切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (06) : 791 -795. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2018.06.009

所属专题: 文献

综述

按骨折线倾斜角分型Ⅲ型青壮年股骨颈骨折的治疗进展
吴乾1, 袁振2,(), 郝跃峰2, 张林3   
  1. 1. 215123 苏州大学附属第一医院骨科
    2. 215123 苏州市立医院运动医学与康复中心
    3. 215123 苏州大学
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-06 出版日期:2018-12-01
  • 通信作者: 袁振

Clinical progress of Pauwels type Ⅲ for femoral neck fractures in young adults

Qian Wu1, Zhen Yuan2,(), Yuefeng Hao2, Lin Zhang3   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China
    2. Center of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou 215123, China
    3. Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China
  • Received:2017-11-06 Published:2018-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Zhen Yuan
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yuan Zhen, Email:
引用本文:

吴乾, 袁振, 郝跃峰, 张林. 按骨折线倾斜角分型Ⅲ型青壮年股骨颈骨折的治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(06): 791-795.

Qian Wu, Zhen Yuan, Yuefeng Hao, Lin Zhang. Clinical progress of Pauwels type Ⅲ for femoral neck fractures in young adults[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(06): 791-795.

近年来随着交通方式及人们生活习惯的改变,青壮年股骨颈骨折的发生率逐年上升,且多为Pauwels Ⅲ型骨折。改良的Pauwels分型由于其较原方案更加稳定,被大多数骨科医师所接受,但其内固定方法多样,有空心加压螺钉、动力髋螺钉和经皮加压钢板等,尚没有1种金标准。新型的经皮加压钢板(PCCP)与以往术式相比,具有创伤小、出血少、抗旋性好、并发症少、早期死亡率低且具有更高的Harris评分等优点,但还需更多的随机、多中心和前瞻性试验以证实其临床可靠性。

In recent years, the incidence of femoral neck fractures in young adults has been increasing year by year due to changes in means of transportation and people’s living habits, and most of them are Pauwels type III fractures. The improved Pauwels classification is more stable than the original protocol and is accepted by most orthopedists. However, its internal fixation methods are various. There are hollow compression screws, dynamic hip screws, and percutaneous compression plates, and so on. But there is still no golden standard. The new internal fixation method named percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) has the advantages of less trauma, less bleeding, better anti-rotation, fewer complications, lower early mortality, and higher Harris score compared to previous surgical procedures. More randomized, multicenter, and prospective trials are still needed to confirm it.

