切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华关节外科杂志(电子版)

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (03) : 430 -434. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2023.03.020

临床经验

年轻患者初次髋关节置换术后关节翻修的原因分析
皮颖, 王高, 张强, 黄志荣†()   
  1. 330000　南昌，江西中医药大学附属洪都中医院
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-25 出版日期:2023-06-01
  • 通信作者: 黄志荣

Factors analysis on revision surgery after total hip replacement in young patients

Ying Pi, Gao Wang, Qiang Zhang, Zhirong Huang†()   

  1. Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Nanchang Hongdu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang 330000, China
  • Received:2021-04-25 Published:2023-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Zhirong Huang
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

皮颖, 王高, 张强, 黄志荣. 年轻患者初次髋关节置换术后关节翻修的原因分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 430-434.

Ying Pi, Gao Wang, Qiang Zhang, Zhirong Huang. Factors analysis on revision surgery after total hip replacement in young patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(03): 430-434.

目的

分析40岁之前接受初次全髋置换的患者行髋关节翻修的主要原因，并与老年患者(年龄≥60岁)的翻修原因对比。

方法

回顾性分析2005年1月至2020年10月在南昌市洪都中医院接受髋关节翻修术的156例(年轻组76例，老年组80例)患者(188例髋关节)，明确患者行髋关节翻修的原因、两次手术间隔的时间和需要翻修的部分是否有区别。卡方检验分析翻修部分与初始固定方式(骨水泥或非骨水泥固定)的关系。

结果

年轻患者初次置换术后至翻修手术的平均间隔时间为(11±5)年，行初次全髋置换最常见的病因分别是：股骨头缺血性坏死、发育性髋关节发育不良、创伤性关节炎和青少年特发性关节炎。年轻患者行髋关节翻修的主要原因是：髋臼假体松动(29.4%)、聚乙烯内衬磨损(20.6%)和股骨假体松动(18.6%)。老年患者髋关节翻修的最常见的原因分别是：术后脱位(26.7%)、感染(20.9%)、髋臼假体松动(16.3%)。在年轻患者中，假体松动需翻修的部分与初始固定方式的差异无统计学意义(χ2＝0.146，P>0.05)。

结论

髋臼假体松动、聚乙烯磨损和股骨假体松动是年轻患者翻修的常见原因；与高龄患者翻修原因相比，术后脱位和感染的发生率较低。

关键词: 关节成形术，置换，髋, 再手术, 假体失效, 关节不稳定性
Objective

To analyze the main causess for hip revision in patients who have primary total hip replacement(THA) under 40 years old, and to compare with the elderly (age≥60 years).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 156 patients (76 in the young group and 80 in the elderly group) who underwent revision hip arthroplasty at Nanchang Hongdu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2005 to October 2020. Clinical data of 188 hip joints (102 hips in the young group and 86 hips in the elderly group) were collected to clarify the reasons for hip revision, the time between two operations, and the difference in the revision part. Chi-square test was applied to analyze the relationship between revision parts and the fixation methods of primary THA (bone cement or cementless prostheses).

Results

The average interval between primary THA and revision surgery in the young group was(11±5)years. The most common causes of primary THA were: avascular necrosis of the femoral head, developmental dysplasia of the hip, traumatic arthritis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis. The causes for hip revision in the young group were: acetabular prosthesis loosening(29.4%), polyethylene liner wear(20.6%)and femoral prosthesis loosening(18.6%). The most common reasons for revision in the elderly group were: postoperative dislocation(26.7%), infection(20.9%), and loosening of the acetabular prosthesis(16.3%). In the young group, the revision part of prosthesis was not related to the fixation method in primary THA (χ2=0.146, P>0.05).

Conclusions

After primary THA, acetabular prosthesis loosening, polyethylene wear and femoral prosthesis loosening are the common causes of revision in young patients; while the incidences of postoperative dislocation and infection are lower in the youth than that in the elderly.

