切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华关节外科杂志(电子版)

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (05) : 576 -585. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2022.05.008

荟萃分析

前交叉韧带对膝关节单髁置换疗效影响的荟萃分析
刘典琦1, 李之琛1, 唐林1, 潘恩豪1, 卢伟杰1,†()   
  1. 1. 510120　广州医科大学附属第一医院关节外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-22 出版日期:2022-10-01
  • 通信作者: 卢伟杰

Meta analysis of anterior cruciate ligament influence on curative effect of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Dianqi Liu1, Zhichen Li1, Lin Tang1, Enhao Pan1, Weijie Lu1,†()   

  1. 1. Joint Surgery Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China
  • Received:2021-12-22 Published:2022-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Weijie Lu
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

刘典琦, 李之琛, 唐林, 潘恩豪, 卢伟杰. 前交叉韧带对膝关节单髁置换疗效影响的荟萃分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 576-585.

Dianqi Liu, Zhichen Li, Lin Tang, Enhao Pan, Weijie Lu. Meta analysis of anterior cruciate ligament influence on curative effect of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(05): 576-585.

目的

比较前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤和完整行膝关节单髁置换术(UKA)后的临床疗效，进一步探索前交叉韧带损伤是否为UKA的禁忌证之一。

方法

计算机搜索中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网、万方数据库等中文数据库和PubMed、Web of Science、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)、循证医学数据库(Cochrane Library)等英文数据库中与ACL有关的UKA的病例对照文献，检索时限为建库至2022年4月。排除同时应用其他术式文献，没有评估ACL损伤程度文献，观察指标不符文献以及无法获得全文的文献，2名研究员独立筛选、评价文献。采用RevMan 5.4软件进行Meta分析。

结果

最终12篇文献纳入本研究，其中英文文献9篇，中文文献3篇；共有3 177例膝：ACL损伤组665例膝；ACL完整组2 512例膝。Meta分析显示：在膝关节活动度(ROM)[均数差(MD)＝－1.40，95%置信区间(CI)(－3.08，0.29)]、膝关节翻修率[比值比(OR)＝1.24，95%CI(0.82，1.89)]、胫骨后倾角度[MD＝－0.06，95%CI(－0.51，0.40)]、美国特种医院(HSS)评分[MD＝－0.47，95%CI(－4.33，3.39)]、牛津膝关节评分(OKS)[MD＝－0.21，95%CI(－1.42，1.01)]和Tenger评分[MD＝－0.09，95%CI(－0.39，0.20)]方面，两组差异无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)。在膝外翻角度方面[标准化均数差(SMD)＝－0.39，95%CI(－0.64，－0.13)]，ACL损伤组大于ACL完整组(P＝0.003，P<0.05)。

结论

ACL损伤被定义为韧带在术中用小拉勾用力牵拉后不能保持正常张力或被拉断，此类患者的术后中远期疗效与ACL完整组对比相似，ACL损伤可能不是UKA的手术禁忌证之一。

关键词: 前交叉韧带, 关节成形术，置换，膝, Meta分析
Objective

To compare the efficacy of deficient and intact anterior cruciate ligament in treatment of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty(UKA)of the knee joint. Further explored whether the deficiency of the anterior cruciate ligament is one of the contraindications for UKA.

Methods

Databases of BioMedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Data, PubMed, Web of Science, Excerpta Medica Database(EMBASE)and Cochrane Library were searched for studies about the case-control literature on ACL-related UKA surgery from inception to April 2022. The literature that using other methods concurrently, no assessment of the ACL, irrelevant to the observation index or not accessed to the full-text were excluded. Two researchers strictly screened and evaluated the literature. The meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.4.

