切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (02) : 225 -229. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2019.02.016

所属专题: 文献

综述

非骨水泥假体在全膝关节置换术中的应用进展
安明1, 董川1, 王波1, 王海鹏1, 陈佳1, 祁鹏1, 马保安1,()   
  1. 1. 710038 西安,空军军医大学唐都医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-17 出版日期:2019-04-01
  • 通信作者: 马保安

Application progress of cementless fixation prostheses for total knee arthroplasty

Ming An1, Chuan Dong1, Bo Wang1, Haipeng Wang1, Jia Chen1, Peng Qi1, Baoan Ma1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Tangdu Hospital of Airforce Medical University, Xian, 710038, China
  • Received:2018-09-17 Published:2019-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Baoan Ma
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ma Baoan, Email:
引用本文:

安明, 董川, 王波, 王海鹏, 陈佳, 祁鹏, 马保安. 非骨水泥假体在全膝关节置换术中的应用进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(02): 225-229.

Ming An, Chuan Dong, Bo Wang, Haipeng Wang, Jia Chen, Peng Qi, Baoan Ma. Application progress of cementless fixation prostheses for total knee arthroplasty[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(02): 225-229.

全膝关节置换术(TKA)是治疗膝关节终末期骨关节炎及风湿性关节炎的有效手段,传统的骨水泥假体在TKA中应用一直占据主流地位。针对年轻患者(≤60岁)和有运动需求的患者而设计的非骨水泥假体在早期由于设计和技术上的限制,未能获得较好的预后,因此没有得到广泛推崇。随着设计理念及材料技术的提升,新型非骨水泥假体优势突显,逐渐受到关节科医生的青睐。本文就非骨水泥假体的设计初衷、发展历程、新技术特点、临床预后以及目前研究的不足等角度出发,对非骨水泥假体在TKA中的应用进行全面的综合评述。

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment for advanced osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) of the knee. Cemented fixation implants are widely referred by orthopedic surgeons. Cementless prostheses which are designed and applied for younger (≤60years old) and more active patients, do not gain great favor over cement prostheses for the sake of poor design and material technique, leading to frequent TKA failure and unpleasing outcome. However, the latest generation of cementless fixation prostheses are gradually considered as a reasonable option among TKA processes attributed to the development of prostheses design and material technique. This article reviewed the history and current application, newest characteristics and the research disadvantage of cementless TKA.

