切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (05) : 676 -680. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2018.05.014

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

胫骨高位截骨术与腓骨截骨术治疗膝骨关节炎临床疗效比较
邱华耀1, 冯宗权1,(), 王卫刚1   
  1. 1. 528000 佛山市中医院骨九科
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-18 出版日期:2018-10-01
  • 通信作者: 冯宗权
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81774339)

Comparison of high tibial osteotomy and fibula osteotomy in treatment of knee osteoarthritis

Huayao Qiu1, Zongquan Feng1,(), Weigang Wang1   

  1. 1. 9th Department of Orthopedics, Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan 528000, Guangdong, China
  • Received:2018-07-18 Published:2018-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Zongquan Feng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Feng Zongquan, Email:
引用本文:

邱华耀, 冯宗权, 王卫刚. 胫骨高位截骨术与腓骨截骨术治疗膝骨关节炎临床疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(05): 676-680.

Huayao Qiu, Zongquan Feng, Weigang Wang. Comparison of high tibial osteotomy and fibula osteotomy in treatment of knee osteoarthritis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(05): 676-680.

目的

比较胫骨高位截骨术(HTO)与腓骨截骨术治疗膝关节骨性关节炎(KOA)临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析于2015年1月至2016年12月在佛山市中医院骨九科行HTO或腓骨截骨术治疗KOA的患者。HTO组共37例,男11例,女26例,平均年龄(59±3)岁;腓骨截骨组共26例,男9例,女17例,平均年龄(59±3)岁。分析比较两组的手术耗时、术中失血量、住院总花费、术后并发症、随访期内再次行膝关节置换情况。采用膝关节Lysholm评分、西安大略和曼彻斯特大学关节炎指数(WOMAC)对术前、术后6个月、术后12个月随访时膝关节功能进行评估。数据采用SPSS13.0统计学软件进行统计学分析。手术耗时、术中失血量、住院总花费、Lysholm评分、WOMAC评分均采用独立样本t检验,术后并发症、随访期内再次行膝关节置换情况比较采用卡方检验。

结果

HTO组术后随访中位数15.7个月,腓骨截骨组术后随访中位数14.9个月。HTO组手术耗时(t=21.094,P<0.05)、术中失血量(t=9.91,P<0.05)、住院总花费(t=65.471,P<0.05)均显著劣于腓骨截骨组。HTO组有1例(2.7%)并发症,腓骨截骨组有2例并发症(7.7%),采用Fisher确切概率法分析,差异无统计学意义(P=0.785)。两组患者术前膝关节Lysholm评分、WOMAC评分差异均无统计学意义。术后6个月Lysholm评分HTO组显著优于腓骨截骨组(t=2.426,P<0.05)。WOMAC评分HTO组显著劣于腓骨截骨组(t=3.997,P<0.01)。术后12个月HTO组Lysholm评分(t=2.979,P<0.01)、WOMAC评分(t=-2.472,P<0.05)均显著优于腓骨截骨组。

结论

行胫骨高位截骨术治疗膝关节骨性关节炎比行腓骨截骨术手术耗时长、术中出血多、住院总花费多;术后12个月的随访提示行胫骨高位截骨术能比行腓骨截骨术取得更好的膝关节功能。

Objective

To compare the clinical efficacy of high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and fibular osteotomy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was made on the patients with KOA who underwent HTO or fibular osteotomy from January 2015 to December 2016 in the 9th Department of Orthopedics, Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. There were 37 cases in HTO group, 11 males and 26 females, with an average age of (59±3) 26 cases in fibular osteotomy group, nine males and 17 females, with an average age of (59±3). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, total hospitalization cost, postoperative complications and knee arthroplasty were analyzed between the two groups. The Lysholm score and the University of Western Ontario and Manchester arthritis index (WOMAC) were used to assess the knee function before surgery, six months after surgery and 12 months after surgery. Data were analyzed by SPSS13.0 statistical software. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, total cost of hospitalization, Lysholm score and WOMAC score were examined by independent sample t-test, and chi-square test was used to compare the incidence of postoperative knee arthroplasty and postoperative complications during follow-up period.

Results

The median follow-up time of group HTO was 15.7 months, and the fibula osteotomy group had a median follow-up of 14.9 months. The operation time (t=21.094, P<0.05), intraoperative blood loss (t= 9.91, P<0.05), total hospitalization cost (t=65.471, P<0.05) in HTO group were significantly lower than those in fibular osteotomy group. There was one complication case in HTO group (2.7%) and two complication cases in fibular osteotomy group (7.7%) and no significant difference was found between the two groups by Fishers exact probability analysis (P=0.785). There was no significant difference in Lysholm score and WOMAC score between the two groups before operation. The Lysholm score in HTO group was significantly better than that in fibular osteotomy group (t=2.426, P<0.05). WOMAC score in HTO group was significantly lower than that in fibular osteotomy group (t=3.997, P<0.01). The Lysholm score (t=2.979, P<0.01), WOMAC score (t=-2.472, P<0.05) in HTO group were significantly better than those in fibular osteotomy group 12 months after operation.

Conclusion

High tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee is more time-consuming, more bleeding and more hospital costs than fibular osteotomy; 12 months follow-up shows that high tibial osteotomy can achieve better knee function than fibular osteotomy.