[1]
Freitas A, Torres GM, Souza AC, et al. Analysis on the mechanical resistance of fixation of femoral neck fractures in synthetic bone, using the dynamic hip system and an anti-rotation screw[J]. Rev Bras Ortop, 2014, 49(6): 586-592.
[2]
Nowotarski PJ, Ervin B, Weatherby B, et al. Biomechanical analysis of a novel femoral neck locking plate for treatment of vertical shear Pauwel′s type C femoral neck fractures[J]. Injury, 2012, 43(6): 802-806.
[3]
Arash A, Gao F, Fedoriw WW, et al. Vertically oriented femoral neck fractures: mechanical analysis of four fixation techniques[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2007, 21(8): 544-548.
[4]
Bartonícek J. Pauwels′ classification of femoral neck fractures: correct interpretation of the original[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2001, 15(5): 358-360.
[5]
Pauwels F. Der schenkelhalsbruch em mechanisches problem: Grundlagen des heilungsborganges prognose und kausale therapie[M]. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke Verlag, 1935.
[6]
Wang SH, Yang JJ, Shen HC, et al. Using a modified Pauwels method to predict the outcome of femoral neck fracture in relatively young patients[J]. Injury, 2015, 46(10): 1969-1974.
[7]
Van Embden D, Roukema GR, Rhemrev SJ, et al. The Pauwels classification for intracapsular hip fractures: is it reliable?[J]. Injury, 2011, 42(11): 1238-1240.
[8]
Gaşpar D, Crnković T, Durović D, et al. AO group, AO subgroup, Garden and Pauwels classification systems of femoral neck fractures: are they reliable and reproducible? [J]. Med Glas (Zenica), 2012, 9(2): 243-247.
[9]
Embden D, Van, Roukema GR, Rhemrev SJ, et al. Meylaerts SAG. The Pauwels classification for intracapsular hip fractures: is it reliable?[J]. Injury, 2011, 42(11): 1238-1240.
[10]
Collinge CA, Hassan M, Reddix R. Fracture morphology of high shear angle " vertical" femoral neck fractures in young adult patients[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2014, 28(5): 270-275.
[11]
Shen M, Wang C, Chen H, et al. An update on the Pauwels classification[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2016, 11(1): 161.
[12]
Rocca GJD. Gaps and opportunities in the management of the young femoral neck fracture[J]. Injury,2015, 46(3): 515-518.
[13]
Krischak G, Beck A, Wachter N, et al. Relevance of primary reduction for the clinical outcome of femoral neck fractures treated with cancellous screws[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2003, 123(8): 404-409.
[14]
庞忠训,彭方敏.青壮年股骨颈骨折内固定取出后股骨头坏死的临床分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2012,20(14):1335-1336.
[15]
张施展,张卫国,汪阳,等.髋关节镜辅助下复位联合空心钉内固定治疗青壮年移位型股骨颈骨折[J].骨科,2018, 9(04):296-301.
[16]
勘武生,郑琼,胡家朗,等.切开复位与闭合复位治疗移位型股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2011, 13(5):401-405.
[17]
Slobogean GP, Sprague SA, Scott T, et al. Complications following young femoral neck fractures[J]. Injury, 2015, 46(3): 484-491.
[18]
Farooq MA, Orkazai SH, Okusanya O, et al. Intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck in younger patients[J]. Ir J Med Sci, 2005, 25(4): 667-669.
[19]
Samsami S, Saberi S, Bagheri N, et al. Interfragmentary motion assessment for three different fixation techniques of femoral neck fractures in young adults[J]. Biomed Mater Eng, 2016, 27(4): 389-404.
[20]
Hoshino CM, Christian MW, O’Toole RV, et al. Fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures in young adults: fixed-angle devices or Pauwel screws? [J]. Injury, 2016, 47(8): 1676-1684.
[21]
Zhang B, Liu J, Zhu Y, et al. A new configuration of cannulated screw fixation in the treatment of vertical femoral neck fractures[J]. Int Orthop, 2018, 42(8): 1949-1955.
[22]
Sağlam N, Küçükdurmaz F, Kivilcim H, et al. Biomechanical comparison of antirotator compression hip screw and cannulated screw fixations in the femoral neck fractures[J]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc, 2014, 48(2): 196-201.
[23]
Warschawski Y, Sharfman ZT, Berger O, et al. Dynamic locking plate vs. simple cannulated screws for nondisplaced intracapsular hip fracture: a comparative study[J]. Injury, 2016, 47(2): 424-427.
[24]
