切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (02) : 193 -200. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2024.02.006

临床论著

全膝关节置换术中选择窄版股骨假体的影响因素
刘浩1, 郑清源1, 程龙1, 辛鹏1, 吴博2, 任鹏3, 张国强3,()   
  1. 1. 100039 北京,解放军医学院
    2. 300071 天津,南开大学医学院
    3. 100039 北京,解放军总医院第一医学中心骨科
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-12 出版日期:2024-04-01
  • 通信作者: 张国强

Factors influencing selection of relatively narrow femoral prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty

Hao Liu1, Qingyuan Zheng1, Long Cheng1, Peng Xin1, Bo Wu2, Peng Ren3, Guoqiang Zhang3,()   

  1. 1. Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100039, China
    2. Nankai University School of Medicine, Tianjin 300071, Email
    3. Department of Orthopedics, the First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
  • Received:2023-03-12 Published:2024-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Guoqiang Zhang
引用本文:

刘浩, 郑清源, 程龙, 辛鹏, 吴博, 任鹏, 张国强. 全膝关节置换术中选择窄版股骨假体的影响因素[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 193-200.

Hao Liu, Qingyuan Zheng, Long Cheng, Peng Xin, Bo Wu, Peng Ren, Guoqiang Zhang. Factors influencing selection of relatively narrow femoral prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(02): 193-200.

目的

研究膝关节形态差异性,分析两款膝关节假体系统的使用情况,并确定哪种因素与使用假体宽窄有关。

方法

回顾性收集2019年1月至2021年1月解放军总医院接受初次人工全膝关节置换术的616例患者,其中348例使用Legion膝关节假体系统(Smith&Nephew公司,美国),268例使用Unique膝关节假体系统(正天公司,天津)。仅纳入原发性膝骨关节炎的患者,排除有任何手术史或膝关节创伤病史、大量骨缺损需植骨、内/外翻畸形大于15°的患者。统计患者的性别、身高、使用假体型号等信息。用pearson相关分析、二分类logistic回归分析等方法分析性别、身高、股骨尺寸与假体宽窄选择的关系。

结果

Unique组使用最多的两个股骨假体尺寸均比Legion组更窄(58/60 vs 58/62;61/63 vs 61/66)。两组女性拥有更小更窄的股骨,汇总两组所有患者,男性左右径/前后径(ML/AP)比值为(1.08±0.03),女性约ML/AP比值为(1.07±0.03);男女之间差异有统计学意义(t=-4.75,P<0.05)。采用二分类logistic回归分析评估性别、身高、股骨尺寸对使用窄版假体的影响发现,发现性别是相关性最大的因素。在Legion组中女性使用窄版假体的概率是男性的4.41倍[OR=4.41, 95%CI(1.97,9.85),P<0.01];在Unique假体中女性是男性的7.11倍[OR=7.11,95%CI(2.71,18.61),P<0.01]。其次是股骨的尺寸,股骨尺寸越大窄版假体的使用率越大。

结论

性别之间膝关节形态存在差异,但是不管是女性还是男性都有相当多的人使用窄版的假体。应考虑种族差异,针对亚洲人群设计假体,并增加假体型号,减少型号间的差值。

Objective

To study the morphological differences of knee joints by analyzing the use of two knee prosthesis systems and determine which factors are related to the use of prosthesis width.

Methods

From January 2019 to January 2021, 616 patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty in PLA General Hospital were retrospectively collected. Among them, 348 patients used Legion knee prosthesis system (Smith&Nephew Company, USA) and 268 patients used Unique knee prosthesis system (Zhengtian Company, Tianjin). Only patients with primary knee osteoarthritis were included, and patients with any history of surgery or knee joint trauma, a large number of bone defects requiring bone grafting and varus/valgus deformity greater than 15° were excluded. Statistics of gender, height, prosthesis type and other information were made. Pearson correlation analysis and binary logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the relationship between sex, height, femur size and prosthesis width selection.

Results

The two most frequently used femoral prostheses in the Unique group were both narrower in size than those in the Legion group (58/60 vs 58/62; 61/63 vs 61/66). Women in both groups had smaller and narrower femurs. The medial-lateral/anterior-posterior(ML/AP) ratio was (1.08±0.03) in men and (1.07±0.03) in women. There was statistically significant difference between male and female (t=-4.75, P<0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the influence of gender, height, and femur size on the use of narrow prosthesis, and it was found that gender was the most relevant factor. In Legion group, women were 4.41 times more likely to use narrow prosthesis than men [OR=4.41, 95%CI (1.97, 9.85), P<0.01]. In the Unique prosthesis, women were 7.11 times more than men [OR=7.11, 95%CI (2.71, 18.61), P<0.01]. The second is the size of the femur. The larger the size of the femur, the higher the utilization rate of narrow prosthesis.

