切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (04) : 488 -491. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2022.04.017

临床经验

髌股关节软骨退变程度对单髁置换术后效果的影响
姜未1, 王黎杰1, 周楚坤1, 刘旺兴1, 刘文涛1, 姜嵩1, 李广恒1, 林博文1,()   
  1. 1. 518020 深圳市人民医院骨关节外科/暨南大学第二临床医学院/南方科技大学附属第一医院
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-04 出版日期:2022-08-01
  • 通信作者: 林博文

Effect of different degrees of patellofemoral joint cartilage degeneration on outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Wei Jiang1, Lijie Wang1, Chukun Zhou1, Wangxing Liu1, Wentao Liu1, Song Jiang1, Guangheng Li1, Bowen Lin1,()   

  1. 1. Bone and Joint Department of Shenzhen People’s Hospital/The Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University/The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanfan University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518020, China
  • Received:2021-08-04 Published:2022-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Bowen Lin
引用本文:

姜未, 王黎杰, 周楚坤, 刘旺兴, 刘文涛, 姜嵩, 李广恒, 林博文. 髌股关节软骨退变程度对单髁置换术后效果的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 488-491.

Wei Jiang, Lijie Wang, Chukun Zhou, Wangxing Liu, Wentao Liu, Song Jiang, Guangheng Li, Bowen Lin. Effect of different degrees of patellofemoral joint cartilage degeneration on outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(04): 488-491.

目的

探讨髌股关节软骨退变程度对内侧活动平台单髁置换术短期疗效的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2017年1月至2018年12月在深圳市人民医院因前内侧骨关节炎行内侧活动平台单髁置换或全膝关节置换术的75例患者资料,依据术中探查髌股关节软骨退变情况分为无退变单髁组(无退变组)、内侧退变单髁组(内侧退变组)、内外退变单髁组(内外退变组)和内外退变全膝组(全膝组)。单因素方差分析对比4组患者术前术后牛津大学膝关节评分(OKS)、美国特种外科医院(HSS)评分、骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分,并记录终末随访时有无假体松动、脱位、力线改变等情况。

结果

所有患者获得随访,随访时间平均(36±10)个月。4组患者术后OKS评分、HSS评分、WOMAC评分较术前均有改善(F=18.555,P<0.001;F=5.867,P=0.001;F=22.671,P<0.001);术前术后OKS、HSS、WOMAC评分差值,无退变组与内侧退变组之间差异均无统计学意义(均为P>0.05),内外退变组与无退变组、内侧退变组相比,功能改善程度稍差(均为P<0.05),内外退变组与全膝组之间OKS、HSS、WOMAC评分差值差异无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)。所有病例于末次随访时无假体松动、脱位、力线改变。

结论

内侧髌股关节软骨退变对内侧活动平台单髁置换术后疗效影响不大,但面对外侧髌股关节软骨退变时则需慎重,此时选择单髁或是全膝,需个性化考虑。

Objective

To investigate the effect of different degrees of patellofemoral joint cartilage degeneration on short-term outcome of medial mobile-bearing unicondyle knee arthroplasty.

Methods

The data of 75 patients who underwent medial mobile-bearing unicondyle knee arthroplasty (UKA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for anteriormedial osteoarthritis in Shenzhen People’s Hospital from January 2017 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the intraoperative exploration of patellofemoral joint cartilage degeneration, the patients were divided into four groups: no patellofemoral joint degeneration+ UKA group (the non-degeneration group), the medial patellofemoral joint degeneration+ UKA group (the medial degeneration group); the medial and lateral patellofemoral joint degeneration+ UAK group (the medial-lateral degeneration group); the medial and lateral patellofemoral joint degeneration+ TKA group (the TKA group). The preoperative and postoperative Oxford knee assessment scores (OKS), Hospital for Special Surgery(HSS)knee scores, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index scores of the four groups were compared and analyzed by one way ANOVA. The prosthesis loosening, dislocation, and force line changes were recorded during the final follow-up.

Results

All the patients were followed up for (36±10) months on average. The postoperative OKS, HSS, and WOMAC scores of the four groups were improved compared with those before operation (F=18.555, P<0.001; F=5.867, P=0.001; F=22.671, P<0.001). Comparing the differences of OKS, HSS and WOMAC scores before and after the surgery, there was no statistically significant difference between the non-degeneration group and the medial degeneration group (all P>0.05). Compared with the non-degeneration group and the medial degeneration group, the function improvement of the medial-lateral degeneration group was slightly worse, and the difference was statistically significant (all P<0.05). The difference in OKS, HSS, and WOMAC scores between the medial-lateral degeneration group and the TKA group was not statistically significant (all P >0.05). No prosthesis loosening, dislocation, or force line change was found at the final follow-up.

Conclusions

Medial patellofemoral joint degeneration has little effect on the outcome after medial mobile-bearing UKA. Cautions should be taken with the lateral patellofemoral joint cartilage degeneration, choosing UKA or TKA should be individually considered.

