切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华关节外科杂志(电子版)

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (03) : 424 -429. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2023.03.019

临床经验

改良加强减张无结缝线桥技术治疗肩袖撕裂合并冻结肩
李程, 朱梁, 庞勇, 张星晨, 查国春, 郭开今†()   
  1. 221006　徐州医科大学附属医院关节外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-23 出版日期:2023-06-01
  • 通信作者: 郭开今

Modified load sharing rip-stop and knotless suture bridge technique for rotator cuff tear repair in frozen shoulder

Cheng Li, Liang Zhu, Yong Pang, Xingchen Zhang, Guochun Zha, Kaijin Guo†()   

  1. The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Department of Orthopedics, Xuzhou 221006, China
  • Received:2022-06-23 Published:2023-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Kaijin Guo
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

李程, 朱梁, 庞勇, 张星晨, 查国春, 郭开今. 改良加强减张无结缝线桥技术治疗肩袖撕裂合并冻结肩[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 424-429.

Cheng Li, Liang Zhu, Yong Pang, Xingchen Zhang, Guochun Zha, Kaijin Guo. Modified load sharing rip-stop and knotless suture bridge technique for rotator cuff tear repair in frozen shoulder[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(03): 424-429.

目的

比较关节镜下松解联合改良加强减张无结缝线桥技术或传统无结缝线桥技术治疗肩袖撕裂合并冻结肩的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2017年6月至2020年6月，徐州医科大学附属医院关节外科采用关节镜下松解联合改良加强减张无结缝线桥技术(改良组30例)和传统无结缝线桥技术(传统组33例)治疗肩袖撕裂合并冻结肩的患者63例。采用t检验比较两组患者术前和末次随访时的疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)，美国加州大学肩关节评分(UCLA)、美国肩肘外科医师学会评分(ASES)和肩关节活动度。根据肩关节MRI影像学Sugaya分型标准评估肩袖愈合情况，比较两组术后肩袖再撕裂发生率。

结果

患者术后随访(21±8)个月。两组患者在一般资料方面差异均无统计学意义(均为P>0. 05)。两组患者术前肩关节活动度差异无统计学意义(均为P>0. 05)。末次随访时，改良组的前屈、外展、体侧外旋优于传统组(t＝3.750、3.244、2.554、均为P<0. 05)。两组患者术前VAS、UCLA和ASES评分差异均无统计学意义(均为P>0. 05)。末次随访时，改良组VAS、UCLA、ASES评分均优于传统组(t＝2.405、3.884、3.899，均为P<0. 05)；改良组再撕裂为0，传统组再撕裂率为21.2%(χ2＝5.172，P＝0.023)。

结论

对于肩袖撕裂合并冻结肩的患者，关节镜下松解联合改良加强减张无结缝线桥技术较传统无结缝线桥技术能获得更好的肩关节活动度和功能，疼痛减轻更明显，肩袖再撕裂发生率更低。

关键词: 关节镜, 肩关节, 滑囊炎, 缝合技术
Objective

To compare the efficacy of arthroscopic release combined with modified load sharing rip-stop and knotless suture bridge technique and traditional knotless suture bridge technique for rotator cuff tear repair in frozen shoulder.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 63 patients with rotator cuff tear and frozen shoulder treated by arthroscopic release combined with modified load sharing rip-stop and knotless suture bridge technique (modified group, 30 cases) or traditional knotless suture bridge technique (traditional group, 33 cases) in the Joint Surgery Department of Xuzhou Medical University Affiliated Hospital from June 2017 to June 2020. Visual analogue scale (VAS), the University of California shoulder joint score (UCLA), the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and range of motion of shoulder joint in the two groups were compared using t tests before surgery and at the last follow-up. The healing of the rotator cuff was evaluated by the Sugaya classification for shoulder joint MRI imaging, and the re-tearing incidence of rotator cuff after surgery was also compared.