Conclusions

There are differences in knee joint morphology between males and females, but there are quite a number of women and men who use narrow prosthesis. Ethnic differences should be taken into account to design components for Asian populations and the femoral component size options should be increased with lesser increments in between sizes.

表1 两组患者一般资料(±s)
Table 1 General information of two groups of patients
图1 Legion股骨假体型号
Figure 1 Femoral prosthesis size of Legion knee prosthesis system
图2 Unique股骨假体型号
Figure 2 Femoral prosthesis size of Unique knee prosthesis system
图3 Legion组和Unique组股骨假体型号使用分布
Figure 3 Distribution of femoral prosthesis sizes in Legionand Unique groups
图4 Legion组和Unique组中使用窄版假体的性别分布
Figure 4 Gender distribution of narrow version prostheses used in LegionandUnique groups
图5 两组不同股骨型号窄版使用占比
Figure 5 The share of narrow version prostheses used in two groups of different femoral sizes
图6 两组不同身高窄版股骨假体数量。图A为Legion组不同身高假体使用情况;图B为Unique组不同身高假体使用情况;图C为Legion组男性患者不同身高假体使用情况;图D为Unique组男性患者不同身高假体使用情况;图E为Legion组女性患者不同身高假体使用情况;图F为Unique组女性患者不同身高假体使用情况
Figure 6 Number of narrow version prostheses in two groups with different heights. A is the prostheses with different heights in Legion group; B is the prostheses with different heights in Unique group; C is the prostheses prostheses of different heights in male patients in Legion group; D is the prostheses of different heights in male patients in Unique group; E is the prostheses of different heights in female patients in Legion group; F is the prostheses with different heights in female patients in Unique group
表2 两组二分类logistic回归分析数据
Table 2 Two groups of binary logistic regression analysis data
[1]
Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2007, 89(4): 780-785.
[2]
Kahlenberg CA, Nwachukwu BU, McLawhorn AS, et al. Patient satisfaction after total knee replacement: a systematic review[J]. HSS J, 2018, 14(2): 192-201.
[3]
Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, et al. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010, 468(1): 57-63.
[4]
王聪,梁钰琪,张国荣,等. 全膝关节置换术患者不满意危险因素分析[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(3): 289-293.
[5]
林博夫,李梦远,郑秋坚. 全膝关节置换术后运动学变化特征的研究进展[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(6): 712-717.
[6]
Murray DW, Frost SJ. Pain in the assessment of total knee replacement[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1998, 80(3): 426-431.
[7]
Ho WP, Cheng CK, Liau JJ. Morphometrical measurements of resected surface of femurs in Chinese knees: correlation to the sizing of current femoral implants[J]. Knee, 2006, 13(1): 12-14.
[8]
Hitt K, Shurman JR 2nd, Greene K, et al. Anthropometric measurements of the human knee: correlation to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty systems[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003, 85-A(Suppl 4): 115-122.
[9]
Xie X, Lin L, Zhu B, et al. Will gender-specific total knee arthroplasty be a better choice for women? A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2014, 24(8): 1341-1349.
[10]
Bonnin MP, Schmidt A, Basiglini L, et al. Mediolateral oversizing influences pain, function, and flexion after TKA[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2013, 21(10): 2314-2324.
[11]
Mahoney OM, Kinsey T. Overhang of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty: risk factors and clinical consequences[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2010, 92(5): 1115-1121.
[12]
Yue B, Varadarajan KM, Ai S, et al. Differences of knee anthropometry between Chinese and white men and women[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2011, 26(1): 124-130.
[13]
Cheng FB, Ji XF, Lai Y, et al. Three dimensional morphometry of the knee to design the total knee arthroplasty for Chinese population[J]. Knee, 2009, 16(5): 341-347.
[14]
Urabe K, Miura H, Kuwano T, et al. Comparison between the shape of resected femoral sections and femoral prostheses used in total knee arthroplasty in Japanese patients: simulation using three-dimensional computed tomography[J]. J Knee Surg, 2003, 16(1): 27-33.
[15]
Thomsen MG, Husted H, Bencke J, et al. Do we need a gender-specific total knee replacement? A randomised controlled trial comparing a high-flex and a gender-specific posterior design[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2012, 94(6): 787-792.
[16]