表1 患者术前一般资料比较
表2 术前术后OKS、HSS、WOMAC评分差值的比较(±s)
[1]
Deshmukh RV, Scott RD. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long-term results[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2001, (392): 272-278.
[2]
Mohammad HR, Strickland L, Hamilton TW. Long-term outcomes of over 8,000 medial Oxford Phase 3 Unicompartmental Knees-a systematic review[J]. Acta Orthop, 2018, 89(1): 101-107.
[3]
Mohammad HR, Kennedy JA, Mellon SJ, et al. Ten-year clinical and radiographic results of 1000 cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacements[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2020, 28(5): 1479-1487.
[4]
Kozinn SC, Scott R. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1989, 71(1): 145-150.
[5]
Deckard ER, Jansen K, Ziemba-Davis M, et al. Does patellofemoral disease affect outcomes in contemporary medial fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty?[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2020, 35(8): 2009-2015.
[6]
Lim JW, Chen JY, Chong HC, at al. Pre-existing patellofemoral disease does not affect 10-year survivorship in fixed bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2019, 27(6): 2030-2036.
[7]
Berger Y, Ftaita S, Thienpont E. Does medial patellofemoral osteoarthritis influence outcome scores and risk of revision after fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty?[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2019, 477(9): 2041-2047.
[8]
Hamilton TW, Pandit HG, Inabathula A, et al. Unsatisfactory outcomes following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with partial thickness cartilage loss:a medium-term follow-up[J]. Bone Joint J, 2017, 99-B(4): 475-482.
[9]
Konan S, Haddad FS. Does location of patellofemoral chondral lesion influence outcome after Oxford medial compartmental knee arthroplasty?[J]. Bone Joint J, 2016, 98-B(10 Supple B): 11-15.
[10]
Pongcharoen B, Reutiwarangkoon C. The comparison of anterior knee pain in severe and non severe arthritis of the lateral facet of the patella following a mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J/OL]. Springerplus, 2016, 27(5): 202. DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-1914-1.
[11]
Liddle AD, Judge A, Pandit H, et al. Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101,330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales[J]. Lancet, 2014, 384(9952): 1437-1445.
[12]
Murray DW, Parkinson RW. Usage of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Bone Joint J, 2018, 100B(4): 432-435.
[13]
Mohammad HR, Matharu GS, Judge A, et al. The effect of surgeon caseload on the relative revision rate of cemented and cementless unicompartmental knee replacements: an analysis from the National joint registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the isle of man[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2020, 102(8): 644-653.
[14]
Liebensteiner M, Köglberger P, Ruzicka A, et al. Unicondylar vs. total knee arthroplasty in medial osteoarthritis: a retrospective analysis of registry data and functional outcome[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2020, 140(4): 545-549.
[15]
Wilson HA, Middleton R, Abram SGF, et al. Patient relevant outcomes of unicompartmental versus total knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis[J/OL]. BMJ, 2019, 21(364): l352. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l352.
[1] 邓华梅, 袁札根, 曾德荣, 潘珊珊, 张葆青, 欧爱华, 曹学伟. 全膝关节置换术中气压止血带应用效果与影响因素分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 788-794.
[2] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[3] 闫文, 谢兴文, 顾玉彪, 雷宁波, 马成, 于文霞, 高亚雄, 张磊. 微小RNA与全膝关节置换术后深静脉血栓的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 842-846.
[4] 王宏宇. 固定与活动平台假体在全膝关节置换术中的应用价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 871-876.
[5] 李善武, 叶永杰, 王兵, 王子呓, 银毅, 孙官军, 张大刚. 胫骨高位截骨与单髁置换的早期疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 882-888.
[6] 李辉, 吴奇, 张子琦, 张晗, 王仿, 许鹏. 日间全膝关节置换术早期疗效及标准化流程探索[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 889-892.
[7] 刘伦, 王云鹭, 李锡勇, 韩鹏飞, 张鹏, 李晓东. 机器人辅助膝关节单髁置换术的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 715-721.
[8] 王桂冠, 徐杰. 运动学对线在全膝关节置换术中的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 726-731.
[9] 杨依琴, 何敏仪, 杜桂菊, 刘欣, 詹文英. 膝关节置换术后康复应用基于保护动机理论的健康教育[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 741-746.
[10] 李鸿昌, 孙艳宏, 高旺, 张金才, 牛亚清, 张国梁. 滑膜软骨瘤病的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 679-683.
[11] 姚轶超, 张麒, 滕海茂, 黄攀, 吴雷涛, 韩哲. 膝关节置换术后恐动症与康复效果及社会支持的相关性[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 613-618.
[12] 樊绪国, 赵永刚. 全膝关节置换术中髌骨轨迹的研究进展及处理策略[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 701-707.
[13] 罗璠, 饶志涛. 机械敏感蛋白Piezo1介导创伤后骨关节炎的作用及机制[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 528-533.
[14] 周晓强, 金宇杰, 李志强, 徐人杰, 张向鑫, 陈广祥, 虞宵. 运动学与机械学对线在全膝关节置换中的比较研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 554-559.
[15] 邵长杰, 杜晓颖, 徐奎帅, 张靓, 纪岩磊. 住院天数影响全膝关节置换术后下肢深静脉血栓形成[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 588-591.
阅读次数
全文


摘要