切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (06) : 697 -704. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2022.06.008

临床论著

双瓣钢板内固定系统治疗前交叉韧带止点骨折的研究
谢文伟1,(), 吴利洲1, 冯庆裕1, 张家勋2, 叶龙城3, 姚沛全1, 王志坤1, 李再学1, 余颖锋1   
  1. 1. 523326 东莞市松山湖中心医院
    2. 516000 惠州市中心人民医院
    3. 523000 东莞,广东医科大学
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-17 出版日期:2022-12-01
  • 通信作者: 谢文伟
  • 基金资助:
    广东省东莞市社会科技发展重点项目(202050715024191)

Study on treatment of tibial spine avulsion fractures with double-flap plate internal fixation system

Wenwei Xie1,(), Lizhou Wu1, Qingyu Feng1, Jiaxun Zhang2, Longcheng Ye3, Peiquan Yao1, Zhikun Wang1, Zaixue Li1, Yingfeng Yu1   

  1. 1. Songshan Lake Central Hospital of Dongguan, Dongguan 523326, China
    2. Central People′s Hospital of Huizhou, Huizhou 516000, China
    3. Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan 523000, China
  • Received:2022-09-17 Published:2022-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Wenwei Xie
引用本文:

谢文伟, 吴利洲, 冯庆裕, 张家勋, 叶龙城, 姚沛全, 王志坤, 李再学, 余颖锋. 双瓣钢板内固定系统治疗前交叉韧带止点骨折的研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 697-704.

Wenwei Xie, Lizhou Wu, Qingyu Feng, Jiaxun Zhang, Longcheng Ye, Peiquan Yao, Zhikun Wang, Zaixue Li, Yingfeng Yu. Study on treatment of tibial spine avulsion fractures with double-flap plate internal fixation system[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(06): 697-704.

目的

研发一种适用于关节镜下治疗前交叉韧带止点骨折(TSAFs)的新型双瓣钢板内固定系统,并论证其可行性及实用性。

方法

收集松山湖中心医院50例17~45岁TSAFs病例(排除膝骨折及骨代谢异常等)的CT数据,掌握骨折块大小及解剖分布特点;对8具新鲜成年人膝关节标本髁间窝及前叉韧带止点周围骨性空间测量,确定止点前方空间大小及特点。60例猪膝标本制作成TSAFs模型,简单随机抽样法分为4组,每组15例,分别予不同方式内固定:单股钢丝环扎固定(钢丝环扎组),空心钉固定(空心钉组),指钢板不可吸收Fiber Wire线固定(指钢板线组);实验组为双瓣钢板固定(双瓣钢板组)。对各组进行抗拨伸力生物力学实验并进行对比分析,多组间采用方差检验,各组间采用SNK-q检验进行两两对比。通过临床应用双瓣钢板内固定系统对8例17~45岁TSAFs病人进行关节镜下手术,并排除有影响骨质疾病的患者。术前术后采用Lysholm膝关节功能评分及(国际膝关节文献委员会IKDC)2000膝关节功能评分评估效果,评分数据进行t检验。

结果

确定TSAFs骨折块分布区域特点为O点(以外侧半月板前角游离缘与前叉韧带止点中线交点为"O"点)。前侧部分骨块大小约长(10±5)mm×宽(15±4)mm,内外侧旁开各6 mm的范围,能容纳一块不超过2 mm厚度的薄片类内固定物,在多角度活动下均不会撞击关节软骨面。在猪膝关节生物力学测定中,4组的一级抗拨伸力和最大抗拨伸力差异均有统计学意义(F=38.091、15.885, both P<0.001 );其中双瓣钢板组组一级抗拨伸力为(105±6)N、最大抗拨伸力为(346±21)N,较其他三组有优势,两两比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),为临床应用提供生物力学证据。8例TSAFs病例骨折愈合时间(3.5±0.8)个月,Lysholm膝关节功能评分从术前(43±7)分提高到术后3个月的(89±6)分,且差异均有统计学意义(t=-14.87,P<0.05)。IKDC 2000膝关节功能主观评分从术前的(55±6)分提高到术后3个月(92±5)分,术前术后评分比较差异均具有统计学意义(t=-13.54,P<0.05)。5例骨愈合病例术后关节镜取出内固定,未见关节软骨有磨损表现。