Asseln M, Hänisch C, Schick F, et al. Gender differences in knee morphology and the prospects for implant design in total knee replacement[J]. Knee, 2018, 25(4): 545-558.
[17]
Conley S, Rosenberg A, Crowninshield R. The female knee: anatomic variations[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 200715(Suppl 1): S31-S36.
[18]
Pongcharoen B, Tantarak N, Pholsawatchai W. Is standard total knee arthroplasty with lateral femoral overhanging a cause of anterior knee pain? A randomized controlled trial[J/OL]. SICOT J, 2022, 8: 3. DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2022003.
[19]
Vaidya SV, Ranawat CS, Aroojis A, et al. Anthropometric measurements to design total knee prostheses for the Indian population[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2000, 15(1): 79-85.
[20]
Bellemans J, Carpentier K, Vandenneucker H, et al. The John Insall Award: both morphotype and gender influence the shape of the knee in patients undergoing TKA[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010, 468(1): 29-36.
[21]
Mahfouz M, Abdel Fatah EE, Bowers LS, et al. Three-dimensional morphology of the knee reveals ethnic differences[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2012, 470(1): 172-185.
[22]
Yue B, Wang J, Wang Y, et al. How the gender or morphological specific TKA prosthesis improves the component fit in the Chinese population?[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2014, 29(1): 71-74.
[23]
Tanavalee A, Rojpornpradit T, Khumrak S, et al. The early results of gender-specific total knee arthroplasty in Thai patients[J]. Knee, 2011, 18(6): 483-487.
[24]
Song EK, Jung WB, Yoon TR, et al. Comparison of outcomes after bilateral simultaneous total knee arthroplasty using gender-specific and unisex knees[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2012, 27(2): 226-231.
[25]
Kim YH, Choi Y, Kim JS. Comparison of standard and gender-specific posterior-cruciate-retaining high-flexion total knee replacements: a prospective, randomised study[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2010, 92(5): 639-645.
[26]
Johnson AJ, Costa CR, Mont MA. Do we need gender-specific total joint arthroplasty?[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011, 469(7): 1852-1858.
[27]
Loures FB, de Araújo Góes RF, de Sousa EB, et al. Intraoperative morphometric study of distal femur in Brazilian patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty[J/OL]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(5): e0233715. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233715.
[28]
Budhiparama NC, Lumban-Gaol I, Ifran NN, et al. Mismatched knee implants in Indonesian and Dutch patients: a need for increasing the size[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2021, 29(2): 358-369.
[1] 卢芳连, 汤莉, 何河北, 李建云, 欧栓机, 陈燕, 陈娇妹. 责任护士主导的疼痛管理在膝关节置换术后的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 435-439.
[2] 赵锦伟, 李晓军, 刘桂宇, 荣晓玲, 黄明利, 宋文静, 高广凌, 鞠昌军. 固定平台假体膝关节单髁置换术中止血带应用策略研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 39-47.
[3] 王宏宇. 固定与活动平台假体在全膝关节置换术中的应用价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 871-876.
[4] 闫文, 谢兴文, 顾玉彪, 雷宁波, 马成, 于文霞, 高亚雄, 张磊. 微小RNA与全膝关节置换术后深静脉血栓的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 842-846.
[5] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[6] 邓华梅, 袁札根, 曾德荣, 潘珊珊, 张葆青, 欧爱华, 曹学伟. 全膝关节置换术中气压止血带应用效果与影响因素分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 788-794.
[7] 李善武, 叶永杰, 王兵, 王子呓, 银毅, 孙官军, 张大刚. 胫骨高位截骨与单髁置换的早期疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 882-888.
[8] 李辉, 吴奇, 张子琦, 张晗, 王仿, 许鹏. 日间全膝关节置换术早期疗效及标准化流程探索[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 889-892.
[9] 樊绪国, 赵永刚. 全膝关节置换术中髌骨轨迹的研究进展及处理策略[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 701-707.
[10] 姚轶超, 张麒, 滕海茂, 黄攀, 吴雷涛, 韩哲. 膝关节置换术后恐动症与康复效果及社会支持的相关性[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 613-618.
[11] 刘伦, 王云鹭, 李锡勇, 韩鹏飞, 张鹏, 李晓东. 机器人辅助膝关节单髁置换术的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 715-721.
[12] 王桂冠, 徐杰. 运动学对线在全膝关节置换术中的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 726-731.
[13] 杨依琴, 何敏仪, 杜桂菊, 刘欣, 詹文英. 膝关节置换术后康复应用基于保护动机理论的健康教育[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 741-746.
[14] 周晓强, 金宇杰, 李志强, 徐人杰, 张向鑫, 陈广祥, 虞宵. 运动学与机械学对线在全膝关节置换中的比较研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 554-559.
[15] 陈山林, 魏绮珮, 刘畅. 腕关节假体:路在何方?[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 469-475.
阅读次数
全文


摘要