切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (03) : 381 -386. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2026.03.016

临床经验

前交叉韧带后外侧束修复治疗轻度膝前向不稳‌
冀航1, 栾海龙2, 陈玉书1, 王宇3,()   
  1. 1 510163 广州医科大学附属第一医院整形外科
    2 519000 珠海,广州医科大学附属第一医院横琴医院医学美容中心
    3 110016 沈阳,北部战区总医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-16 出版日期:2026-06-01
  • 通信作者: 王宇
  • 基金资助:
    辽宁省科技计划联合计划(2023JH2/101700124); 辽宁省科技计划联合计划(2024JH2/102600270)

Posterolateral bundle repair surgery of anterior cruciate ligament for mild anterior knee instability

Hang Ji1, Hailong Luan2, Yushu Chen1, Yu Wang3,()   

  1. 1 Department of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510163, China
    2 Department of Medical Cosmetic Center, Hengqin Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Zhuhai 519000, China
    3 Department of Orthopedics, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang 110016, China
  • Received:2025-09-16 Published:2026-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Yu Wang
引用本文:

冀航, 栾海龙, 陈玉书, 王宇. 前交叉韧带后外侧束修复治疗轻度膝前向不稳‌[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 381-386.

Hang Ji, Hailong Luan, Yushu Chen, Yu Wang. Posterolateral bundle repair surgery of anterior cruciate ligament for mild anterior knee instability[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(03): 381-386.

目的

探讨关节镜下精准修复前交叉韧带后外侧束结合切口美容缝合以改善膝关节轻度前向不稳的临床效果。

方法

对21例膝关节轻度前向不稳的患者行关节镜下前交叉韧带后外侧束解剖修复术,同时进行前内、外侧入路的切口美容缝合。术后按标准方案进行康复训练并对患者进行1、3、6个月的随访,比较术前与随访时的膝关节稳定性(Lachman试验、前抽屉试验及轴移试验)、影像学表现(磁共振成像MRI)及国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分、Lysholm膝关节功能评分、Tegner活动水平评分并记录切口愈合情况及并发症。数据比较采用重复测量方差分析和秩和检验。

结果

21例患者中,有19例在8周达到膝关节全范围屈伸活动,其中2例在屈曲90°时膝关节功能受限。膝关节稳定性评价:与术前Lachman试验Ⅱ度阳性相比,术后所有患者Lachman试验阴性,而前抽屉试验、轴移试验无明显变化,均为阴性。此外,膝关节术后MRI显示连续2层面前交叉韧带信号均匀且连续,韧带张力明显改善。膝关节功能评估:与术前相比,术后患者IKDC评分,Lysholm、Tegner等评分明显升高(F=55.99、105.84,Z=37.86,均为P<0.001)。切口愈合情况:所有患者均未发生感染等不良反应,1例患者因瘢痕体质导致切口瘢痕硬化、色素沉着,且在膝关节极度屈曲时出现疼痛症状,其余患者切口愈合均为优良。

结论

关节镜下精准修复前交叉韧带后外侧束结合切口美容缝合技术治疗膝关节轻度前向不稳定,可减少切口刺激,促进膝关节功能早期康复,远期结局尚需进一步随访观察。

Objective

To investigate the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic anatomical repair of the posterolateral bundle (PLB) of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) combined with cosmetic portal suturing for the treatment of mild anterior knee instability.

Methods

Twenty-one patients with mild anterior knee instability underwent arthroscopic anatomical repair of the PLB of ACL. Cosmetic suturing was simultaneously performed for the anteromedial and anterolateral portals. The patients underwent a standard rehabilitation protocol and were followed up for one to six months after surgery. Knee stability was evaluated by Lachman test, anterior drawer test (ADT), and pivot-shift test. MRI findings, and functional assessments—including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective evaluation form, Lysholm knee scoring scale, and Tegner activity score—were compared between the data before surgery and data during the follow-up. Incision healing and complications were also recorded. The data were analysed by repeated variation analysis and rank sum test.

Results

Among the 21 patients, 19 achieved full range of knee motion eight weeks after surgery, while two experienced restricted knee flexion at 90°. Knee stability: compared with preoperative grade Ⅱ positive Lachman tests, all the patients demonstrated negative Lachman tests postoperatively. The ADT and pivot-shift test remained negative. Postoperative MRI revealed uniform and continuous ACL signals across two consecutive slices, indicating significantly improved ligament tension. Functional assessment: IKDC, Lysholm, and Tegner scores after surgery were significantly higher than the preoperative values (F=55.99, 105.84, Z=37.86, all P<0.001). Incision healing: no infections or other adverse events occurred in any of the patients. One patient with a scar diathesis developed scar induration, hyperpigmentation, and localized pain during extreme knee flexion. The remaining patients achieved excellent incision healing.

