Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02): 217-221. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2020.02.015

Special Issue:

• Clinical Experience • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Femoral revision with Wagner self-locking stem

Hongsong Fang1, Sen Chen1,(), Zhihui Jin1, Hao Peng1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
  • Received:2018-08-01 Online:2020-04-01 Published:2020-04-01
  • Contact: Sen Chen
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Chen Sen, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of Wagner self-locking stem (Wagner SL) in femoral revision.

Methods

Sixty-one hip revision cases using Wagner SL revision stems in Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University were retrospectively analyzed. These cases included 36 males, 25 females; mean age of (61±7) years. The visual analogue scale (VAS) and Harris hip score system was used to evaluate the clinical efficacy. The position of the acetabulum and femoral prostheses and the changes of bone around them were observed according to the pelvic plain film and the positive and lateral X-ray of the hip. The visual analogue scale(VAS)and Harris hip score were adopted for evaluation and analyzed by paired t test.

Results

All the patients were followed up for (5.6±2.2) years. During the follow-up, no infection around the prosthesis and loosening of the prosthesis occurred. One patient had dislocation two weeks after the surgery and did not relapse after manual reduction. One patient had a periprosthetic fracture two years after the operation and was treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Compared to the preoperative score, the VAS(one month after surgery t=10.5505, P<0.01; three months after surgery t=12.6154, P <0.05; six months after surgery t=16.6196, P <0.05)and Harris scores(one month after surgery t=14.1128, P <0.05; three months after surgery t=30.0689, P <0.05; six months after surgery t=59.9639, P <0.05) were greatly improved at the three follow-up time points, and the differences were significant. At the last follow-up, the Harris scores were excellent in 45 cases; good in 10 cases; fair in six cases; the excellent and good rate was 90.2%. At the last follow-up, there was no significant change in the position of the femoral stem prosthesis. Bone remodeling around the stem of the proximal femur could be seen in all the cases, among which 56 cases were degree Ⅰ, five cases were degree II .

Conclusion

For the patients with femoral periprosthetic fractures (Vancouver B2, Vancouver B3) and proximal femoral bone defects (Parprosky II, Parprosky Ⅲ), the Wagner SL revision stem is a good choice, which is easy to use and has been proved to be reliable in enabling restoration of the bone stock, and the clinical effcacy is satisfactory.

Key words: Arthroplasty, replacement, hip, Reoperation, Prostheses and implants

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-83189181,020-83062381 E-mail: cjojs1@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd