切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (03) : 334 -339. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2023.03.006

临床论著

冲击波联合富血小板血浆对骨关节炎软骨损伤的疗效
邬春虎, 马玉海, 陈长松, 尹华东, 朱晓峰, 何剑星, 刘彧()   
  1. 310051 杭州,武警浙江省总队医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-05 出版日期:2023-06-01
  • 通信作者: 刘彧
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省医药卫生科研项目(2021432378); 浙江省中医药科技项目(2021ZB236)

Efficacy of shock wave combined with platelet-rich plasma treatment on cartilage injury in osteoarthritis

Chunhu Wu, Yuhai Ma, Changsong Chen, Huadong Yin, Xiaofeng Zhu, Jianxing He, Yu Liu()   

  1. Department of Orthopedics, Zhejiang Armed Police Corps Hospital, Hangzhou 310051, China
  • Received:2022-06-05 Published:2023-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Yu Liu
引用本文:

邬春虎, 马玉海, 陈长松, 尹华东, 朱晓峰, 何剑星, 刘彧. 冲击波联合富血小板血浆对骨关节炎软骨损伤的疗效[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 334-339.

Chunhu Wu, Yuhai Ma, Changsong Chen, Huadong Yin, Xiaofeng Zhu, Jianxing He, Yu Liu. Efficacy of shock wave combined with platelet-rich plasma treatment on cartilage injury in osteoarthritis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(03): 334-339.

目的

探讨对股骨内侧髁软骨损伤的膝骨关节炎患者行关节镜微骨折术后,采用冲击波联合富血小板血浆(PRP)治疗的临床疗效。

方法

按照2018年中华医学骨科骨关节炎标准纳入内侧髁软骨损伤的门诊患者,且年龄≥45岁。排除标准包括:膝关节外翻畸形或外侧间隙狭窄的患者,膝关节镜检查过程中发现膝关节外侧间室内出现软骨损伤,自身免疫疾病关节炎,膝关节内韧带损伤,凝血功能障碍及血液系统疾病,严重心脑血管疾病及依从性较差患者,既往膝关节手术史。行关节镜下损伤软骨区域微骨折术,术后给予冲击波联合富血小板血浆治疗。手术前及术后2、3、6个月对患者临床症状及功能改善程度通过视觉模拟评分法(VAS)、Lequesne功能演算指数(Lequesne评分)、西安大略麦克马斯特大学关节炎指数(WOMAC)及步态分析进行评估。方差分析及LSD-t检验对数据进行统计学分析。

结果

术后2个月VAS疼痛评分、Lequesne评分、WOMAC评分均较术前明显改善(t=20.35、23.39、27.49,均为P<0.05),WOMAC评分中疼痛、功能、僵硬评分也较术前明显减低(t=10.44、8.00、19.96,均为P<0.05);术后3个月VAS疼痛评分、Lequesne评分、WOMAC评分较术前(t=16.76、27.38、40.98,均为P<0.05)及术后2个月(t=6.27、11.52、24.76,均为P<0.05)明显降低;术后6个月VAS疼痛评分、Lequesne评分、WOMAC评分较术前(t=-17.97、-18.82、-33.65,均为P<0.05)及术后2个月(t=-7.1、-7.7、-28.56,均为P<0.05)、术后3个月(t=-3.19、-1.68、-6.99,均为P<0.05)明显降低;术后2、3、6个月步速较术前明显提升(t=5.26、52.66、32.52,均为P<0.05);术后3个月步长与术前及术后2个月比较明显增大(t=34.68、8.81,P<0.05),术后6个月步长与术前、术后2、3个月比较患者步长增大(t=13.22、9.17、2.54,均为P<0.05)。术后3个月步幅较术前及术后2个月提升明显(t=33.94、18.82,均为P<0.05)。术后6个月步幅与术前及术后2个月比较步幅度增大(t=18.39、13.98,均为P<0.05)。

结论

冲击波联合PRP对因膝骨关节炎股骨内侧髁软骨损伤行关节镜下微骨折手术的患者可以有效缓解疼痛、改善功能,值得进一步临床研究。

Objective

To investigate the clinical efficacy of shock wave combined with platelet-rich plasma(PRP)following arthroscopic microfractures treatment on osteoarthritis patients with medial condylar cartilage injury.

Methods

In accordance with the 2018 Chinese Medical Orthopedic Osteoarthritis Standards, outpatient patients with medial condyle cartilage injury and age over 45 years were included. Exclusion criteria were: patients with knee valgus deformity or narrowing lateral space of knee, cartilage damage in the lateral compartment of the knee during knee arthroscopy, autoimmune disease arthritis, ligament injury inside knee joint cavity, coagulopathy and hematologic disorders, severe cardio- and cerebrovascular diseases and poor compliance, history of knee surgery. Arthroscopic micro-fractures in the cartilage injury area was performed, and shock waves combined with platelet-rich plasma were given after surgery. The clinical symptoms and functional improvement of patients before and after treatment were evaluated by visual analogue scale(VAS), Lequesne index, the Western Ontario & McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index(WOMAC )and gait analysis. The data were analyzed by analysis of variance and LSD-t test.