Conclusions

Arthroscopic anatomical repair of the ACL PLB combined with cosmetic portal suturing for mild anterior knee instability can effectively minimize incision-related irritation and facilitate the early rehabilitation of knee function. Long-term outcomes warrant a further follow-up observation.

图1 MRI检查显示左膝ACL(前交叉韧带)部分损伤。图A为ACL张力改变,后交叉韧带迂曲;图B为ACL退变伴随髁间窝积液
Figure 1 MRI findings of partial ACL injury in the left knee. A is sagittal view showing altered ACL tension and a buckled posterior cruciate ligament; B is sagittal view demonstrating ACL degeneration with associated intercondylar fossa effusion
图2 膝关节镜下探针处显示左膝PLB(后外侧束)松弛并萎缩表现及修复后表现。图A为PLB松弛;图B为修复后的ACL张力满意,剩余线未剪断目的提示锚钉位置
Figure 2 Left knee arthroscopy showed relaxation and atrophy of the PLB (posterolateral bundle) at the probe site and condition after repair. A shows the PLB relaxation; B shows that the repaired ACL tension is satisfactory, and the remaining line is not cut to indicate the anchor position
图3 MRI检查左膝术前与术后ACL对比。图A为术前ACL部分损伤表现;图B为ACL修复后形态及张力恢复表现
Figure 3 MRI scans in comparison of the left knee before and after ACL surgery. Figure A shows partial ACL injury before surgery; Figure B shows the morphology and tension recovery after ACL repair
图4 膝关节术后评分不同时间点的两两比较。图A为IKDC评分的两两比较;图B为Lysholm评分的两两比较;图C为Tegner评分的两两比较 注:P值为Bonferroni校正后,*-P<0.05,**-P<0.01,***-P<0.001
Figure 4 Pairwise comparisons of postoperative knee scores. A shows the pairwise comparisons of IKDC scores; B shows the pairwise comparisons of Lysholm scores; C shows the pairwise comparisons of Tegner scores Note: after Bonferroni correction, *-P<0.05, **-P<0.01, ***-P<0.001
表1 不同时间点膝关节功能评分(n=21)
Table 1 Trend of functional scores over time after knee surgery
[1]
冯建豪, 陈世益, 敖英芳, 等. 美国骨科医师协会《前十字韧带损伤治疗循证临床实践指南(2022版)》解读[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2023, 43(3): 205-212.
[2]
李宝, 刘欣伟, 孙扬, 等. 前交叉韧带双束双隧道增强重建术治疗膝关节前交叉韧带损伤的临床疗效[J]. 中国骨伤, 2024, 37(7): 649-654.
[3]
夏天, 华英汇. 前交叉韧带修补的临床应用现状[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2024, 104(17): 1534-1539.
[4]
中华医学会运动医疗分会膝关节学组, 中国医师协会运动医学医师分会. 前十字韧带损伤初次修复技术中国专家共识(2024年版)[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2024, 44(19): 1255-1264.
[5]
Alzobi OZ, Almannai H, Elshoeibi AM, et al. A bibliometric analysis of the top cited articles on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with anterolateral ligament reconstruction[J/OL]. J Orthop Rep, 2025, 4(4): 100509. DOI: 10.1016/j.jorep.2024.100509.
[6]
Temponi EF, de Carvalho LH Jr, Sonnery-Cottet B, et al. Partial tearing of the anterior cruciate ligament: diagnosis and treatment[J]. Rev Bras Ortop, 2015, 50(1): 9-15.
[7]
Malik DS, Ahmad Wani DA, Faizan DSSM, et al. Comparative analysis of Lachman’s test versus pivot Shift test in diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament tear[J]. Natl J Clin Orthop, 2024, 8(1): 36-39.
[8]
Deviandri R, van der Veen HC, Lubis A, et al. Psychometric properties analysis of Indonesian IKDC scale for managing patients with ACL injury[J/OL]. Orthop J Phys Med, 2024, 12(10_suppl 3): 2325967124S00432. DOI: 10.1177/2325967124s00432.