Results

The patients were followed up for (21 ±8) months. There was no statistically significant difference in general information between the two groups (all P>0.05). No statistically significant difference was found in the range of motion of shoulder joint between the two groups before operation (all P>0.05). At the last follow-up, the modified group had better flexion, abduction, and lateral rotation than the traditional group (t=3.750, 3.244, 2.554, all P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in preoperative VAS, UCLA, nor ASES scores between the two groups (all P>0 05). At the last follow-up, the VAS, UCLA, and ASES scores of the modified group were better than those of the traditional group (t=2.405, 3.884, 3.899, all P<0.05). No re-tearing occurred in modified group, while the re-tearing rate of traditional group was 21.2% (χ2=5.172, P=0.023).

Conclusion

For patients of rotator cuff tear combined with frozen shoulder, arthroscopic release combined with modified load sharing rip-stop and knotless suture bridge technique can achieve better shoulder joint mobility and function compared to traditional knotless suture bridge technique, with more effective pain relief and lower incidence of re-tearing of rotator cuff.

Key words: Arthroscope, Shoulder joint, Bursitis, Suture techniques
图1 传统无结缝线桥技术示意图。图A示置入两枚内排锚钉，4根线尾均匀地缝过肩袖；图B示4根线尾穿入1枚外排锚钉，拉紧缝线后置入外排锚钉；图C示4根线尾分别穿入2枚外排锚钉并拉紧后置入外排锚钉
Figure 1 Schematic diagram of traditional knotless suture bridge technique. A shows insert two medial row anchors are inserted, the remaining four sutures are evenly sewed over the rotator cuff; B shows four sutures are set into one lateral anchor and fastened; C shows four sutures are set into two lateral anchors and fastened
图2 改良加强减张无结缝线桥技术示意图。图A置入2枚内排锚钉，4根蓝色缝线均匀地缝过肩袖，2根绿色缝线分别在蓝色缝线区域两侧各缝一针；图B~C示绿色缝线打结固定，减张缩小撕裂口，蓝色缝线的线尾穿入1枚或2枚外排锚钉并拉紧后置入外排锚钉
Figure 2 Schematic diagram of modified load sharing rip-stop and knotless suture bridge technique. A shows two medial anchors are placed, and four blue sutures are evenly sewed over the rotator cuff, the remaining two green sutures are sewed on each side of the blue sutures; B and C show that the green sutures are tied and fastened to optimize the load sharing and narrow the tear, then the four blue sutures are set into one or two lateral anchors and fastened
表1 两组患者一般资料比较
Table 1 Comparison of general information between two groups
分组Groups 例数Number of cases 年龄[岁，(±s)]Age 性别(男/女)Gender (male/female) 侧别(左/右)Affected side (left/right) 撕裂大小(例)Size of tear
小small 中medium 大large
改良组Modified group 30 57±11 13/17 11/19 12 10 8
传统组Traditional group 33 58±10 11/22 16/17 14 9 10
统计值   t＝0.410 χ2＝0.666 χ2＝0.896 χ2＝0.286
P值   >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05
分组Groups 例数Number of cases 外伤史(有/无)History of trauma (yes/ no) 吸烟史(有/无)Smoking (yes/ no) 注射类固醇激素(有/无)Steroid injections (yes/ no) 病程Course of disease[个月，(±s)] 随访时间Follow-up time[个月，(±s)]
改良组Modified group 30 16/14 4/26 2/28 10±5 20±7
传统组Traditional group 33 20/13 3/30 4/29 11±6 22±8
统计值   χ2＝0.339 χ2＝0.286 χ2＝0.543 t＝0.680 t＝0.941
P值   >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05
表2 两组患者肩关节活动度[°，(±s)]
Table 2 Range of motion of shoulder joint in two groups