结论

双瓣钢板内固定系统是利用胫骨髁间窝骨性空间特点,可在关节镜下直接在关节内钢板固定TSAFs骨折块,简化了关节内操作步骤,具有操作简捷、固定可靠、疗效确切的优点,并不会增加对关节软骨的损伤,值得深入研究推广。

Objective

To develop a novel double-flap plate internal fixation system for arthroscopic treatment of tibial spine avulsion fractures (TSAFs), and to demonstrate its feasibility and practicability.

Methods

CT data of 50 TSAFs patients (those with knee fractures and abnormal bone metabolism diseases, etc. were exluded) in Songshan Lake Hospital were gathered to explore the size and anatomical distribution of fracture blocks. The bone space around the intercondylar fossa and anterior fork ligament insertion in eight fresh adult knee specimens was measured to determine the size and characteristics of the anterior insertion space. Sixty knee specimens of swines were selected and made into TSAFs model. Simple random sampling method was used to divide the samples into four groups, 15 samples in each group. The samples were treated with different internal fixation methods: single-strand wire loop fixation (the wire loop fixation group), hollow nail fixation (the hollow nail group), and finger steel plate fixation with non-absorbent Fiber Wire( the finger steel plate wire group). The experimental group were fixed with double plate (the double plate group). The biomechanical experiment of tensile force was conducted and comparative analysis was conducted by variance test among the groups, and SNK-q test was utilized for paired comparison. Arthroscopic surgery was conducted using double-flap plate internal fixation system on eight TSAFs patients aged from 17 to 45 years; osteogenic diseases were excluded. Lysholm knee function score and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) 2000 subjective knee function score were used to evaluate effects before and after surgery, and t test was conducted for data comparisons.

Results

The distribution area of TSAFs fracture fragments was characterized as O point (the " O" point was the intersection point between the free margin of the lateral meniscus anterior angle and the mid line of the anterior cruciate ligament insertion). The size of the anterior part of the bone fragments was about (10±5) mm× (15±4) mm, and the inner and lateral parts were six millimeters apart, which could accommodate a thin slice of internal fixation with a thickness of less than two millimeters, which would not impact the articular cartilaginous surface under multiple angle movements. Considering the biomechanical determination of swine knee joints, the differences in the first-order tensile force and maximum tensile force among the groups were statistically significant (F=38.091, 15.885, both P<0.001); the first-order tensile force and maximum tensile force of the double-flap steel plate group were (105±6) N and (346±21) N respectively, which were superior to those of the other three groups (all P<0.05), providing biomechanical evidence for clinical application. The fracture healing time of eight TSAFs patients was (3.5±0.8) months, and Lysholm knee functional score was increased from (43±7) before surgery to (89±6) three months after surgery, with statistically significant differences (t=-14.87, P<0.05). IKDC 2000 subjective score increased from preoperative (55±6) to (92±5) three months after surgery, and the difference was statistically significant (t=-13.54, P<0.05). The internal fixations were removed in five cases of bone union by arthroscope, and no articular cartilage abrasion was observed.

Conclusions

The double-flap plate internal fixation system utilizes the characteristics of the osseous space of the tibial intercondylar fossa, and can directly fix the TSAFs fracture block with intraventricular plate under arthroscope. It simplifies the intramuscular operation steps, and provides the advantages of simple operation, reliable fixation and exact efficacy. It does not increase the damage to articular cartilage, and is worthy of further study and promotion.

