧髋关节Harris评分差异无统计学意义(t＝1.156，P>0.05)，患者自我功能评价差异有统计学意义(t＝3.550，P＝0.002)。PAO术后患者关节疼痛持续时间较长，使用拐杖非负重活动时间较THA长。PAO侧髋关节共出现3例并发症，THA侧出现1例。早期随访THA侧满意度(58.3%)高于PAO侧(41.7%)，但差异无统计学意义(χ2＝0.667，P>0.05)；至末次随访患者对两种术式的满意度相同。手术倾向性方面，所有患者在末次随访时倾向接受PAO手术。

结论

PAO和THA在功能改善和疼痛缓解方面均可获得满意的疗效，术后1年以上随访患者更倾向接受PAO。此研究结果对年轻症状型DDH患者的治疗方案选择有一定的参考意义。

关键词: 发育性髋关节发育不良, 截骨术, 关节成形术
Objective

To investigate the difference of self-evaluated joint function and the effect on the tendency of operation choice in DDH patients who bilaterally receive periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) and total hip replacement (THA) respectively.

Methods

A retrospectively analysis was carried out on the patients with DDH who underwent bilateral PAO and THA in the joint surgery department of the Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital from June 2010 to May 2017. Inclusion criteria: preoperative diagnosis of bilateral DDH, the patient had the same DDH classification of both sides. The patients who underwent surgeries other than PAO and THA were excluded. The medical records and imaging data were reviewed. The operation related data such as operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume and perioperative complications were compared use on-way ANOVA. The hip Harris score, patient-reported function score (iHOT-12)and operation tendency at early and last follow-up were also compared use independent t test.

Results

Overall 12 patients (24 hips) were included in this study, among which were two males and 10 females, the age at the first operation time were (35±4) years, with the interval between the two operations (17±11) months. The Harris score was significantly improved (t=-15.222 P<0.001) in THA side, but the scone of the PAO side decreased (t=3.927 P=0.001) compared with the preoperative data at three months follow-up. There was no statistically significant difference of the postoperative Harris score of both sides after follow-up more than one year (t=1.156 P=0.264). There was statistically significant difference in the patient-reported function score between the two sides (t=3.550 P=0.002). The duration of joint pain after PAO was longer, and the time of non-loadbearing activity with crutches was longer than THA patients. There were three cases have complications in PAO side and only one case in THA side. The satisfaction rate of THA side was higher (58.3%) than that of the PAO side (41.7%) at the early follow-up, the difference was not statistically significant(χ2=0.667, P>0.05). The patient satisfaction results of the two procedures were the same at the last follow-up. All the patients tended to chose PAO surgery at the last follow-up.

Conclusions

PAO and THA both produce comparable improvement in function and pain one year after surgery. The patients are satisfied with bilateral surgery but more incline to receive PAO. These findings may be important in the decision making process in middle aged patients with symptomatic acetabular dysplasia.

