切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (03) : 326 -333. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2023.03.005

临床论著

关节镜下带线锚钉缝合修复前交叉韧带部分损伤的疗效分析
王旭, 李彦林(), 王国梁, 赵正吕, 贾笛, 宁梓文, 施政良, 何璐, 王坤   
  1. 650032 昆明医科大学第一附属医院运动医学科
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-30 出版日期:2023-06-01
  • 通信作者: 李彦林
  • 基金资助:
    云南省重大科技专项计划项目(202102AA100015); 云南省骨关节疾病临床医学中心项目(ZX2019-03-04); 云南省领军人才项目(L-201601)

Clinical outcome of anterior cruciate ligament partial injury repair with suture anchor under arthroscopy

Xu Wang, Yanlin Li(), Guoliang Wang, Zhenglyu Zhao, Di Jia, Ziwen Ning, Zhengliang Shi, Lu He, Kun Wang   

  1. Department of Sports Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming 650032, China
  • Received:2021-11-30 Published:2023-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Yanlin Li
引用本文:

王旭, 李彦林, 王国梁, 赵正吕, 贾笛, 宁梓文, 施政良, 何璐, 王坤. 关节镜下带线锚钉缝合修复前交叉韧带部分损伤的疗效分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 326-333.

Xu Wang, Yanlin Li, Guoliang Wang, Zhenglyu Zhao, Di Jia, Ziwen Ning, Zhengliang Shi, Lu He, Kun Wang. Clinical outcome of anterior cruciate ligament partial injury repair with suture anchor under arthroscopy[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(03): 326-333.

目的

探讨关节镜下使用带线锚钉缝合修复前交叉韧带部分损伤的早期疗效。

方法

自2018年1月至2019年12月,共纳入40例就治于昆明医科大学第一附属医院运动医学科的前交叉韧带损伤患者。所有患者为急性损伤且MRI及关节镜下证实前交叉韧带股骨附着处部分撕裂且滑膜覆盖良好,术前查体前抽屉试验或Lachman试验阳性,排除痛风性关节炎及类风湿关节炎病史。其中男25例,女15例;年龄13~42岁,左膝关节患者17例、右膝关节患者23例。关节镜下采用带线锚钉缝合修复部分损伤的膝关节前交叉韧带,MRI检查评价膝关节前交叉韧带修复情况。采用重复测量数据方差分析比较术前及术后3、6、12个月Tegner评分、Lysholm评分、国际膝关节文献委员会膝关节评估表(IKDC)评分。同时招募40例正常膝关节志愿者,利用Opti_Knee膝关节三维运动分析系统采集膝关节运动学数据,采用独立样本t检验比较患者与健康成人的数据、评价患者膝关节功能。

结果

40例患者年龄平均(28.0±1.2)岁,受伤至入院时间平均(13.0±0.4)d。术后均获随访,无前交叉韧带二次损伤,无手术相关并发症。术后12个月患膝Tegner评分、Lysholm评分、IKDC评分与术前比较差异有统计学意义(F=222.839,295.774,268.836,P<0.05)。MRI结果提示40例患者术后12个月时前交叉韧带走行、信号强度分级均为Ⅰ度。40例患者术后12个月屈伸角度、内外翻角、内外旋转范围、前后、上下和内外位移范围、最大步长、最小步长及步频值与健康人相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

前交叉韧带部分损伤通过关节镜下带线锚钉缝合修复,有助于术后膝关节早期康复训练及膝关节功能的恢复,早期临床疗效满意。

Objective

To explore the early clinical outcome of partial injury of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair with suture anchor repair under arthroscopy.

Methods

From January 2018 to December 2019, a total of 40 patients with ACL injuries attending the Department of Sports Medicine of the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University were included. All the patients were acute injuries and partial tears of the femoral attachment of the ACL with good synovial coverage confirmed by MRI and arthroscopy, with positive results of anterior drawer test or Lachman test before operation. The patients with a history of gouty arthritis or rheumatoid arthritis were exluded. There were 25 males and 15 females, aged from 13 to 42 years. The injured knees were on the left side in 17 patients and on the right side in 23 patients. Under arthroscope, suture anchors were used to repair the partially injured ACL. The recovery of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was evaluated by MRI examination. The Tegner score, Lysholm score and IKDC score were compared before surgery and at three, six, 12 months after surgery by repeated measurement data analysis of variance. Forty healthy adults were also recruited for the knee function data by the Opti Knee three-dimensional movement analysis system. The independent sample t test was applied to compare the data of the patients and healthy adults and evaluate the knee function of the patients.