图1 TSAFs(膝关节前交叉韧带止点骨折)俯视图注:设定髁间窝中线骨折块最前缘点为"F"点,延伸至胫骨平台最前端骨嵴缘处为"A"点,外侧半月板前角游离缘与前叉韧带止点中线交点为"O"点,通过测量,FA距离约(15±3)mm,OA距离约(25±2)mm,即OF距离约(10±5)mm
图2 双瓣钢板内固定系统示意图注:部件一、二为关节腔内起固定作用的一对小钢板;部件三、四为骨外的一对小钢板;部件五、六为连接前两者的双股钢丝
图3 双瓣钢板内固定系统实物图注:部件一、二的一对小钢板,呈短长方体状,表面微圆弧光滑面,底部中央有一圆角立柱结构,柱腰部有贯穿孔,分别被部件五、六的钢丝穿过后拧紧单股,钢板底部对角分别有尖锥状结构突起;部件三、四为骨外的一对小钢板,中部有两小孔,会被部件五、六的两束钢丝分别穿过再会聚成股拧紧
表1 4种固定方式猪膝关节抗拔伸力指标比较[N,(±s)]
表2 术前术后Lysholm评分及IKDC 2000膝关节功能主观评分比较(±s)
图12 典型病例术后2个月示屈膝伸膝功能良好
[1]
Thaunat M, Barbosa NC, Gardon R, et al. Prevalence of knee stiffness after arthroscopic bone suture fixation of tibial spine avulsion fractures in adults[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2016, 102(5): 625-629.
[2]
Zaricznyj B. Avulsion fracture of the tibial eminence:treatment of open reduction and pinning[J]. J Bone Joint Surg (Am)197759:1111-1114.
[3]
Meyers M, Mckeever F. Fractures of the intercondylar eminence of the tibia[J]. J Bone Joint Surg, 1970, 52:1677-1684.
[4]
王琪,李众利,刘玉杰,等.关节镜下两种治疗方法治疗胫骨髁间嵴骨折的疗效对比[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版)201913(2):161-167.
[5]
Coyle C, Jagernauth S, Ramachandran M. Tibial eminence fractures in the paediatric population: a systematic review[J]. J Child Orthop, 2014, 8(2): 149-159.
[6]
Lysholm J, Gillquist J. Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale[J]. Am J Sports Med, 1982, 10(3): 150-154.
[7]
Hefti F, Muller W, Jakob RP, et al. Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 1993, 1(3/4): 226-234.
[8]
Shelbourne KD, Urch SE. Outcomes after arthroscopic exci-sion of the bony prominence in the treatment of tibial spine avul-sion fractures[J]. Arthroscopy, 2011, 27(6): 784-791.
[9]
倪世君,刘泉.胫骨髁间嵴撕脱性骨折治疗进展[J].医学理论与实践202033(12):1925-1929
[10]
汪阳,陈丰,张卫国.关节镜下全内VERSALOK锚钉固定前交叉韧带止点撕脱性骨折19例[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志201725(8):64-65.
[11]
姚俊娜,王洪刚,权松涛,等.关节镜下缝合线桥内固定技术治疗青少年前交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折[J].中国修复重建外科杂志201832(11):1402-1405.
[12]
ElqiremZ, AlhanbaliM, SbiehY. Double-Row fixation for avulsion of anterior cruciate ligament[J]. Arthrosc Tech, 2019, 8(12): 1473-1477.
[13]
董佩龙,唐晓波,王健,等.关节镜下缝线8固定成人前交叉韧带胫骨止点骨折的疗效分析[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版)20148(6):756-760.
[14]
张海龙,管国平,蒋旭,等.关节镜下钛缆联合螺钉加压技术治疗前交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志202035(2):192-194.
[15]
胡勇,谭海涛.关节镜下双排锚钉交叉缝线固定术治疗前交叉韧带止点撕脱性骨折效果观察[J].山东医药201858(4): 60-62.
[16]
黄育强,覃万安,唐葆青,等.关节镜下空心双螺纹钉治疗前交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱性骨折[J].生物骨科材料与临床研究201815(5): 38-40.