Key words: Developmental dysplasia of the hip, Osteotomy, Arthroplasty
表1 患者两侧手术相关数据比较(±s)
手术侧 例数 术时年龄(岁) BMI(kg/m2) 手术时间(min) 术中出血量(ml) 出院时Hgb(g/L) 住院天数(d) 住院费用(万元)
PAO 12 34.3±8.7 25.3±3.8 103.3±13.7 533.3±176.2 74.1±7.2 13.8±2.2 4.9±1.3
THA 12 34.3±10.3 25.9±3.4 69.8±10.6 145.8±62.0 79.5±10.4 11.6±1.4 7.0±0.5
t值   0.000 －0.410 6.692 7.185 －1.487 2.954 －5.143
P值   >0.05 >0.05 <0.001 <0.001 >0.05 0.007 <0.001
表2 患者两侧手术髋关节功能相关数据比较　(±s)
手术侧 例数 VAS评分 F值 P值
术前 术后3个月 术后1年
PAO 12 28.8±5.5 30.3±5.6 9.0±5.3ab 67.576 <0.001
THA 12 68.1±9.8 20.0±4.7a 9.2±6.3ab 215.188 <0.001
t值   －12.116 4.910 －0.070    
P值   <0.001 <0.001 >0.05    
手术侧 例数 Harris评分 F值 P值
术前 术后3个月 术后1年
PAO 12 87.3±3.8 80.5±4.7a 93.3±2.9ab 36.636 <0.001
THA 12 48.1±5.8 86.3±5.8a 91.8±3.4a 212.123 <0.001
t值   19.522 －2.672 1.156    
P值   <0.001 <0.014 >0.05    
手术侧 例数 iHOT-12评分   F值 P值
术前 术后1年
PAO 12 44.7±4.3 73.6±4.3a － －17.297 <0.001
THA 12 37.2±3.6 68.6±2.4a － －23.961 <0.001
t值   4.657 3.550 －    
P值   <0.001 0.002 －    
图1 典型病例患者双侧髋关节手术前后X线片。图A为患者术前站立位骨盆正位X线片，左髋关节T?nnis 2期，右髋关节T?nnis 0期；图B右侧髋臼周围截骨术后23个月随访X线片，右髋关节外侧中心角正为25°，T?nnis角矫正为0°，左髋关节T?nnis分期加重至3期；图C为患者右髋内固定取出左髋关节置换术后12个月随访X线片，右髋截骨后矫正角度未见丢失，T?nnis 0期，左髋假体位置良好未见松动迹象
图2 术后并发症患者骨盆正位X线片。图A示右髋截骨术后耻骨上支不愈合；图B示左髋THA术中股骨距骨折给予钢丝固定
[1]
Cooperman DR. How good is the evidence linking acetabular dysplasia to osteoarthritis？[J]. J Pediatr Orthop, 2019, 39(Issue 6, Suppl 1): S20-S22.
[2]
Ganz R, Klaue K, Vinh TS, et al. A new periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasias. Technique and preliminary results[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1988, (232)：26-36.
[3]
Wyles CC, Vargas JS, Heidenreich MJ, et al. Natural history of the dysplastic hip following modern periacetabular osteotomy[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2019, 101(10): 932-938.
[4]
Faldini C, Miscione MT, Chehrassan M, et al. Congenital hip dysplasia treated by total hip arthroplasty using cementless tapered stem in patients younger than 50 years old: results after 12-years follow-up[J]. J Orthop Traumatol, 2011, 12(4): 213-218.
[5]
Wade R, Shah KA. Functional and radiological outcome of uncemented total hip arthroplasty in young adults-5 year follow-up[J]. J Orthop, 2019, 6(18): 237-239.
[6]
Kalore NV, Cheppalli SP, Daner W3, et al. Acetabular dysplasia in middle-aged patients: periacetabular osteotomy or total hip arthroplasty？[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2016, 31(9): 1894-1898.
[7]
程徽，张洪，罗殿中，等．伯尔尼髋臼周围截骨术治疗髋关节发育不良的中长期疗效[J]．中华骨科杂志，2014，34(12)：1190-1197.
[8]
Hodgkinson JP, Shelley P, Wroblewski BM. The correlation between the roentgenographic appearance and operative findings at the bone-cement junction of the socket in Charnley low friction arthroplasty[J]. Clin Orthop, 1988, (228)：105-109.
[9]
DeLee JG, Charnley J. Radiographic demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement[J]. Clin Orthop, 1976, (121)：20-32
[10]
Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1990, (257)：107-128.
[11]
Hsieh PH, Chang YH, Lee PC, et al. Periprosthetic fractures of the greater trochanter through osteolytic cysts with uncemented Micro Structured Omnifit prosthesis: retrospective analyses of 23 fractures in 887 hips after 5-14 years[J]. Acta Orthop, 2005, 76(4)：538-543.
[12]
Shih CH, Lee PC, Chen JH, et al. Measurement of polyethylene wear in cementless total hip arthroplasty[J]. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 1997, 79(3)：361-365.
[13]
Wells J, Millis M, Kim YJ, et al. Survivorship of the bernese periacetabular osteotomy: what factors are associated with long-term failure？[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2017, 475(2): 396-405.
[14]
Hartig-Andreasen C, Troelsen A, Thillemann TM, et al. What factors predict failure 4 to 12 years after periacetabular osteotomy？[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2012, 470(11): 2978-2987.
