切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (02) : 195 -200. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2023.02.007

临床论著

髂筋膜阻滞复合全身麻醉在全髋关节置换术中的应用
彭胜男(), 李志伟, 徐静, 彭晓星, 蒋微   
  1. 620010 眉山市中医医院
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-21 出版日期:2023-04-01
  • 通信作者: 彭胜男
  • 基金资助:
    眉山市东坡区科技局(kjzd202152)

Local iliac fascia block combined with general anaesthesia in total hip arthroplasty

Shengnan Peng(), Zhiwei Li, Jing Xu, Xiaoxing Peng, Wei Jiang   

  1. Meishan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Meishan 620010, China
  • Received:2021-10-21 Published:2023-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Shengnan Peng
引用本文:

彭胜男, 李志伟, 徐静, 彭晓星, 蒋微. 髂筋膜阻滞复合全身麻醉在全髋关节置换术中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 195-200.

Shengnan Peng, Zhiwei Li, Jing Xu, Xiaoxing Peng, Wei Jiang. Local iliac fascia block combined with general anaesthesia in total hip arthroplasty[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(02): 195-200.

目的

探究在全髋关节置换术(THA)中全身麻醉、单次髂筋膜阻滞复合应用的效果且对患者术后的影响。

方法

选择116例2018年2月至2021年2月期间于眉山市中医医院接受的经评估适合THA治疗且手术耐受患者,排除合并器质性疾病、凝血功能存在障碍、无法正常交流沟通、合并严重并发症、术前需长期服用镇痛药患者。采用随机数字表法将患者分为对照组(全身麻醉)、研究组(复合应用全身麻醉、单次髂筋膜阻滞)。t检验对比两组药物使用量、术后静息和运动状态下疼痛程度、术后精神状况和认知功能状况、术后心理状态,采用卡方检验对比两组术后恶心呕吐(PONV)和并发症状况。

结果

在用药方面,研究组镇静、镇痛药物包括丙泊酚、舒芬太尼以及瑞芬太尼的用量均比对照组用量更少,差异有统计学意义(t=33.275、14.483、4.4954,均为P<0.05)。在术后疼痛感方面,不论是静息还是运动状态,研究组的视觉模拟评分(VAS)均明显更低(t=14.904、5.114,均为P<0.05)。手术前后,两组组内相比简易精神状态检查评分(MMSE)、蒙特利尔认知评估量评分(MoCA)均下降,差异有统计学意义(对照组t=24.182、29.142,研究组t=16.045、10.913,均为P<0.05);术后组间比较,研究组的MMSE评分、MoCA评分更高(t=3.589、6.606,均为P<0.05)。术前术后组内比较,两组焦虑自评量评分(SAS)、抑郁自评量评分(SDS)都有显著的变化,差异有统计学意义(对照组t=20.205、14.137,研究组t=29.438、24.176,均为P<0.05);其中手术后研究组各项评分均高于对照组(t=3.145、2.862,均为P<0.05)。研究组PONV发生率(3.4%)低于对照组(15.5%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.921,P<0.05);但并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

在THA中全身麻醉与单次髂筋膜阻滞的复合应用,不仅可以明显减少用药剂量,起到降低并发症风险的效果,还能舒缓疼痛,有效减少神经损伤,保护患者认知功能。

Objective

To explore the effect of combined application of general anaesthesia plus a single dose local iliac fascia block on total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

Between February 2018 and February 2021, a total of 116 patients who were suitable for THA treatment and tolerant of the surgery for total hip arthroplasty at Meishan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine were included in this study. Exclusion criteria: patients with other diseases, coagulation dysfunction, difficult to communicate, severe complications and a long history of analgesics. Patients were randomly divided into a control group (general anaesthesia) and a study group (general anaesthesia combined with single dose local iliac fascia block). The dosage of administered anaesthetic drugs, postoperative pain at rest and exercise, as well as mental and cognitive status and psychological status after surgery between the groups were compared by t test. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and complications were compared between the two groups by chi square test.

