切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (04) : 561 -566. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2018.04.019

所属专题: 文献

临床经验

钽金属大杯重建严重髋臼骨缺损的早期临床疗效观察
王涛1, 任伟平1, 张志强1,()   
  1. 1. 030000 太原,山西医科大学第二医院关节外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-01 出版日期:2018-08-01
  • 通信作者: 张志强

Tantalum jumbo acetabular components for severe acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty: short-term clinical follow-up study

Tao Wang1, Weiping Ren1, Zhiqiang Zhang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030000, China
  • Received:2017-06-01 Published:2018-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Zhiqiang Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Zhiqiang, Email:
引用本文:

王涛, 任伟平, 张志强. 钽金属大杯重建严重髋臼骨缺损的早期临床疗效观察[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(04): 561-566.

Tao Wang, Weiping Ren, Zhiqiang Zhang. Tantalum jumbo acetabular components for severe acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty: short-term clinical follow-up study[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(04): 561-566.

目的

评估在全髋关节翻修术中应用钽金属Jumbo杯重建严重Gross型髋臼骨缺损的早期临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析了从2012年10月至2016年5月在山西医科大学第二医院关节外科使用钽金属Jumbo杯实施髋关节翻修手术患者17例。男6例,女11例,年龄49~78岁,平均(68± 7)岁。纳入标准:单侧初次翻修(对侧髋关节正常);翻修原因均为无菌性松动;Gross Ⅲ型和Gross Ⅳ型使用Jumbo杯翻修。排除标准:缺血性骨坏死;假体与宿主骨接触面积<30%;任何原因导致的失访。观察其髋关节Harris评分、髋臼外展角变化、髋臼旋转中心(水平及垂直方向位移)变化等情况及并发症,使用SPSS 22.0统计学软件包对手术前后计量指标进行配对t检验。

结果

所有患者均获得随访,随访时间(29±14)个月。没有出现假体松动,感染等并发症,只有1例患者于术后5 d后脱位,腰麻下闭合复位,术后皮肤牵引4周,至末次随访未发生脱位。术前Harris评分(32.8±4.8)分,末次随访时(87.1±4.7)分,差异有统计学意义(t=62.46,P<0.05)。髋臼外展角和位移变化分别小于4°和4 mm,患侧髋臼中心(垂直距离和水平距离),末次随访时和术前相比,差异有统计学意义(t=10.95,P<0.05;t=5.53,P<0.05)。末次随访时健患侧髋臼旋转中心位置相比,差异无统计学意义(t=1.78,P>0.05;t=0.44,P>0.05)。术后髋臼旋转中心相比术前得到明显改变,与健侧相比差异不明显,基本重建了正常的髋臼旋转中心。

结论

钽金属Jumbo杯增加与宿主骨接触面积,假体植入技术简单,减少植骨量,最大限度恢复旋转中心,臼杯骨长入快,可以取得显著的早期临床疗效。

Objective

To evaluate the early clinical effect of the reconstruction of severe Gross dislocation of acetabular bone in the reconstruction of hip arthroplasty.

Methods

From October 2012 to May 2016, 17 cases of hip arthroplasty were performed in the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University. There were six males and 11 females, aged from 49 to 78 years, (68±7) years on average. Inclusion criteria: unilateral primary revision (normal opposite hip joint); the reasons for renovation were aseptic loosening; Gross Ⅲ type and Gross Ⅳ patients using Jumbo cup renovations. Exclusion criteria: ischemic osteonecrosis; the contact area between the prosthesis and the host bone is less than 30%; any loss of visit for any reason. The complications, Harris score, the change of the external angle of the acetabulum, and the acetabular rotation center were observed. Paired t test was performed for preoperative and postoperative measurement indexes using SPSS.22.0 software.