Key words: Arthroplasty, replacement, hip, Reoperation, Prosthesis failure, Joint, instability
表1 研究人群的人口统计特征
Table 1 Demographic characteristics of the study population
组别Groups 例数Number of cases 初次THA至翻修手术时间[年，(±s)]Interval between primary THA and revision surgery 女性Female 使用糖皮质激素或生物制剂Glucorticoids or biologics
是Yes 否None 未记录No record
青年组Young group 76 11±5 46 28 40 8
老年组Elderly group 80 7±6 38 17 50 13
统计值   t＝2.017 χ2＝2.661 χ2＝4.891
P值   <0.05 >0.05 >0.05
图1 青年组按初始诊断分层的翻修原因注：AVN-股骨头缺血性坏死坏死；DDH-发育性髋关节发育不良；PTA-创伤后关节炎；OA-骨性关节炎；RA-类风湿关节炎
Figure 1 Causes for revision surgery in the young group stratified by primary diagnosis
图2 老年组按初始诊断分层的翻修原因注：AVN-股骨头缺血性坏死坏死；DDH-发育性髋关节发育不良；PTA-创伤后关节炎；OA-骨性关节炎；RA－类风湿关节炎
Figure 2 Causes for revision surgery in the elderly group stratified by primary diagnosis
表2 两组患者髋关节翻修原因的对比分析[例(%)]
Table 2 Comparative analysis of the reasons for hip joint revision between two groups
组别Groups 例数Number of cases 翻修原因
髋臼假体松动Loosening of acetabular prosthesis 股骨假体松动Loosening of femoral prosthesis 感染Infection 脱位Dislocation 聚乙烯磨损Wearing of polyethylene 假体周围骨折Periprosthetic fractures 全髋假体松动Loosening of total prostheses
青年组Young group 76 30(29.4) 19(18.6) 8(7.8) 13(12.7) 21(20.6) 5(4.9) 6(5.9)
老年组Elderly group 80 14(16.3) 7(8.1) 18(20.9) 23(26.7) 8(9.3) 11(12.8) 5(4.8)
χ2值       24.968        
P值       <0.001        
图3 初次THA(全髋关节置换)术后髋臼侧假体无菌性松动翻修前后双髋关节X线片。图A为双髋关节正位片，示侧人工全髋关节置换术后髋臼假体松动，患侧肢体短缩；图B为术后复查双髋正位片，示术后翻修假体固定牢靠，双下肢基本等长
Figure 3 Anterio-posterior views of bilateral hips of X rays before and after the revision surgery of aseptic prosthetic loosening on the acetabular side after the primary THA. A is the X ray image before the revision surgery, showing the loosening of the acetabular prosthesis and shortening of the affected limb after the right primary THA; B is the X ray image after the revision surgery, showing the revised prosthesis was firmly fixed and both lower limbs were equal in length.
表3 青年组假体初始固定方式与假体翻修部位(例)
Table 3 Primary fixation methods of prostheses in the young group and the revision parts
固定方式Fixation methods 例数Number of cases 翻修的部位Revision parts
髋臼侧Acetabular side 股骨侧Femoral side 全髋Total hip prostheses
股骨和髋臼侧均生物型Cementless components on both sides 31 19 10 2
髋臼侧生物型+股骨侧水泥型Cementless acetabular component + cemented femoral component 20 8 9 3
髋臼和股骨侧均水泥型Cemented components on both sides 4 3 0 1
χ2值   0.146    
P值   >0.05    
[1]
Kaneko S, Takegami Y, Seki T, et al. Surgery trends for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a fifteen-year multi-centre study in Japan[J]. Int Orthop, 2020, 44(4): 761－769.
[2]
Khatod M, Barber T, Paxton E, et al. An analysis of the risk of hip dislocation with a contemporary total joint registry[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2006, 447：19－23.
[3]
Tsukanaka M, Halvorsen V, Nordsletten L, et al. Implant survival and radiographic outcome of total hip replacement in patients less than 20 years old[J]. Acta Orthop, 2016, 87(5): 479－484.
[4]
Kim YH, Choi Y, Kim JS. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with ceramic-on-ceramic bearing in patients younger than 45 years with femoral-head osteonecrosis[J]. Int Orthop, 2010, 34(8): 1123－1127.
[5]
Firestone DE, Callaghan JJ, Liu SS, et al. Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2007, 89(1): 126－132.
[6]
Bozic KJ, Kamath AF, Ong K, et al. Comparative epidemiology of revision arthroplasty: failed THA poses greater clinical and economic burdens than failed TKA[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2015, 473(6): 2131－2138.
[7]