Results

Twelve articles were enrolled in this study, including nine articles in English and three articles in Chinese. A total of 3177 knees were investigated, including 665 knees in the ACL deficient group and 2512 knees in ACL intact group. The meta-analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the range of motion of the knee [ mean difference(MD)=-1.40, 95% confidence interval(CI)(-3.08, 0.29)], the rate of revision [ odds ratio(OR)=1.24, 95% CI(0.82, 1.89)], the posterior slope of the tibial implant [ standard mean difference(SMD)=-0.39, 95% CI(-0.51, -0.40)], the Hospital for Special Surgery(HSS)score [ MD=-0.47, 95% CI(-4.33, 3.39)], the Oxford Knee Score(OKS) [ MD=-0.21, 95% CI(-1.42, 1.01)] and the Tenger score [MD=-0.09, 95% CI(-0.39, 0.20)] between the two groups (P>0.05). In the valgus angle of the knee [SMD=-0.39, 95% CI(-0.64, -0.13)], the ACL deficient group was superior to ACL intact group (P =0.003, P < 0.05).

Conclusions

ACL deficiency is defined as that the ligament can not maintain normal tension or be pulled off after being forcibly pulled with a small hook during the operation. The mid-term and long-term efficacy of such patients after the operation is similar to that of the ACL intact group. ACL deficiency may not be one of the contraindications for UKA.