Results

All the patients were followed up. One patient experienced postoperatively hip dislocation postoperatively on the 5th day, which was resolved after a closed reduction and a 4-week skin traction treatment. Until the end of the follow-up, the dislocation did not recur. There was no infection, loosening or other complications. The Harris hip score was (32.8±4.8) preoperatively and (87.1±4.7) postoperatively (t=62.46, P <0.05). Acetabular abduction angle variation was less than 4°, displacement of acetabulum was less than 4 mm. The preoperative acetabular center (vertical distance and horizontal distance) comparing with the data of last follow-up showed a statistically significant difference (t=10.95; t=5.53; all P<0.05). At the last follow-up, the difference in acetabular rotation center location between the contralateral side and ipsilateral side was not statistically significant (t=1.78, P>0.05; t=0.44, P>0.05). After the operation, the rotational acetabular center returned to normal comparing with the healthy side.

Conclusion

The contact area of the host bone can be increased by tantalum metal Jumbo cup, the prosthesis implantation technique is simple with less bone graft, the rotation center can be restored to the maximum, and the bone cup can regenerate rapidly, which suggest that early clinical efficacy can be achieved.

表1 观察组术前术后不同指标的比较(±s)
表2 末次随访与健侧髋臼中心比较(±s)
图1 右侧全髋关节翻修术前术后骨盆X线片;图A 为翻修术前X线片,示:髋臼松动伴假体脱位;图B 为术后48 h X线片,使用52 mm钽金属髋臼杯,髋臼颗粒植骨;图C 为末次随访时X线片,示假体与骨接触紧密,缺损区被完全填充,植骨整合替代满意
[1]
Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, et al. Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2014, 96(8):624-630.
[2]
Jafari SM, Bender B, Coyle C, et al. Do Tantalum and Titanium Cups show similar results in revision hip arthroplasty?[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010, 468(2):459-465.
[3]
王波,李晓华,赵辉,等. 骨小梁金属髋臼杯在脊髓灰质炎后遗症患者非瘫痪侧全髋关节置换术中的应用[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2015,(6):45-49.
[4]
Brown NM, Morrison J, Sporer SM, et al. The use of structural distal femoral allograft for acetabular reconstruction of paprosky type IIIA defects at a mean 21 years of follow-up[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2016, 31(3):680-683.
[5]
Saleh KJ, Holtzman J, Gafni A, et al. Development, test reliability and validation of a classification for revision hip arthroplasty[J]. J Orthop Res, 2010, 19(1):50-56.
[6]
D'Antonio JA, Capello WN, Borden LS, et al. Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1989, 243(243):126.
[7]
Edwards PK, Queen RM, Butler RJ, et al. Are range of motion measurements needed when calculating the harris hip score?[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2016, 31(4):815-819.
[8]
Murray DW. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1993, 75(2):228-232.
[9]
Park KS, Seon JK, Lee KB, et al. Revision total hip arthroplasty using an acetabular reinforcement ring with a hook: A precise follow-up, at average 11.4 Years, of a previous report[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2017,32(2):503-509.
[10]
廉永云,裴福兴,程惊秋,等.金属网罩结合异体骨打压植骨修复髋臼骨缺损[J].中华医学杂志,2007,87(23):1603-1606.
[11]
Yoder SA, Brand RA, Pedersen DR, et al. Total hip acetabular component position affects component loosening rates[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1988, 228(228):79.
[12]
段王平,卫小春.全髋关节置换术中髋臼骨缺损的分型[J].实用骨科杂志,2007,13(3):156-157.
[13]
Gross AE, Duncan CP, Garbuz D, et al. Revision arthroplasty of the acetabulum in association with loss of bone stock[J]. Instr Course Lect, 1999, 48(3):57.
[14]
Gross AE. Revision arthroplasty of the hip using allograft bone.In:Czitrom[C]∥AA, 1992: 147-173.
[15]
Gustke KA, Levering MF, Miranda MA. Use of jumbo cups for revision of acetabulae with large bony defects[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2014, 29(1):199-203.
[16]