Results

The average age of the patients was (28.0±1.2) years, the time from injury to operation was (13±0.4 )days on average. All the patients were followed up after surgery. There was no secondary ACL injury and operative complications. There were statistically significant differences in Tegner score, Lysholm score and IKDC score at 12 months after operation compared with the data before operation( F=222.839, 295.774, 268.836, all P <0.05). The results of MRI showed that the continuity and fibrosis signal intensity grade of 40 patients were all gradeⅠ. There was no statistically significant difference in the range of internal-external rotation angle, the range of flexion and extension, the range of varus and valgus angles, the ranges of antero-posterior, internal-external and proximal-distal displacements, the maximum step length, the minimum step length or the step frequency compared with healthy adults at 12 months after operation (all P>0.05).

Conclusion

Partial injury of ACL repaired with suture anchor under arthroscope is beneficial to early rehabilitation of knee joint and function recovery of knee, that may achieve good early clinical outcome.

图1 ACL(前交叉韧带)部分损伤关节镜下手术过程。图A示术中探查见ACL股骨附着处撕裂;图B示ACL松弛;图C~D可见ACL表面滑膜覆盖良好;图E在ACL股骨附着撕裂部位植入1枚带缝线可吸收锚钉;图F~G应用缝合钩通过过线技术"8"字缝合ACL;图H示打结固定后探查交叉韧带撕裂端贴附于股骨附着处
Figure 1 Surgical procedure of partial ACL injury under arthroscope. A : intraoperative exploration of ACL femoral attachment tear.; B: ACL relaxation; C~D: the synovial membrane on the surface of ACL was well covered; E: an absorbable anchor with suture was implanted at the femoral attachment tear site of ACL; F~G: suture hooks were used to suture ACL in figure-of-eight suture; H: exploration of the torn end of the cruciate ligaments attached to the femur after fixation
表1 手术组与健康组一般资料
Table 1 General information of the surgical group and healthy group
表2 患膝手术前后Tegner、Lyshlom及IKDC评分比较[ n=40,(±s)]
Table 2 Tegner, Lyshlom and IKDC scores of the involved knees before and after knee surgery
图2 左膝ACL(前交叉韧带)术前术后MRI变化。图A为术前膝关节MRI,示前交叉韧带中夹杂大量高信号,提示损伤;图B为术后6 d膝关节MRI,示前交叉韧带走行连续,其中夹杂部分提示水肿的高信号影;图C为术后6个月膝关节MRI,示前交叉韧带走行良好,连续性较好;图D为术后12个月膝关节MRI,示前交叉韧带走行连续注:无损伤的ACL表现为条状低信号,高信号提示前交叉韧带有损伤,信号越高说明损伤程度越严重
Figure 2 Preoperative and postoperative MRI changes of the ACL of the left knee. A is preoperative MRI, showing a large number of high signals in the anterior cruciate ligament;B is MRI at six days after surgery, showing ACL running continuously with some high-signal shadows; C is MRI at six months after surgery, showing good alignment and continuity of ACL; D is MRI at 12 months after surgery, showing that ACL runs continuouslyNote: the ACL without injury presents as a strip of low signal, high signal indicates the ACL injury, the higher the signal indicates the more serious the injury
表3 患膝术后12个月屈伸角、内外翻角、内外旋角范围[°,(±s)]
Table 3 Comparison of flexion and extension Angle, varus and valgus Angle, internal and external rotation Angle of the affected knee with healthy subjects 12 months after operation
表4 患膝术后12月的前后、上下、内外位移范围[cm,(±s)]
Table 4 Anteroposterior, proximal-distal and internal-external displacements of the involved knee at 12 months after operation
表5 术后12个月患膝最大、最小步长及步频值(±s)
Table 5 Maximum and minimum stride lengths and stride frequency of the involved knee at 12 months after operation
[1]
Koch M, di Matteo B, Eichhorn J, et al. Correction to: intra-ligamentary autologous conditioned plasma and healing response to treat partial ACL ruptures[J/OL]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2018, 138(5): 685. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-018-2903-3.
[2]
Stone AV, Marx S, Conley CW. Management of partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament: a review of the anatomy, diagnosis, and treatment[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2021, 29(2): 60-70.
