切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (05) : 606 -610. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2019.05.015

所属专题: 文献

综述

膝关节单髁置换术假体生存率的研究进展
曾绪雯1, 杨春喜2,()   
  1. 1. 200072 上海,同济大学附属口腔医院
    2. 200127 上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-16 出版日期:2019-10-01
  • 通信作者: 杨春喜
  • 基金资助:
    上海市科委引导类面上项目(16411971700)

Research progress of prosthesis survivorship for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Xuwen Zeng1, Chunxi Yang2,()   

  1. 1. The affiliated stomatology hospital of Tongji university, Shanghai 200072, China
    2. Renji hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong university school of medicine, Shanghai 200127, China
  • Received:2018-03-16 Published:2019-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Chunxi Yang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yang Chunxi , Email:
引用本文:

曾绪雯, 杨春喜. 膝关节单髁置换术假体生存率的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(05): 606-610.

Xuwen Zeng, Chunxi Yang. Research progress of prosthesis survivorship for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(05): 606-610.

近几十年来,膝关节单髁置换(UKA)术的假体设计、植入器械、手术技术经历了改进和发展,加上对UKA手术适应证的合理选择,使得UKA术的临床表现取得了可喜的成绩,其假体生存率已接近全膝关节表面置换(TKA)术,有些报道的数据甚至优于TKA的。本综述从假体类型、患者年龄、身体质量指数、手术器械的设计与改进、术者经验及手术技术等方面对膝关节单髁假体生存率的影响,进行分析与综述。

For decades, UKA prosthesis, technique and technology has undergone improvements and developments. The clinical manifestations of UKA achieved gratifying results because of the progress of prosthetic material, prosthetic design, surgical technique and the rational choice of the indications for UKA, where the survivorship has been close to the total knee arthroplasty(TKA), some data even better than TKA. This article reviewed the effect of prosthesis classification, age, body mass index, progress of surgical technique, experience and technology on the survivorship of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