Faizan A, Black BJ, Fay BD, et al. Comparison of head center position and screw fixation options between a jumbo cup and an offset center of rotation cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: A computer simulation study[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2015, 31(1):307-311.
[17]
Fan CY, Chen WM, Lee OK, et al. Acetabular revision arthroplasty using jumbo cups: an experience in Asia[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2008, 128(8):809-813.
[18]
Gustke KA. Jumbo cup or high hip center[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2004, 19(4):120-123.
[19]
Lachiewicz PF, Watters TS. The jumbo acetabular component for acetabular revision: curtain calls and caveats[J]. Bone Joint J, 2016, 98B(1, A):64-67.
[20]
Von RP, Abdel MP, Harmsen WS, et al. Uncemented Jumbo cups for revision total hip arthroplasty: A concise follow-up, at a mean of twenty years, of a previous report[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2015, 97(4):284-287.
[21]
黄勇,周一新,郭盛杰,等. 钽金属骨小梁臼杯联合钽金属加强块重建髋臼严重骨缺损的临床研究[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2015(6):38-44.
[22]
刘玮璐,张洋,张贤祚,等.多孔钽金属棒治疗股骨头坏死的最新研究进展[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2017,11(2):176-179.
[23]
Tokarski AT, Novack TA, Parvizi J. Is Tantalum protective against infection in revision total hip arthroplasty?[J]. Bone Joint J, 2015, 97-B(1):45-49.
[24]
Reid C, Grobler GP, Dower BJ, et al. Revision total hip arthroplasty:addressing acetabular bone loss[J]. SA Orthop J, 2012, 11(3):34-46.
[25]
Lakstein D, Backstein D, Safir O, et al. Trabecular metal (TM) Cups for acetabular defects with 50% or less host bone contact[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2009, 467(9):2318-2324.
[26]
Hailer NP, Weiss RJ, Stark A, et al. The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis. An analysis of 78,098 operations in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register[J]. Acta Orthop, 2012, 83(5):442-448.
[27]
Howie DW, Holubowycz OT, Middleton R, et al. Large femoral heads decrease the incidence of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2012, 94(12):1095-1102.
[28]
Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP, et al. The frank stinchfield award: dislocation in revision THA: do large heads (36 and 40 mm) result in reduced dislocation rates in a randomized clinical trial?[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2012, 470(2):351-356.
[1] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[2] 林文, 王雨萱, 许嘉悦, 王矜群, 王睿娜, 何董源, 樊沛. 人工关节置换登记系统的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 834-841.
[3] 闫文, 谢兴文, 顾玉彪, 雷宁波, 马成, 于文霞, 高亚雄, 张磊. 微小RNA与全膝关节置换术后深静脉血栓的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 842-846.
[4] 贺敬龙, 尚宏喜, 郝敏, 谢伟, 高明宏, 孙炜, 刘安庆. 重度类风湿关节炎患者行多关节置换术的临床手术疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 860-864.
[5] 孟繁宇, 周新社, 赵志, 裴立家, 刘犇. 侧位直接前方入路髋关节置换治疗偏瘫肢体股骨颈骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 865-870.
[6] 王宏宇. 固定与活动平台假体在全膝关节置换术中的应用价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 871-876.
[7] 李善武, 叶永杰, 王兵, 王子呓, 银毅, 孙官军, 张大刚. 胫骨高位截骨与单髁置换的早期疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 882-888.
[8] 李辉, 吴奇, 张子琦, 张晗, 王仿, 许鹏. 日间全膝关节置换术早期疗效及标准化流程探索[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 889-892.
[9] 金鑫, 谢卯, 刘芸, 杨操, 杨述华, 许伟华. 个性化股骨导向器辅助初次全髋关节置换的随机对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 780-787.
[10] 邓华梅, 袁札根, 曾德荣, 潘珊珊, 张葆青, 欧爱华, 曹学伟. 全膝关节置换术中气压止血带应用效果与影响因素分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 788-794.
[11] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[12] 罗旺林, 杨传军, 许国星, 俞建国, 孙伟东, 颜文娟, 冯志. 开放性楔形胫骨高位截骨术不同植入材料的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 818-826.
[13] 李培杰, 乔永杰, 张浩强, 曾健康, 谭飞, 李嘉欢, 王静, 周胜虎. 细菌培养阴性的假体周围感染诊治的最新进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 827-833.
[14] 郭晓磊, 李晓云, 孙嘉怿, 金乐, 郭亚娟, 史新立. 含生长因子骨移植材料的研究进展和监管现状[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 373-378.
[15] 李岩松, 李涛, 张元鸣飞, 李志鹏, 周谋望. 头戴式虚拟现实设备辅助全膝关节置换术后康复的初步研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 676-681.
阅读次数
全文


摘要