切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02) : 252 -255. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2021.02.020

所属专题: 文献

临床经验

两种内固定术式治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折的疗效对比
李永冬1,(), 张结合1, 毛立科1, 朱玉洲1, 赵鸣1   
  1. 1. 232000 淮南新华医疗集团新华医院
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-09 出版日期:2021-04-01
  • 通信作者: 李永冬
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省高校自然科学项目(KJ2019A0261)

Comparison of clinical outcomes of two types of internal fixation in complex tibial plateau fractures

Yongdong Li1,(), Jiehe Zhang1, Like Mao1, Yuzhou Zhu1, Ming Zhao1   

  1. 1. Huainan Xinhua Hospital of Xinhua Medical Group, Huainan 232000, China
  • Received:2020-10-09 Published:2021-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Yongdong Li
引用本文:

李永冬, 张结合, 毛立科, 朱玉洲, 赵鸣. 两种内固定术式治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折的疗效对比[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 252-255.

Yongdong Li, Jiehe Zhang, Like Mao, Yuzhou Zhu, Ming Zhao. Comparison of clinical outcomes of two types of internal fixation in complex tibial plateau fractures[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(02): 252-255.

目的

比较双切口双钢板内固定与单侧锁定钢板内固定治疗Schatzker V型胫骨平台骨折的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2016年5月至2019年5月淮南新华医疗集团新华医院收治的患者,共纳入54例Schatzker V型胫骨平台骨折患者。根据手术方法的不同,将双切口双钢板内固定治疗方案的30例纳入观察组,行单侧锁定钢板内固定治疗方案的24例纳入对照组,通过卡方检验、连续校正卡方检验及t检验比较两组围手术期及术后恢复相关指标(术中失血量、出院时间、切口总长度、手术时长、膝关节功能锻炼开始时间、完全负重下地锻炼时间、骨折愈合时间),测量患者术毕和术后12个月的内翻角(TPA)、后倾角(PA)和膝关节活动度(ROM),采用美国特种外科医院(HSS)膝关节评分系统评定患者膝关节功能及有无术后并发症。

结果

观察组与对照组的术中失血量、出院时间、切口总长度、手术时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组膝关节功能锻炼开始时间显著短于对照组(t=20.549,P<0.05);观察组完全负重下地锻炼时间(t=20.549,P<0.05)和骨折愈合时间(t=20.095,P<0.05)均显著长于对照组。观察组术毕和术后12个月的TPA、PA和ROM与对照组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组HSS优良率分与对照组无统计学差异(χ2=0.244,P>0.05)。观察组术后并发症发生率显著低于对照组(χ2=4.351,P<0.05)。

结论

双切口双钢板内固定与单侧锁定钢板内固定治疗Schatzker V型均可获得满意的治疗效果。同时双切口双钢板内固定方案因其复位准确、固定牢靠等优点,可早期进行膝关节术后康复训练,从而有效降低术后膝关节僵直的发生。

Objective

To compare the clinical outcomes of double-incision double-plate internal fixation and unilateral locking plate internal fixation in the treatment of Schatzker V tibial plateau fracture.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of patients admitted to Huainan Xinhua Hospital of Xinhua Medical Group from May 2016 to May 2019. A total of 54 patients with Schatzker V tibial plateau fractures were included. According to different surgical methods, 30 cases of double-incision double steel plate internal fixation were included in the observation group, and 24 cases of single-sided locking steel plate internal fixation were included in the control group. The chi-square test, continuous correction chi-square test t test were used to compare the two groups of perioperative and postoperative recovery indicators (intraoperative blood loss, discharge time, total length of incision, operation time, knee functional exercise start time, full weight-bearing exercise time, fracture healing time). The varus angle (TPA), posterior angle (PA) and range of motion (ROM) of the knee joint after the operation, and at the postoperative 12 months were evaluated by the the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee scoring system to assess the patients’ knee joint function and the presence or absence of postoperative complications.

Results

There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss, discharge time, total incision length, and operation time between the observation group and the control group (P>0.05). the start time of knee functional exercise in the observation group was significantly shorter than that of the control group (t=20.549, P<0.05). the observation group exercise time under full load (t=20.549, P<0.05) and fracture healing time (t=20.095, P<0.05) were significantly longer than the control group. There was no significant difference between the observation group and the control group in TPA, PA and ROM after operation and 12 months after operation (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the HSS excellent and good rate of the observation group and the control group (χ2=0.244, P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (χ2=4.351, P<0.05).

Conclusions

Both double-incision double plate internal fixation and unilateral locking plate internal fixation for Schatzker V type can obtain satisfactory therapeutic effects. The double-incision double-plate internal fixation scheme can be used for early rehabilitation training after knee joint surgery due to its advantages such as accurate reduction and firm fixation, thereby effectively reducing the occurrence of postoperative knee joint stiffness.

