切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (01) : 92 -96. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2020.01.016

所属专题: 文献

临床经验

半肩置换治疗老年肱骨近端骨折疗效分析
安庆1, 张敬标1, 李伟峰1, 夏卫国1, 丁纬1, 周霖2, 曹洪2,(), 郑志远1   
  1. 1. 236700 亳州,利辛县人民医院骨一科
    2. 442000 十堰市人民医院(湖北医药学院附属人民医院)创伤骨科
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-05 出版日期:2020-02-01
  • 通信作者: 曹洪
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(81602867); 湖北省自然科学基金面上项目(2018CFB524); 湖北省教育厅科学研究计划指导性项目(No: B2018110)

Semi-shoulder arthroplasty in treatment of three or four part proximal humeral fractures in elderly

Qing An1, Jingbiao Zhang1, Weifeng Li1, Weiguo Xia1, Wei Ding1, Lin Zhou2, Hong Cao2,(), Zhiyuan Zheng1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lixin People’s Hospital, Bozhou 236700, China
    2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shiyan People’s Hospital Affiliated to Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan 442000, China
  • Received:2018-04-05 Published:2020-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Hong Cao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Cao Hong, Email:
引用本文:

安庆, 张敬标, 李伟峰, 夏卫国, 丁纬, 周霖, 曹洪, 郑志远. 半肩置换治疗老年肱骨近端骨折疗效分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(01): 92-96.

Qing An, Jingbiao Zhang, Weifeng Li, Weiguo Xia, Wei Ding, Lin Zhou, Hong Cao, Zhiyuan Zheng. Semi-shoulder arthroplasty in treatment of three or four part proximal humeral fractures in elderly[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(01): 92-96.

目的

分析应用半肩关节置换术治疗老年肱骨近端NeerⅢ、Ⅳ部分骨折的手术方法及临床疗效。

方法

纳入2012年1月至2016年1月应用半肩关节置换术治疗的老年肱骨近端NeerⅢ、Ⅳ部分骨折患者进行回顾性分析,排除病理性骨折。对术后8周、12周及48周疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)和Constant-Murley评分以及肩关节主动活动度进行分析。采用ANOVA单因素方差分析比较组间结果,以P<0.05为差异具有统计学意义。

结果

共纳入27例患者并均获得随访,年龄平均(70.3±5.5)岁,其中3部分骨折11例(包括4例肩关节脱位),4部分骨折16例(包括12例肩关节脱位),随访时间平均(25±6)个月。术后48周随访VAS评分(1.3±0.7)分;Constant-Murley评分(81.2±5.7)分,肩关节平均活动范围:前屈上举(113±15)°,外展(97±4)°,内旋(50±13)°,外旋(39±12)°,后伸(42±14)°。所有患者术后无神经损伤、异位骨化及感染等并发症发生。

结论

半肩关节置换术是治疗老年肱骨近端NeerⅢ、Ⅳ部分骨折的有效方法,成功的关键在于术中准确的重建肱骨长度,有效地修复损伤的肩袖以及术后长期、规范的康复训练。

Objective

To analyze the methods and the outcome of the semi-shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of three or four parts proximal humeral fractures in the elderly.

Methods

From Jan 2012 to Jan 2016, proximal humeral fractures whose undergone semi-shoulder arthroplasty were reviewed.The partⅢ or Ⅳproximal humeral fractures were included according to Neer classification and pathological fracture was excluded. Outcomes were evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS), Constant-Murley scoring system and active range of motion of shoulder at eight, 12, 48 weeks postoperatively. One-way ANOVA was used for statistical analyzed.

Results

Twenty-seven patients were finally reviewed, which included 11 cases of part Ⅲfractures (four cases with shoulder dislocation) and 16 cases of partⅣ fractures, (12 cases with shoulder dislocation). All the patients were followed up for an average of (24.7±6.3) months. Mean VAS score was (1.3±0.7) and Constant-Murley score was (81.2±5.7) at the 48 weeks postoperatively. The average range of active movement of shoulder joint at the 48 weeks postoperativelywere as following: forward flexion (113±15) °, abduction (97±4) °, internal rotation (50±13) °, external rotation (39±12) ° and extension (41.7± 14.2) °. No postoperative complications occurred, such as nerve injury, heterotopic ossification and infection.

Conclusions

Hemiarthroplasty is an effective method for the treatment of the partⅢ or Ⅳof the proximal humeral fracture in the elderly. The accurate reconstruction of humerus length, effective restoration of shoulder cuff, correct reconstruction of the large and small nodules, combine with long-term and standardized rehabilitation training after operation are the keys to success in semi-shoulder arthroplasty.

