切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (01) : 64 -68. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2018.01.012

所属专题: 文献

基础论著

骨关节炎患者胫骨平台偏心距性别差异分析
韵向东1, 姜金1, 安丽萍2, 夏亚一1,()   
  1. 1. 730030 兰州大学第二医院骨科;730030 兰州,甘肃省骨关节疾病研究重点实验室
    2. 730030 兰州,甘肃省骨关节疾病研究重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2015-07-17 出版日期:2018-02-01
  • 通信作者: 夏亚一
  • 基金资助:
    甘肃省自然科学基金(1208RJZA273)

Analysis of gender differences in offset of tibial plateau in patients with osteoarthritis of Gansu province

Xiangdong Yun1, Jin Jiang1, Liping An2, Yayi Xia1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730030, China; Orthopaedic Key Laboratory of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730030, China
    2. Orthopaedic Key Laboratory of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730030, China
  • Received:2015-07-17 Published:2018-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Yayi Xia
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xia Yayi, Email:
引用本文:

韵向东, 姜金, 安丽萍, 夏亚一. 骨关节炎患者胫骨平台偏心距性别差异分析[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(01): 64-68.

Xiangdong Yun, Jin Jiang, Liping An, Yayi Xia. Analysis of gender differences in offset of tibial plateau in patients with osteoarthritis of Gansu province[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(01): 64-68.

目的

测量甘肃地区膝内翻畸形的骨关节炎(OA)患者胫骨平台的解剖特点及胫骨平台中心到胫骨干中心的偏心距。

方法

选取2012年1月至2014年10月在兰州大学第二医院关节外科进行人工全膝关节置换术(TKA)的患者121例,所有患者均诊断为膝内翻畸形的骨关节炎,包括72例女性,49例男性,共126例膝,平均年龄(65±8)岁。排除类风湿性关节炎、屈曲或外翻畸形、创伤后关节炎、接受过胫骨或股骨截骨术和先天畸形等。使用64层三维重建CT扫描膝关节测量偏心距。所有测量的资料采用影像归档和通信系统(PACS)保存两次,由第三方未参与试验的研究者分析,作组内相关系数相关性分析,使用SPSS 13.0统计软件进行数据统计分析,两组之间比较采用t检验。

结果

研究显示甘肃地区骨关节炎患者的胫骨平台偏心距解剖有很大的变异。平均的偏心距是(7.6±3.0)mm,胫骨平台的前后和内外距离分别是(53.1±4.8)mm和(70.4±8.3)mm。偏心距性别差异分析显示无统计学意义(P>0.05),胫骨平台的内外径和前后径性别差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。胫骨干轴线与胫骨平台的关系进行性别差异分析显示在胫骨软骨下水平横截面女性72%位于前外侧,男性却只有50%位于前外侧。

结论

甘肃地区骨关节炎患者的偏心距解剖数据不同于健康中青年人群,也不同于西方人群,但是无性别差异。在进行全膝关节置换(TKA)手术前,如果使用延长柄胫骨假体,术前必须做充分手术评估。

Objective

To measure the anatomic features of the tibial plateau and to assess variations in the offset of the tibial shaft from the tibial plateau of osteoarthritis (OA) patients in Gansu Province.

Methods

A retrospectively review was carried out on 126 knees of 121 patients (72 females, 49 males)who underwent total knee arthroplasty in orthopaedics department of Lanzhou University Second Hospital between April 2011 to October 2014, with an average age of(65±8)years. The inclusion criteria were knee OA with varus; the exclusion criteria were rheumatoid arthritis, flexion or valgus deformity, knee surgery history. The anatomic features of the tibial plateau were measured and analyzed using three-dimensional reconstruction information derived from the 64-slice spiral CT. All the measured data were analyzed by Picture Archiving and Communication System, and SPSS 13.0 software for the intraclass correlation coefficient analysis. The comparison between the two groups was performed by t test.

Results

This study showed that significant variations in the proximal tibial anatomy among the subjects. The mean offset was (7.6±3.0) mm at the resection just distal to the subchondral bone. The mean anteroposterior and mediolateral dimensions of the tibial plateau were (53.1±4.8) mm and (70.4±8.3) mm at the resection just distal to the subchondral bone. There was no significant difference between male and female in offset of the tibial plateau (P>0.05 ). There was 50% located anterolateral to the center of the tibial plateau in male, while there was 72% located anterolateral to the center of the tibial plateau in female at the resection just distal to the subchondral bone. Spss 13.0 software was used for the statistical analysis.

Conclusions

There are anatomic variations in the offset of the tibial shaft from the tibial plateau of OA patients in China. However, there is no significant difference between male and female. A wide range of implant sizes is thus necessary before TKA.

