切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03) : 277 -282. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2021.03.003

临床论著

前方入路半髋关节置换治疗股骨颈骨折伴认知功能障碍
林志炯1,(), 高大伟1, 张会良1, 陈海宏1, 梁华辉1, 万明1, 甘福开1, 吴微1   
  1. 1. 528400 广州中医药大学附属中山市中医院骨三科
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-15 出版日期:2021-06-01
  • 通信作者: 林志炯
  • 基金资助:
    中山市社会公益科技研究项目(2018B1052)

Femoral neck fracture associated with cognitive impairment treated with direct anterior approach hip arthroplasty

Zhijiong Lin1,(), Dawei Gao1, Huiliang Zhang1, Haihong Chen1, Huahui Liang1, Ming Wan1, Fukai Gan1, Wei Wu1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Zhongshan Hospital of traditional Chinese medicine, Zhongshan 528400, China
  • Received:2020-10-15 Published:2021-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Zhijiong Lin
引用本文:

林志炯, 高大伟, 张会良, 陈海宏, 梁华辉, 万明, 甘福开, 吴微. 前方入路半髋关节置换治疗股骨颈骨折伴认知功能障碍[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 277-282.

Zhijiong Lin, Dawei Gao, Huiliang Zhang, Haihong Chen, Huahui Liang, Ming Wan, Fukai Gan, Wei Wu. Femoral neck fracture associated with cognitive impairment treated with direct anterior approach hip arthroplasty[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(03): 277-282.

目的

评价直接前方入路(DAA)行半髋关节置换术治疗合并神经认知功能障碍的老年股骨颈骨折的临床疗效。

方法

选取2017年7月至2020年5月中山市中医院80例老年股骨颈骨折合并神经认知功能障碍患者,骨折分型为GardenⅢ、Ⅳ型,年龄≥80岁,符合认知功能障碍诊断标准,根据患者住院号末位数奇偶性,分为两组,采用DAA行半髋关节置换术的病例为DAA组(n=40);采用后外侧入路(PLA)行半髋关节置换术的病例为PLA组(n=40),比较两组患者的切口长度、失血量、手术时间、下床时间、住院时间、术周两后VAS评分、术后两周Harris评分、并发症发生率,采用t检验或卡方检验分析比较两组的数据。

结果

80例患者74例得到随访,随访率为92.5%,平均随访时间(12.3±3.5)月。两组切口长度为(8.0±2.1)cm、(12.0±2.0)cm,术中失血量为(70.0±20.5)ml、(185.0±25.0)ml,手术时间为(60.0±20.1)min、(55.0±18.2)min,术后下床时间(20.4±12.2)h、(68.4±28.2)h,住院时间(9.5±2.5)d、(14.3±5.5)d,术后两周疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)(4.0±1.8)分、(5.9±2.0)分,术后两周Harris评分(82.9±6.4)分、(72.9±6.0)分,术后3月VAS评分(2.0±0.8)分、(2.2±1.2)分,术后3月Harris评分(88.9±6.4)分、(86.9±5.8)分,两组并发症发生率分别为7.9%、30.8%,其中脱位发生率分别为0、8.3%。两组资料,切口长度(t=8.381)、失血量(t=9.210)、下床时间(t=8.871)、住院时间(t=4.876)、术周两后VAS评分(t=4.300)、术后两周Harris评分(t=6.925)、并发症发生率(χ2=7.402)等指标差异有统计学意义(均为P<0.05)。

结论

采用DAA入路治疗合并认知功能障碍的老年股骨颈骨折患者,手术微创、住院时间短、并发症少、脱位率低,与后外侧入路相比优势明显。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of the direct anterior approach (DAA) for hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture in elderly patients with comorbid neurocognitive impairment.

Methods

From July 2017 to May 2020, 80 elderly patients with femoral neck fracture and neurocognitive impairment in Zhongshan Hospital of traditional Chinese medicine were selected, and the fractures were classified as garden types III and IV, aged≥80 years, met the diagnostic criteria for cognitive impairment, and were divided into two groups according to the patients' odd paired end of hospitalization number, the cases that underwent hemiarthroplasty using the direct anterior approach were those in the DAA group (n=40), while the others underwent hemiarthroplasty using the posterolateral approach were the posterolateral approach (PLA)group (n=40), incision length, blood loss, time to get out of bed, hospital stay length, VAS score two weeks after operation, Harris score two weeks after operation, and complication rate of the two groups were compared by SPSS 19.0 statistical software, and comparisons of the metrology data between groups were performed by t test. Comparisons between the two groups were performed by chi square analysis.