[3]
Fayard JM, Sonnery-Cottet B, Vrgoc G, et al. Incidence and risk factors for a partial anterior cruciate ligament tear progressing to a complete tear after nonoperative treatment in patients younger than 30 years[J/OL]. Orthop J Sports Med, 2019, 7(7): 2325967119856624. DOI: 10.1177/2325967119856624.
[4]
Jog AV, Smith TJ, Pipitone PS, et al. Is a partial anterior cruciate ligament tear TrulyPartial? A clinical, arthroscopic, and histologic investigation[J]. Arthroscopy, 2020, 36(6): 1706-1713.
[5]
Brady MP, Weiss W. Clinical diagnostic tests versus MRI diagnosis of ACL tears[J]. J Sport Rehabil, 2018, 27(6): 596-600.
[6]
Vermeijden HD, van der List JP, O'Brien RJ, et al. Primary repair of anterior cruciate ligament injuries: current level of evidence of available techniques[J/OL]. JBJS Rev, 2021, 9(5).DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.20.00174.
[7]
Gobbi A, Whyte GP. Long-term outcomes of primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament combined with biologic healing augmentation to treat incomplete tears[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2018, 46(14): 3368-3377.
[8]
王文河,陈伟,李克军. 前交叉韧带损伤的MRI征象分析[J]. 影像研究与医学应用2020, 4(7): 53-54.
[9]
Barton KI, Heard BJ, Kroker A, et al. Structural consequences of a partial anterior cruciate ligament injury on remaining joint integrity: evidence for ligament and bone changes over time in an ovine model[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2021, 49(3): 637-648.
[10]
Barton KI, Shekarforoush M, Heard BJ, et al. Three-dimensional in vivo kinematics and finite helical axis variables of the ovine stifle joint following partial anterior cruciate ligament transection[J]. J Biomech, 2019, 88: 78-87.
[11]
Zhang L, Guan T, Qi J, et al. A model of anterior cruciate ligament injury in cynomolgus monkeys developed via arthroscopic surgery[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2018, 15(3): 2239-2246.
[12]
Nayak M, Nag HL, Nag TC, et al. Ultrastructural and histological changes in tibial remnant of ruptured anterior cruciate ligament stumps: a transmission electron microscopy and immunochemistry-based observational study[J]. Musculoskelet Surg, 2020, 104(1): 67-74.
[13]
Fu W, Li Q, Tang X, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells reside in anterior cruciate ligament remnants in situ[J]. Int Orthop, 2016, 40(7): 1523-1530.
[14]
Lee JK, Jo S, Lee YL, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament remnant cells have different potentials for cell differentiation based on their location[J/OL]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 3097. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-60047-w.
[15]
毛云鹤,唐婕晞,李箭,等. 穿骨原位缝合修复前交叉韧带技术在膝关节多发韧带损伤脱位中的应用[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志2020, 34(2): 190-195.
[16]
Nohmi S, Yamamoto Y, Mizukami H, et al. Post injury changes in the properties of mesenchymal stem cells derived from human anterior cruciate ligaments[J]. Int Orthop, 2012, 36(7): 1515-1522.
[17]
Butt U, Khan ZA, Zahir N, et al. Histological and cellular evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament[J]. Knee, 2020, 27(5): 1510-1518.
[18]
王旭.前交叉韧带本体感觉与膝关节功能[J].中国矫形外科杂志2002(4):86-88 .
[19]
van der List JP, DiFelice GS. Arthroscopic primary anterior cruciate ligament repair with suture augmentation[J]. Arthrosc Tech, 2017, 6(5): e1529-e1534.
[20]
Kon E, di Matteo B, Altomare D, et al. Biologic agents to optimize outcomes following ACL repair and reconstruction: a systematic review of clinical evidence[J]. J Orthop Res, 2022, 40(1): 10-28.
[21]
Sonnery-Cottet B, Bazille C, Hulet C, et al. Histological features of the ACL remnant in partial tears[J]. Knee, 2014, 21(6): 1009-1013.
[22]
