切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (05) : 609 -613. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2021.05.013

临床经验

关节镜下改良双滑轮技术交叉缝合固定骨性Bankart损伤
杨仁瑞1, 徐永清2, 何鹏举2, 金涛2,(), 耿睿智1, 杨够仙2   
  1. 1. 650032 昆明,解放军联勤保障部队第九二〇医院骨科;650500 昆明医科大学
    2. 650032 昆明,解放军联勤保障部队第九二〇医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-11 出版日期:2021-10-01
  • 通信作者: 金涛
  • 基金资助:
    云南省创伤骨科临床医学中心(ZX20191001)

Modified double-pulley technology to fix bony Bankart injury with cross suture by arthroscope

Renrui Yang1, Yongqing Xu2, Pengju He2, Tao Jin2,(), Ruizhi Geng1, Gouxian Yang2   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, 920th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force, Kunming 650032, China; Kunming Medical University, Kunming 650500, China
    2. Department of Orthopaedics, 920th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force, Kunming 650032, China
  • Received:2020-12-11 Published:2021-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Tao Jin
引用本文:

杨仁瑞, 徐永清, 何鹏举, 金涛, 耿睿智, 杨够仙. 关节镜下改良双滑轮技术交叉缝合固定骨性Bankart损伤[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 609-613.

Renrui Yang, Yongqing Xu, Pengju He, Tao Jin, Ruizhi Geng, Gouxian Yang. Modified double-pulley technology to fix bony Bankart injury with cross suture by arthroscope[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(05): 609-613.

目的

探讨一种改良双滑轮(double-pulley)交叉缝合技术固定新鲜的骨性Bankart损伤在临床上的使用价值及手术效果。

方法

回顾2018年1月至2020年10月联勤保障部队第九二〇医院运动医学科20例新鲜骨性Bankart损伤,关节镜下使用一种改良double-pulley技术进行缝合、复位、固定骨折块。采用配对样本t检验比较患侧术前、术后及双侧肩关节活动度、美国肩肘外科评分、Constant-Murley肩关节功能评分、Rowe评分和西安大略肩关节不稳指数。

结果

20例新鲜骨性Bankart损伤患者术后骨块复位良好,平均随访时间(15.0±2.8)个月。与术前相比,术后患者主观功能评分有显著的提高、疼痛明显好转(t=9.903、2.609、27.107、59.173,均为P<0.05)。术后随访未发现骨折块移位,也无感染、血管神经损伤等其他并发症。

结论

关节镜下治疗新鲜的骨性Bankart损伤效果良好,使用改良的double-pulley技术在关节镜下交叉缝合固定新鲜的骨性Bankart损伤,复位效果满意。

Objective

To explore the clinical value and surgical effect of a modified double-pulley technology to fix fresh bony Bankart with cross suture under arthroscopy.

Methods

From January 2018, the Department of Sports Medicine of the 920th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force has performed arthroscopic treatment on 20 patients diagnosed with bony Bankart lesion, and used an modified double-pulley technology for suture, reduction, and fixation. The range of motion of shoulder joint, American shoulder and elbow surgery score (ASES), Constant-Murley scores, Rowe scores and the Western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI) were compared with paired sample t test.

Results

From January 2018 to October 2020, 20 patients diagnosed with fresh bony Bankart injury were successfully completed. The postoperative X-ray and CT results showed that 20 patients had good bone mass reduction. The average follow-up time of 20 patients was (15.0±2.8)months. Compared with preoperative data, the subjective function scores were significantly improved, and the pain was relieved (t=9.903, 2.609, 27.107 and 59.173, all P<0.05). No fracture displacement was found in the postoperative follow-up, and no other complication such as infection or vascular nerve injury was found.

Conclusions

Arthroscopic treatment is effective for fresh bony Bankart injuries. The use of modified double-pulley technology to fix fresh bony Bankart lesion with cross suture under arthroscope can achieve anatomical reduction, and the reduction effect is also satisfactory.

