切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (02) : 277 -279. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2024.02.017

临床经验

比较不同类型假体用于骨质疏松症的老年股骨颈骨折
卢国良1, 潘耀成1,()   
  1. 1. 528000 佛山市中医院创伤骨科
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-28 出版日期:2024-04-01
  • 通信作者: 潘耀成

Comparison of different prostheses types in femoral neck fractures of elderly patients with osteoporosis

Guoliang Lu1, Yaocheng Pan1,()   

  1. 1. Orthopedics Department of Trauma, Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan 528000, China
  • Received:2023-04-28 Published:2024-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Yaocheng Pan
引用本文:

卢国良, 潘耀成. 比较不同类型假体用于骨质疏松症的老年股骨颈骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 277-279.

Guoliang Lu, Yaocheng Pan. Comparison of different prostheses types in femoral neck fractures of elderly patients with osteoporosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(02): 277-279.

目的

对比骨质疏松症(OP)老年股骨颈骨折患者使用不同类型假体的效果。

方法

回顾性分析佛山市中医院收治的91例患者的临床资料,采用非骨水泥型股骨假体42例(非骨水泥组)、骨水泥型股骨假体者有49例(骨水泥组)。对比两组手术相关指标、患侧髋关节功能、并发症。计量资料采用t检验,计数资料采用卡方检验。

结果

骨水泥组术后下地时间和术后完全负重时间均短于非骨水泥组(t=9.484、3.646,均为P<0.05);骨水泥组术后髋关节功能评分均高于非骨水泥组(t=7.626、6.891,均为P<0.05);骨水泥组并发症发生率低于非骨水泥组(校正χ2=4.623,P<0.05)。

结论

对老年伴OP的股骨颈骨折患者采用骨水泥型股骨假体进行髋关节置换较非骨水泥型股骨假体更具优势。

Objective

To compare the application effect of cementless femoral prosthesis and cemented femoral prosthesis in hip replacement for femoral neck fracture of elderly patients with osteoporosis (OP).

Methods

The clinical data of 91 elderly patients with femoral neck fracture with OP from Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine were retrospectively analyzed. They were all treated with hip replacement, and 42 cases were treated with non cemented femoral prosthesis (the non-cemented group) and 49 cases were treated with cemented femoral prosthesis (the cemented group). The operation related indexes, hip function of affected side and complications were compared between the two groups. Measurement data were analyzed using t tests, while count data were analyzed using chi square tests.

Results

The ambulance time and full weight-bearing in the cemented group was shorter than the non-cemented group (t=9.484, 3.646, both P <0.05). The hip function scores of the cemented group after operation were higher than those in the non-cemented group (t=7.626, 6.891, both P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the cemented group was lower than that in the non-cemented group (corrected χ2=4.623, P<0.05).

Conclusion

The use of bone cement femoral prosthesis for hip replacement is more advantageous than non bone cement femoral prosthesis for elderly patients with femoral neck fracture accompanied by OP.

