[1] |
Miller LE, Gondusky JS, Bhattacharyya S, et al. Does surgical approach affect outcomes in total hip arthroplasty through 90 days of follow-up? A systematic review with meta-analysis[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2018, 33(4): 1296-1302.
|
[2] |
Wang Z, Jz H, Wu CH, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of direct anterior approach versus posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2018, 13(1): 229-240.
|
[3] |
Putananon C, Tuchinda H, Arirachakaran A, et al. Comparison of direct anterior, lateral, posterior and posterior-2 approaches in total hip arthroplasty: network meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2018, 28(2): 255-267.
|
[4] |
Higgins BT, Barlow DR, Heagerty NE, et al. Anterior vs. posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty,a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].J Arthroplasty, 2015, 30(3): 419-434.
|
[5] |
Berstock JR, Blom AW, Beswick AD. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the standard versus mini-incision posterior approach to total hip arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2014, 29(10): 1970-1982.
|
[6] |
National Guideline Centre (UK). Evidence review for hip replacement approach: Joint replacement (primary): hip, knee and shoulder[M/OL]. London:National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK),2020:PMID: 32881466.
URL
|
[7] |
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations[J]. BMJ, 2008, 336(7650): 924-926.
|
[8] |
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust[M/OL]. Washington (DC):National Academies Press (US), 2011. doi 10.17226/13058.
|
[9] |
Brouwers MC, Kerkvliet K, Spithoff K. The AGREE Reporting Checklist: a tool to improve reporting of clinical practice guidelines[J/OL]. BMJ, 2016, 9(6):i1152. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1152.
|
[10] |
Sinclair D, Isba R, Kredo T, et al. World Health Organization guideline development: an evaluation[J/OL]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(5): e63715.doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063715.
|
[11] |
Xing D, Wang B, Hou Y, et al. A protocol for developing a clinical practice guideline for intra-articular injection for treating knee osteoarthritis[J]. Int J Surg Protoc, 2018, 7(9): 1-4.
|
[12] |
Xing D, Wang Q, Yang Z, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for intra-articular injection in knee osteoarthritis: formulating and evaluating research questions[J]. Int J Rheum Dis, 2018, 21(8): 1533-1542.
|
[13] |
Khodyakov D, Grant S, Denger B, et al. Practical considerations in using online Modified-Delphi approaches to engage patients and other stakeholders in clinical practice guideline development[J]. Patient, 2020, 13(1): 11-21.
|
[14] |
Conrad S, Kaiser L, Kallenbach M, et al. GRADE evidence to decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices[Article in German][J/OL]. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes, 2019, 140:63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2019.02.006.
|
[15] |
Chen Y, Yang K, Marušic A, et al. A reporting Tool for practice guidelines in health care: the RIGHT statement[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2017, 166(2): 128-132.
|