切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (01) : 58 -63,98. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2019.01.012

所属专题: 文献

基础论著

人股骨头表面微观形貌的表征提取及分析
段浩1, 金泽亚1, 孙彬1, 刘政1, 钟宗雨1, 何飞1,()   
  1. 1. 650032 昆明医科大学第一附属医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-05 出版日期:2019-02-01
  • 通信作者: 何飞
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(31460244); 云南省应用基础研究重点项目(2015FA002)

Characterization and analysis of human femoral head surface micromorphology

Hao Duan1, Zeya Jin1, Bin Sun1, Zheng Liu1, Zongyu Zhong1, Fei He1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kuming 650032, China
  • Received:2018-03-05 Published:2019-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Fei He
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: He Fei, Email:
引用本文:

段浩, 金泽亚, 孙彬, 刘政, 钟宗雨, 何飞. 人股骨头表面微观形貌的表征提取及分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(01): 58-63,98.

Hao Duan, Zeya Jin, Bin Sun, Zheng Liu, Zongyu Zhong, Fei He. Characterization and analysis of human femoral head surface micromorphology[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(01): 58-63,98.

目的

对多个人股骨头微观形貌进行表征并提取形貌参数进行分析,为设计与制备仿生骨修复材料奠定理论基础。

方法

收集43例2016至2017年度在昆明医科大学第一附属医院骨科需行人工股骨头或全髋关节置换术患者的股骨头标本,纳入标准为术前已完善骨密度检查,血液检验无异常内并签署知情同意书的患者;排除标准为存在陈旧性骨折,或患有骨代谢疾病、肿瘤、局部炎症、结核、遗传性疾病史的患者。分别按照年龄、性别、骨密度分为3组:(1)青中年组(42~59)岁(n =7)/老年组(60~83)岁(n =36);(2)男性组(n =21)/女性组(n =22);(3)骨量正常组(n =9),骨量减少组(n =13),骨质疏松组(n =21)。利用扫描电镜表征其表面微观形貌并用Image J软件提取形貌参数,用多因素方差分析对得到的微观形貌参数数据(直径、角度、长度)进行统计学分析。

结果

不同组别的骨表面微观形貌存在着不同现象。(1)骨质疏松组:矿化胶原纤维束直径(1.57±0.46)μm、长度(19.14±7.98)μm、角度(66.67±9.40)°;骨量减少组:矿化胶原纤维束直径(2.02±0.71)μm、长度(23.10±7.89)μm、角度(51.66±14.78)°;骨量正常组:矿化胶原纤维束直径(2.22±0.25)μm、长度(27.02±12.25)μm、角度(46.85±7.53)°。3组之间直径差异有统计学意义(F =33.687,P<0.01),LSD-t两两比较,骨质疏松组和骨量正常组直径组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);3组之间及组间的角度、长度参数差异有统计学意义(F =19.614,P<0.05)。(2)老年组与中青年组胶原纤维束数据分别为:直径(1.76±0.62)μm和(2.22±0.25)μm(t =-2.896,P<0.01)、角度(60.51±13.99)°和(46.85±7.53)°(t =7.674,P<0.01)、长度(20.89±8.11)μm和(27.02±12.25)μm(t =-2.653,P<0.05)。(3)不同性别两组间的角度差异较大(t=2.375,P<0.05),其余组数据差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

扫描电镜技术可对股骨头骨表面微观形貌进行表征,运用Image J软件处理电镜图像可以准确可靠地提取微观形貌参数。不同的骨状态会导致骨表面微观形貌发生变化,即矿化胶原纤维束的直径、长度、取向分布的不同。

Objective

To observe the surface micro-topography of multiple femoral heads under different grouping and to extract, analyze and summarize the topographic parameters.

Methods

During 2016 to 2017, 43 cases of femoral head specimens for patients with artificial femoral head replacement or total hip arthroplasty in the Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University were collected. The inclusion criteria: the patients who have completed bone density examination before surgery, no abnormalities in blood tests and signed informed consent. Exclusion criteria: the patients with old fractures, or with a history of bone metabolic diseases, tumors, local inflammation, tuberculosis, and hereditary diseases. The specimens divided into three groups according to age, sex and bone density: (1)the middle-aged group (42-59 years old, n=7)and the elderly group (60-83 years old, n=36); (2)the male group (n=21) and the female group (n=22); (3)the normal bone mass group (n=9), the bone mass reduction group (n=13), and the osteoporosis group (n=21). The surface microscopic morphology was characterized by scanning electron microscopy and the morphology parameters were extracted by ImageJ software. The data of the microscopic topography parameters (diameter, angle and length) were statistically analyzed by multivariate analysis of variance.