表1 两组手术相关指标对比(±s)
Table 1 Comparison of surgical related indicators between two groups
表2 两组患侧髋关节功能对比(±s)
Table 2 Function comparison of on the affected hip joint between two groups
[1]
张立海. 老年骨质疏松骨折的现状和挑战[J]. 中华老年多器官疾病杂志2020, 19(7): 481-484.
[2]
黄永湘,李宝林,唐爱民,等. 老年股骨颈骨折患者使用骨水泥型和生物型假体行股骨头置换术的疗效对比[J]. 创伤外科杂志2020, 22(2): 151-152.
[3]
Mercier Lonnie R.原著//戴闽,姚浩群主译. 实用骨科学精要[M]. 6版. 北京:人民军医出版社,2016: 178-182.
[4]
Jørgensen PB, Lamm M, Søballe K, et al. Equivalent hip stem fixation by Hi-Fatigue G and Palacos R+G bone cement: a randomized radiostereometric controlled trial of 52 patients with 2 years′ follow-up[J]. Acta Orthop, 2019, 90(3): 237-242.
[5]
Scanelli JA, Reiser GR, Sloboda JF, et al. Cemented femoral component use in hip arthroplasty[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2019, 27(4): 119-127.
[6]
思玉楼,刘娥,杨涛. 老年股骨颈骨折双侧同期非骨水泥型与骨水泥型人工全髋关节置换术临床疗效比较[J]. 医学临床研究2018, 35(1): 52-55.
[7]
浦飞飞,张志才,邵增务,等. 骨水泥型与非骨水泥型假体置换治疗膝关节周围骨肉瘤的疗效评价[J]. 中国骨与关节杂志2021, 10(2): 107-110.
[8]
Hines CB, Collins-Yoder A. Bone cement implantation syndrome: key concepts for perioperative nurses[J]. AORN J, 2019, 109(2): 202-216.
[9]
Pritchett J. Large diameter total hip replacement for acute displaced femoral neck fracture[J]. J Long Term Eff Med Implants, 2019, 29(1): 71-78.
[1] 钟向娣, 任婷婷, 任丽, 刘梦碟, 周娅颖, 游月梅, 张琳玲. 全髋关节置换护理的可视化分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 256-263.
[2] 欧梁, 齐麒, 胡伟伟, 卢敏, 黄彦昌, 黄维琛, 匡建军. 股骨颈动力交叉钉系统与其它内固定治疗股骨颈骨折对比[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 92-105.
[3] 潘韩丽, 何静, 陈媛媛, 贾梦瑶, 赵兴, 杨佩. 机器人辅助全髋关节置换围手术期应用加速康复护理[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 142-146.
[4] 中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组, 广东省医学会骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病分会, 广东省佛山市顺德区第三人民医院. 中国髋部脆性骨折术后抗骨质疏松药物临床干预指南(2023年版)[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 751-764.
[5] 金鑫, 谢卯, 刘芸, 杨操, 杨述华, 许伟华. 个性化股骨导向器辅助初次全髋关节置换的随机对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 780-787.
[6] 孟繁宇, 周新社, 赵志, 裴立家, 刘犇. 侧位直接前方入路髋关节置换治疗偏瘫肢体股骨颈骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 865-870.
[7] 王岩, 马剑雄, 郎爽, 董本超, 田爱现, 李岩, 孙磊, 靳洪震, 卢斌, 王颖, 柏豪豪, 马信龙. 外泌体在骨质疏松症诊疗中应用的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 673-678.
[8] 浦路桥, 徐永清, 齐保闯, 施洪鑫, 林玮, 卜鹏飞, 白艳, 唐志方, 李川. 中国髋部脆性骨折术后抗骨质疏松药物临床干预指南(2023年版)计划书[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 747-750.
[9] 陆宜仙, 张震涛, 夏德萌, 王家林. 巨噬细胞极化在骨质疏松中调控作用及机制的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 538-541.
[10] 宋红霞, 杨英, 陈芳. 老年COPD患者并发骨质疏松症相关危险因素的研究进展[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(06): 895-898.
[11] 肖伍豪, 刘抗寒. 晚期慢性肾脏病患者骨质疏松症的治疗研究进展[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 92-96.
[12] 冉仁国, 罗政, 廖鑫, 张付民. 低频脉冲电磁场对骨质疏松性胸腰椎骨折内固定术后康复的促进作用[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 39-45.
[13] 金浪, 石洁, 黄正, 贾永伟, 张建坡, 魏礼成, 金昊雷. 3D打印数字技术辅助改良交叉PVP对重度骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折脊柱-骨盆矢状面平衡状态的影响[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 263-268.
[14] 王娟, 高俊, 周伊兰, 李小红, 史兵伟, 潘美珍. 血清IL-2、IL-17和骨密度关系及其对骨质疏松症的预测价值[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 295-300.
[15] 邸文佳, 牛爱原. 基于东亚人群的肝硬化与骨质疏松症相关性研究[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2024, 11(01): 40-44.
阅读次数
全文


摘要