Results

In terms of medication, the dosage of sedative and analgesic drugs administered, including propofol, sufentanil and remifentanil, in the study group was less than that in the control group, with a statistically significant difference (t=33.275, 14.483, 4.4954, all P<0.05). Of the postoperative pain, the visual analogue scale (VAS) score of the study group was significantly lower, and the difference was statistically significant (t=14.904, 5.114, both P<0.05), which showed that the patients in the study group suffered less pain. After surgery, scores of intergroup mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) in both groups decreased than that before surgery, and the differences were statistically significant (control group: t=24.182, 29.142; study group: t=16.045, 10.913; all P<0.05). Postoperative intergroup comparison of MMSE and MoCA scores were higher in the study group (t=3.589, 6.606, both P<0.05). Significant changes in self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) scores were noticed between the two groups before and after surgery, and the differences were statistically significant (control group: t=20.205, 14.137; study group: t=29.438, 24.176; all P<0.05). The scores of all after surgery observed items in the study group were higher than those in the control group (t=3.145, 2.862, both P<0.05). The study group had a lower incidence of PONV than the control group (3.4% vs 15.5%), with a statistically significant difference (χ2=4.921, P<0.05). Finally, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of complication (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The combined applications of general anaesthesia and single dose local iliac fascia block in total hip arthroplasty can not only significantly reduce the drug administration and the risk of complications, but also relieve pain, effectively reduce nerve injury and safeguard the cognitive function of patients.

