切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03) : 383 -386. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2021.03.022

临床经验

第一跖趾关节融合术治疗拇外翻的临床疗效
张成1, 陈树涛1, 高武长1,(), 刘延子1, 安超1   
  1. 1. 255000 淄博市第七人民医院足踝外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-21 出版日期:2021-06-01
  • 通信作者: 高武长

Clinical effect of first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion in treatment of hallux valgus

Cheng Zhang1, Shutao Chen1, Wuchang Gao1,(), Yanzi Liu1, Chao An1   

  1. 1. Zibo Seventh People’s Hospital, Zibo 255000, China
  • Received:2019-12-21 Published:2021-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Wuchang Gao
引用本文:

张成, 陈树涛, 高武长, 刘延子, 安超. 第一跖趾关节融合术治疗拇外翻的临床疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 383-386.

Cheng Zhang, Shutao Chen, Wuchang Gao, Yanzi Liu, Chao An. Clinical effect of first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion in treatment of hallux valgus[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(03): 383-386.

目的

探讨应用交叉中空加压螺钉联合背侧解剖接骨板的第一跖趾关节融合术治疗中重度拇外翻伴骨质疏松患者的临床疗效。

方法

自2017年5月~2019年4月收集了46例中重度拇外翻伴骨质疏松患者,年龄65~73岁。观察患者的融合率情况以及术后相关并发症的发生率,分析比较了术前和末次随访时的拇外翻角(HVA)、第一二跖骨间角(IMA)、美国矫形足踝协会足功能评分(AOFAS)以及视觉疼痛模拟量表评分(VAS)。术前、末次随访比较采用t检验。

结果

对46例患者进行了6~22个月的随访。46例中重度拇外翻伴骨质疏松患者全部实现了临床上和影像学上的第一跖趾关节融合,全部达成了早期负重活动的目的,末次随访时发现切口全部一期愈合,无相关并发症出现。术前HVA为(41.8±7.6)°,术后HVA为(15.6±1.6)°;术前IMA为(18.3±1.9)°,术后IMA为(9.6±1.3)°;术前AOFAS为(49.7±4.7)分,术后AOFAS为(81.6±2.9)分;术前VAS为(8.9±0.9)分,术后为(1.7±1.1)分。患者HAV、IMA、AOFAS、VAS在术前和末次随访差异有统计学意义(t=23.75、27.28、-35.94、36.78,均为P<0.05)。

结论

对于中重度拇外翻伴骨质疏松患者来说,应用交叉中空加压螺钉联合背侧解剖接骨板的第一跖趾关节融合术矫形效果满意,融合率高,康复快,值得临床推广。

Objective

To explore the clinical effect of the first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion with cross hollow compression screw and dorsal anatomical plate in the treatment of moderate and severe hallux valgus with osteoporosis.

Methods

From May 2017 to April 2019, 46 patients with moderate to severe hallux valgus and osteoporosis, aged 65-73 years, were collected. The fusion rate and the incidence of postoperative complications were observed. The hallux valgus angle (HVA), first and second metatarsal angle (IMA), American Orthopedic foot and ankle Association foot function score (AOFAS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) were compared before and at the last follow-up. Preoperative and final follow-up were compared by t test.

Results

Forty-six patients were followed up for six to 22 months by outpatient follow-up. Forty-six cases of moderate and severe hallux valgus with osteoporosis all achieved clinical and imaging fusion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint, all achieved the purpose of early weight-bearing activities. At the last follow-up, it was found that all the incisions healed in the first stage, and no related complications occurred. Preoperative HVA was (41.8±7.6)° and postoperative HVA was (15.6±1.6)° respectively; preoperative IMA was (18.3±1.9)° and postoperative IMA was (9.6±1.3)° respectively; preoperative AOFAS was (49.7±4.7), postoperative AOFAS was (81.6±2.9) respectively; preoperative VAS was (8.9±0.9) and postoperative was (1.7±1.1). The differences of the two groups were statistically significant (t=23.75, 27.28, -35.94, 36.78, all P<0.05).

Conclusion

For patients with moderate and severe hallux valgus and osteoporosis, the first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion with cross hollow compression screw combined with the anatomical plate on the back is satisfactory, the fusion rate is high and the recovery is fast, which is worth clinical promotion.