图1 确定胫骨干轴线,在胫骨平台软骨下截面的7 cm处胫骨干内侧,标记一内切圆
图2 胫骨平台旋转力线的前后轴,AB即是后交叉韧带胫骨止点和髌腱内侧止点的连线
图3 胫骨平台中心到胫骨干力线的测量。P是CDEF(胫骨平台)矩形的中心;PO线的距离即是胫骨平台中心到胫骨干力线的偏心距;Anterior(前侧),Medial(内侧),Posterior(后侧),Lateral(外侧)
表1 胫骨平台与胫骨干偏心距[mm,(±s)]
表2 不同性别胫骨平台与胫骨干在各切面水平的偏心距[mm,(±s)]
表3 不同性别胫骨平台与胫骨干在各切面水平的内外径[mm,(±s)]
表4 不同性别胫骨平台与胫骨干在各切面水平的前后径[mm,(±s)]
表5 男性和女性在不同层面偏心距的差异(%)
[1]
Iorio R,Robb WJ,Healy WL, et al. Orthopaedic surgeon workforce and volume assessment for total hip and knee replacement in the United States: preparing for an epidemic[J]. Journal of Bone and Joint Surg(Am), 2008, 90A(7): 1598-1605.
[2]
黄菲,曲铁兵. 关于当前人工膝关节假体设计的焦点与展望[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2012, 6(4):617-624.
[3]
Khan MS,Seon JK,Song EK. Rotational profile of lower limb and axis for tibial component alignment in varus osteoarthritic knees[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2012, 27(5): 797-802.
[4]
Christie MJ,Deboer DK,Mcqueen DA, et al. Salvage procedures for failed total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003, 85-A(Suppl 1): S58-S62.
[5]
Abraham R,Malkani AL,Lewis J, et al. An anatomical study of tibial metaphyseal/diaphyseal mismatch during revision total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2007, 22(2): 241-244.
[6]
Tang Q,Zhou Y,Yang D, et al. The offset of the tibial shaft from the tibial plateau in Chinese People[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2010, 92(10): 1981-1987.
[7]
Nagamine R,Miura H,Bravo CV, et al. Anatomic variations should be considered in total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Orthop Sci, 2000, 5(3): 232-237.
[8]
Ko PS,Tio MK,Ban CM, et al. Radiologic analysis of the tibial intramedullary canal in Chinese varus knees: implications in total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2001, 16(2): 212-215.
[9]
Matsuda S,Mizu-Uchi H,Miura H, et al. Tibial shaft axis does not always serve as a correct coronal landmark in total knee arthroplasty for varus knees[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2003, 18(1): 56-62.
[10]
Akagi M,Oh M,Nonaka T, et al. An anteroposterior axis of the tibia for total knee arthroplasty[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004, (420): 213-219.
[11]
Hashemi J,Chandrashekar N,Gill B, et al. The geometry of the tibial plateau and its influence on the biomechanics of the tibiofemoral joint[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2008, 90(12): 2724-2734.
[12]
Yoshino N,Takai S,Watanabe Y, et al. Total knee arthroplasty with long stem for treatment of nonunion after high tibial osteotomy[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2004, 19(4): 528-531.
[13]
Hicks CA,Noble P,Tullos H. The anatomy of the tibial intramedullary canal[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1995, (321): 111-116.
[1] 刘鹏, 罗天, 许珂媛, 邓红美, 李瑄, 唐翠萍. 八段锦对膝关节炎疗效的初步步态分析[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 590-595.
[2] 苏介茂, 齐岩松, 王永祥, 魏宝刚, 马秉贤, 张鹏飞, 魏兴华, 徐永胜. 关节镜手术在早中期膝骨关节炎治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 646-652.
[3] 谢佳乐, 李琦, 芦升升, 姜劲松. 内侧膝骨关节炎伴胫股关节冠状半脱位的手术治疗[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 653-657.
[4] 许银峰, 盛璞义, 余世明, 张阳春. 偏心性髋臼旋转截骨术治疗发育性髋关节发育不良[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 568-574.
[5] 庄若语, 杭明辉, 李文华, 张霆, 侯炜. 膝骨关节炎半定量磁共振评分研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 545-552.
[6] 李志文, 李远志, 李华, 方志远. 糖皮质激素治疗膝骨关节炎疗效的网状Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 484-496.
[7] 王冰, 孙海宁, 于秀淳, 周珂, 翟凯, 苗族康. 膝骨关节炎的活动衬垫型单髁置换疗效与假体生存率[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 337-345.
[8] 张江礼, 刘金辉, 潘西庆, 刘光源, 范虓. 全膝关节置换应用智能辅助手术导航系统治疗膝骨关节炎[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 346-351.
[9] 张刚, 秦勇, 黄超, 薛震, 吕松岑. 基于骨关节炎软骨细胞表型转化的新兴治疗靶点[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 352-362.
[10] 陈松, 黄玲巧, 余清卿, 魏志鑫, 付琰. 单细胞RNA测序技术在骨关节炎软骨中的研究应用[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 363-371.
[11] 王振宇, 张洪美, 荆琳, 何名江, 闫奇. 膝骨关节炎相关炎症因子与血浆代谢物间的因果关系及中介效应[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 467-473.
[12] 郭杰坤, 王楹, 杨轩, 晏欢欣, 钟豪. Ilizarov 骨搬移技术在急诊一期修复GustiloⅢB 型胫骨长段开放粉碎性骨折的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 507-510.
[13] 许桂祥, 徐丽, 赵鸿志, 周世龙, 武永明, 彭新刚. 腹腔镜视野下直疝疝囊进入阴囊的解剖观察及原因分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 466-470.
[14] 高广涵, 张耀南, 石磊, 王林, 王飞, 郑子天, 王鸿禹, 郭民政, 薛庆云. 膝骨关节炎患者前交叉韧带功能影像学影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 301-307.
[15] 喻蓉, 周伟力, 雷青, 陈松, 陈立, 刘峰, 丁州, 阳宏奇, 王康, 王大鹏. 改良的内外侧环抱锁定钢板在复杂胫骨平台骨折治疗中的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 764-770.
阅读次数
全文


摘要