| [1] |
Yang G, Liu D, Zhou G, et al. Robot-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction based on three-dimensional images[J/OL]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2024, 19(1): 246. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04732-w.
|
| [2] |
Zhang Z, Meng B, Li W, et al. The role of navigation technology in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction bone tunnel positioning[J/OL]. J Robot Surg, 2025, 19(1): 90. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-02254-z.
|
| [3] |
Tran JYS, Mak RW, Ho KK, et al. Novel application of an imageless robotic system in simultaneous unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J]. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol, 2024, 39: 37-40.
|
| [4] |
张丽, 梁求真, 赵赞栋, 等. 机器人辅助关节镜下重建前交叉韧带的疗效[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2022, 38(2): 142-148.
|
| [5] |
Zhang L, Hu H, Huang W, et al. Superior accuracy of femoral bone tunnel drilling in robot-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial[J]. Int J Surg, 2025, 111(6): 3886-3894.
|
| [6] |
He K, Leng Y, Jiao X, et al. Early clinical outcomes of Naton robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Int Orthop, 2025, 49(6): 1339-1349.
|
| [7] |
Wu XB, Wang JQ, Sun X, et al. Guidance for treatment of pelvic acetabular injuries with precise minimally invasive internal fixation based on the orthopaedic surgery robot positioning system[J]. Orthop Surg, 2019, 11(3): 341-347.
|
| [8] |
Thomas TL, Goh GS, Nguyen MK, et al. Pin-related complications in computer navigated and robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty: a systematic review[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2022, 37(11): 2291-2307.e2.
|
| [9] |
Burton W, Myers C, Knowles R, et al. Towards markerless robot-assisted navigation with 2D-3D registration for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J/OL]. Comput Biol Med, 2025, 194: 110396. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110396.
|
| [10] |
Ding G, Yang G, Zhang J, et al. Feasibility and accuracy of orthopaedic surgical robot system for intraoperative navigation to locate bone tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J/OL]. Int J Med Robot, 2022, 18(2): e2354. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2354.
|
| [11] |
Zhang L, Hu H, Huang W, et al. Surgical robots improve tunnel angle and graft bending angle in anatomic ACL reconstruction: a multicenter study[J/OL]. Bioengineering (Basel), 2025, 12(4): 338. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12040338.
|
| [12] |
Yavari E, Moosa S, Cohen D, et al. Technology-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction improves tunnel placement but leads to no change in clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2023, 31(10): 4299-4311.
|
| [13] |
Foissey C, Batailler C, Shatrov J, et al. Is combined robotically assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction a good solution for the young arthritic knee?[J]. Int Orthop, 2023, 47(4): 963-971.
|
| [14] |
Ren Y, Cao S, Wu J, et al. Efficacy and reliability of active robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Postgrad Med J, 2019, 95(1121): 125-133.
|
| [15] |
Chu CR, Williams AA. Quantitative MRI UTE-T2* and T2* show progressive and continued graft maturation over 2 years in human patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J/OL]. Orthop J Sports Med, 2019, 7(8): 2325967119863056. DOI: 10.1177/2325967119863056.
|
| [16] |
Planta A, Surbeck R, Taylor WR, et al. A dual-plane fluoroscope to track joint kinematics during dynamic daily activities[J/OL]. PLoS One, 2025, 20(7): e0328351. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328351.
|
| [17] |
Tashman S, Araki D. Effects of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on in vivo, dynamic knee function[J]. Clin Sports Med, 2013, 32(1): 47-59.
|
| [18] |
Boyd E, Endres NK, Geeslin AG. Postoperative healing and complications based on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft type[J/OL]. Ann Jt, 2024, 9: 30. DOI: 10.21037/aoj-24-3.
|
| [19] |
Ptasinski AM, Dunleavy M, Adebayo T, et al. Returning athletes to sports following anterior cruciate ligament tears[J]. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med, 2022, 15(6): 616-628.