[9]
Nestorovski Z, Vangelovska Z, Ciriviri J, et al. Evaluating knee function post-ACL reconstruction: conventional versus all-inside technique using Lysholm score[J]. Arch Public Health, 2024, 16(2): 5-17.
[10]
Arundale AJH, Silvers-Granelli HJ, Myklebust G. ACL injury prevention: Where have we come from and where are we going?[J]. J Orthop Res, 2022, 40(1): 43-54.
[11]
张延杰, 王啸, 李继超, 等. 关节镜下自体腘绳肌腱联合锚钉缝合带增强重建前交叉韧带的临床研究[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2021, 35(2): 171-177.
[12]
李宝, 林欣其, 李思桐, 等. 前交叉韧带双隧道增强重建术治疗膝关节前交叉韧带损伤[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2024, 30(1): 70-74.
[13]
Zhang ZY, Huang HJ, Maimaitijiang P, et al. Comparisons of diagnostic performance and the reliability in identifying ACL injury between two measuring protocols of anterior tibial subluxation on MR images[J]. Skeletal Radiol, 2023, 52(9): 1713-1720.
[14]
Mayer C, Barner K, Lorimer S, et al. Side variations of anterior cruciate ligament coronal angles: implications for ACL reconstruction[J]. Clin Anat, 2019, 32(8): 1102-1106.
[15]
刘嘉欣, 李宏宇, 王萌, 等. 缝线增强技术用于前交叉韧带重建的研究进展[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2025, 39(4): 504-510.
[1] 刘聪, 毛冰清, 甄允方, 方建峰, 文军, 刘一聪, 钱涛, 刘尧. 肱骨外髁骨折合并肘关节脱位的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 266-274.
[2] 张晋, 王敏, 贾摄, 邵龙辉, 杨伟宇. 关节镜下肩袖缝合钩全内缝合治疗半月板损伤[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 248-251.
[3] 马桥桥, 张传开, 刘雨晴, 张姗, 蒋涛, 蔡文清, 胡俊生. 关节镜下克氏针张力带修复肘内翻-后内侧旋转不稳[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 158-163.
[4] 缪伟金, 谢杰, 王敏, 刘小斐, 梁绍华, 韩梦虎, 刘贤茂, 王文. 人工真皮与同种异体脱细胞真皮修补肩袖损伤的对比​[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 151-157.
[5] 许娅, 汪翔, 刘高鹏, 黄预如, 王斌. 关节镜下无喙突骨隧道悬吊式固定治疗急性肩锁关节脱位[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 104-109.
[6] 李政, 李雳, 欧传双, 杨琼, 李长树. 对比分析单束不同方式保残重建治疗前交叉韧带断裂[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 162-171.
[7] 肖志满, 张泽锋, 庄锡其, 肖青福. 关节镜术后下肢深静脉血栓早期及远期发生的对比[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 253-256.
[8] 马栋, 曾俊杰, 苑博, 田明, 张绍龙. 三种术式治疗老年肩袖损伤合并冻结肩疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 94-101.
[9] 陈胤熹, 李辉. 异常股骨前倾角的生物力学研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 778-784.
[10] 郭艳波, 马亮, 李刚, 阎伟, 骆帝, 岳亮, 吴伟山. 全膝关节置换术后胫股关节脱位的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 658-671.
[11] 于威, 王艺凯, 杨文博, 孟春庆, 王洪, 黄玮. 陈旧性前交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折的诊疗进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 532-537.
[12] 王晶晶, 王辉, 李阿漫, 曾峥. 对肩峰下撞击综合征患者肩关节镜术后居家康复锻炼方案的应用效果与依从性分析[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2025, 20(03): 227-232.
[13] 李宜璐, 曹永丽, 杨阳, 王思远, 张远耀, 杨维维, 王信琛, 陈俊, 魏东. 腹腔镜盆底修复联合PPH 术治疗直肠内脱垂的手术疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 394-401.
[14] 冯倩倩, 毛俊超, 缪祎, 赵海珠, 袁慧颖, 杨伟欣. 关节外肌腱固定术对前交叉韧带损伤合并重度轴移现象患者术后关节功能恢复的疗效研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2026, 12(02): 106-113.
[15] 李元志, 董志杰, 王奕博, 谢磊, 何帅, 邢栋. 不同移植物进行前交叉韧带重建对膝关节功能及运动水平的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 106-113.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?