Key words: Anterior cruciate ligament, Arthroplasty, replacement, knee, Meta analysis
表1 纳入文章的基本特征
作者及年份 性别(男/女) 年龄(岁) BMI(kg/m2) 样本量(例膝) 评价指标
Plancher[12] 2022 ACLD：33/25 ACLD：65±10 ACLD：28±4 ACLD：58 ①⑦
  ACLI：86/71 ACLI：65±11 ACLI：28±5 ACLI：157  
Kikuchi[11] 2021 ACLD：6/26 ACLD：72.9 ACLD：25.8 ACLD：32 ①⑦
  ACLI：90/279 ACLI：72.7 ACLI：25.5 ACLI：369  
Plancher[8] 2021 总体：61/70* ACLD：65±12 平均：27.9 ± 4 ACLD：32 ①②
    ACLI：65±9   ACLI：99  
Tao[13] 2021 ACLD：8/32 ACLD：69.35±7.9 NR ACLD：40 ⑦
  ACLI：10/35 ACLI：64.27±8.55   ACLI：45  
Zumbrunn[14] 2020 ACLD：3/5 ACLD：63 ACLD：26.9 ACLD：8 ⑦
  ACLI：8/2 ACLI：67 ACLI：25.3 ACLI：10  
Hamilton[16] 2016 ACLD：150/105 ACLD：68.19±9.28 NR ACLD：255 ①⑤⑥
  ACLI：271/294 ACLI：66.1±9.7   ACLI：565  
Engh[17] 2014 总体：223/338* 平均：66±10 平均：29.5±6 ACLD：68 ①
        ACLI：706
Boissonneault[18] 2013 ACLD：32/10 ACLD：65±11 NR ACLD：46 ①②③⑥
  ACLI：35/10 ACLI：65±11   ACLI：46  
Hernigou[19] 2004 NR 平均：70 NR ACLD：18 ①
        ACLI：81
彭松[15] 2016 ACLD：8/24 ACLD：62.4±8 ACLD：22.34±3.5 ACLD：32 ①⑤
  ACLI：21/160 ACLI：61.9±9 ACLI：22.67±3.6 ACLI：181  
刘少华[9] 2021 ACLD：17/28 ACLD：63.52±10.48 ACLD：22.53±3.12 ACLD：45 ①②③④⑥
  ACLI：94/129 ACLI：64.22±11.01 ACLI：23.15±2.99 ACLI：223
吴颖斌[10] 2021 ACLD：5/24* ACLD：68±6 ACLD：26±3 ACLD：31 ④⑦
  ACLI：8/18* ACLI：67±10 ACLI：26±4 ACLI：30  
表2 纳入文章的MINORS评分
  Plancher等[12]2022 Kikuchi等[11]2021 Plancher等[8]2021 Tao等[13]2021 Zumbrunn等[14]2020 Hamilton等[16]2016
明确给出研究目的 2 2 2 2 2 2
纳入患者连贯性 2 2 2 2 2 2
预期数据的收集 2 0 2 0 0 0
终点指标是否恰当反映研究目的 1 2 1 2 1 2
终点指标评价客观性 1 0 0 1 0 2
随访时间是否充分 2 2 2 0 0 2
失访率低于5% 2 2 2 0 2 0
是否估算样本量 0 0 0 0 0 0
对照组选择是否恰当 2 2 2 2 2 1
对照组是否同步 2 2 2 2 2 2
组间基线是否可比 2 2 2 1 0 1
统计分析是否恰当 2 2 2 2 2 2
总结 20 18 19 14 13 16
  Engh等[17]2014 Boissonneault等[18]2013 Hernigou等[19]2004 彭松等[15]2016 刘少华等[9]2021 吴颖斌等[10]2021
明确给出研究目的 2 2 2 2 2 2
纳入患者连贯性 2 2 2 2 2 2
预期数据的收集 0 0 0 0 0 0
终点指标是否恰当反映研究目的 2 1 2 2 2 2
终点指标评价客观性 2 2 0 2 0 0
随访时间是否充分 2 1 2 0 1 0
失访率低于5% 0 2 0 0 2 0
是否估算样本量 0 0 0 0 0 0
对照组选择是否恰当 2 2 2 2 2 2
对照组是否同步 2 2 2 2 2 2
组间基线是否可比 1 1 0 1 2 2
统计分析是否恰当 2 2 2 2 2 2
总结 17 17 14 15 17 14
图1 文献检索及筛选流程图
图2 不同评价指标的漏斗图分析。图A为ROM(膝关节活动度)漏斗图；图B为膝关节翻修率漏斗图；图C为Tenger评分漏斗图；图D为膝外翻角度漏斗图；图E为OKS(牛津膝关节功能)评分漏斗图；图F为胫骨后倾角度漏斗图；图G为HSS(美国特种医院)评分漏斗图
图3 ACL(前交叉韧带)损伤组和ACL完整组UKA(膝关节单髁置换术)术后ROM(膝关节活动度)比较森林图
图4 ACL(前交叉韧带)损伤组和ACL完整组UKA(膝关节单髁置换术)术后翻修率比较森林图
图5 ACL(前交叉韧带)损伤组和ACL完整组UKA(膝关节单髁置换)术后Tenger评分比较森林图
图6 ACL(前交叉韧带)损伤组和ACL完整组UKA(膝关节单髁置换术)术后膝外翻角度比较的森林图
图7 ACL(前交叉韧带)损伤组和ACL完整组UKA(膝关节单髁置换术)术后OKS(牛津膝关节功能)评分比较的森林图
图8 ACL(前交叉韧带)损伤组和ACL完整组UKA(膝关节单髁置换术)术后胫骨后倾角度比较的森林图
图9 ACL(前交叉韧带)损伤组和ACL完整组UKA(膝关节单髁置换术)术后HSS(美国特种医院)评分比较的森林图
[1]
任燕，石娅娅，谭波，等．中国人群膝骨关节炎危险因素的Meta分析[J]．现代预防医学，2015，42(12):2282-2284, 2292.
[2]
马偲铭，王连成，张伟业．膝骨关节炎的发病机制及中医康复研究进展[J]．实用医院临床杂志，2021，18(3):194-197.
[3]
张启栋，曹光磊，何川，等．膝关节单髁置换术围手术期管理专家共识[J]．中华骨与关节外科杂志，2020，13(4):265-271.
[4]
李沂阳，孔宁，刘冠志，等．新版膝关节评分系统在评价单髁关节置换术的应用分析[J/CD]．中华关节外科杂志(电子版)，2019，13(1):47-51.
[5]
Mancuso F, Christopher AD, Murray DW, et al. Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the ACL-deficient knee[J]. J Orthop Traumatol, 2016, 17(3): 267-275.
[6]
Goodfellow J, O'Connor J. The anterior cruciate ligament in knee arthroplasty. A risk-factor with unconstrained meniscal prostheses[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1992, (276): 245-252.
[7]
Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, et al. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2003, 73(9): 712-716.
[8]
Plancher KD, Briggs KK, Brite JE, et al. The Lawrence D. Dorr surgical techniques & technologies award: patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) in medial and lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: does the status of the ACL impact outcomes？[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2022, 37(8):S710-S715.
[9]
刘少华，周观明，陈希聪，等．前交叉韧带缺陷对固定平台单髁置换后中期疗效的影响[J]．中国组织工程研究，2021，25(6):860-865.
[10]