Results

Seventy-four of 80 patients were followed up, and the follow-up rate was 92.5%, with a mean follow-up time of (12.3±3.5) months. The incision length in both groups were (8.0±2.1) cm, (12.0±2.0) cm, intraoperative blood loss were (70.0±20.5) ml, (185.0±25.0) ml, operative time were(60.0±20.1) min, (55.0±18.2) min, postoperative ambulation time was (20.4±12.2) h, (68.4±28.2) h, hospital stay were(9.5±2.5) d, (14.3±5.5) d, and VAS score at two weeks after operation were(4.0±1.8), (5.9±2.0), two weeks after operation (82.9±6.4), (72.9±6.0), and VAS at three months after surgery were (2.0±0.8), (2.2±1.2), and at three months after surgery were (88.9±6.4), (86.9±5.8); the incidence of complications in the two groups were 7.9%, 30.8%, respectively, in which dislocation occurred in zero and 8.3%of the patients, respectively. The data of the two groups had significant differences (all P<0.05), including incision length(t=8.381), blood loss(t=9.210), time to get out of bed(t=8.871), hospital stay length(t=4.876), VAS score two weeks after operation(t=4.300), Harris score two weeks after operation(t=6.925), and complication rate(χ2=7.402).

Conclusion

In elderly femoral neck fracture patients with cognitive impairment treated with the DAA approach, the procedure is minimally invasive, with short hospital stay, few complications, low dislocation rate, and a significant superiority compared with the posterolateral heel approach.