Zhang L, Zhou YX, Zhou XH, et al. Analysis of the failure mechanisms of the revision hip arthroplasties[J]. Chin J Surg, 2009, 47(3): 164－167.
[8]
Guo SJ, Zhou YX, Zhang L, et al. An investigation on failure mechanisms of primary 327 hip arthroplasties[J]. Chin J Surg, 2009, 47(3): 168－171.
[9]
Grübl A, Chiari C, Gruber M, et al. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with a tapered，rectangular titanium stem and a threaded cup：a minimum ten-year follow-up[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2002, 84(3): 425－431.
[10]
Solomon MI, Dall DM, Learmonth ID, et al. Survivorship of cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients 50 years of age or younger[J]. J Arthroplasty, 1992, 7 Suppl: 347－352.
[11]
Cordtz RL, Zobbe K, Højgaard P, et al. Predictors of revision，prosthetic joint infection and mortality following total hip or total knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis：a nationwide cohort study using Danish healthcare registers[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2018, 77(2): 281－288.
[12]
Johnson AJ, Mont MA, Tsao AK, et al. Treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis in the United States: 16-year analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014, 472(2): 617－623.
[13]
Alberton GM, High WA, Morrey BF. Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty：an analysis of risk factors and treatment options[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2002, 84(10): 1788－1792.
[14]
Prodinger PM, Schauwecker J, Mühlhofer H, et al. Hip dislocation after revision arthroplasty：Risk assessment and treatment strategies[J]. Orthopade, 2017, 46(2): 133－141.
[15]
Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klässbo M, et al. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) － validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement[J/OL]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2003, 4: 10. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-4-10.
[1] 金鑫, 谢卯, 刘芸, 杨操, 杨述华, 许伟华. 个性化股骨导向器辅助初次全髋关节置换的随机对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 780-787.
[2] 孟繁宇, 周新社, 赵志, 裴立家, 刘犇. 侧位直接前方入路髋关节置换治疗偏瘫肢体股骨颈骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 865-870.
[3] 谭俊, 詹丽娟, 吴凌霄, 蔡可晗, 江旭, 陈涛, 许建中. 保留部分假体的翻修术治疗慢性髋关节假体周围感染[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 318-325.
[4] 王波, 许珂, 刘林, 张斌飞, 庄岩, 许鹏. 全髋关节置换术在老年髋臼骨折中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 385-390.
[5] 王博永, 张飞洋, 沈灏. 全髋关节置换术后假体周围骨折研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 391-397.
[6] 彭胜男, 李志伟, 徐静, 彭晓星, 蒋微. 髂筋膜阻滞复合全身麻醉在全髋关节置换术中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 195-200.
[7] 王启中, 李辉. 全髋关节置换术中假体位置安全区的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 261-266.
[8] 吴聪, 刘伦, 贾全忠. 老年股骨颈骨折初次全髋关节置换近期疗效影响因素[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 283-287.
[9] 陈丽冰, 欧会芝, 陆映霞. 基于配偶支持的个案管理在全髋关节置换患者中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 292-296.
[10] 陈浩斌, 曾小龙, 谢珍艳, 钟国庆, 何学程, 周欣羽, 黄文汉, 张余. 全身关节过度活动青年步行时踝关节运动学特征[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 19-28.
[11] 江钰璇, 陈颖, 周钟明, 温宝泓, 陈文韬, 钟国庆, 张余, 李丽萍. 全身关节过度活动的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 52-59.
[12] 唐林, 吴颖斌, 潘恩豪, 卢伟杰. 发育性髋关节发育不良全髋置换髋臼假体放置的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 65-70.
[13] 王鑫光, 李杨, 何宜蓁, 田华. 3D打印技术在膝关节置换翻修术中的应用研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 93-97.
[14] 孙强, 郭晓忠, 王冉东, 李兵, 岳聚安, 刘忘言, 陈蛟. 双粗通道减压植骨+结构性骨支撑治疗早期股骨头坏死疗效分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(06): 490-495.
[15] 王向, 张永杰. 胆管损伤修复后再狭窄原因与处理[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 131-136.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号