表1 两组一般资料比较
Table 1 General Information of the two groups
表2 两组用药状况(±s)
Table 2 Medication status of the two groups
表3 两组术后在静息和运动状态下VAS评分(±s)
Table 3 Pain level of two groups under resting and exercise state after operation
表4 两组术前术后精神和认知状况评分(±s)
Table 4 Mental and cognitive status before and after operation in the two group
表5 两组术前术后心理状态评分(±s)
Table 5 Preoperative and postoperative psychological status of the two groups
表6 两组PONV和并发症发生率对比[例(%)]
Table 6 Comparison of PONV and complication rates between the two groups
[1]
祝义军,殷勇,贺广宝,等. 超声引导下不同置管长度连续股神经阻滞对老年患者膝关节周围骨折术后的镇痛效果[J]. 海南医学2019, 30(4): 482-486.
[2]
祝义军,殷勇,冉国,等. 超声引导下不同置管长度连续股神经阻滞对老年膝关节周围骨折术后镇痛效果的影响[J]. 实用临床医药杂志2019, 23(6): 116-119.
[3]
关山,吴川,霍树平,等. 腰丛阻滞和腹股沟上髂筋膜阻滞在老年髋关节置换术中的比较[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志2021, 37(7): 684-688.
[4]
张宇,姚富,于天雷,等. 超声引导下腹股沟韧带上髂筋膜阻滞对老年股骨近端骨折病人术后疼痛及认知功能的影响[J]. 实用老年医学2019, 33(12):1164-1167.
[5]
秦爱敏,马春宇,张增梅,等. 腰丛-坐骨神经阻滞对高龄全髋关节置换术术后转归的影响[J]. 中华实验外科杂志2019, 36(1): 157-159.
[6]
马楚洲,陈琼仪,林梓霞,等. 腰方肌阻滞与髂筋膜阻滞对老年人全髋关节置换术后镇痛效果的比较研究[J]. 中国现代医学杂志2019, 29(7): 97-101.
[7]
于健,朱春华,季雅君,等. 不同入路髂筋膜间隙阻滞用于全髋关节置换术老年患者术后镇痛效果的比较[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志2019, 39(10): 1224-1227.
[8]
董建军,姚型柱,吴超贤. B超引导下骶丛神经阻滞对髋关节置换术患者应激及免疫功能的影响[J]. 重庆医学2019, 48(12): 2061-2066.
[9]
秦洪猛,王星,司海超,等. 麻醉方式对髋关节置换患者术后谵妄和镇痛效果的影响[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志2020, 28(11): 903-908.
[10]
张伟,王述明,孙丙亭,等. 腰方肌髂筋膜阻滞对全髋置换围术期的影响[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志2020, 28(7): 602-606.
[11]
刘思源,唐晓宁,陈攀宇,等. 全髋关节置换患者延迟出院相关危险因素分析[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(5): 521-527.
[12]
陈冰莎,陶涛,张雅婷,等. 腰方肌阻滞对全髋关节置换术后急性疼痛的影响[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志2020, 22(6): 512-517.
[13]
樊雅玲,郑岗,陈旭,等. 超声引导下不同入路持续髂筋膜间隙阻滞在全髋关节置换术中的应用[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志2019, 35(3): 247-252.
[14]
刘绪华,谢珏,袁从旺,等. 超声引导下髂筋膜间隙阻滞在老年患者全髋关节置换术中的应用[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志2022, 38(4): 356-360.
[15]
胡小雪,金忆,许明岚,等. 髂筋膜联合腰骶丛神经阻滞在老年髋关节置换术患者中的应用[J]. 实用临床医药杂志2020, 24(13): 75-79.
[16]
段晓玲,李明,卜先龙,等. 右美托咪定在老年髋关节置换术后的应用效果分析[J]. 安徽医学2021, 42(3): 240-244.
[17]
王军,任岩岩. 超声引导下腹股沟韧带上髂筋膜阻滞用于老年患者全身麻醉下全髋关节置换术中的效果[J]. 检验医学与临床2022, 19(16): 2256-2562.
[18]
张珏颢,杨学林,马正良. 髂筋膜阻滞复合全身麻醉对全髋关节置换术患者术后抑郁状态的影响[J]. 国际麻醉学与复苏杂志2020, 41(10): 976-980.
[19]
廖希,许福生,詹普怡. 超声引导下腰方肌阻滞用于全髋关节置换术后镇痛的效果评价[J]. 东南国防医药2019, 21(3) : 305-307.
[20]
陆小龙,俞学锋,胡四毛,等. 超声引导下仰卧位腰丛阻滞与髂筋膜阻滞对高龄患者髋关节置换镇痛的比较:单中心、随机、对照临床试验[J]. 中国组织工程研究2019, 23(8): 1149-1154.
[21]
赵峰,樊超. 超声引导髂筋膜神经阻滞复合全身麻醉在小儿先天性髋关节脱位术中的应用[J]. 中国临床研究2022, 35(8): 1064-1067, 1072.
[22]
张炳勇,高涛. 超声引导下行髂筋膜联合腰骶丛神经阻滞和全身麻醉在老年患者髋关节置换术中的对比研究[J]. 中华老年多器官疾病杂志2019, 18(9): 688-692.
[1] 孟繁宇, 周新社, 赵志, 裴立家, 刘犇. 侧位直接前方入路髋关节置换治疗偏瘫肢体股骨颈骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 865-870.
[2] 金鑫, 谢卯, 刘芸, 杨操, 杨述华, 许伟华. 个性化股骨导向器辅助初次全髋关节置换的随机对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 780-787.
[3] 吴香敏, 吴鹏. 超声引导下收肌管阻滞联合腘动脉与膝关节后囊间隙阻滞在老年患者全膝关节置换术中的应用效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 516-522.
[4] 卫洪波. 保留邓氏筋膜直肠癌根治术(iTME)手术技巧和质量控制[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 351-351.
[5] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[6] 熊海波, 邓立豪, 邓力宾, 曾云龙, 李叔强, 强正宏, 袁家天, 吕波, 李俊. 腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中保留与切除Denonvilliers 筋膜对男性排尿及性功能影响的Meta分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 497-501.
[7] 李腾成, 谭益元, 黄群雄, 吴杰英, 肖恒军, 胡成, 李茂胤, 高新, 狄金明. 机器人腹腔镜后入路完全筋膜内根治性前列腺切除术治疗早期前列腺癌[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 452-456.
[8] 朱明, 童国煜, 赵海腾, 钟量, 邹翔宇, 吴少峰, 张轶男. 腹腔镜在减少儿童隐匿性腹股沟斜疝与鞘膜积液二次手术的意义[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 457-460.
[9] 田静, 方秀春. 超声引导下横筋膜平面阻滞在儿童腹股沟疝手术的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 740-744.
[10] 段文忠, 白延霞, 徐文亭, 祁虹霞, 吕志坚. 七氟烷和丙泊酚在肝切除术中麻醉效果比较Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 640-645.
[11] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[12] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
[13] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
[14] 戴俊, 李硕, 曹影, 汪守峰, 宋红毛, 蔡菁菁, 邵敏, 陈莉, 程雷, 怀德. 鼻内镜下改良高选择性翼管神经低温等离子消融术对中重度变应性鼻炎的效果研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 689-693.
[15] 边震, 宋绍永, 杨国旺, 范凤尾, 黄庆红, 李健, 金鑫. 江苏省基层医院围麻醉期危机状况的调查分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 499-506.
阅读次数
全文


摘要