[15]
Dahl LB, Dengsø K, Bang-Christiansen K, et al. Clinical and radiological outcome after periacetabular osteotomy: a cross-sectional study of 127 hips operated on from 1999－2008[J]. Hip Int, 2014, 24(4): 369-380.
[16]
Teratani T, Naito M, Kiyama T, et al. Periacetabular osteotomy in patients fifty years of age or older[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2010, 92(1): 31-41.
[17]
Gray BL, Stambough JB, Baca GR, et al. Comparison of contemporary periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia with total hip arthroplasty for hip osteoarthritis[J]. Bone Joint J, 2015, 97－B(10): 1322-1327.
[18]
Garbuz DS, Awwad M, Duncan CP. Periacetabular osteotomy and total hip arthroplasty in patients older than 40 years[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2008, 23(7): 960-963.
[19]
Wamper KE, Sierevelt IN, Poolman RW, et al. The harris hip score: do ceiling effects limit its usefulness in orthopedics？[J]. Acta Orthop, 2010, 81(6): 703-707.
[20]
罗殿中，张洪，程徽，等．简化国际髋关节评分量表在髋臼周围截骨术评价中的应用附69例报告[J]．中国骨与关节杂志，2016，5(2)：105-108.
[21]
Novais EN, Carry PM, Kestel LA, et al. Does surgeon experience impact the risk of complications after Bernese periacetabular osteotomy[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2017, 475(4): 1110-1117.
[22]
Van BA, Garbuz DS. Quality of Life and sports-specific outcomes after Bernese periacetabular osteotomy[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2002, 84(3): 339-343.
[23]
Lerch TD, Steppacher SD, Liechti EF, et al. One-third of hips after periacetabular osteotomy survive 30 years with good clinical results, no progression of arthritis, or conversion to THA[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2017, 475(4): 1154-1168.
[24]
Parvizi J, Burmeister H, Ganz R. Previous Bernese periacetabular osteotomy does not compromise the results of total hip arthroplasty[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004, (423)：118-122.
[25]
Amanatullah DF, Stryker L, Schoenecker P, et al. Similar clinical outcomes for THAs with and without prior periacetabular osteotomy[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2015, 473(2): 685-691.
[1] 金鑫, 谢卯, 刘芸, 杨操, 杨述华, 许伟华. 个性化股骨导向器辅助初次全髋关节置换的随机对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 780-787.
[2] 邓华梅, 袁札根, 曾德荣, 潘珊珊, 张葆青, 欧爱华, 曹学伟. 全膝关节置换术中气压止血带应用效果与影响因素分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 788-794.
[3] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[4] 罗旺林, 杨传军, 许国星, 俞建国, 孙伟东, 颜文娟, 冯志. 开放性楔形胫骨高位截骨术不同植入材料的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 818-826.
[5] 李培杰, 乔永杰, 张浩强, 曾健康, 谭飞, 李嘉欢, 王静, 周胜虎. 细菌培养阴性的假体周围感染诊治的最新进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 827-833.
[6] 林文, 王雨萱, 许嘉悦, 王矜群, 王睿娜, 何董源, 樊沛. 人工关节置换登记系统的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 834-841.
[7] 闫文, 谢兴文, 顾玉彪, 雷宁波, 马成, 于文霞, 高亚雄, 张磊. 微小RNA与全膝关节置换术后深静脉血栓的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 842-846.
[8] 贺敬龙, 尚宏喜, 郝敏, 谢伟, 高明宏, 孙炜, 刘安庆. 重度类风湿关节炎患者行多关节置换术的临床手术疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 860-864.
[9] 孟繁宇, 周新社, 赵志, 裴立家, 刘犇. 侧位直接前方入路髋关节置换治疗偏瘫肢体股骨颈骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 865-870.
[10] 王宏宇. 固定与活动平台假体在全膝关节置换术中的应用价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 871-876.
[11] 李善武, 叶永杰, 王兵, 王子呓, 银毅, 孙官军, 张大刚. 胫骨高位截骨与单髁置换的早期疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 882-888.
[12] 李辉, 吴奇, 张子琦, 张晗, 王仿, 许鹏. 日间全膝关节置换术早期疗效及标准化流程探索[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 889-892.
[13] 刘伦, 王云鹭, 李锡勇, 韩鹏飞, 张鹏, 李晓东. 机器人辅助膝关节单髁置换术的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 715-721.
[14] 王桂冠, 徐杰. 运动学对线在全膝关节置换术中的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 726-731.
[15] 李岩松, 李涛, 张元鸣飞, 李志鹏, 周谋望. 头戴式虚拟现实设备辅助全膝关节置换术后康复的初步研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 676-681.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号