Results

Different bone surface morphology was found in each group. (1)The micro-topography parameters of the three groups were as follows: in the osteoporosis group, the mineralized collagen fiber bundle diameter was (1.57±0.46)μm, the length was (19.14±7.98)μm, angle was (66.67±9.40)°; in the osteopenia group, the diameter of collagen fibril bundle diameter was (2.02±0.71)μm, the length was (23.10±7.89)μm and the angle was (51.66±14.78)°; in the normal bone mass group, the diameter of collagen fibril bundle diameter was (2.22±0.25)μm, the length was (27.02±12.25)μm and the angle was (46.85±7.53)°.Statistical analysis showed significant difference in diameter among the three groups (F =33.687, P<0.01). LSD-t comparison showed significant difference in the diameters between osteoporosis group and normal bone mass group (P<0.05). The differences in angles and lengths of the three groups were statistically significant (F =19.614, P<0.05). (2) Data of collagen fibril bundles in the elderly group vs. the young and middle-aged group: diameter (1.76±0.62) μm and (2.22±0.25)μm(t =-2.896, P<0.01); angle (60.51±13.99) ° and (46.85±7.53)°(t =7.674, P<0.01); length (20.89±8.11) μm and (27.02±12.25)μm(t =-2.653, P<0.05). (3) No statistical difference was found in the data between the two gender groups(P>0.05).

Conclusions

SEM can clearly and completely characterize the microstructure of the bone surface, and the microscopic morphology parameters can be accurately and reliably extracted by using ImageJ software. Different state of bone will lead to the changes of the surface micro-morphology, including mineralize collagen fibers diameter, length, orientation of the different distribution.