[1]
van der List JP, McDonald LS, et al. Systematic review of medial versus lateral survivorship in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Knee. 2015, 22(6):454-460.
[2]
Streit MR, Streit J, Walker T, et al. Minimally invasive Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in young patients[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2017, 25(3): 660-668.
[3]
Scott CE, Eaton MJ, Nutton RW, et al. Metal-backed versus all-polyethylene unicompartmental knee arthroplasty proximal tibial strain in an experimentally validated finite element model[J]. Bone Joint Res, 2017, 6(1): 22-30.
[4]
王弘毅,冯建民,何川.活动平台与固定平台内侧单髁膝关节置换术后疗效对比的Meta分析[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2013,7(4):499-508.
[5]
徐建平,徐卫东,林国兵,等.双膝骨关节炎患者行小切口单髁置换术与全膝关节置换术临床疗效对比分析[J].中华外科杂志,2013,51(2):157-160.
[6]
Chowdhry M, Khakha RS, Norris M, et al. Improved survival of computer-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: 252 cases with a minimum follow-up of 5 years[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2017, 32(4): 1132-1136.
[7]
Tuncer M, Patel R, Cobb JP, et al. Variable bone mineral density reductions post-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2015, 23(8): 2230-2236.
[8]
Xu TT, Lao YJ, Wang JT, et al. Mid-term results of Oxford phase-3 medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial arthritis in Chinese patients[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2017, 87(4): 287-290.
[9]
Paredes EB, Sanchez PB, Toledano DS, et al. Total knee arthroplasty after failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.clinical results, radiologic findings, and technical tips[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2017, 32(1): 193-196.
[10]
Scott CE, Wade FA, Bhattacharya R, et al. Changes in bone density in metal-backed and all-polyethylene medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2016, 31(3): 702-709.
[11]
Vasso M, Regno CD, Perisano C, et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is effective: ten year results[J]. Int Orthop, 2015, 39(12): 2341-2346.
[12]
Parratte S, Pauly V, Aubaniac JM, et al. No long-term difference between fixed and Mobile medial unicompartmental arthroplasty[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2012, 470(1): 61-68.
[13]
冯建民. 单间室膝关节置换术[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2013,7(4):434-437.
[14]
鲍哲明,孙海宁,王冰,等.膝关节单髁置换活动与固定平台短期疗效分析[J].生物骨科材料与临床研究,2018,15(3):57-65.
[15]
Kozinn SC, Scott R. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1989, 71(1):145.
[16]
Hamilton TW, Pandit HG, Jenkins C, et al. Evidence-based indications for Mobile-Bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in a consecutive cohort of thousand knees[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2017, 32(6): 1779-1785.
[17]
Pandit H, Hamilton TW, Jenkins C, et al. The clinical outcome of minimally invasive phase 3 Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Bone Joint J, 2015, 97-B(11): 1493-1500.
[18]
Waldstein W, Kolbitsch P, Koller U, et al. Sport and physical activity following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2017, 25(3): 717-728.
[19]
Kerens B, Schotanus MG, Boonen B, et al. Cementless versus cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: early results of a non-designer user group[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2017, 25(3): 703-709.
[20]
Campi S, Pandit HG, Dodd CA, et al. Cementless fixation in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review[J]. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2017, 25(3): 736-745.
[21]
Chawla H, Ghomrawi HM, van Der List JP, et al. Establishing Age-Specific Cost-Effective annual revision rates for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2017, 32(1): 326-335.
[22]
Grupp TM, Holderied M, Pietschmann MF, et al. Primary stability of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty under dynamic flexion movement in human femora[J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2017, 41: 39-47.
[23]
Pearle AD, van Der List JP, Lee L, et al. Survivorship and patient satisfaction of robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum two-year follow-up[J]. Knee, 2017, 24(2): 419-428.
[24]
Longo UG, Loppini M, Trovato U, et al. No difference between unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty for the management of medial osteoarthtritis of the knee in the same patient: a systematic review and pooling data analysis[J]. Br Med Bull, 2015, 114(1): 65-73.
[25]
Murray DW, Pandit H, Weston-Simons JS, et al. Does body mass index affect the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement?[J]. Knee, 2013, 20(6): 461-465.
[26]
Cavaignac E, Lafontan V, Reina N, et al. Obesity has no adverse effect on the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement at a minimum follow-up of seven years[J]. Bone Joint J, 2013, 95-B(8): 1064-1068.
[27]
康凯,高石军,董江涛,等.膝关节单髁置换术的发展研究进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2014,22(2):130-133.
[28]
Weber P, Schroder C, Schwiesau J, et al. Increase in the tibial slope reduces wear after medial unicompartmental fixed-bearing arthroplasty of the knee[J/OL]. Biomed Res Int, 2015, (2015):736826. doi: 10.1155/2015/736826.
[29]
李宇,许建中,田科.膝关节单髁置换的研究进展[J].中国实用医刊,2012,39(3):109-111.
[30]
Inui H, Taketomi S, Tahara K, et al. A modified technique to reduce tibial keel cutting errors during an Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2017, 25(3): 710-716.
[31]
姚坚,丁海.计算机导航及机器人技术辅助膝关节单髁置换术的研究进展[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2017,31(1):110-115.
[32]
Grant AL, Doma KD, Hazratwala K. Determination of the accuracy of navigated kinematic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a 2-year follow-up[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2017, 32(5): 1443-1452.
[33]
Ollivier M, Parratte S, Lunebourg A, et al. The John Insall Award: No functional benefit after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty performed with patient-specific instrumentation: a randomized trial[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2016, 474(1): 60-68.
[34]
Tu YH, Xue H, Ma T, et al. Superior femoral component alignment can be achieved with Oxford microplasty instrumentation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2017, 25(3): 729-735.
[1] 邓华梅, 袁札根, 曾德荣, 潘珊珊, 张葆青, 欧爱华, 曹学伟. 全膝关节置换术中气压止血带应用效果与影响因素分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 788-794.
[2] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[3] 闫文, 谢兴文, 顾玉彪, 雷宁波, 马成, 于文霞, 高亚雄, 张磊. 微小RNA与全膝关节置换术后深静脉血栓的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 842-846.
[4] 王宏宇. 固定与活动平台假体在全膝关节置换术中的应用价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 871-876.
[5] 李善武, 叶永杰, 王兵, 王子呓, 银毅, 孙官军, 张大刚. 胫骨高位截骨与单髁置换的早期疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 882-888.
[6] 李辉, 吴奇, 张子琦, 张晗, 王仿, 许鹏. 日间全膝关节置换术早期疗效及标准化流程探索[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 889-892.
[7] 刘伦, 王云鹭, 李锡勇, 韩鹏飞, 张鹏, 李晓东. 机器人辅助膝关节单髁置换术的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 715-721.
[8] 王桂冠, 徐杰. 运动学对线在全膝关节置换术中的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 726-731.
[9] 杨依琴, 何敏仪, 杜桂菊, 刘欣, 詹文英. 膝关节置换术后康复应用基于保护动机理论的健康教育[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 741-746.
[10] 姚轶超, 张麒, 滕海茂, 黄攀, 吴雷涛, 韩哲. 膝关节置换术后恐动症与康复效果及社会支持的相关性[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 613-618.
[11] 樊绪国, 赵永刚. 全膝关节置换术中髌骨轨迹的研究进展及处理策略[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 701-707.
[12] 邵长杰, 杜晓颖, 徐奎帅, 张靓, 纪岩磊. 住院天数影响全膝关节置换术后下肢深静脉血栓形成[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 588-591.
[13] 周晓强, 金宇杰, 李志强, 徐人杰, 张向鑫, 陈广祥, 虞宵. 运动学与机械学对线在全膝关节置换中的比较研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 554-559.
[14] 李博, 张立茉, 乔成钢, 包金全, 白志刚, 赵文强. 全膝关节置换术下肢力线的影响因素[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 398-403.
[15] 刘亚茹, 毛彦杰, 张仁波, 何阿祥, 张先龙, 刘万军. 全膝关节置换术行髌骨置换的疗效及其影响因素[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 201-208.
阅读次数
全文


摘要