Diermeier T, Rothrauff BB, Engebretsen L, et al. Treatment after anterior cruciate ligament injury: panther Symposium ACL Treatment Consensus Group[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2020, 28(8): 2390-2402.
[23]
忻慰,吴海山,赵辉,等. 兔膝单侧前交叉韧带损伤后双侧韧带内本体感受器变化的实验研究[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(3): 367-372.
[24]
刘日许,陈艺,陈玉书,等. 步态分析在膝关节疾病中的应用[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(6): 806-813.
[25]
Sherman MF, Lieber L, Bonamo JR, et al. The long-term followup of primary anterior cruciate ligament repair. Defining a rationale for augmentation[J]. Am J Sports Med, 1991, 19(3): 243-255.
[26]
辜刘伟,周霖,庹伟,等. 一期缝合修复术与保留残端重建术治疗急性前交叉韧带损伤疗效的Meta分析[J]. 湖北医药学院学报2021, 40(4): 382-390.
[27]
Kohl S, Stock A, Ahmad SS, et al. Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization and primary repair: a new concept for the treatment of knee dislocation[J]. Injury, 2015, 46(4): 724-728.
[28]
魏钰,运行,刘洋,等. WALANT技术下前交叉韧带部分损伤缝合术的疗效研究[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志2021, 35(3): 337-342.
[29]
Takeuchi S, Rothrauff BB, Kanto R, et al. Superb microvascular imaging (SMI) detects increased vascularity of the torn anterior cruciate ligament[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2022, 30(1): 93-101.
[30]
Toy BJ, Yeasting RA, Morse DE, et al. Arterial supply to the human anterior cruciate ligament[J]. J Athl Train, 1995, 30(2): 149-152.
[31]
Nguyen DT, Ramwadhdoebe TH, van der Hart CP, et al. Intrinsic healing response of the human anterior cruciate ligament: an histological study of reattached ACL remnants[J]. J Orthop Res, 2014, 32(2): 296-301.
[32]
Ateschrang A, Schreiner AJ, Ahmad SS, et al. Improved results of ACL primary repair in one-part tears with intact synovial coverage[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2019, 27(1): 37-43.
[33]
Novaretti JV, Astur DC, Casadio D, et al. Higher gene expression of healing factors in anterior cruciate ligament remnant in acute anterior cruciate ligament tear[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2018, 46(7): 1583-1591.
[1] 黄子荣, 罗渝鑫, 杨文瀚, 陈小虎, 谢环宇, 朱伟民. 前交叉韧带重建对膝关节稳定性影响的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 847-854.
[2] 陈志超, 张志伟, 蒋勰, 顾祖超, 蒋菁芸, 许婷婷. 带线锚钉结合缝线捆扎固定髌骨下极粉碎性骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 732-735.
[3] 梁家敏, 黄子荣, 崔家鸣, 钟名金, 冯文哲, 陈康, 胡艳, 欧阳侃, 杨雷, 王大平, 王满宜, 朱伟民. 前交叉韧带保留残端重建促进膝关节功能的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 708-714.
[4] 杨国栋, 张辉, 郭珈, 曲迪, 张静, 戚超. 外侧半月板后角撕裂是否修复的术后疗效对比[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 619-624.
[5] 邢阳, 何爱珊, 康焱, 杨子波, 孟繁钢, 邬培慧. 前交叉韧带单束联合前外侧结构重建的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 508-519.
[6] 郭春花, 徐晓燕, 何劼, 刘晓洁, 孟庆芳, 杨曦, 江珉, 刘铁成. 反重力跑台系统在前交叉韧带重建术后步行训练的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 485-491.
[7] 刘延子, 王维军, 韩向东, 田学东. 保留残余腱束与残端重建前交叉韧带后外侧束[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 439-442.
[8] 李程, 朱梁, 庞勇, 张星晨, 查国春, 郭开今. 改良加强减张无结缝线桥技术治疗肩袖撕裂合并冻结肩[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 424-429.
[9] 赵宇, 赵松, 赵金忠. 前交叉韧带损伤及重建后继发性膝骨关节炎的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 415-423.
[10] 周兰, 徐一宏, 徐卫东. 前交叉韧带重建术后重返运动的评估[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 409-414.
[11] 吴旺, 郁慧杰, 杨茂宪, 王倩倩, 朱建刚, 刘雷, 蒋禛, 沈永帅, 沈鹏. 血清钙对创伤性凝血病患者预后价值的研究[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 300-305.
[12] 米洁, 陈晨, 李佳玲, 裴海娜, 张恒博, 李飞, 李东杰. 儿童头面部外伤特点分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 511-515.
[13] 刘江涛, 王一勇, 欧阳容兰, 黄书润. 采用改良胸脐带蒂皮瓣修复手腕背部深度创面的临床效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(04): 321-325.
[14] 蓝青楠, 俞金龙, 余捷, 何首华, 翁起宁, 罗桂芝, 邹琦, 邹兆伟. 改良两针法连续缝合在回肠单腔造口术中的应用[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 278-281.
[15] 邱红生, 林树体, 梁朝莹, 劳世高, 何荷. 模拟现实步态训练对膝关节前交叉韧带损伤的功能恢复及对跌倒恐惧的影响[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 343-350.
阅读次数
全文


摘要