切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (04) : 494 -503. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2026.04.012

综述

机器人辅助前交叉韧带重建术的研究现状及进展
忻慰1, 岳志鹏2, 祝云利1, 祝钧1, 陈宜1, 符培亮1, 钱齐荣1,†()   
  1. 1 200003 上海,海军军医大学附属长征医院骨科
    2 116013 辽宁 大连,联勤保障部队大连康复疗养中心
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-17 出版日期:2026-08-01
  • 通信作者: 钱齐荣
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82272471)

Research progress and advances in robot-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Wei Xin1, Zhipeng Yue2, Yunli Zhu1, Jun Zhu1, Yi Chen1, Peiliang Fu1, Qirong Qian†,1()   

  1. 1Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China
    2Dalian Rehabilitation and Recuperation Center of PLA CN, Dalian 116013, China
  • Received:2025-08-17 Published:2026-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Qirong Qian
引用本文:

忻慰, 岳志鹏, 祝云利, 祝钧, 陈宜, 符培亮, 钱齐荣. 机器人辅助前交叉韧带重建术的研究现状及进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 494-503.

Wei Xin, Zhipeng Yue, Yunli Zhu, Jun Zhu, Yi Chen, Peiliang Fu, Qirong Qian. Research progress and advances in robot-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(04): 494-503.

前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤是一种常见的运动损伤,关节镜下ACL重建术(ACLR)是现今ACL损伤的标准手术方式,手术成功与否很大程度上取决于骨隧道精度,技术失误是ACL重建失败的最主要原因。为此,机器人辅助手术(RAS)作为一种新兴技术应运而生,旨在提高手术准确性及可重复性,减少人为失误。本综述对机器人辅助ACLR的现状、现阶段存在问题及未来研究方向进行阐述。但目前研究证实了已有的临床研究结果存在着核心的“精准-结局”悖论:从尸体研究到临床研究均表明机器人系统在建立骨隧道的精准度远高于常规徒手方法,但这一精准优势却不能使患者获得更好的临床结果或中、长期的膝关节稳定性随访结果。这涉及多方面原因,包括移植物生物学上的修复、术后的康复状况、个体差异及评估工具本身敏感性不足等,这些因素在最终疗效中发挥的作用可能比微小的精度提升更为关键。而机器人技术的长期应用还面临着高昂的机器设备成本、更长的手术时间及缺乏触觉反馈等现实问题。展望未来,机器人辅助ACLR的发展方向将会由单纯追求精准的工具发展为一个“更加聪明”的临床伙伴,未来结合人工智能(AI)、增强现实(AR)及术后处理在内构成的全流程管理,以填补技术精准和临床疗效之间的差异,为患者带来更好的临床结局。

Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injury is a common sports-related injury. Although arthroscopic ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is the standard treatment, the success of the surgery is highly dependent on the precise placement of bone tunnels, with technical errors being one of the primary causes of surgical failure. To address the precision challenges of traditional surgery, robot-assisted surgery has been introduced into clinical practice as an emerging technology, aiming to reduce human error by enhancing operational accuracy and reproducibility. This review elaborated on the current status, existing problems and future research directions of robot-assisted ACLR. Current research reveals a core "precision-outcome" paradox: although studies ranging from cadaveric models to multicenter clinical trials have consistently confirmed that robotic systems achieve significantly higher precision in bone tunnel creation than traditional manual methods, this technical advantage has not translated into superior clinical functional outcomes or knee stability for patients in short- to mid-term follow-up. This phenomenon may stem from the combined influence of multiple factors, including the biological healing of the graft, the quality of postoperative rehabilitation, patient-specific variables, and the insensitivity of existing clinical assessment tools. These factors may play a more critical role in determining the final outcome than marginal improvements in precision. Furthermore, the widespread adoption of robotic technology is still hindered by practical issues such as high equipment costs, longer surgical times, and a lack of haptic feedback. Looking ahead, the future direction for robot-assisted ACLR is to evolve from a tool merely pursuing precision into a "smarter" clinical partner. Through the deep integration of artificial intelligence (AI), augmented reality (AR), and comprehensive management of the entire process including postoperative rehabilitation, it may ultimately bridge the gap between technical precision and clinical efficacy, delivering long-term, tangible benefits to patients.