Results

VAS pain scores, Lequesne scores, and WOMAC scores at two months after surgery improved remarkably compared with those before surgery(t=20.35, 23.39, 27.49, all P<0.05). The pain, function and stiffness scores in WOMAC scores were also significantly lower than those at preoperative (t=10.44, 8.00, 19.96, all P<0.05). VAS pain scores, Lequesne scores, and WOMAC scores at the three months after surgery were significantly lower than the data before operation(t=16.76, 27.38, 40.98, all P<0.05)and data of two months after operation(t=6.27, 11.52, 24.76, all P<0.05). VAS pain scores, Lequesne scores, and WOMAC scores were significantly lower at postoperative six months than the data before operation(t=-17.97, 18.82, -33.65, all P<0.05)and data of two months(t=-7.1, -7.7, -28.56, all P<0.05)and three months after operation (t=-3.19, -1.68, -6.99, all P<0.05). The stride rate at two, three and six months after surgery significantly improved compared with the rate before surgery (t=5.26, 52.66, 32.52, all P<0.05). The step length at two and three months after surgery were significantly longer than those before surgery (t=34.68, 8.81, P<0.05). The step length at postoperative six month also significantly improved compared with those before operation at two months and three months after operation (t=13.22, 9.17, 2.54, P<0.05). The stride length at three months after surgery was significantly higher than that at two months after surgery (t=33.94、18.82P<0.05). The stride length obviously increased at six months compared with the data before operation and the data of two months after operation (t=18.39, 13.98, P<0.05).

Conclusion

Shock wave combined with PRP can effectively relieve pain and improve function in knee osteoarthritis patients with medial femoral condylar cartilage injury after arthroscopic microfractures, which is worthy of further clinical research.