Selvan VT, Oakley MJ, Rangan A, et al. Optimum configuration of cannulated hip screws for the fixation of intracapsular hip fractures: a biomechanical study[J]. Injury, 2004, 35(2): 136-141.
[25]
Liporace F, Gaines R, Collinge C, et al. Results of internal fixation of pauwels type-3 vertical femoral neck fractures[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2008, 90(8):1654-1659.
[26]
Gumustas SA, Tosun HB, Ağır İ, et al. Influence of number and orientation of screws on stability in the internal fixation of unstable femoral neck fractures[J]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc, 2014, 48(6): 673-678.
[27]
张浩,史雪峰,杨春宝,等.三枚与四枚螺钉置入治疗Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折的有限元分析[J].中国组织工程研究,2016,20(26):3897-3902.
[28]
Schwartsmann CR, Lammerhirt HM, Spinelli LF, et al. Treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in young patients with DHS and its association to osteonecrosis [J]. Rev Bras Ortop, 2018, 53(1): 82-87.
[29]
王齐,韩国建,张宇,等.两种手术方法治疗Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折的临床效果分析[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志,2016,9(5):414-417.
[30]
魏志辉,马坤龙,张铭华.4枚空心钉与动力髋螺钉结合防旋螺钉内固定治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2017,32(2):187-188.
[31]
王松华,刘璠,查涛,等.经皮加压钢板固定治疗中青年移位型股骨颈骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2016,18(11):932-937.
[32]
朱锋,徐耀增,耿德春,等.经皮加压钢板与空心加压螺钉治疗中青年移位型股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2014,16(8):731-733.
[33]
李英周,叶锋,万蕾,等.改良经皮加压钢板治疗Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折的疗效分析[J].中国骨伤,2018,31(2):120-123.
[34]
Koval KJ, Aharonoff GB, Su ET, et al. Effect of acute inpatient rehabilitation on outcome after fracture of the femoral neck or intertrochanteric fracture[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1998, 80(3): 357-364.
[35]
Fuchs RK, Kersh ME, Carballido-Gamio JA, et al. Physical activity for strengthening fracture prone regions of the proximal femur[J]. Curr Osteoporos Rep, 2017, 15(1): 43-52.
[36]
Auais MA, Eilayyan O, Mayo NE. Extended exercise rehabilitation after hip fracture improves patients′ physical function: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Phys Ther, 2012, 92(11): 1437-1451.
[37]
Salpakoski A, Törmäkangas T, Edgren J, et al. Effects of a multicomponent home-based physical rehabilitation program on mobility recovery after hip fracture:a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 2014, 15(5): 361-368.
[1] 刘正宇, 刘春风, 王振. 改良后外侧入路半髋置换治疗股骨颈骨折的早期疗效[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 409-413.
[2] 卢国良, 潘耀成. 比较不同类型假体用于骨质疏松症的老年股骨颈骨折[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 277-279.
[3] 欧梁, 齐麒, 胡伟伟, 卢敏, 黄彦昌, 黄维琛, 匡建军. 股骨颈动力交叉钉系统与其它内固定治疗股骨颈骨折对比[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 92-105.
[4] 孟繁宇, 周新社, 赵志, 裴立家, 刘犇. 侧位直接前方入路髋关节置换治疗偏瘫肢体股骨颈骨折[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 865-870.
[5] 吴聪, 刘伦, 贾全忠. 老年股骨颈骨折初次全髋关节置换近期疗效影响因素[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 283-287.
[6] 张琳袁, 吴佳俊, 崔煦, 沈超, 付备刚, 崔崟, 王秀会, 蔡攀. 大结节解剖钢板与PHILOS内固定治疗伴肩关节脱位的Mutch I/II型肱骨大结节骨折的疗效差异[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 139-145.
[7] 单良, 刘怡, 于涛, 徐丽. 老年股骨颈骨折术后患者心理弹性现状及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 294-300.
[8] 茹江英, 廖启宇, 温国洪, 潘思华, 刘栋, 张皓琛, 牛云飞. 直接前方入路和后外侧入路半髋关节置换治疗老年痴呆股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 287-293.
[9] 张于, 程亮亮, 王峰, 赵德伟. 2枚与3枚空心钉治疗无移位股骨颈骨折的疗效对比[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 281-286.
[10] 宋晓亮, 郝海虎, 刘渊, 李浩江, 雷晓晶, 邵新中, 李卿源. 股骨重建钉治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 201-208.
[11] 金宇杰, 虞宵, 周晓强, 李志强, 徐人杰, 张向鑫, 陈广祥. 动力交叉钉系统治疗股骨颈骨折其内固定位置与临床疗效的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 193-200.
[12] 赵清斌, 殷剑, 肖伟, 孙俊刚, 周文正. 异体皮质骨板结合髂骨植骨辅助钢板治疗肱骨干骨折骨不连的短期临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 152-156.
[13] 刘锦秀, 王晓伟, 张同乐, 姜爱华. 青年社会体检者、医务工作者及心肌梗死患者心血管疾病高危因素的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 249-254.
[14] 邓晨阳, 侯淑肖. 中青年脑卒中患者抗逆力相关研究进展及启示[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 97-103.
[15] 赖敏, 林碧玲, 王亚文, 林玉禧, 欧开雅. 中青年脑卒中患者重返工作的影响因素分析及预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 145-152.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?