吴颖斌，卢伟杰，郑冲，等．前交叉韧带MRI异常患者单髁膝关节置换随访分析[J/CD]．中华关节外科杂志(电子版)，2021，15(1):18-22.
[11]
Kikuchi K, Hiranaka T, Kamenaga T, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament deficiency is not always a contraindication for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study in nondesigner's Japanese hospital[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2021, 36(2): 495-500.
[12]
Plancher KD, Shanmugam JP, Brite JE, et al. Relevance of the tibial slope on functional outcomes in ACL-deficient and ACL intact fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2021, 36(9): 3123-3130.
[13]
Tao Y, Tang S, Zhao P, et al. Value of passive anterior tibial subluxation on axial MRI in identifying anterior cruciate ligament functional deficiency in patients with advanced anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee: a case-control study[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2021, 22(1): 434.
[14]
Zumbrunn T, Schütz P, von Knoch F, et al. Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in ACL-deficient knees is a viable treatment option: in vivo kinematic evaluation using a moving fluoroscope[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2020, 28(6):1765-1773.
[15]
彭松．前交叉韧带缺陷和髌股关节退变对固定平台单髁置换术后疗效影响的研究[D]．上海：第二军医大学，2016.
[16]
Hamilton TW, Pistritto C, Jenkins C, et al. Unicompartmental knee replacement: does the macroscopic status of the anterior cruciate ligament affect outcome？[J]. Knee, 2016, 23(3): 506-510.
[17]
Engh GA, Ammeen DJ. Unicondylar arthroplasty in knees with deficient anterior cruciate ligaments[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014, 472(1): 73-77.
[18]
Boissonneault A, Pandit H, Pegg E, et al. No difference in survivorship after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with or without an intact anterior cruciate ligament[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2013, 21(11): 2480-2486.
[19]
Hernigou P, Deschamps G. Posterior slope of the tibial implant and the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2004, 86-A(3): 506-511.
[20]
Zemirline A, Gérard R, Uguen A, et al. Meniscoligamentous band between the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus and the anterior cruciate ligament: arthroscopic, anatomical and histological observations[J]. Surg Radiol Anat, 2010, 32(2): 129-133.
[21]
Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Grelsamer RP. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery. 10-year minimum follow-up period[J]. J Arthroplasty, 1996, 11(7): 782-788.
[22]
Pegg EC, Mancuso F, Alinejad M, et al. Sagittal kinematics of mobile unicompartmental knee replacement in anterior cruciate[J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2016, 31:33-39.
[23]
Varadarajan KM, Zumbrunn T, Rubash HE, et al. Reverse engineering nature to design biomimetic total knee implants[J]. J Knee Surg, 2015, 28(5): 363-369.
[24]
Suter L, Roth A, Angst M, et al. Is ACL deficiency always a contraindication for medial UKA? Kinematic and kinetic analysis of implanted and contralateral knees[J]. Gait Posture, 2019, 68: 244-251.
[25]
Markatos K, Kaseta MK, Lallos SN, et al. The anatomy of the ACL and its importance in ACL reconstruction[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2013, 23(7): 747-752.
[26]
Stone AV, Marx S, Conley CW. Management of partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament：a review of the anatomy, diagnosis, and treatment[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2021, 29(2): 60-70.
[27]
Sharpe I, Tyrrell PN, White SH. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment for unicompartmental knee replacement: a limited role[J]. Knee, 2001, 8(3): 213-218.
[28]
马童，凃意辉．前交叉韧带在膝关节单髁置换术中作用的研究进展[J/CD]．中华关节外科杂志(电子版)，2012，6(4):612-616.
[29]
吴颖斌，卢伟杰．前交叉韧带变性损伤单髁膝关节置换进展[J/CD]．中华关节外科杂志(电子版)，2021，15(5):601-608.
[30]