表1 不同随访时间点VAS评分、Lequesne评分、WOMAC评分(±s)
Table 1 VAS, Lequesne score, WOMAC score at different follow-up time points
表2 患者治疗前后步态结果
Table 2 Gait outcomes before and after treatment at different times
[1]
Felson DT. Epidemiology of hip and knee osteoarthritis[J]. Epidemiol Rev, 1988, 10: 1-28.
[2]
Thomas MJ, Guillemin F, Neogi T. Osteoarthritis flares[J]. Clin Geriatr Med, 2022, 38(2): 239-257.
[3]
鲁谊,张海龙,李屹钧. 关节镜下微骨折或自体软骨移植术治疗肘关节剥脱性骨软骨炎早期临床疗效[J]. 中华骨科杂志2018, 38(1): 1-7.
[4]
Bennell KL, Hunter DJ, Paterson KL. Platelet-rich plasma for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis[J/OL]. Curr Rheumatol Rep, 2017, 19(5): 24. DOI: 10.1007/s11926-017-0652-x.
[5]
王前源. 体外冲击波对伴骨质疏松的骨关节炎模型软骨及软骨下骨结构、代谢及功能的影响[D].太原:山西医科大学,2017.
[6]
刘水涛,刘彧,杨军,等. 计算机辅助步态分析评价体外冲击波疗法治疗膝骨关节炎的效果[J/CD]. 中国医学前沿杂志(电子版), 2016, 8(3): 12-15.
[7]
中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组. 骨关节炎诊疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中华骨科杂志2018, 38(12):705-715.
[8]
Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, et al. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis:classification of osteoarthritis of the knee[J].Arthritis Rheum, 1986, 29(8): 1039-1049.
[9]
Kettelkamp DB, Chao EY. A method for quantitative analysis of medial and lateral compression forces at the knee during standing[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1972, 83: 202-213.
[10]
贾科江,关津京,宋志勇,等. 胫骨内侧高位截骨联合关节镜下清理术治疗膝内侧单间室骨关节炎[J]. 临床骨科杂志2021, 24(3): 362-365.
[11]
Freitag J, Ford J, Bates D, et al. Adipose derived mesenchymal stem cell therapy in the treatment of isolated knee chondral lesions: design of a randomised controlled pilot study comparing arthroscopic microfracture versus arthroscopic microfracture combined with postoperative mesenchymal stem cell injections[J/OL]. BMJ Open, 2015, 5(12): e009332. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009332.
[12]
Yang HY, Lee KB. Arthroscopic microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the talus[J]. J Bone JointSurg, 2019, 102(1): 10-20.
[13]
Eren TK, Ataoǧlu MB, Eren, et al. Comparison of arthroscopic microfracture and cell-free scaffold implantation techniques in the treatment of talar osteochondral lesions[J]. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi, 2019, 30(2): 97-105.
[14]
Camp CL, Dines JS, Degen RM, et al. Arthroscopic microfracture for osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the Capitellum[J/OL]. Arthrosc Tech, 2016, 5(3): e477-e481. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2016.01.030.
[15]
Case JM, Scopp JM. Treatment of articular cartilage defects of the knee with microfracture and enhanced microfracture techniques[J]. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev, 2016, 24(2): 63-68.
[16]
Redondo ML, Beer AJ, Yanke AB. Cartilage restoration: microfracture and osteochondral autograft transplantation[J]. J Knee Surg, 2018, 31(3): 231-238.
[17]
Küffer J, Ziltener J. PRP and knee osteoarthritis[J]. Rev Med Suisse202218(766):127-130.
[18]
Bansal H, Leon J, Pont JL, et al. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in osteoarthritis (OA) knee: correct dose critical for long term clinical efficacy[J/OL]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1): 3971. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83025-2.
[19]
刘彧,吴坤,刘水涛,等. 体外冲击波治疗中老年女性膝关节炎的疗效观察[J]. 武警医学2016, 27(4): 349-352.
[20]
Waugh CM, Morrissey D, Jones E, et al.In vivo biological response to extracorporeal shockwave therapy in human tendinopathy [J]. Eur Cell Mater, 2015, 29: 268-280; discussion 280.
[21]
Sun D, Junger WG, Yuan C, et al. Shockwaves induce osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells through ATP release and activation of P2X7 receptors[J]. Stem Cells, 2013, 31(6): 1170-1180.
[22]
郭月森. 五苓散加减对半月板损伤关节镜术后膝关节肿胀影响的疗效观察[D].福州:福建中医药大学,2016.
[23]
王绍玉. 五苓散合防己黄芪汤治疗半月板损伤关节镜术后肿胀的临床研究[D].北京:中国中医科学院,2019.
[1] 杨滢甄, 黄子荣, 梁家敏, 黄晓芳, 胡艳, 朱伟民. 膝关节前交叉韧带重建术前康复治疗的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 538-544.
[2] 庄若语, 杭明辉, 李文华, 张霆, 侯炜. 膝骨关节炎半定量磁共振评分研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 545-552.
[3] 王振宇, 张洪美, 荆琳, 何名江, 闫奇. 膝骨关节炎相关炎症因子与血浆代谢物间的因果关系及中介效应[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 467-473.
[4] 李亚龙, 王星童, 申传安. 异体富血小板血浆在创面修复中的临床应用进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 541-545.
[5] 孙俊锋, 涂家金, 付丹, 蒋满香, 刘金晶, 崔乃硕. 手部烧伤瘢痕挛缩畸形整形术后综合康复联合点阵二氧化碳激光治疗的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 411-415.
[6] 钟锴, 蒋铁民, 张瑞青, 吐尔干艾力·阿吉, 邵英梅, 郭强. 加速康复外科在肝囊型棘球蚴病肝切除术中的应用分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 425-429.
[7] 李月平, 李科, 乔禹铭, 钟美浓. 前列腺热蒸汽消融术医护康一体化快速康复模式初探[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 464-472.
[8] 曹健, 冯高华, 周卫军, 陈诚, 沈王丰, 吴英姿. 补脾益肺膏联合肺康复训练治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 781-784.
[9] 杨轲, 丁增巴姆, 马静, 李盼盼, 陈婷. 全程无缝隙肺康复训练在单孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 801-804.
[10] 朱志, 张鑫炜, 谭文斐, 高梓茗, 赵睿涵, 杨野, 王世洋, 智冬梅, 赵鑫, 尹长欣, 高畅远, 王锡山, 王振宁, 李凯, 周海涛. 直肠癌经自然腔道取标本手术在日间手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 329-334.
[11] 陈冬冬, 余程冬, 曹晓光. 上肢外骨骼机器人在脑卒中康复中的应用与研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 312-317.
[12] 谢浩文, 丁建英, 刘小霞, 冯毅, 姚婧. 椎旁神经阻滞对微创胃切除肥胖患者术中血流、术后应激及康复质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 569-573.
[13] 贾玲玲, 滕飞, 常键, 黄福, 刘剑萍. 心肺康复在各种疾病中应用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 859-862.
[14] 刘芳明, 石秀秀, 唐冲, 张克石, 徐影, 王桂杉, 关振鹏, 李晓. 骨科康复患者对数字疗法应用的知晓度和需求度:一项基于928 份问卷调查结果分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 654-661.
[15] 刘晓鹏, 柳聪艳, 杨宁, 蔡琛, 李晓兵, 王红宇, 张思森. 三穴五针联合腹部提压法在机械通气患者肺康复中的疗效[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 193-198.
阅读次数
全文


摘要