切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (04) : 425 -430. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2022.04.007

临床论著

不同股神经阻滞对全膝关节置换术后疼痛和肌力的影响
王鑫光1, 侯毅2, 李杨1, 董子漾1, 何宜蓁1, 田华1,()   
  1. 1. 100191 北京大学第三医院骨科;100191 北京,骨与关节精准医学教育部工程研究中心
    2. 450003 郑州,河南省人民医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-24 出版日期:2022-08-01
  • 通信作者: 田华
  • 基金资助:
    北京大学第三医院临床重点项目(BYSYZD2019012)

Comparison of pain and muscle strength between different femoral nerve block after total knee arthroplasty

Xinguang Wang1, Yi Hou2, Yang Li1, Ziyang Dong1, Yizhen He1, Hua Tian1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine, Beijing 100191, China
    2. Department of Orthopedics, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou 450003, China
  • Received:2022-01-24 Published:2022-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Hua Tian
引用本文:

王鑫光, 侯毅, 李杨, 董子漾, 何宜蓁, 田华. 不同股神经阻滞对全膝关节置换术后疼痛和肌力的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 425-430.

Xinguang Wang, Yi Hou, Yang Li, Ziyang Dong, Yizhen He, Hua Tian. Comparison of pain and muscle strength between different femoral nerve block after total knee arthroplasty[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(04): 425-430.

目的

比较连续股神经阻滞(CFNB)与单次股神经阻滞(SFNB)联合关节腔周围注射(PAI)对全膝关节置换术(TKA)术后早期疼痛和肌力的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2020年1月至2020年12月期间于北京大学第三医院骨科行TKA的患者资料。纳入由同一工作组完成手术及围术期管理且麻醉方式为椎管内麻醉的单侧初次TKA的患者,并排除同侧膝关节有既往手术史、膝关节严重内外翻畸形或严重关节外畸形、术前肌力和肌张力异常患者。患者按镇痛方案分为CFNB组和联合组;比较患者一般信息、手术时间、额外镇痛药物比例及下肢深静脉血栓(DVT)、留置管脱落、阻滞区域感染等并发症差异。分析术后12、24、48、72 h疼痛程度及股四头肌肌力差异。所得数据使用独立样本t检验、卡方检验、Kruskal-Wallis检验、Wilcoxon符号秩检验或方差分析进行统计学分析。

结果

共纳入患者144例(CFNB组65例,联合组79例)。两组患者的一般信息、手术时间、额外镇痛药物比例和DVT发生率差异无统计学意义(均为P>0.05);所有患者均未出现留置管脱落、阻滞区域感染等并发症。两组患者12 h和72 h自评视觉模拟评分(VAS)差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后24 h和48 h,CFNB组VAS评分[(1.8±1.3)、(2.6±0.8)]低于联合组[(3.2±0.7)、(4.0±0.8)](t =-7.670、10.250,均为P<0.001)。两组患者术后12 h时的肌力差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),CFNB组24、48、72 h的肌力低于联合组(H=62.944、88.486、120.694,均为P<0.01)。

结论

在TKA术后早期,SFNB联合PAI可以达到与CFNB相同的临床镇痛效果,但联合组患者股四头肌肌力恢复更快,且DVT发生风险更小,是TKA术后可取的镇痛方式之一。

Objective

To explore the difference of pain and muscle strength between continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB)and single femoral nerve block combined (SFNB) with periarticular injection (PAI) in the early stage after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to evaluate their analgesic effect and performance in functional rehabilitation.

Methods

The data of the patients using continuous femoral nerve block and single femoral nerve block combined with periarticular injection after TKA in Peking University Third Hospital from January 2020 to December 2020 were retrospectively collected. The patients who underwent unilateral primary TKA with intraspinal anesthesia and perioperative management by the same surgical group were included. The patients who had knee surgery history, severe varus deformity, valgus deformity or extra-articular deformity, and abnormal muscle strength and muscle tension were excluded. The patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into two groups according to analgesia plan: the CFNB group and the combined group. The differences of demographic data, surgical time and additional analgesic were studied between the two groups. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of lower extremity, accidental pullout of nerve block catheter, infection in the area of nerve block catheter and other complications during hospitalization were analyzed. The degrees of pain and muscle strength of quadriceps were recorded at 12, 24, 48 and 72h after surgery. Independent sample t test, chi-square test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Wilcoxon signed rank test or ANOVA test were used for statistical analysis.