表1 国内外商用膝关节手术机器人系统比较概览
Table 1 Comparison of major commercial robotic systems for knee surgery in China and abroad
表2 机器人辅助ACLR与传统ACLR的比较研究总结
Table 2 Summary of comparative studies between robot-assisted and conventional ACLR
[1]
Yang G, Liu D, Zhou G, et al. Robot-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction based on three-dimensional images[J/OL]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2024, 19(1): 246. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04732-w.
[2]
Zhang Z, Meng B, Li W, et al. The role of navigation technology in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction bone tunnel positioning[J/OL]. J Robot Surg, 2025, 19(1): 90. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-02254-z.
[3]
Tran JYS, Mak RW, Ho KK, et al. Novel application of an imageless robotic system in simultaneous unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J]. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol, 2024, 39: 37-40.
[4]
张丽, 梁求真, 赵赞栋, 等. 机器人辅助关节镜下重建前交叉韧带的疗效[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2022, 38(2): 142-148.
[5]
Zhang L, Hu H, Huang W, et al. Superior accuracy of femoral bone tunnel drilling in robot-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial[J]. Int J Surg, 2025, 111(6): 3886-3894.
[6]
He K, Leng Y, Jiao X, et al. Early clinical outcomes of Naton robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Int Orthop, 2025, 49(6): 1339-1349.
[7]
Wu XB, Wang JQ, Sun X, et al. Guidance for treatment of pelvic acetabular injuries with precise minimally invasive internal fixation based on the orthopaedic surgery robot positioning system[J]. Orthop Surg, 2019, 11(3): 341-347.
[8]
Thomas TL, Goh GS, Nguyen MK, et al. Pin-related complications in computer navigated and robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty: a systematic review[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2022, 37(11): 2291-2307.e2.
[9]
Burton W, Myers C, Knowles R, et al. Towards markerless robot-assisted navigation with 2D-3D registration for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J/OL]. Comput Biol Med, 2025, 194: 110396. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110396.
[10]
Ding G, Yang G, Zhang J, et al. Feasibility and accuracy of orthopaedic surgical robot system for intraoperative navigation to locate bone tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J/OL]. Int J Med Robot, 2022, 18(2): e2354. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2354.
[11]
Zhang L, Hu H, Huang W, et al. Surgical robots improve tunnel angle and graft bending angle in anatomic ACL reconstruction: a multicenter study[J/OL]. Bioengineering (Basel), 2025, 12(4): 338. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12040338.
[12]
Yavari E, Moosa S, Cohen D, et al. Technology-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction improves tunnel placement but leads to no change in clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2023, 31(10): 4299-4311.
[13]
Foissey C, Batailler C, Shatrov J, et al. Is combined robotically assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction a good solution for the young arthritic knee?[J]. Int Orthop, 2023, 47(4): 963-971.
[14]
Ren Y, Cao S, Wu J, et al. Efficacy and reliability of active robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Postgrad Med J, 2019, 95(1121): 125-133.
[15]
Chu CR, Williams AA. Quantitative MRI UTE-T2* and T2* show progressive and continued graft maturation over 2 years in human patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J/OL]. Orthop J Sports Med, 2019, 7(8): 2325967119863056. DOI: 10.1177/2325967119863056.
[16]
Planta A, Surbeck R, Taylor WR, et al. A dual-plane fluoroscope to track joint kinematics during dynamic daily activities[J/OL]. PLoS One, 2025, 20(7): e0328351. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328351.
[17]
Tashman S, Araki D. Effects of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on in vivo, dynamic knee function[J]. Clin Sports Med, 2013, 32(1): 47-59.
[18]
Boyd E, Endres NK, Geeslin AG. Postoperative healing and complications based on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft type[J/OL]. Ann Jt, 2024, 9: 30. DOI: 10.21037/aoj-24-3.
[19]
Ptasinski AM, Dunleavy M, Adebayo T, et al. Returning athletes to sports following anterior cruciate ligament tears[J]. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med, 2022, 15(6): 616-628.
[20]
Coronado RA, Sterling EK, Fenster DE, et al. Cognitive-behavioral-based physical therapy to enhance return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an open pilot study[J]. Phys Ther Sport, 2020, 42: 82-90.
[21]
Lee YM, Kim GW, Lee CY, et al. No difference in clinical outcomes and survivorship for robotic, navigational, and conventional primary total knee arthroplasty with a minimum follow-up of 10 years[J]. Clin Orthop Surg, 2023, 15(1): 82-91.
[22]
Jeon SW, Kim KI, Song SJ. Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty does not improve long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2019, 34(8): 1656-1661.