表1 两种钢板内固定胫骨平台骨折患者的手术相关指标比较(±s)
表2 两种钢板内固定术后即刻及术后12个月膝关节指标比较[°,(±s)]
表3 两种钢板内固定术临床疗效比较[例(%)]
[1]
Abdelbadie A, El-Hennawy A, Sallam A. Primary total knee arthroplasty: a viable surgical option for complex tibial plateau fractures in elderly[J]. J Knee Surg, 2020, 33(5): 496-503.
[2]
王伟,罗强,李天宇,等.联合入路双钢板内固定治疗Schatzker V、VI型胫骨平台骨折的临床疗效分析[J].创伤外科杂志,2019,21(3):185-187.
[3]
刘燊,Thakur SS, 程鑫,等.改良前外侧入路治疗老年复杂胫骨平台骨折的临床效果[J].中国骨与关节杂志,2019,8(7):486-490.
[4]
Wu K, Huang J, Lin J, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of anterior tibial plateau fracture-dislocation: a case series and literature review[J]. J Knee Surg, 2017, 30(2): 114-120.
[5]
高永进.锁定加压钢板内固定术与解剖钢板内固定术对复杂性胫骨平台骨折的疗效对比[J].河南医学研究,2018,27(21):3983-3984.
[6]
白晓兵,任龙龙,路星.锁定钢板与双切口双钢板内固定治疗复杂性胫骨平台骨折的疗效比较[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2018,17(16):1754-1757.
[7]
葛建智.锁定钢板内固定对复杂性胫骨平台骨折患者术后恢复进程的影响[J].内蒙古医学杂志,2018,50(6):714-715.
[8]
苗本宽,余润泽.不同手术方式在最佳时间内对复杂性胫骨平台骨折合并膝关节周围软组织损伤的疗效[J].中国医药导报,2018,15(6):75-79.
[9]
黄永刚,宋春健.锁定钢板与双切口双钢板内固定治疗复杂性胫骨平台骨折的疗效分析[J].吉林医学,2017,38(9):1746-1747.
[10]
顾建钦,郑稼,刘珂,等.锁定钢板治疗复杂性胫骨平台骨折的疗效分析[J].中国现代药物应用,2016,10(16):3-4.
[11]
喻元,喻宙,屈增辉,等.两种不同内固定方式在复杂性胫骨平台骨折治疗中的临床效果比较[J].临床医学研究与实践,2020,5(1):89-90.
[12]
邢彬,翁茂盛.锁定钢板与双切口双钢板内固定治疗复杂性胫骨平台骨折的疗效比较[J].中华全科医学,2015,13(2):334-336.
[1] 刘瀚忠, 黄生辉, 万俊明, 李家春, 舒涛. 髌上入路和髌旁外侧入路髓内钉治疗胫骨骨折疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 795-801.
[2] 夏效泳, 王立超, 朱治国, 丛云海, 史宗新. 深度塌陷性胫骨平台骨折的形态特点和治疗策略[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 625-632.
[3] 谢文伟, 吴利洲, 冯庆裕, 张家勋, 叶龙城, 姚沛全, 王志坤, 李再学, 余颖锋. 双瓣钢板内固定系统治疗前交叉韧带止点骨折的研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 697-704.
[4] 周晓强, 孙超, 李志强, 徐人杰, 佘远时, 张向鑫, 陈广祥, 虞宵. 动力抗旋交叉钉治疗不稳定股骨颈骨折的早期疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 670-676.
[5] 袁涛, 钱洪, 杨少强, 赖圳登, 孟嘉, 江辉, 赵建宁, 包倪荣. 关节镜下全内缝合技术治疗冈上肌肌腱关节面撕裂[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 611-615.
[6] 邹建平, 李惠锡, 陈锦明, 刘凯骅, 陈进宇, 林军华. 微创双切口与外侧L形切口治疗跟骨骨折的疗效对比[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 507-511.
[7] 杨德育, 尤瑞金, 郑耿阳. 成年股骨颈骨折愈合后内固定物取出术后短期随访[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 483-487.
[8] 吴萍, 刘永林, 陈能彬, 季明军, 万晓波. 应用皮瓣联合负压封闭引流及灌洗引流治疗胫骨骨折术后钢板外露的临床效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(04): 317-320.
[9] 李涛, 杨义, 冯光, 郝岱峰. 北京市某三甲医院创面修复专科病区5年间糖尿病足住院病例回顾性分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(05): 405-410.
[10] 王刚, 单伟根, 刘娟, 李长庆, 王新民. 常规治疗联合阿托伐他丁钙片对支气管扩张症临床分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 538-540.
[11] 赵海林, 王璐璐, 罗冬冬, 胡骕, 李丹, 彭彪. 脑室-腹腔分流术对脑膜转移癌的治疗效果分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(06): 335-340.
[12] 韦强, 秦赢, 王光明, 周立祥, 付双林, 栾永昕. 腰大池-腹腔分流术治疗交通性脑积水的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(03): 173-177.
[13] 高岩, 张泽, 张进, 张登峰, 刘杰, 刘沛东, 包勤济, 张永红. 主辅钢板内固定治疗胫骨中下1/3骨折的初步临床研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 39-44.
[14] 贾春娟, 房贤村, 刘云霞, 吴华清. 自拟中药方剂(血安胃康)联合西药治疗上消化道出血的临床研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(01): 26-29.
[15] 汪赓, 夏泽锋, 陶凯雄. 代谢手术在非肥胖型2型糖尿病中的治疗效果及研究进展[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 155-160.
阅读次数
全文


摘要