Results

A total of 144 patients were enrolled, including 65 patients in the CFNB group and 79 patients in the combined group. There was no statistically significant difference in demographic data, surgical time, additional analgesics and the incidence of DVT between the two groups (all P>0.05). No complication such as accidental pullout of nerve block catheter, infection in the area of nerve block catheter occurred. There was also no statistically significant difference in self-assessed visual analogue scale (VAS) scores between the two groups at 12 and 72h postoperatively (both P>0.05). The VAS scores of CFNB group[(1.8±1.3), (2.6±0.8)] were lower than those of combined group [(3.2±0.7), (4.0±0.8)]at 24 and 48 h postoperatively [t =-7.670, 10.250, both P<0.001]. There was no statistically significant difference in muscle strength of quadriceps between the two groups at 12h postoperatively (P>0.05). The muscle strength of quadriceps of CFNB group were lower than those of combined group at 24, 48 and 72h postoperatively (H=62.944, 88.486, 120.694, all P<0.01).

Conclusion

SFNB combined with PAI can achieve the same clinical analgesic effect as CFNB in the early postoperative stage after TKA, but the combined group patients have faster recovery of muscle strength of quadriceps and a lower risk of DVT, which is one of the desirable analgesic methods after TKA.

表1 两组患者术前一般资料比较
表2 两组患者早期临床资料比较
表3 两组患者术后VAS评分比较(分)
表4 两组患者术后肌力比较(例)
[1]
Singh JA, Yu S, Chen L, et al. Rates of total joint replacement in the United States: future projections to 2020-2040 using the National inpatient sample[J]. J Rheumatol, 2019, 46(9): 1134-1140.
[2]
中国康复技术转化及发展促进会,中国研究型医院学会,中国医疗保健国际交流促进会,等.中国骨科手术加速康复围手术期疼痛管理指南[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志201912(12):929-938.
[3]
李洪星,毛新展,吕国华.多模式镇痛在髋膝关节置换术围手术期的应用[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版)20148(2):228-232.
[4]
赵旻暐,田华,王宁,等.膝关节置换术后超声引导收肌管阻滞的镇痛疗效观察[J].中华医学杂志201696(35):2813-2817.
[5]
Ma T, Liu Q, Zhou L, et al. Continuous nerve block versus single-shot nerve block for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials[J]. Minerva Anestesiol, 2020, 86(2): 205-216.
[6]
Chen J, Zhou C, Ma C, et al. Which is the best analgesia treatment for total knee arthroplasty: adductor canal block, periarticular infiltration, or liposomal bupivacaine? A network meta-analysis[J/OL]. J Clin Anesth, 2021, 68: 110098. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110098.
[7]
Chan EY, Fransen M, Parker DA, et al. Femoral nerve blocks for acute postoperative pain after knee replacement surgery[J/OL]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014, 5(5): CD009941. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009941.pub2.
[8]
Marino J, Scuderi G, Dowling O, et al. Periarticular knee injection with liposomal bupivacaine and continuous femoral nerve block for postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2019, 34(3): 495-500.
[9]
Fu H, Wang J, Zhang W, et al. Potential superiority of periarticular injection in analgesic effect and early mobilization ability over femoral nerve block following total knee arthroplasty[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2017, 25(1): 291-298.
[10]
Qin L, You D, Zhao G, et al. A comparison of analgesic techniques for total knee arthroplasty: a network meta-analysis[J/OL]. J Clin Anesth, 2021, 71: 110257. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110257.
[11]
Danoff JR, Goel R, Sutton R, et al. How much pain is significant? Defining the minimal clinically important difference for the visual analog scale for pain after total joint arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2018, 33(7S): S71-S75.e2.
[12]
王波,董补怀.全膝关节置换术后镇痛应用外周神经阻滞的进展[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版)202014(4):486-490.
[13]
Dong P, Tang X, Cheng R, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of different analgesia treatments for total knee arthroplasty: a network meta-analysis[J]. Clin J Pain, 2018, 34(11): 1047-1060.
[14]
Layera S, Aliste J, Bravo D, et al. Motor-sparing nerve blocks for total knee replacement: a scoping review[J/OL]. J Clin Anesth, 2021, 68: 110076. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110076.