分组Groups 例数Number of cases 前屈Flexion 外展Abduction 体侧位外旋External rotation at side
术前Before surgery 末次随访Final follow-up 术前Before surgery 末次随访Final follow-up 术前Before surgery 末次随访Final follow-up
改良组Modified group 30 115±18 159±12 103±17 148±11 21±11 53±13
传统组Traditional group 33 116±18 148±13 106±17 138±13 21±12 45±11
t值   0.303 3.750 0.629 3.244 0.234 2.554
P值   >0.05 <0.001 >0.05 0.002 >0.05 0.013
表3 两组患者VAS、UCLA、ASES评分及肩袖再撕裂情况
Table 3 VAS, UCLA, ASES scores and rotator cuff retearing rate in two groups
分组Groups 例数Number of cases VAS(±s) UCLA(±s) ASES(±s) 肩袖再撕裂(愈合/再撕裂)Rotator cuff retear (healed/retear)
术前Before surgery 末次随访Final follow-up 术前Before surgery 末次随访Final follow-up 术前Before surgery 末次随访Final follow-up
改良组Modified group 30 7.0±1.6 1.3±0.8 14.9±2.9 31.0±3.2 39.4±6.5 88.1±9.5 30/0
传统组Traditional group 33 6.8±1.5 1.8±0.8 15.3±3.1 27.6±3.9 41.2±7.2 79.2±8.6 26/7
统计值   t ＝0.699 t＝2.405 t＝0.619 t ＝3.884 t＝1.027 t ＝3.899 χ2＝5.172
P值   >0.05 0.019 >0.05 <0.001 >0.05 <0.001 0.023
图3 右肩袖撕裂合并冻结肩，行关节镜下松解联合改良加强减张无结缝线桥技术修复肩袖。图A为术前右肩关节MRI，示冈上肌腱撕裂；图B为术中关节镜下示肩袖撕裂；图C示置入两枚内排锚钉；图D示缝线减张缝合裂口并打结固定；图E示4根缝线尾分别穿入2枚外排锚钉后拉紧固定；图F为术后12个月MRI，示肩袖愈合为Sugaya分型Ⅰ型
Figure 3 Rotator cuff tear in right shoulder with frozen shoulder, that was repaired by arthroscopy release combined with modified load sharing rip-stop and knotless suture bridge technique.A is MRI of right shoulder joint before operation, showing supraspinatus tendon tear; B is intraoperative arthroscopic image, showing rotator cuff tear; C shows that two medial anchors were inserted; D shows that the tear of rotator cuff was sutured by load sharing rip-stop method and the sutures were tied fixed; E shows that the four sutures were set into two lateral anchors, fastened and fixed; F is MRI at 12 months after surgery, showing the rotator cuff healed as Sugaya's classification type I
[1]
Cho NS, Rhee YG.Functional outcome of arthroscopic repair with concomitant manipulation in rotator cuff tears with stiff shoulder[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2008, 36(7): 1323－1329.
[2]
Ho WP, Huang CH, Chiu CC, et al. One-stage arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears with shoulder stiffness[J]. Arthroscopy, 2013, 29(8): 1283－1291.
[3]
Takeuchi Y, Sugaya H, Takahashi N, et al. Repair integrity and retear pattern after arthroscopic medial knot-tying after suture-bridge lateral row rotator cuff repair[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2020, 48(10): 2510－2517.
[4]
Brown BS, Cooper AD, McIff TE, et al. Initial fixation and cyclic loading stability of knotless suture anchors for rotator cuff repair[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2008, 17(2): 313－318.
[5]
Burkhart SS. Shoulder arthroscopy. new concepts[J]. Clin Sports Med, 1996, 15(4): 635－653.
[6]
Weber M, Prim J, Bugglin R, et al. Long-term follow up to patients with frozen shoulder after mobilization under anesthesia, with special reference to the rotator cuff[J]. Clin Rheumatol, 1995, 14(6): 686－691.
[7]
Gladstone J, Bishop J, Lo I, et al. Fatty Infiltration and atrophy of the rotator cuff do not improve after rotator cuff repair and correlate with poor functional outcome[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2007, 35: 719－728.