图1 术前规划及术中细节图。图A为Thompson手术入路;图B为术中游离大、小结节并在其上钻孔并预留不可吸收缝线;图C为缝线打结,使大、小结节固定于肱骨干和假体近端
图2 左侧肱骨近端骨折半肩关节置换术前后X线正位片。图A为术前X线片,示肱骨近端骨折Neer Ⅳ型;图B为术后X线片,示肩关节假体位置正常
表1 术后VAS评分和肩关节Constant-Murley评分比较[n=27,(±s)]
表2 术后肩关节主动活动度变化[n=27,(±s)]
[1]
Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review[J]. Injury, 2006, 37(8): 691-697.
[2]
张峻玮,张治国,陈玲玲,等.成人肱骨近端骨折的手术治疗进展[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2018,26(1):84-88.
[3]
邢方凯,丁红涛.反式与半肩关节置换术治疗老年肱骨骨折的疗效对比[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2016,10(2):59-64.
[4]
Torrens C, Alentorn-Geli E, Mingo F, et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of acute complex proximal humeral fractures: influence of greater tuberosity healing on the functional outcomes[J]. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 2018, 26(1): 1-7.
[5]
Vancolen SY, Elsawi R, Horner NS, et al. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the younger patient (≤65 years): a systematic review[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2020,29(1):202-209.
[6]
赵星,储伟,祝少博. 肱骨近端骨折的手术治疗方案及研究进展[J/CD]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2017(7):1221-1226.
[7]
Shannon SF, Wagner ER, Houdek MT, et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: outcomes comparing primary reverse arthroplasty for fracture versus reverse arthroplasty after failed osteosynthesis[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2016, 25(10): 1655-1660.
[8]
Ferrel JR, Trinh TQ, Fischer RA. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2015, 29(1): 60-68.
[9]
Bosch U, Skutek M, Fremerey RW, et al. Outcome after primary and secondary hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with fractures of the proximal humerus[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 1998, 7(5): 479-484.
[10]
吴春辉,李建赤,邓洁瑜,等.肩关节置换术中肱骨假体低置的疗效分析[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2012,6(1):34-38.
[11]
Saul D, Himmelmann T, Dresing K. Humeral tip-apex-distance as a prognostic marker for proximal humeral fractures in 203 patients[J]. Open Orthop J, 2017, 11(9): 297-308.
[12]
赵春明,范卫民,王青,等.肱骨近端解剖测量在人工肩关节置换中的意义[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2008,26(5):497-499.
[13]
Valenti P, Aliani D, Maroun C, et al. Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: analysis of clinical and radiographic outcomes at midterm follow-up: a series of 51 patients[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2017, 27(3): 309-315.
[14]
Sebastia-Forcada E, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Cebrian-Gomez R, et al. Outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: primary arthroplasty versus secondary arthroplasty after failed proximal humeral locking plate fixation[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2017, 31(8): e236-e240.
[15]
姚振均,张弛,陈峥嵘.人工半肩关节置换治疗肱骨近端粉碎骨折[J].中华创伤杂志,2006,22(3):179-182.
[1] 金鑫, 谢卯, 刘芸, 杨操, 杨述华, 许伟华. 个性化股骨导向器辅助初次全髋关节置换的随机对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 780-787.
[2] 邓华梅, 袁札根, 曾德荣, 潘珊珊, 张葆青, 欧爱华, 曹学伟. 全膝关节置换术中气压止血带应用效果与影响因素分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 788-794.
[3] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[4] 李培杰, 乔永杰, 张浩强, 曾健康, 谭飞, 李嘉欢, 王静, 周胜虎. 细菌培养阴性的假体周围感染诊治的最新进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 827-833.
[5] 林文, 王雨萱, 许嘉悦, 王矜群, 王睿娜, 何董源, 樊沛. 人工关节置换登记系统的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 834-841.
[6] 闫文, 谢兴文, 顾玉彪, 雷宁波, 马成, 于文霞, 高亚雄, 张磊. 微小RNA与全膝关节置换术后深静脉血栓的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 842-846.
[7] 贺敬龙, 尚宏喜, 郝敏, 谢伟, 高明宏, 孙炜, 刘安庆. 重度类风湿关节炎患者行多关节置换术的临床手术疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 860-864.
[8] 孟繁宇, 周新社, 赵志, 裴立家, 刘犇. 侧位直接前方入路髋关节置换治疗偏瘫肢体股骨颈骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 865-870.
[9] 王宏宇. 固定与活动平台假体在全膝关节置换术中的应用价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 871-876.
[10] 李善武, 叶永杰, 王兵, 王子呓, 银毅, 孙官军, 张大刚. 胫骨高位截骨与单髁置换的早期疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 882-888.
[11] 李辉, 吴奇, 张子琦, 张晗, 王仿, 许鹏. 日间全膝关节置换术早期疗效及标准化流程探索[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 889-892.
[12] 姚轶超, 张麒, 滕海茂, 黄攀, 吴雷涛, 韩哲. 膝关节置换术后恐动症与康复效果及社会支持的相关性[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 613-618.
[13] 樊绪国, 赵永刚. 全膝关节置换术中髌骨轨迹的研究进展及处理策略[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 701-707.
[14] 刘伦, 王云鹭, 李锡勇, 韩鹏飞, 张鹏, 李晓东. 机器人辅助膝关节单髁置换术的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 715-721.
[15] 李岩松, 李涛, 张元鸣飞, 李志鹏, 周谋望. 头戴式虚拟现实设备辅助全膝关节置换术后康复的初步研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 676-681.
阅读次数
全文


摘要