[23]
Yang HY, Song EK, Park CJ, et al. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty improves aseptic survivorship compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty: a minimum 15-year follow-up[J]. Knee Surg Phys Traumatol Arthrosc, 2025, 33(11): 3884-3895.
[24]
Zhang L, Liang Q, Zhao Z, et al. Robot-assisted all-epiphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients: a retrospective study[J]. Int Orthop, 2023, 47(2): 429-435.
[25]
Migliorini F, Pilone M, Memminger MK, et al. All-epiphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction yields superior sports performances than the trans-epiphyseal technique in skeletally immature patients: a systematic review[J/OL]. J Orthop Traumatol, 2024, 25(1): 7. DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00751-9.
[26]
Ueki H, Kanto R, DiNenna M, et al. Arthroscopic centralization reduces extrusion of the medial meniscus with posterior root defect in the ACL reconstructed knee[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2023, 31(2): 543-550.
[27]
Kunze KN, Ferguson D, Pareek A, et al. Robotic-assisted arthroscopy promises enhanced procedural efficiency, visualization, and control but must overcome barriers to adoption[J]. HSS J, 2025, 21(3): 283-288.
[28]
Zhang C, Hallbeck MS, Salehinejad H, et al. The integration of artificial intelligence in robotic surgery: a narrative review[J/OL]. Surgery, 2024, 176(3): 552-557.
[29]
Bhimreddy M, Menta AK, Fuleihan AA, et al. Beyond pedicle screw placement: future minimally invasive applications of robotics in spine surgery[J/OL]. Neurosurgery, 2025, 96(3S): S94-S102.
[30]
Ding H, Sun W, Zheng G. Robot-assisted augmented reality (AR)-guided surgical navigation for periacetabular osteotomy[J/OL]. Sensors(Basel), 2024, 24(14): 4754. DOI: 10.3390/s24144754.
[31]
Shu H, Liu M, Seenivasan L, et al. Seamless augmented reality integration in arthroscopy: a pipeline for articular reconstruction and guidance[J/OL]. Healthc Technol Lett, 2025, 12(1): e12119. DOI: 10.1049/htl2.12119.
[32]
Khizir L, Bhandari V, Kaloth S, et al. From diagnosis to precision surgery: the transformative role of artificial intelligence in urologic imaging[J]. J Endourol, 2024, 38(8): 824-835.
[33]
van der Meijden OA, Schijven MP. The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review[J]. Surg Endosc, 2009, 23(6): 1180-1190.
[34]
Iftikhar M, Saqib M, Zareen M, et al. Artificial intelligence: revolutionizing robotic surgery: review[J]. Ann Med Surg (Lond), 2024, 86(9): 5401-5409.
[35]
Soma Y, Mutsuzaki H, Yoshioka T, et al. Single-joint hybrid assistive limb in knee rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction: an open-label feasibility and safety trial[J/OL]. Prog Rehabil Med, 2022, 7: 20220036. DOI: 10.2490/prm.20220036.
[36]
Wen Y, Wang X, Mao Y, et al. Effectiveness of an intelligent weight-bearing rehabilitation robot in enhancing recovery following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J/OL]. Front Public Health, 2025, 13: 1526105. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1526105.
[1] 向阳, 欧阳剑锋, 李炳权, 叶永恒. 改良单排增强修复与双排缝线桥修复肩袖撕裂的比较[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 406-415.
[2] 刘瀚旻. 关于母胎,现在向未来[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 22(04): 277-282.
[3] 刘晓玲, 谢晓曦, 李骁, 王春晖. 内镜下逆行胰胆管造影术在儿童胆胰疾病中的诊治价值[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 22(03): 229-238.
[4] 蔡泽荣, 吴小剑. 机器人辅助右半结肠切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 420-420.
[5] 刘荣. 机器人右半肝切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 324-324.
[6] 李永顺, 李凡凡, 常娟, 杨晓春. 经皮肾镜碎石取石术穿刺定位技术的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 594-600.
[7] 国产腔镜手术机器人系统的临床应用解决方案研究项目专家组. 单孔机器人肾上腺切除术专家共识[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 491-497.
[8] 鲁丁维, 郭洪瑞, 刘迪, 毛显龙, 易泓霖, 王汝娟, 邹春莉, 李鹏. 3+2+1解剖缝合策略在完全机器人食管裂孔疝修补+胃底折叠术中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 265-271.
[9] 周哲琦, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 李义亮, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 玉素江·图荪托合提, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 机器人辅助与腹腔镜袖状胃切除联合胃底折叠及食管裂孔疝修补术的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 259-264.
[10] 郑瑞, 何天霖. 人工智能引领胃癌外科治疗迈向精准微创新时代[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(03): 183-186.
[11] 冯源康, 薄智豪, 王勇. 机器人外科的演进与未来[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(03): 187-192.
[12] 韩晓钊, 杨能红, 韩民, 李永宁, 冉勋, 张宏, 何志伟, 罗加农, 喻超. 机器人与腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术安全性及疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 568-574.
[13] 杜修琪, 侍新宇, 胡优, 王索, 孙金兵, 钟润泽, 柯子昂, 王梦婷, 穆丽茜, 张丽娟, 周晓俊, 何宋兵. 机器人单切口加一孔与腹腔镜多孔全结肠切除术治疗慢传输型便秘的短期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 340-348.
[14] 孔琴, 岳慧玲, 侯卫华, 郑智, 何阿祥, 赵松, 陆群峰. 基于互联网技术赋能的医护康协作模式在前交叉韧带重建术后患者康复中的应用与评价[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 265-274.
[15] 陈磊, 高明. 数字化与智能外科技术在手足外科的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2026, 14(03): 219-224.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?