Trompeter AJ, Gill K, Appleton M, et al. Predicting anterior cruciate ligament integrity in patients with osteoarthritis[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2009, 17(6): 595-599.
[31]
Watanabe T, Abbasi AZ, Conditt MA, et al. In vivo kinematics of a robot-assisted uni- and multi-compartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. J Orthop Sci, 2014, 19(4): 552-557.
[32]
Goodfellow JW, Tibrewal SB, Sherman KP, et al. Unicompartmental Oxford meniscal knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 1987, 2(1): 1-9.
[33]
Ashraf T, Newman JH, Evans RL, et al. Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement survivorship and clinical experience over 21 years[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2002, 84(8): 1126-1130.
[34]
Hollinghurst D, Stoney J, Ward T, et al. No deterioration of kinematics and cruciate function 10 years after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty[J]. Knee, 2006, 13(6): 440-444.
[35]
Jean-Noël AA, Komistek RD, Jean-Manuel A, et al. In vivo determination of knee kinematics for subjects implanted with a unicompartmental arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2002, 17(8): 1049-1054.
[36]
Møller JT, Weeth RE, Keller JO, et al. Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Cadaver study of the importance of the anterior cruciate ligament[J]. Acta Orthop Scand, 1985, 56(2): 120-123.
[37]
Christensen NO. Unicompartmental prosthesis for gonarthrosis. A nine-year series of 575 knees from a Swedish hospital[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1991, (273): 165-169.
[38]
马童，薛华明，文涛，等．单髁置换术应用于骨关节炎合并前交叉韧带缺失的三维有限元研究[J]．生物骨科材料与临床研究，2019，16(3):12-17.
[39]
彭松，王波，符培亮，等．前交叉韧带缺陷对单髁置换疗效影响的研究[J]．中国骨与关节杂志，2016，5(6):449-453.
[40]
Hurst JM, Berend KR, Morris MJ, et al. Abnormal preoperative MRI does not correlate with failure of UKA[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2013, 28(9 Suppl): 184-186.
[41]
van der List JP, Chawla H, Zuiderbaan HA, et al. The role of preoperative patient characteristics on outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis critique[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2016, 31(11): 2617-2622.
[1] 邓华梅, 袁札根, 曾德荣, 潘珊珊, 张葆青, 欧爱华, 曹学伟. 全膝关节置换术中气压止血带应用效果与影响因素分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 788-794.
[2] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[3] 罗旺林, 杨传军, 许国星, 俞建国, 孙伟东, 颜文娟, 冯志. 开放性楔形胫骨高位截骨术不同植入材料的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 818-826.
[4] 闫文, 谢兴文, 顾玉彪, 雷宁波, 马成, 于文霞, 高亚雄, 张磊. 微小RNA与全膝关节置换术后深静脉血栓的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 842-846.
[5] 黄子荣, 罗渝鑫, 杨文瀚, 陈小虎, 谢环宇, 朱伟民. 前交叉韧带重建对膝关节稳定性影响的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 847-854.
[6] 王宏宇. 固定与活动平台假体在全膝关节置换术中的应用价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 871-876.
[7] 李善武, 叶永杰, 王兵, 王子呓, 银毅, 孙官军, 张大刚. 胫骨高位截骨与单髁置换的早期疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 882-888.
[8] 李辉, 吴奇, 张子琦, 张晗, 王仿, 许鹏. 日间全膝关节置换术早期疗效及标准化流程探索[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 889-892.
[9] 李雄雄, 周灿, 徐婷, 任予, 尚进. 初诊导管原位癌伴微浸润腋窝淋巴结转移率的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 466-474.
[10] 张再博, 王冰雨, 焦志凯, 檀碧波. 胃癌术后下肢深静脉血栓危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 475-480.
[11] 武慧铭, 郭仁凯, 李辉宇. 机器人辅助下经自然腔道取标本手术治疗结直肠癌安全性和有效性的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 395-400.
[12] 莫闲, 杨闯. 肝硬化患者并发门静脉血栓危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 678-683.
[13] 段文忠, 白延霞, 徐文亭, 祁虹霞, 吕志坚. 七氟烷和丙泊酚在肝切除术中麻醉效果比较Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 640-645.
[14] 杨海龙, 邓满军, 樊羿辰, 徐梦钰, 陈芳德, 吴威浩, 张生元. 腹腔镜胆总管探查术一期缝合术后胆漏危险因素Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 545-550.
[15] 邱红生, 林树体, 梁朝莹, 劳世高, 何荷. 模拟现实步态训练对膝关节前交叉韧带损伤的功能恢复及对跌倒恐惧的影响[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 343-350.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号