表1 两组手术患者一般情况比较(±s)
表2 两组手术前后膝关节Lysholm评分、WOMAC评分对比(±s)
图4 病例2双膝关节腓骨截骨术后X线正位片,示双膝关节内侧间隙扩大、双膝关节内翻畸形改善
[1]
马同敏,张持晨,杨辉,等.腓骨近端段切术治疗严重膝关节骨性关节炎疗效的队列研究[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2015,30(6):595-598.
[2]
余建平,魏杰,苏云星.腓骨截骨术治疗膝骨关节炎的临床分析[J]. 中国药物与临床,2015,15(8):1161-1162.
[3]
刘培来,张蒙,卢群山.植骨在胫骨高位截骨术中的应用[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2016,10(5):530-534.
[4]
Jackson J P, Waugh W, Green J P.High tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1969, 51(1):88-94.
[5]
宋德臣,李瑞,张有磊.胫骨高位截骨术治疗伴膝内翻的膝关节骨性关节炎[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志,2013,21(9):897-899.
[6]
黄野.胫骨高位截骨术治疗膝关节骨关节炎的现状[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2016,10(5):1-4.
[7]
张海宁,王英振,吕成昱,等.胫骨高位楔形截骨治疗创伤性膝关节内翻畸形的临床研究[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2009,3(3):4-7.
[8]
尚松,王明贵,饶锐强,等.腓骨截骨治疗膝关节炎疗效分析[J]. 创伤外科杂志,2018,20(4):309.
[9]
徐彬,马俊,聂涌,等.腓骨近端截骨术治疗膝关节骨关节炎的早期临床疗效研究[J/CD]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,2(1):11-15.
[10]
周磊,曲铁兵,林源,等.腓骨近端截骨术治疗膝关节骨关节炎的疗效评价[J/CD]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,2(1):16-20.
[11]
Jevsevar D S.Treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: evidence-based guideline, 2nd edition[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2013, 21(9):571-576.
[12]
赵恩哲,郑艮强,梁伟,等.腓骨近端截骨术治疗膝关节骨关节炎的临床疗效及影像学评价[J/CD]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,3(1):32-37.
[13]
陈伟,秦迪,吴涛,等.应用腓骨截骨术治疗膝关节骨性关节炎效果优良的机制分析[J]. 河北医科大学学报,2015(6):726-727.
[14]
杨延江,郑占乐,李坤,等.腓骨高位截骨治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的解剖学研究[J]. 河北医科大学学报,2014(6):724-725.
[15]
Bouharras M, Hoet F, Watillon M, et al.Results of tibial valgus osteotomy for internal femoro-tibial arthritis with an average 8-year follow-up[J]. Acta Orthop Belg, 1994, 60(2):163-169.
[16]
Holden D L, James S L, Larson R L, et al.Proximal tibial osteotomy in patients who are fifty years old or less. A long-term follow-up study[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1988, 70(7):977-982.
[17]
Poignard A, Flouzat L C, Amzallag J, et al.Revisiting high tibial osteotomy: fifty years of experience with the opening-wedge technique[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2010, 92(Suppl 2):187-195.
[18]
Rudan J F, Simurda M A.Valgus high tibial osteotomy. A long-term follow-up study[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1991: 157-160.
[1] 谢佳乐, 李琦, 芦升升, 姜劲松. 内侧膝骨关节炎伴胫股关节冠状半脱位的手术治疗[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 653-657.
[2] 许银峰, 盛璞义, 余世明, 张阳春. 偏心性髋臼旋转截骨术治疗发育性髋关节发育不良[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 568-574.
[3] 李志文, 李远志, 李华, 方志远. 糖皮质激素治疗膝骨关节炎疗效的网状Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 484-496.
[4] 庄若语, 杭明辉, 李文华, 张霆, 侯炜. 膝骨关节炎半定量磁共振评分研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 545-552.
[5] 杨士慷, 曹光磊. 膝骨关节炎三种术式患者满意度的术前影响因素[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 390-397.
[6] 蒋政, 郑楠, 毛彦杰, 何阿祥, 林蔚铭, 郭瀚, 刘语嫣, 臧慧, 王聪, 刘万军. 关于胫骨高位截骨术后髌股关节变化的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 398-404.
[7] 王啸, 李一凡, 沈素红, 曹国瑞, 史小涛, 袁彦浩, 谭红略. 全膝关节置换术后早期下肢深静脉血栓形成的时空规律[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 414-420.
[8] 中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组, 解放军总医院第四医学中心骨科医学部, 国家骨科与运动康复临床医学研究中心. 中国膝骨关节炎非手术治疗专家共识(2023年版)[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 151-159.
[9] 郝鑫, 贾健, 任雨昊, 成凯, 王小虎. 膝关节骨关节炎的运动学疗法[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 264-270.
[10] 姚放鸣, 焦莹莹, 何敏聪, 曾子俊, 何晓铭, 刘良燕, 何伟, 魏秋实, 刘文刚. 膝骨关节炎患者的肌少症发病率及发病特点分析[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 30-38.
[11] 唐艳, 赵小虎, 栗玉姣, 顾向梅. 针刀治疗老年膝骨关节炎的肌骨超声特征与疗效相关性[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 48-53.
[12] 郭杰坤, 王楹, 杨轩, 晏欢欣, 钟豪. Ilizarov 骨搬移技术在急诊一期修复GustiloⅢB 型胫骨长段开放粉碎性骨折的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 507-510.
[13] 苏永涛, 王春雷, 徐广琪, 关中正, 焦伟, 隋颖. 胫骨骨膜牵张术联合富血小板血浆对治疗糖尿病足溃疡的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(03): 238-244.
[14] 郭昆, 杨晓峰, 李传明. 双切口双钢板内固定治疗SchatzkerⅣ型以上复杂胫骨平台骨折的安全性及中远期预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 159-164.
[15] 喻蓉, 周伟力, 雷青, 陈松, 陈立, 刘峰, 丁州, 阳宏奇, 王康, 王大鹏. 改良的内外侧环抱锁定钢板在复杂胫骨平台骨折治疗中的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 764-770.
阅读次数
全文


摘要