图1 SEM(扫描电镜)下不同骨量组别的骨表面微观形貌对比(× 500)。图A为骨质正常组,示胶原纤维排列整齐;图B为骨量减少组,示胶原纤维束较正常组变细;图C为骨质疏松组,示骨小梁表面凹凸,骨矿化胶原纤维束排列紊乱
图2 SEM(扫描电镜)下不同骨量组的骨表面微观形貌形态对比(×3 000)。图A为骨质正常组;图B为骨量减少组,示胶原纤维束直径变细,间隙增大;图C为骨质疏松组,示出现部分胶原纤维束断裂、缺失的现象
图3 SEM(扫描电镜)下不同年龄组的骨表面微观形貌形态对比(× 3 000)。图A为青中年组,示胶原纤维束正常;图B为老年组,示大部分矿化胶原纤维束明显出现断裂、连续性丧失
图4 SEM(扫描电镜)下不同性别的骨表面微观形貌对比(×3 000)。图A为男性组,图B为女性组,示两组间并无明显差异
表1 不同骨量组别的骨表面微观形貌参数分析(±s)
表2 不同年龄组骨表面微观形貌参数分析(±s)
表3 不同性别组骨表面微观形貌参数分析(±s)
图5 不同骨量组之间的矿化胶原纤维束取向分布分析
[1]
Osterhoff G, Morgan EF, Shefelbine SJ, et al. Bone mechanical properties and changes with osteoporosis[J]. Injury, 2016, 47(Suppl 2):S11-S20.
[2]
Weiner S, Wagner HD. The material bone: structure-mechanical function relations[J]. Annu Rev Mater Res, 2003, 28(1): 271-298.
[3]
Reznikov N, Shahar R, Weiner S. Bone hierarchical structure in three dimensions [J]. Acta Biomater, 2014, 10(9): 3815-3826.
[4]
Weiner S, Arad T, Sabanay I, et al. Rotated plywood structure of primary lamellar bone in the rat:orientations of the collagen fibril arrays[J]. Bone, 1997, 20(6):509-514.
[5]
Mcmurray RJ, Gadegaard N, Tsimbouri P, et al. Nanoscale surfaces for the long-term maintenance ofmesenchymal stem cell phenotype and multipotency[J]. Nat Mater, 2011, 10(8): 637-644.
[6]
Yang C. Mechanical memory and dosing influence stem cell fate[J]. Nat Mater, 2014, 13(6): 645-652.
[7]
Sun AX, Lin H, Fritch MR, et al. Chondrogenesis of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in 3-dimensional, photocrosslinked hydrogel constructs: effect of cell seeding density and material stiffness[J/OL]. Acta Biomater, 2017, 58: 302-311.doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.06.016
[8]
Ozdemir MT, Kir MC. Repair of long bone defects with deminer-alized bone matrix and autogenous bone composite[J]. Indian J Orthop, 2011, 45(3): 226-230.
[9]
Zhao X, Zhou L, Li Q, et al. Biomimetic mineralization of carboxymethyl chitosan nanofibers with improved osteogenic activity in vitro and in vivo[J/OL]. Carbohydr Polym, 2018, 195: 225-234. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.04.090.
[10]
石玉泽,陆志东,金群华.自体骨修复初次全膝关节置换术中胫骨骨缺损的临床研究[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2012,6(2):207-212.
[11]
邱贵兴,裴福兴,胡侦明,等.中国骨质疏松性骨折诊疗指南(全文)(骨质疏松性骨折诊断及治疗原则)[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2015,9(6):795-798.
[12]
Ashim Gupta, Nitin Kukkar, Kevin Sharif, et al. Bone graft substitutes for spine fusion: a brief review[J]. World J Orthop, 2015, 6(6): 449-456.
[13]
Li J, Wang Q, Gu Y, et al. Production of composite scaffold containing silk fibroin, chitosan, and gelatin for 3D cell culture and bone tissue regeneration[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2017, 23:5311-5320.
[14]
刘燕,付玉,刘帅,等.两种矿化胶原的显微结构对成骨样细胞MG 63形貌的影响[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2014,46(1):19-24.
[15]
Goldstein S A. The mechanical properties of trabecular bone: dependence on anatomic location and function[J]. J Biomech, 1987, 20(11–12):1055-1061.
[16]
Choi K, Kuhn JL, Ciarelli MJ, et al. The elastic moduli of human subchondral, trabecular, and cortical bone tissue and the size-dependency of cortical bone modulus[J]. J Biomech, 1990, 23(11):1103-1113.
[17]
Georgiadis M, Müller R, Schneider P. Techniques to assess bone ultrastructure organization: orientation and arrangement of mineralized collagen fibrils[J/OL]. J R Soc Interface, 2016, 13(119):20160088. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2016.0088.
[18]
徐丛,徐飞,杜元良,等.绝经后女性不同Singh指数骨扫描电镜特点[J].中国老年学杂志,2016,36(4):936-938.
[19]
Hua W D, Chen P P, Xu M Q, et al. Quantitative description of collagen fibre network ontrabecular bone surfaces based on AFM imaging[J]. J Microsc, 2016, 262(1):112-122.
[20]
Lv LW, Liu YS, Zhang P, et al. The nanoscale geometry of TiO2 nanotubes influences the osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells by modulating H3K4 trimethylation[J]. Biomaterials, 2015, 39:193-205.
[1] 许正文, 李振, 侯振扬, 苏长征, 朱彪. 富血小板血浆联合植骨治疗早期非创伤性股骨头坏死[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-779.
[2] 卫杨文祥, 黄浩然, 刘予豪, 陈镇秋, 王海彬, 周驰. 股骨头坏死细胞治疗的前景和挑战[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 694-700.
[3] 马瑞, 杨佩, 田润, 王春生, 王坤正. 机器人辅助髓芯减压术治疗股骨头坏死的效果[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 123-128.
[4] 余新愿, 李旭升, 张浩强, 李梓瑶, 周胜虎, 乔永杰, 甄平, 宋晓阳, 章文华. 青年患者生物固定型人工全髋关节置换术后疗效评估[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 11-18.
[5] 莫亮, 熊贤梅, 马超, 刘予豪, 陈镇秋, 何伟, 周驰. 股骨颈骨折内固定术后因素与股骨头坏死关系的分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 735-744.
[6] 徐永清, 浦路桥, 李川, 单长蒙, 浦绍全, 王腾, 林玮, 蔡兴博, 李霞. 保留后上支持动脉的股方肌骨瓣治疗股骨头坏死的临床研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 664-669.
[7] 余少君, 汪衍雪, 栾烁, 马超, 伍少玲. 富血小板血浆在股骨头坏死治疗中的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 462-466.
[8] 孙强, 郭晓忠, 王冉东, 李兵, 岳聚安, 刘忘言, 陈蛟. 双粗通道减压植骨+结构性骨支撑治疗早期股骨头坏死疗效分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(06): 490-495.
[9] 陈亦阳, 刘佳玉, 万全, 卢志远, 高梓君, 刘佳梦. 半侧颜面短小畸形患儿非病变侧下颌骨形态改变特点[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 234-240.
[10] 宋晓亮, 郝海虎, 刘渊, 李浩江, 雷晓晶, 邵新中, 李卿源. 股骨重建钉治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效观察[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 201-208.
[11] 李玉龙, 焦龙兵, 郑连生. 液氮冷冻法制备兔股骨头坏死模型新方法及效果评估[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(05): 263-268.
[12] 王娟, 王忠正, 王宇钏, 李会杰, 李泳龙, 程晓东, 朱燕宾, 吕红芝, 陈伟, 张英泽. 股骨头部分置换术精准微创治疗ARCO Ⅲ期股骨头缺血坏死的实验研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(05): 260-262.
[13] 朱燕宾, 程晓东, 王宇钏, 王忠正, 李泳龙, 李会杰, 王娟, 吕红芝, 陈伟, 张英泽. 股骨头部分置换术精准微创治疗中老年ARCO Ⅲ期股骨头缺血坏死的有限元分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(05): 257-259.
[14] 王娟, 陈伟, 李会杰, 连晓东, 侯志勇, 邵新中, 邵德成, 朱燕宾, 王忠正, 王宇钏, 张英泽. 应用自体股骨髁骨软骨整体移植微创治疗ARCO Ⅲ期股骨头缺血坏死[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(04): 193-196.
[15] 李田利, 张照龙, 孙成建, 刘国平, 谢宜兴, 赵晓龙, 邵黎明, 郑璇, 王长鑫, 徐锐. 基于血流动力学、血脂及外周血炎症标志物的眼段动脉瘤破裂风险相关研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 78-83.
阅读次数
全文


摘要