关节镜下全内缝合技术治疗冈上肌肌腱关节面撕裂

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2022.05.013

目的

对全内缝合技术治疗冈上肌关节面部分损伤的临床应用进行疗效分析。

方法

对2020年1月至2020年12月在东部战区总医院接受关节镜下冈上肌关节面部分损伤全内缝合修补术的20例患者行回顾性研究。使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)、肩关节功能Constant-Murley(CM)评分、美国加州大学肩关节评分(UCLA)、美国肩肘外科评分(ASES)对患者肩关节功能进行术前、术后3周和3个月随访评价。手术前后VAS、ASES、Constant及UCLA评分差值采用配对t检验。

结果

患者术后3周随访时表现出良好的临床疗效：UCLA评分从术前(15.58±2.59)分提升到(26.53±3.05)分(t＝4.013，P<0. 05)；CM评分从术前的(35.7±4.2)分提高到(73.6±3.8)分(t＝4.763，P<0. 05)。术后3个月随访时，患者疼痛和功能均明显提升：ASES评分从术前的(38.23±2.81)分提高到(94.15±3.38)分(t＝3.778，P<0. 01)；VAS评分从术前的(6.35±0.48)分降低到到(1.42±0.17)分(t ＝4.562，P<0.01)。术后3个月磁共振检查显示冈上肌无撕裂，愈合良好，末次随访时无一例翻修。

结论

冈上肌关节面部分损伤采用全内缝合修补技术有利于患者的早期康复，可获得良好的临床疗效。

关键词: 回旋套损伤, 回旋套, 关节镜, 治疗效果

Objective

To analyze the clinical effect of all-inside repair technique in the treatment of partial-thickness articular surface rotator cuff tears.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 20 patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery due to partial-thickness articular supraspinatus tendon avulsion (PASTA) from January 2020 to December 2020 in Jinling Hospital. All of these patients received the all-inside repair technique, that is, the supraspinatus tendon injury repaired within the glenohumeral joint without damaging or destroying the bursal layer of the rotator cuff. The visual analog scale (VAS), Constant-Murley(CM) score, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES) were used before the operation, three weeks, and three months after the surgery to evaluate shoulder joint function and pain. The differences of VAS, ASES, Constant and UCLA scores before and after surgery were analyzed by paired t test.

Results

The clinical results were excellent at the early follow-up in the postoperative three weeks: the UCLA score increased from (15.58±2.59) to (26.53±3.05) ( t=4.013, P<0. 05), and the CM score improved from(35.7±4.2) to (73.6±3.8) (t=4.763, P<0. 05). Three months after the surgery, the shoulder function and pain scores were significantly improved: ASES score increased from the preoperative (38.23±2.81) to the postoperative(94.15±3.38) (t =3.778, P<0. 01); VAS score improved from(6.35±0.48)to(1.42±0.17) ( t =4.562, P<0.01). MRI examination in postoperative three months revealed good healing of supraspinatus tendon, and no revision was performed.

Conclusion

All-inside repair technique is an effective surgical method for the treatment of partial-thickness articular surface rotator cuff tears, which is beneficial to the early recovery of patients.

Key words: Rotator cuff injury, Rotator cuff, Arthroscopy, Treatment outcome

图1 冈上肌关节面撕裂全内缝合技术操作步骤。图A为清理关节腔，充分暴露冈上肌下表面损伤部位，清理骨床，并确定置钉位置；图B为经肌腱将锚钉送入关节腔后，充分暴露视野再植入锚钉；图C~D示退出锚钉手柄前将锚钉线配合送入关节腔，从前下入路取出；图E~G示缝合钩从前下入路进入，选择恰当的位置缝合冈上肌下表面；图H示过线后通过前下入路在冈上肌下表面打结

图2 右肩冈上肌关节面部分撕裂修补术前和术后3个月MRI。图A~B为术前MRI斜冠状位，箭头所指冈上肌下表面损伤，深度超过50%，关节侧肩袖撕裂回缩；图C为轴位MRI，示冈上肌附着点骨髓水肿信号；图D~E为修补术后3个月MRI斜冠状位，箭头所指示冈上肌连续性恢复，腱骨愈合良好；图F为修补术后3个月MRI轴位，示冈上肌附着点骨髓水肿明显好转

表1 冈上肌关节面部分撕裂全内缝合修补术后UCLA评分比较[n＝20，分，(±s)]

组别	疼痛	功能	前侧屈曲活动	外展屈曲活动	体侧外旋活动	总分
术前	4.15±0.26	3.83±0.25	1.77±0.29	1.85±0.18	2.10±0.14	15.58±2.59
术后3周	7.10±0.18	6.18±0.37	3.78±0.23	3.95±0.35	3.59±0.33	26.53±3.05
术后3个月	9.42±0.35	9.35±0.30	4.75±0.34	4.47±0.21	4.55±0.27	32.75±1.45
t值	5.583^a，4.127^b	4.965^a，4.386^b	5.774^a, 4.365^b	5.215^a，4.825^b	5.371^a, 4.763^b	4.013^a，3.859^b
P值	<0.05^a，<0.01^b	<0.05^a，<0.01^b	<0.05^a，<0.01^b	<0.05^a，<0.01^b	<0.05^a，<0.01^b	<0.05^a，<0.01^b