[8]
刘玉雷，闫辉，肖健，等. 关节镜下缝合桥双排固定技术治疗肩袖全层撕裂的初步疗效[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2011, 5(6): 710－714.
[9]
张智勉，何河北，向孝兵，等. 关节镜下缝线桥技术治疗巨大肩袖撕裂的临床研究[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(5): 601－607.
[10]
Elbuluk AM, Coxe FR, Fabricant PD, et al. Does medial-row fixation technique affect the retear rate and functional outcomes after double-row transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair？[J]. Orthop J Sports Med, 2019, 7(5): 2325967119842881.
[11]
Honda H, Gotoh M, Mitsui Y, et al. Clinical and structural outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a comparison between suture bridge techniques with or without medial knot tying[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2018, 13(1): 297.
[12]
Kim KC, Shin HD, Lee WY, et al. Clinical outcomes and repair integrity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using suture-bridge technique with or without medial tying: prospective comparative study[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2018, 13(1): 1－8.
[13]
Kim KC, Rhee KJ, Shin HD, et al. A modified suture-bridge technique for a marginal dog-ear deformity caused during rotator cuff repair[J]. Arthroscopy, 2007, 23(5): 562.e1－562.e4.
[14]
Brislin KJ, Field LD, Savoie FH 3rd. Complications after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair[J]. Arthroscopy, 2007, 23(2): 124－128.
[15]
吴剑，陈俊，刘艳西，等. 快速康复外科理念在关节镜下治疗肩袖损伤中的应用[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(1): 102－106.
[1] 夏传龙, 迟健, 丛强, 连杰, 崔峻, 陈彦玲. 富血小板血浆联合关节镜治疗半月板损伤的临床疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 877-881.
[2] 欧阳剑锋, 李炳权, 叶永恒, 胡少宇, 向阳. 关节镜联合富血小板血浆治疗粘连性肩周炎的疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 765-772.
[3] 肖志满, 龚煜, 谢景凌, 刘斌伟. 上下肢关节镜手术后患者下肢深静脉血栓发生的对比研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 601-606.
[4] 杨国栋, 张辉, 郭珈, 曲迪, 张静, 戚超. 外侧半月板后角撕裂是否修复的术后疗效对比[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 619-624.
[5] 马鹏程, 刘伟, 张思平. 股骨髋臼撞击综合征关节镜手术中闭合关节囊的疗效影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 653-662.
[6] 陈宏兴, 张立军, 张勇, 李虎, 周驰, 凡一诺. 膝骨关节炎关节镜清理术后中药外用疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 663-672.
[7] 邢阳, 何爱珊, 康焱, 杨子波, 孟繁钢, 邬培慧. 前交叉韧带单束联合前外侧结构重建的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 508-519.
[8] 吴俊贤, 曾俊杰, 许有银, 苑博. 体外冲击波疗法辅助治疗肩袖修补术后关节僵硬[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 571-576.
[9] 齐伟亚, 方杰, 吴衡, 刘波. 掌侧小切口联合腕关节镜治疗AO－C型桡骨远端骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 577-582.
[10] 米洁, 陈晨, 李佳玲, 裴海娜, 张恒博, 李飞, 李东杰. 儿童头面部外伤特点分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 511-515.
[11] 蓝青楠, 俞金龙, 余捷, 何首华, 翁起宁, 罗桂芝, 邹琦, 邹兆伟. 改良两针法连续缝合在回肠单腔造口术中的应用[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 278-281.
[12] 杨大威, 张鑫. 肩关节上方悬吊复合体损伤研究进展[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 193-197.
[13] 龙珂, 戴祝, 刘全辉. 关节镜下肩袖修补联合喙突成形治疗肩袖撕裂合并喙突下囊肿[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 198-203.
[14] 郑翰, 丁国强, 谢鹏, 卢冰. 切开Latarjet手术治疗复发性肩关节前脱位的随访研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 204-211.
[15] 张镇斌, 闫兆龙, 王功腾, 张文琦, 王旭凤, 李广兴, 孙华强, 李树锋. 关节镜对胫骨高位截骨术治疗膝骨关节炎的效果研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 218-225.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号