|
| [20] |
Coronado RA, Sterling EK, Fenster DE, et al. Cognitive-behavioral-based physical therapy to enhance return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an open pilot study[J]. Phys Ther Sport, 2020, 42: 82-90.
|
| [21] |
Lee YM, Kim GW, Lee CY, et al. No difference in clinical outcomes and survivorship for robotic, navigational, and conventional primary total knee arthroplasty with a minimum follow-up of 10 years[J]. Clin Orthop Surg, 2023, 15(1): 82-91.
|
| [22] |
Jeon SW, Kim KI, Song SJ. Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty does not improve long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2019, 34(8): 1656-1661.
|
| [23] |
Yang HY, Song EK, Park CJ, et al. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty improves aseptic survivorship compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty: a minimum 15-year follow-up[J]. Knee Surg Phys Traumatol Arthrosc, 2025, 33(11): 3884-3895.
|
| [24] |
Zhang L, Liang Q, Zhao Z, et al. Robot-assisted all-epiphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients: a retrospective study[J]. Int Orthop, 2023, 47(2): 429-435.
|
| [25] |
Migliorini F, Pilone M, Memminger MK, et al. All-epiphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction yields superior sports performances than the trans-epiphyseal technique in skeletally immature patients: a systematic review[J/OL]. J Orthop Traumatol, 2024, 25(1): 7. DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00751-9.
|
| [26] |
Ueki H, Kanto R, DiNenna M, et al. Arthroscopic centralization reduces extrusion of the medial meniscus with posterior root defect in the ACL reconstructed knee[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2023, 31(2): 543-550.
|
| [27] |
Kunze KN, Ferguson D, Pareek A, et al. Robotic-assisted arthroscopy promises enhanced procedural efficiency, visualization, and control but must overcome barriers to adoption[J]. HSS J, 2025, 21(3): 283-288.
|
| [28] |
Zhang C, Hallbeck MS, Salehinejad H, et al. The integration of artificial intelligence in robotic surgery: a narrative review[J/OL]. Surgery, 2024, 176(3): 552-557.
|
| [29] |
Bhimreddy M, Menta AK, Fuleihan AA, et al. Beyond pedicle screw placement: future minimally invasive applications of robotics in spine surgery[J/OL]. Neurosurgery, 2025, 96(3S): S94-S102.
|
| [30] |
Ding H, Sun W, Zheng G. Robot-assisted augmented reality (AR)-guided surgical navigation for periacetabular osteotomy[J/OL]. Sensors(Basel), 2024, 24(14): 4754. DOI: 10.3390/s24144754.
|
| [31] |
Shu H, Liu M, Seenivasan L, et al. Seamless augmented reality integration in arthroscopy: a pipeline for articular reconstruction and guidance[J/OL]. Healthc Technol Lett, 2025, 12(1): e12119. DOI: 10.1049/htl2.12119.
|
| [32] |
Khizir L, Bhandari V, Kaloth S, et al. From diagnosis to precision surgery: the transformative role of artificial intelligence in urologic imaging[J]. J Endourol, 2024, 38(8): 824-835.
|
| [33] |
van der Meijden OA, Schijven MP. The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review[J]. Surg Endosc, 2009, 23(6): 1180-1190.
|
| [34] |
Iftikhar M, Saqib M, Zareen M, et al. Artificial intelligence: revolutionizing robotic surgery: review[J]. Ann Med Surg (Lond), 2024, 86(9): 5401-5409.
|
| [35] |
Soma Y, Mutsuzaki H, Yoshioka T, et al. Single-joint hybrid assistive limb in knee rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction: an open-label feasibility and safety trial[J/OL]. Prog Rehabil Med, 2022, 7: 20220036. DOI: 10.2490/prm.20220036.
|
| [36] |
Wen Y, Wang X, Mao Y, et al. Effectiveness of an intelligent weight-bearing rehabilitation robot in enhancing recovery following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J/OL]. Front Public Health, 2025, 13: 1526105. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1526105.
|