[1]
戴尅戎,李慧武,严孟宁. 我国人工关节加速发展的二十年[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2015, 9(6):691-694.
[2]
Gandhi R, Tsvetkov D, Davey JR, et al. Survival and clinical function of cemented and uncemented prostheses in total knee replacement: a meta-analysis[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2009, 91(7): 889-895.
[3]
Abdel MP, Bonadurer GF 3rd, Jennings MT, et al. Increased aseptic tibial failures in patients with a BMI>/=35 and Well-Aligned total knee arthroplasties[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2015, 30(12): 2181-2184.
[4]
Silverton CD. Cemented and cementless fixation: results and techniques[J]. Instr Course Lect, 2006, 55:429-437.
[5]
Meneghini RM, Hanssen AD. Cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty: past, present, and future[J]. J Knee Surg, 2008, 21(4): 307-314.
[6]
Duffy GP, Berry DJ, Rand JA. Cement versus cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1998, (356):66-72.
[7]
Whiteside LA. Cementless total knee replacement. Nine- to 11-year results and 10-year survivorship analysis[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1994, 309(39): 185-192.
[8]
Soballe K, Hansen ES, Brockstedt-Rasmussen H, et al. Hydroxyapatite coating converts fibrous tissue to bone around loaded implants[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1993, 75(2): 270-278.
[9]
Bobyn JD, Stackpool GJ, Hacking SA, et al. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous Tantalum biomaterial[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1999, 81(5): 907-914.
[10]
Nakama GY, Peccin MS, Almeida GJ, et al. Cemented, cementless or hybrid fixation options in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and other non-traumatic diseases[J/OL]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2012, (10): CD006193. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006193.pub2.
[11]
Cross MJ, Parish EN. A hydroxyapatite-coated total knee replacement:prospective analysis of 1000 patients[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2005, 87(8): 1073-1076.
[12]
Epinette JA, Manley MT. Hydroxyapatite-coated total knee replacement-clinical experience at 10 to 15 years[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2007, 89B(1): 34-38.
[13]
Onsten I, Nordqvist A, Carlsson AS, et al. Hydroxyapatite augmentation of the porous coating improves fixation of tibial components. A randomised RSA study in 116 patients[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1998, 80(3): 417-425.
[14]
Harrison AK, Gioe TJ, Simonelli CA, et al. Do porous Tantalum implants help preserve bone? Evaluation of tibial bone density surrounding tantalum tibial implants in TKA[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010, 468(10): 2739-2745.
[15]
Meneghini RM, De Beaubien BC. Early failure of cementless porous tantalum monoblock tibial components[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2013, 28(9): 1505-1508.
[16]
Waddell DD, Sedacki K, Yang Y, et al. Early radiographic and functional outcomes of a cancellous titanium-coated tibial component for total knee arthroplasty[J]. Musculoskelet Surg, 2016, 100(1): 71-74.
[17]
Pulido L, Abdel MP, Lewallen DG, et al. The Mark Coventry Award:trabecular metal tibial components were durable and reliable in primary total knee arthroplasty:a randomized clinical trial[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2015, 473(1): 34-42.
[18]
Murr LE, Gaytan SM, Martinez E, et al. Next generation orthopaedic implants by additive manufacturing using electron beam melting[J/OL]. Int J Biomater, 2012, 2012: 245727. doi: 10.1155/2012/245727.
[19]
Ritter MA, Meneghini RM. Twenty-year survivorship of cement-less anatomic graduated component total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2010, 25(4): 507-513.
[20]
Hofmann AA, Evanich JD, Ferguson RP, et al. Ten-to 14-year clinical followup of the cementless natural knee system[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2001, (388): 85-94.
[21]
Buechel FF. Long-term followup after mobile-bearing total knee replacement[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2002, 404(44): 40-50.
[22]
Turner TM, Urban RM, Sumner DR, et al. Bone ingrowth into the tibial component of a canine total condylar knee replacement prosthesis[J]. J Orthop Res, 1989, 7(6): 893-901.
[23]
Petersen MM, Nielsen PT, Lebech A, et al. Preoperative bone mineral density of the proximal tibia and migration of the tibial component after uncemented total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 1999, 14(1): 77-81.
[24]
Carlsson A, Bjorkman A, Besjakov J, et al. Cemented tibial component fixation performs better than cementless fixation -A randomized radiostereometric study comparing porous-coated, hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components over 5 years[J]. Acta Orthop, 2005, 76(3): 362-369.
[25]
Sadoghi P, Leithner A, Weber PA, et al. Radiolucent lines in low-contact-stress mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a blinded and matched case control study[J/OL]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2011, 12: 142. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-142.
[26]
Gao F, Henricson A, Nilsson KG. Cemented versus uncemented fixation of the femoral component of the NexGen CR total knee replacement in patients younger than 60 years A Prospective randomised controlled RSA study[J]. Knee, 2009, 16(3): 200-206.
[27]
Abram SG, Marsh AG, Brydone AS, et al. The effect of tibial component sizing on patient reported outcome measures following uncemented total knee replacement[J]. Knee, 2014, 21(5): 955-959.
[28]
Nodzo SR, Hohman DW, Hoy AS, et al. Short term outcomes of a hydroxyapatite coated metal backed patella[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2015, 30(8): 1339-1343.
[29]
Ferguson RP, Friederichs MG, Hofmann AA. Comparison of screw and screwless fixation in cementless total knee arthroplasty[J]. Orthopedics, 2008, 31(2): 127.
[30]
Whiteside LA, Vigano R. Young and heavy patients with a cementless TKA do as well as older and lightweight patients[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2007, (464): 93-98.
[31]
Dixon P, Parish EN, Chan B, et al. Hydroxyapatite-coated, cementless total knee replacement in patients aged 75 years and over[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2004, 86(2): 200-204.
[32]
Eskola A, Vahvanen V, Santavirta S, et al. Porous-coated anatomic(PCA)knee arthroplasty.3-year results[J]. J Arthroplasty, 1992, 7(3): 223-228.
[33]
Woo YK, Kim KW, Chung JW, et al. Average 10.1-year follow-up of cementless total knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Can J Surg, 2011, 54(3): 179-184.
[1] 邓华梅, 袁札根, 曾德荣, 潘珊珊, 张葆青, 欧爱华, 曹学伟. 全膝关节置换术中气压止血带应用效果与影响因素分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 788-794.
[2] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[3] 林文, 王雨萱, 许嘉悦, 王矜群, 王睿娜, 何董源, 樊沛. 人工关节置换登记系统的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 834-841.
[4] 闫文, 谢兴文, 顾玉彪, 雷宁波, 马成, 于文霞, 高亚雄, 张磊. 微小RNA与全膝关节置换术后深静脉血栓的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 842-846.
[5] 王宏宇. 固定与活动平台假体在全膝关节置换术中的应用价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 871-876.
[6] 李善武, 叶永杰, 王兵, 王子呓, 银毅, 孙官军, 张大刚. 胫骨高位截骨与单髁置换的早期疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 882-888.
[7] 李辉, 吴奇, 张子琦, 张晗, 王仿, 许鹏. 日间全膝关节置换术早期疗效及标准化流程探索[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 889-892.
[8] 姚轶超, 张麒, 滕海茂, 黄攀, 吴雷涛, 韩哲. 膝关节置换术后恐动症与康复效果及社会支持的相关性[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 613-618.
[9] 樊绪国, 赵永刚. 全膝关节置换术中髌骨轨迹的研究进展及处理策略[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 701-707.
[10] 刘伦, 王云鹭, 李锡勇, 韩鹏飞, 张鹏, 李晓东. 机器人辅助膝关节单髁置换术的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 715-721.
[11] 王桂冠, 徐杰. 运动学对线在全膝关节置换术中的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 726-731.
[12] 杨依琴, 何敏仪, 杜桂菊, 刘欣, 詹文英. 膝关节置换术后康复应用基于保护动机理论的健康教育[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 741-746.
[13] 周晓强, 金宇杰, 李志强, 徐人杰, 张向鑫, 陈广祥, 虞宵. 运动学与机械学对线在全膝关节置换中的比较研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 554-559.
[14] 邵长杰, 杜晓颖, 徐奎帅, 张靓, 纪岩磊. 住院天数影响全膝关节置换术后下肢深静脉血栓形成[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 588-591.
[15] 李博, 张立茉, 乔成钢, 包金全, 白志刚, 赵文强. 全膝关节置换术下肢力线的影响因素[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 398-403.
阅读次数
全文


摘要