图1 关节盂骨折块面积比计算方法示意图
图6 改良Double-Pulley技术固定骨性Bankart损伤,术中关节镜下示关节盂骨折块呈交叉缝合固定、复位良好
表1 术前与末次随访肩关节活动度比较[°,(±s)]
表2 术前与末次随访肩关节各项评分比较(±s)
图10 术后第2天,肩关节三维CT平扫重建图,示骨折块复位良好,骨折面平整,关节盂的完整性基本恢复
[1]
Burkhart SS, De Beer JF. Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill-Sachs lesion[J]. Arthroscopy, 2000, 16(7): 677-694.
[2]
Huysmans PE, Haen PS, Kidd M, et al. The shape of the inferior part of the glenoid: a cadaveric study[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2006, 15(6): 759-763.
[3]
Arrigoni P, Brady PC, Burkhart SS. The double-pulley technique for double-row rotator cuff repair[J]. Arthroscopy, 2007, 23(6): 675.e671-674.
[4]
Koo SS, Burkhart SS, Ochoa E. Arthroscopic double-pulley remplissage technique for engaging Hill-Sachs lesions in anterior shoulder instability repairs[J]. Arthroscopy, 2009, 25(11): 1343-1348.
[5]
Nicolas B, Philipe C, Marine A, et al. Contribution of arthroscopy in the treatment of anterior glenoid rim fractures: a comparison with open surgery[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2019, 28(1): 42-47.
[6]
Jiang CY, Zhu YM, Liu X, et al. Do reduction and healing of the bony fragment really matter in arthroscopic bony Bankart reconstruction? A prospective study with clinical and computed tomography evaluations[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2013, 41(11): 2617-2623.
[7]
Nakagawa S, Ozaki R, Take Y, et al. Bone fragment union and remodeling after arthroscopic bony bankart repair for traumatic anterior shoulder instability with a glenoid defect: influence on postoperative recurrence of instability[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2015, 43(6): 1438-1447.
[8]
Plath JE, Feucht MJ, Bangoj R, et al. Arthroscopic suture anchor fixation of bony Bankart lesions: clinical outcome, magnetic resonance imaging results, and return to sports[J]. Arthroscopy, 2015, 31(8): 1472-1481.
[9]
Scheibel M, Hug K, Gerhardt C, et al. Arthroscopic reduction and fixation of large solitary and multifragmented anterior glenoid rim fractures[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2016, 25(5): 781-790.
[10]
Spiegl UJ, Smith SD, Todd JN, et al. Biomechanical comparison of arthroscopic single- and double-row repair techniques for acute bony Bankart lesions[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2014, 42(8): 1939-1946.
[11]
Lansdown DA, Cvetanovich GL, Zhang AL, et al. Risk factors for intra-articular bone and cartilage lesions in patients undergoing surgical treatment for posterior instability[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2020, 48(5): 1207-1212.
[12]
Etoh T, Yamamoto N, Shinagawa K, et al. Mechanism and patterns of bone loss in patients with anterior shoulder dislocation[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2020, 29(10):1974-1980.
[13]
He Y, Peng X, Yuan Z, et al. Modified arthroscopic remplissage for Hill-Sachs lesions with high-strength sutures[J]. Orthopade, 2020, 49(3): 260-266.
[14]
Nakagawa S, Mae T, Yoneda K, et al. Influence of glenoid defect size and bone fragment size on the clinical outcome after arthroscopic Bankart repair in male collision/contact athletes[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2017, 45(9): 1967-1974.
[15]
Zhang J, Jiang C. A new " double-pulley" dual-row technique for arthroscopic fixation of bony Bankart lesion[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2011, 19(9): 1558-1562.
[1] 纪小孟, 刘璠, 唐晓波, 卞为伟, 董佩龙, 刘振鲁. 两种手术方式治疗肩袖撕裂合并粘连性肩关节囊炎[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 561-567.
[2] 苏介茂, 齐岩松, 王永祥, 魏宝刚, 马秉贤, 张鹏飞, 魏兴华, 徐永胜. 关节镜手术在早中期膝骨关节炎治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 646-652.
[3] 李程, 朱梁, 庞勇, 查国春, 仇尚, 孙伟, 冯硕. 侧侧缝合联合无结缝线桥技术治疗大型L型肩袖撕裂[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 301-306.
[4] 王典, 刘双赫, 曾峥. 肩关节镜术后肌肉功能改变对颈椎形态及矢状面参数影响的自身前后对照队列研究[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 371-378.
[5] 曲洋, 蒋浩然, 邢博涵, 张蒙, 张培训. 肩袖损伤的治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 289-291.
[6] 冯亚飞, 唐诗添, 唐福宽, 周亮. 关节镜下mLSRS 技术及双排缝线桥技术治疗大型肩袖撕裂的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 295-301.
[7] 王友健, 陶然, 陆跃, 马洪冬. 退行性中、小型肩袖撕裂两种临床治疗效果对比[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 302-308.
[8] 陈天鑫, 杨胜平, 朱瑜琪, 高云, 张帅. 多种手术方式治疗肩关节前向不稳定伴关节盂骨缺损的网状Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 344-352.
[9] 张琛朋, 王靖, 曾塬杰, 高鹏, 陈昕彤. 反式全肩关节置换术的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 373-376.
[10] 单磊, 周君琳. 同期修复肩袖撕裂结合锁定钢板治疗老年肱骨近端骨折的特点及疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 211-215.
[11] 赵静磊, 陈晓婷, 夏莹, 黄维佳, 周菊, 刘芳. 锁骨骨折切开复位内固定术后患者肩关节功能恢复的风险因素研究[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 216-222.
[12] 郁凯, 曾保起, 杨剑, 杨杰, 张殿英, 孙凤. 全关节镜与切开手术治疗肩袖撕裂疗效比较的系统综述与Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 238-245.
[13] 王涵宇, 王蕾. Bankart损伤的关节镜下修复进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 262-270.
[14] 白正林, 高明, 孟增东. 肩关节置换术后假体周围感染的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 271-276.
[15] 马明太, 居家宝, 张一翀, 丁镇涛, 张殿英, 付中国, 陈建海. 肱骨大结节骨折的治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 277-280.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?