[17]
姚彦斌,任民,李慎松,等.关节镜下缝线双排缝合交叉穿隧道固定前交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折[J].临床骨科杂志201821(6): 755-756.
[18]
周敬滨,Working Z, van Eck CF,等.前交叉韧带解剖重建理念与方法[J].中国运动医学杂志201130(6):511-518.
[19]
吕宏升,杨德育,杨爱武,等.关节镜下应用微型钢板治疗陈旧性前交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折[J].中国微创外科杂志201616(3): 266-270.
[20]
陈杰,吴美平.关节镜下带襻钢板治疗前交叉韧带止点撕脱骨折30例[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志202028(6):66-68.
[21]
夏炎,李云龙.关节镜下经套管钢丝固定治疗胫骨髁间前棘骨折的体会[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版)201812(4): 113-116.
[22]
中华医学会小儿外科分会小儿骨科学组,中华医学会骨科分会小儿创伤与矫形学组.中国儿童和青少年前十字韧带损伤诊疗指南:胫骨髁间棘骨折[J].中华骨科杂志202242(3): 129-140.
[1] 李焕玺, 何淳诺, 田志敏, 周胜虎, 吴昊越, 张浩强. 全膝关节置换术后股骨远端假体周围骨折治疗现状[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 630-637.
[2] 曾敬, 吴冬冬, 邵明, 范震波, 王治国, 刘培谊, 兰海峰. 高龄髋部骨折患者不同手术时机的围手术期疗效评估[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 445-449.
[3] 郭杰坤, 王楹, 杨轩, 晏欢欣, 钟豪. Ilizarov 骨搬移技术在急诊一期修复GustiloⅢB 型胫骨长段开放粉碎性骨折的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 507-510.
[4] 于同, 矫健航, 姜炜博, 王中汉, 王洋, 伍旭辉, 吴敏飞. 体位复位与椎板切除减压内固定术治疗胸腰段爆裂性骨折的对比性研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 331-339.
[5] 黄韬, 杨晓华, 薛天森, 肖睿. 改良“蛋壳”技术治疗老年OVCF及对脊柱矢状面平衡参数、预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 340-348.
[6] 谭明明, 战世强, 侯宏涛, 曾翔硕. 经皮微创椎弓根螺钉内固定术对骨质疏松脊柱压缩性骨折患者临床研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 349-354.
[7] 王贝贝, 崔振义, 王静, 王晗妍, 吕红芝, 李秀婷. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后贫血预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 355-362.
[8] 张峻, 赵建民, 姚晓克, 吉浩宇, 越瑞祥. 增加CT对桡骨远端骨折分型的可靠性及可重复性评价[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 264-272.
[9] 房桂彬, 肖进, 傅光涛, 郑秋坚. 老年髋部骨折患者术后1年行走能力的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 273-280.
[10] 张于, 程亮亮, 王峰, 赵德伟. 2枚与3枚空心钉治疗无移位股骨颈骨折的疗效对比[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 281-286.
[11] 茹江英, 廖启宇, 温国洪, 潘思华, 刘栋, 张皓琛, 牛云飞. 直接前方入路和后外侧入路半髋关节置换治疗老年痴呆股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 287-293.
[12] 单良, 刘怡, 于涛, 徐丽. 老年股骨颈骨折术后患者心理弹性现状及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 294-300.
[13] 高广涵, 张耀南, 石磊, 王林, 王飞, 郑子天, 王鸿禹, 郭民政, 薛庆云. 膝骨关节炎患者前交叉韧带功能影像学影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 301-307.
[14] 周锐, 罗飞. 骨质疏松椎体骨折的分型进展[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 315-320.
[15] 喻蓉, 周伟力, 雷青, 陈松, 陈立, 刘峰, 丁州, 阳宏奇, 王康, 王大鹏. 改良的内外侧环抱锁定钢板在复杂胫骨平台骨折治疗中的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 764-770.
阅读次数
全文


摘要