表1 两组老年股骨颈骨折患者一般资料比较(±s)
表2 两组老年股骨颈骨折患者手术相关指标(±s)
表3 两组老年股骨颈骨折患者术后恢复情况(±s)
表4 两组老年股骨颈骨折患者并发症发生情况[例(%) ]
表5 两组老年股骨颈骨折患者术后3月随访情况(±s)
[1]
Iorio R, Iannotti F, Mazza D, et al.Is dual cup mobility better than hemiarthroplasty in patients with dementia and femoral neck fracture? A randomized controlled trial[J/OL]. SICOT J, 2019, 5: 38. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2019035.
[2]
中国医师协会神经内科分会认知障碍专业委员会,《中国血管性认知障碍诊治指南》编写组.2019年中国血管性认知障碍诊治指南[J].中华医学杂志,2019,99(35):2737-2744.
[3]
徐伟.全髋置换术和半髋置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的对比[J].中外医疗,2020,39(10):51-53.
[4]
周雪明,刘彬,陈庆槐,等.半髋柄固定方式对高龄股骨颈骨折疗效的影响[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2020,14(5):527-533.
[5]
陆立岚,吴旭华,李雪.系统干预对老年病人人工全髋关节置换术后认知功能的影响[J].护理研究,2016,30(4):473-474.
[6]
蔡晓云,陆双双,李娟,等.高龄阿尔茨海默症患者行人工髋关节置换术围手术期护理[J].浙江临床医学,2015(3):499-500.
[7]
Unger AC, Dirksen B, Renken FG, et al. Treatment of femoral neck fracture with a minimal invasive surgical approach for hemiarthroplasty-clinical and radiological results in 180 geriatric patients[J].Open Orthop J,2014, 8: 225-231.
[8]
张高峰,杨佩,王强,等.围术期连续股神经阻滞对老年股骨颈骨折病人术后认知功能障碍的影响[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志,2018,38(1):66-69.
[9]
何志勇,狄正林,章军辉,等.80岁及以上患者髋关节置换术围手术期并发症预防和对策[J].中华老年医学杂志,2008,27(6):435-438.
[10]
Graversen AE, Jakobsen SS, Kristensen PK, et al. No dislocations after primary hip arthroplasty with the dual mobility cup in displaced femoral neck fracture in patients with dementia. A one-year follow-up in 20 patients [J/OL]. SICOT J, 2017, 3: 9. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2016050.
[11]
孙振辉,刘月驹,李衡.髋关节置换与内固定术治疗老年移位型股骨颈骨折术后再手术率和并发症的系统评价[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2014,16(2):115-121.
[12]
毋承玺,孟维锟,张震,等.创伤和关节外科医师行初次全髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折的早期临床疗效对比研究[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志,2021,14(2):130-134.
[13]
刘天盛,苏彬.直接前入路全髋关节置换的优势及学习曲线 [J]. 中国组织工程研究,2020,24(27):4364-4370.
[14]
桑伟林,朱力波,马金忠,等.微创直接前入路全髋关节置换术[J].国际骨科学杂志,2010,31(5):266-267,281.
[15]
De Jong L, Van Rijckevorsel VAJIM, Raats JW,et al. Delirium after hip hemiarthroplasty for proximal femoral fractures in elderly patients: risk factors andclinical outcomes[J]. Clin Interv Aging,2019,14:427-435.
[16]
Kunkel ST, Sabatino MJ, Kang R, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the direct anterior approach for hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2018,28(2):217-232.
[17]
王百盛,张敬东,刘欣伟,等.侧卧位直接前方入路与后外侧入路全髋关节置换术治疗高龄股骨颈骨折对照研究[J].临床军医杂志,2016,44(10):1010-1014.
[18]
梅克海,胡月光.髋关节囊的应用解剖研究[J].贵州医药,2013,37(4):359-360.
[19]
郑志博,冯宾,董玉雷,等.全髋关节置换术后脱位因素分析及防治策略[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志,2016,9(3):198-203.
[20]
史思峰,卢文海,周冰,等.保护股方肌及修复后方软组织对后外侧入路全髋关节置换早期脱位的影响[J].中国组织工程研究,2016,20(48):7163-7168.
[21]
黄润华,尚希福,廖中亚,等.直接前方入路初次全髋关节置换术关节囊切除与保留的疗效比较[J].临床骨科杂志,2020, 23(05):650-655.
[1] 陈晓玲, 钟永洌, 刘巧梨, 李娜, 张志奇, 廖威明, 黄桂武. 超高龄髋膝关节术后谵妄及心血管并发症风险预测[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 575-584.
[2] 马桥桥, 张传开, 郭开今, 蒋涛, 王子豪, 刘勇, 郝亮. 可降解止血粉减少初次全膝关节置换术失血量的研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 585-589.
[3] 王相迎, 杨长生, 曲铁兵. 固定平台单髁置换假体合适位置的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 638-645.
[4] 苏介茂, 齐岩松, 王永祥, 魏宝刚, 马秉贤, 张鹏飞, 魏兴华, 徐永胜. 关节镜手术在早中期膝骨关节炎治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 646-652.
[5] 郭艳波, 马亮, 李刚, 阎伟, 骆帝, 岳亮, 吴伟山. 全膝关节置换术后胫股关节脱位的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 658-671.
[6] 陈翠萍, 李佩君, 杜景榕, 谢青梅, 许一宁, 卓姝妤, 李晓芳. 互联网联合上门护理在老年全髋关节置换术后的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 676-681.
[7] 丁莹莹, 宋恺, 金姬延, 田华. 机器人辅助膝髋关节置换术后精细化临床护理[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 553-557.
[8] 孔德铭, 刘铮, 李睿, 钱文伟, 王飞, 蔡道章, 柴伟. 人工智能辅助全髋关节置换三维术前规划准确性评价[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 431-438.
[9] 赵飞鸿, 陈颖杰, 林静芳, 郑晓春, 廖燕凌. 超声引导下周围神经阻滞对髋膝关节置换术后恢复的影响[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 457-468.
[10] 任俊筱, 浦路桥, 王志豪, 施洪鑫, 刘爱峰, 齐保闯, 徐永清, 李川. 机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的临床疗效对照研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 469-476.
[11] 许亚龙, 巩栋, 陈晓涛. 超前镇痛在全膝关节置换术中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 517-523.
[12] 张于, 程亮亮, 王峰, 赵德伟. 2枚与3枚空心钉治疗无移位股骨颈骨折的疗效对比[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 281-286.
[13] 茹江英, 廖启宇, 温国洪, 潘思华, 刘栋, 张皓琛, 牛云飞. 直接前方入路和后外侧入路半髋关节置换治疗老年痴呆股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 287-293.
[14] 单良, 刘怡, 于涛, 徐丽. 老年股骨颈骨折术后患者心理弹性现状及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 294-300.
[15] 王松雷, 张贻良, 孟浩, 宋威, 白林晨, 袁心, 张辉. 股骨前髁预截骨髓外定位技术在全膝关节置换术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 811-819.
阅读次数
全文


摘要