表1 冈上肌关节面部分撕裂全内缝合修补术后UCLA评分比较[n＝20，分，(±s)]

组别	疼痛	功能	前侧屈曲活动	外展屈曲活动	体侧外旋活动	总分
术前	4.15±0.26	3.83±0.25	1.77±0.29	1.85±0.18	2.10±0.14	15.58±2.59
术后3周	7.10±0.18	6.18±0.37	3.78±0.23	3.95±0.35	3.59±0.33	26.53±3.05
术后3个月	9.42±0.35	9.35±0.30	4.75±0.34	4.47±0.21	4.55±0.27	32.75±1.45
t值	5.583^a，4.127^b	4.965^a，4.386^b	5.774^a, 4.365^b	5.215^a，4.825^b	5.371^a, 4.763^b	4.013^a，3.859^b
P值	<0.05^a，<0.01^b	<0.05^a，<0.01^b	<0.05^a，<0.01^b	<0.05^a，<0.01^b	<0.05^a，<0.01^b	<0.05^a，<0.01^b

表2 冈上肌关节面部分撕裂全内缝合修补术后肩关节CM评分比较[n＝20，分，(±s)]

组别	疼痛	活动度	功能活动	肌力	总分
术前	5.3±0.3	6.5±1.6	12.9±1.2	7.2±2.1	35.7±4.2
术后3周	11.1±1.3	12.7±1.9	25.4±1.2	15.8±1.6	73.6±3.8
术后3个月	14.1±1.2	20.0±1.3	38.5±1.2	23.9±1.5	94.1±2.3
t值	4.761^a，4.392^b	4.895^a，4.447^b	5.025^a，4.286^b	4.136^a，3.762^b	4.763^a，3.861^b
P值	<0.05^a，<0.01^b	<0.05^a，<0.01^b	<0.05^a，<0.01^b	<0.05^a，<0.01^b	<0.05^a，<0.01^b

表2 冈上肌关节面部分撕裂全内缝合修补术后肩关节CM评分比较[n＝20，分，(±s)]

组别	疼痛	活动度	功能活动	肌力	总分
术前	5.3±0.3	6.5±1.6	12.9±1.2	7.2±2.1	35.7±4.2
术后3周	11.1±1.3	12.7±1.9	25.4±1.2	15.8±1.6	73.6±3.8
术后3个月	14.1±1.2	20.0±1.3	38.5±1.2	23.9±1.5	94.1±2.3
t值	4.761^a，4.392^b	4.895^a，4.447^b	5.025^a，4.286^b	4.136^a，3.762^b	4.763^a，3.861^b
P值	<0.05^a，<0.01^b	<0.05^a，<0.01^b	<0.05^a，<0.01^b	<0.05^a，<0.01^b	<0.05^a，<0.01^b

表3 冈上肌关节面部分撕裂全内缝合修补术后评分比较[n＝20，分，((±s)]

时间	VAS评分	UCLA评分	ASES评分
术前	6.35±0.48	15.58±2.59	38.23±2.81
术后3个月	1.42±0.17	32.75±1.45	94.15±3.38
t值	4.562	4.065	3.778
P值	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01

表3 冈上肌关节面部分撕裂全内缝合修补术后评分比较[n＝20，分，((±s)]

时间	VAS评分	UCLA评分	ASES评分
术前	6.35±0.48	15.58±2.59	38.23±2.81
术后3个月	1.42±0.17	32.75±1.45	94.15±3.38
t值	4.562	4.065	3.778
P值	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01