表1 手术前后患足HVA、IMA、AOFAS以及VAS比较[n=46,(±s)]
图1 重度拇外翻伴骨质疏松患者右侧第一跖趾关节融合术前后X线片。图A为术前右足正位X线片,示趾呈外翻状态,HVA(外翻角)为42.3°,IMA(第一、二跖骨间角)为20.7°;图B为术前右足斜位X线片,示右足趾重度外翻;图C为术后右足正位X线片,示第一跖趾关节行交叉中空加压螺钉联合背侧解剖接骨板的第一跖趾关节融合术,HVA为13.0°,IMA为8.5°;图D为术后右足斜位X线片,示右足拇趾外翻矫正良好,内固定物位置可
[1]
韩宇,张汉阳,常非.第1跖趾关节融合术研究进展[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2018,33(6):669-671.
[2]
Latif A, Dhinsa BS, Lau B, et al. First metatarsophalangeal fusion using joint specific dorsal plate with interfragmentary screw augmentation: clinical and radiological outcomes[J]. Foot Ankle Surg, 2019, 25(2): 132-136.
[3]
曾林如,汤样华,徐灿达,等.第1跖趾关节融合结合Weil截骨或关节成形术治疗重度拇外翻[J].临床骨科杂志,2016,19(4):451-452.
[4]
楚宇鹏,胡艇,陈学武,等.第1跖趾关节融合联合改良Weil截骨术治疗中重度足拇外翻畸形[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2018,33(6):662-664.
[5]
孙青刚,康庆林,徐佳,等.踇外翻畸形的治疗进展[J].山东医药,2014,54(23):86-88.
[6]
徐继平,徐向阳,刘津浩,等.老年性拇外翻的治疗[J].老年医学与保健,2008,14(2):114-116.
[7]
Storts EC, Camasta CA. Immediate weightbearing of first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion comparing buried crossed kirschner wires versus crossing screws: does incorporating the sesamoids into the fusion contribute to higher incidence of bony union?[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2016, 55(3): 562-566.
[8]
Abben KW, Sorensen MD, Waverly BJ. Immediate weight bearing after first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis with screw and locking plate fixation: a short-term review[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg,2018,57(4):771-775.
[9]
Crowell A, Van JC, Meyr AJ. Early weight-bearing after arthrodesis of the first metatarsal-phalangeal joint: a systematic review of the incidence of non-union[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2018, 57(6): 1200-1203.
[10]
Korim MT, Mahadevan D, Ghosh A, et al. Effect of joint pathology, surface preparation and fixation methods on union frequency after first metatarsophalangeal joint tic review of the English literature[J]. Foot Ankle Surg, 2017, 23(3): 189-194.
[11]
Cone B, Staggers JR, Naranje S, et al. First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis: does the addition of a lag screw to a dorsal locking plate influence union rate and/or final alignment after fusion[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2018, 57(2): 259-263.
[1] 中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组, 广东省医学会骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病分会, 广东省佛山市顺德区第三人民医院. 中国髋部脆性骨折术后抗骨质疏松药物临床干预指南(2023年版)[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 751-764.
[2] 浦路桥, 徐永清, 齐保闯, 施洪鑫, 林玮, 卜鹏飞, 白艳, 唐志方, 李川. 中国髋部脆性骨折术后抗骨质疏松药物临床干预指南(2023年版)计划书[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 747-750.
[3] 陆宜仙, 张震涛, 夏德萌, 王家林. 巨噬细胞极化在骨质疏松中调控作用及机制的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 538-541.
[4] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[5] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[6] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[7] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[8] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[9] 宋钰, 赵阳, 王惠君, 廖新华. 术前BMI与可切除胃癌患者术后远期生存的关系[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 530-533.
[10] 汪毅, 许思哲, 任章霞. 胸乳入路腔镜单侧甲状腺叶切除术与开放手术对分化型甲状腺癌患者术后恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 542-545.
[11] 陈俊宇, 崔宇. TAPP治疗腹股沟嵌顿疝的临床分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 546-549.
[12] 赵新亮, 荆克杰, 樊红艳, 王妮, 葸根. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外补片与腹腔内补片治疗两侧下腹壁切口疝的临床对比观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 554-557.
[13] 惠立良, 王成果, 段东峰, 王健. 腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术治疗胰体尾部良性肿瘤及部分交界性肿瘤的临床效果[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 558-561.
[14] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[15] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
阅读次数
全文


摘要