[15]
Ma HH, Chou T, Tsai SW, et al. The efficacy of continuous versus single-injection femoral nerve block in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J/OL]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2020, 21(1): 121. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-3148-1.
[16]
Turbitt LR, Mchardy PG, Casanova M, et al. Analysis of inpatient falls after total knee arthroplasty in patients with continuous femoral nerve block[J]. Anesth Analg, 2018, 127(1): 224-227.
[17]
Wasserstein D, Farlinger C, Brull R, et al. Advanced age, obesity and continuous femoral nerve blockade are Independent risk factors for inpatient falls after primary total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2013, 28(7): 1121-1124.
[18]
冯宾,张博,任毅,等.人工全膝关节表面置换术后连续股神经阻滞与经静脉患者自控镇痛的随机对照研究[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志201811(1):25-29.
[19]
Hannon CP, Keating TC, Lange JK, et al. Anesthesia and analgesia practices in total joint arthroplasty: a survey of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Membership[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2019, 34(12): 2872-2277.e2.
[20]
Zhang LK, Ma JX, Kuang MJ, et al. Comparison of periarticular local infiltration analgesia with femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2018, 33(6): 1972-1978.e4.
[21]
Chaumeron A, Audy D, Drolet P, et al. Periarticular injection in knee arthroplasty improves quadriceps function[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2013, 471(7): 2284-2295.
[22]
Malcolm TL, Knezevic NN, Zouki CC, et al. Pulmonary complications after hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States, 2004-2014[J]. Anesth Analg, 2020, 130(4): 917-924.
[23]
Runner RP, Gottschalk MB, Staley CA, et al. Utilization patterns, efficacy, and complications of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis strategies in primary hip and knee arthroplasty as reported by American board of orthopedic surgery part II candidates[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2019, 34(4): 729-734.
[24]
Thirugnanam S, Pinto R, Cook DJ, et al. Economic analyses of venous thromboembolism prevention strategies in hospitalized patients: a systematic review[J/OL]. Crit Care, 2012, 16(2): R43. DOI: 10.1186/cc11241.
[25]
孔祥朋,任鹏,倪明,等.全膝关节置换术中三阶段关节腔周围注射鸡尾酒与股神经阻滞镇痛效果的比较[J].中国骨与关节杂志20165(10):752-756.
[26]
闫伟宁,吕成昱,李海燕,等.全膝置换术三种局部注射镇痛配方效果比较[J].中国矫形外科杂志202129(13):1241-1244.
[1] 邓华梅, 袁札根, 曾德荣, 潘珊珊, 张葆青, 欧爱华, 曹学伟. 全膝关节置换术中气压止血带应用效果与影响因素分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 788-794.
[2] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[3] 闫文, 谢兴文, 顾玉彪, 雷宁波, 马成, 于文霞, 高亚雄, 张磊. 微小RNA与全膝关节置换术后深静脉血栓的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 842-846.
[4] 王宏宇. 固定与活动平台假体在全膝关节置换术中的应用价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 871-876.
[5] 李善武, 叶永杰, 王兵, 王子呓, 银毅, 孙官军, 张大刚. 胫骨高位截骨与单髁置换的早期疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 882-888.
[6] 李辉, 吴奇, 张子琦, 张晗, 王仿, 许鹏. 日间全膝关节置换术早期疗效及标准化流程探索[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 889-892.
[7] 刘伦, 王云鹭, 李锡勇, 韩鹏飞, 张鹏, 李晓东. 机器人辅助膝关节单髁置换术的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 715-721.
[8] 王桂冠, 徐杰. 运动学对线在全膝关节置换术中的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 726-731.
[9] 杨依琴, 何敏仪, 杜桂菊, 刘欣, 詹文英. 膝关节置换术后康复应用基于保护动机理论的健康教育[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 741-746.
[10] 于智慧, 赵建军. 后路腰方肌阻滞复合全身麻醉在腹股沟斜疝经腹腹膜前手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 734-739.
[11] 田静, 方秀春. 超声引导下横筋膜平面阻滞在儿童腹股沟疝手术的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 740-744.
[12] 黄铁刚, 肖凤霞. 地塞米松联合罗哌卡因在腹股沟疝修补术后镇痛效果及对血清指标的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 574-578.
[13] 谢文龙, 周建军. 超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞联合腹横肌平面阻滞在老年腹股沟疝中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 588-592.
[14] 段文忠, 白延霞, 徐文亭, 祁虹霞, 吕志坚. 七氟烷和丙泊酚在肝切除术中麻醉效果比较Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 640-645.
[15] 徐洪宇, 何亚爽. 羟考酮与氢吗啡酮用于胃癌根治术后镇痛的疗效[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 312-316.
阅读次数
全文


摘要