[1]	Ellman H, Hanker G, Bayer M. Repair of the rotator cuff. End-result study of factors influencing reconstruction[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1986, 68(8): 1136-1144.
[2]	Yuan T, Qian H, Yu X, et al. Proteomic analysis reveals rotator cuff injury caused by oxidative stress[J/OL]. Ther Adv Chronic Dis, 2021, 17; 12:2040622320987057. DOI：10.1177/2040622320987057.
[3]	Longo UG, Petrillo S, Candela V, et al. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without subacromial decompression is safe and effective: a clinical study[J]. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2020, 21(1): 1-8.
[4]	Lavender C, Lycans D, Sina AA, et al. Single-Incision rotator cuff repair with a needle arthroscope[J]. Arthrosc Tech, 2020, 9(4): e419-e423.
[5]	Shi BY, Diaz M, Binkley M, et al. Biomechanical strength of rotator cuff repairs: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis of cadaveric studies[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2019, 47(8): 1984-1993.
[6]	Chen JJ, Ye Z, Liang JW, et al. Arthroscopic repair of partial articular supraspinatus tendon avulsion lesions by conversion to full-thickness tears through a small incision[J]. Chin J Traumatol, 2020, 23(6): 336-340.
[7]	Vinanti GB, Rossato A, Scrimieri D, et al. Arthroscopic transtendon repair of partial articular-sided supraspinatus tendon avulsion[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2017, 25(7): 2151-2156.
[8]	Rossi LA, Ranalletta M. In situ repair of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears: a critical analysis review[J]. EFORT Open Rev, 2020, 5(3): 138-144.
[9]	Nakagawa S, Mizuno N, Sahara W, et al. Insufficient integrity of partial articular surface tendon avulsion lesions after arthroscopic trans-tendon repair: comparison with integrity after arthroscopic repair after conversion to a full thickness tear[J]. J Orthop Sci, 2020, 25(6): 992-998.
[10]	Spencer EJ. Partial-thickness articular surface rotator cuff tears: an all-inside repair technique[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010, 468(6): 1514-1520.
[11]	Lehman RC, Perry CR. Arthroscopic surgery for partial rotator cuff tears[J/OL]. Arthroscopy, 2003, 19(7): E81-E84.
[12]	Gereli A, Kocaoglu B, Ulku TK, et al. Completion repair exhibits increased healing characteristics compared with in situ repair of partial thickness bursal rotator cuff tears[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2018, 26(8): 2498-2504.
[13]	Park SG, Shim BJ, Seok HG. How much will high tension adversely affect rotator cuff repair integrity？[J]. Arthroscopy, 2019, 35(11): 2992-3000.
[14]	Jordan RW, Bentick K, Saithna A. Transtendinous repair of partial articular sided supraspinatus tears is associated with higher rates of stiffness and significantly inferior early functional scores than tear completion and repair: a systematic review[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2018, 104(6): 829-837.
[15]	吴剑，陈俊，刘艳西，等．快速康复外科理念在关节镜下治疗肩袖损伤中的应用[J/CD]．中华关节外科杂志(电子版)，2018，12(1):102-106.

[1]	苏介茂, 齐岩松, 王永祥, 魏宝刚, 马秉贤, 张鹏飞, 魏兴华, 徐永胜. 关节镜手术在早中期膝骨关节炎治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 646-652.
[2]	纪小孟, 刘璠, 唐晓波, 卞为伟, 董佩龙, 刘振鲁. 两种手术方式治疗肩袖撕裂合并粘连性肩关节囊炎[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 561-567.
[3]	李程, 朱梁, 庞勇, 查国春, 仇尚, 孙伟, 冯硕. 侧侧缝合联合无结缝线桥技术治疗大型L型肩袖撕裂[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 301-306.
[4]	蔡雨琦, 史尉利, 陶立元, 曹建夫, 崔国庆, 杨渝平. 支持带松解联合外侧成形治疗髌骨外侧过度挤压综合征[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 186-192.
[5]	韩燕鸿, 潘建科, 罗明辉, 黄和涛, 曹厚然, 李想, 曾令烽, 梁桂洪, 陈红云, 刘军, 杨伟毅. 肩袖撕裂修复术后腱－骨愈合影响因素的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 239-244.
[6]	肖志满, 庄锡琪, 龚煜. 关节镜下Lasso-loop Gould术式治疗踝关节外侧不稳定的早期疗效[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 280-284.
[7]	王典, 刘双赫, 曾峥. 肩关节镜术后肌肉功能改变对颈椎形态及矢状面参数影响的自身前后对照队列研究[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 371-378.
[8]	韩伟峰, 王典, 陈艺丹, 曾峥. 关节镜下半月板成形术与康复训练治疗中年退行性内侧半月板撕裂的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(02): 134-140.
[9]	曲洋, 蒋浩然, 邢博涵, 张蒙, 张培训. 肩袖损伤的治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 289-291.
[10]	冯亚飞, 唐诗添, 唐福宽, 周亮. 关节镜下mLSRS 技术及双排缝线桥技术治疗大型肩袖撕裂的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 295-301.
[11]	王友健, 陶然, 陆跃, 马洪冬. 退行性中、小型肩袖撕裂两种临床治疗效果对比[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 302-308.
[12]	郁凯, 曾保起, 杨剑, 杨杰, 张殿英, 孙凤. 全关节镜与切开手术治疗肩袖撕裂疗效比较的系统综述与Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 238-245.
[13]	王涵宇, 王蕾. Bankart损伤的关节镜下修复进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 262-270.
[14]	唐晓俞, 邓凯文, 冯剑, 邹义源, 郑新波, 王小芃. 关节镜下V-Y结缝合方式与缝线桥技术修复中型肩袖损伤的比较[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 107-114.
[15]	袁捷, 乔钰琪, 李彦冬. 二甲双胍、来曲唑联合地屈孕酮治疗多囊卵巢综合征合并不孕症的效果评价[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 343-347.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Effect of all-inside repair technique on articular supraspinatus tendon avulsion

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Effect of all-inside repair technique on articular supraspinatus tendon avulsion