切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (01) : 141 -146. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2023.01.021

临床经验

富血小板血浆对膝软骨损伤术后功能康复的影响
贾星海1, 张超1, 林岩1,()   
  1. 1. 221000 徐州矿务集团总医院
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-11 出版日期:2023-02-01
  • 通信作者: 林岩

Effect of platelet-rich plasma on functional rehabilitation after knee cartilage injury surgery

Xinghai Jia1, Chao Zhang1, Yan Lin1,()   

  1. 1. Xuzhou Mining Group General Hospital, Xuzhou 221000, China
  • Received:2021-01-11 Published:2023-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Yan Lin
引用本文:

贾星海, 张超, 林岩. 富血小板血浆对膝软骨损伤术后功能康复的影响[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 141-146.

Xinghai Jia, Chao Zhang, Yan Lin. Effect of platelet-rich plasma on functional rehabilitation after knee cartilage injury surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(01): 141-146.

目的

探讨自体富血小板血浆(PRP)关节腔内注射辅助手术治疗对膝关节软骨损伤患者功能康复的影响。

方法

回顾性分析徐州矿务集团总医院膝关节软骨损伤患者106例(2017年1月至2018年3月)临床资料,接受微骨折术联合PRP治疗者计为研究组(n=53),接受微骨折术联合玻璃酸钠治疗者计对照组(n=53)。比较两组治疗前及治疗后3、6、9个月视觉模拟评分(VAS)、日本骨科协会评分(JOA)、特种外科医院膝关节(HSS)功能评分、炎性因子水平及不良反应。

结果

治疗后3、6、9个月两组VAS评分较治疗前降低,且研究组低于对照组(F时间=34.842,F组别=23.766,F交互=15.591,均为P<0.05)。治疗后3、6、9个月两组JOA评分较治疗前增高,且研究组高于对照组(F时间=69.734,F组别=44.069,F交互=28.318,均为P<0.05)。治疗后3、6、9个月两组HSS评分较治疗前增高,且研究组高于对照组(F时间=61.012,F组别=48.338,F交互=25.443,均为P<0.05)。治疗后研究组血清白介素(IL)-6、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)水平明显低于治疗前(t=64.233、42.920,均为P<0.05),且研究组明显低于对照组(t=12.576、8.324,均为P<0.05)。研究组不良反应发生率(5.7%)低于对照组(18.9%)(χ2=4.296,P<0.05)。

结论

采取PRP关节腔内注射辅助手术治疗膝关节软骨损伤,可有效减轻患者疼痛程度,改善其关节功能,且安全性较高。

Objective

To investigate the effect of intra articular injection of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as an adjuvant surgical treatment on functional recovery in patients with knee cartilage injury.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 106 patients with knee cartilage injury in Xuzhou Mining Group General Hospital (January 2017 to March 2018) was conducted. The patients who received microfracture surgery combined with PRP treatment were assigned in the study group (n=53), while those who received microfracture surgery combined with sodium hyaluronate treatment were assigned in the control group (n=53). The visual analogue scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA) scores, the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee joint function scores, inflammatory factor levels, and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups before and in three, six, and nine months after treatment.

Results

The VAS scores of the two groups in three, six, and nine months after treatment were lower than those before treatment, and the study group were lower than the control group (Ftime=34.842, Fgroup=23.766, F interaction=15.591, all P<0.05). Three, six, and nine months after treatment, the JOA scores in the two groups were higher than those before treatment, and the study group was higher than the control group (Ftime=69.734, Fgroup=44.069, F interaction=28.318, all P <0.05). Three, six, and nine months of treatment, the HSS scores of the two groups were higher than those before treatment, and the study group was higher than the control group (Ftime=61.012, Fgroup=48.338, F interaction=25.443, all P <0.05). The levels of serum interleukin (IL) -6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α in the study group after treatment were significantly lower than those before the treatment(t=64.233、42.920, both P<0.05), and levels of IL-6 and TNF-α in the study group were lower than the control group (t=12.576, 8.324, both P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group (5.7%) was lower than that in the control group (18.9%)(χ2=4.296, P<0.05).

Conclusion

Intraarticular injection of PRP as an adjunctive surgical treatment for knee cartilage injury can effectively alleviate pain and improve joint function.

表1 两组一般资料比较
Table 1 Comparison of general informations between two groups
表2 两组VAS评分比较[分,(±s)]
Table 2 Comparison of VAS scores between the two groups
表3 两组JOA评分比较[分,(±s)]
Table 3 Comparison of JOA scores between the two groups
表4 两组HSS评分比较[分,(±s)]
Table 4 Comparison of HSS scores between the two groups
表5 两组治疗前后血清IL-6和TNF-α水平[ng/L,(±s)]
Table 5 Serum levels of IL-6 and TNF-α in the two groups before and after treatment
表6 两组不良反应比较[例(%)]
Table 6 Comparison of adverse reactions between the two groups
[1]
李磊,吴昊. 关节软骨损伤关节镜下微骨折手术效果的影响因素分析[J]. 中国医药导报2018, 15(9): 62-65, 73.
[2]
Kraeutler MJ, Belk JW, Purcell JM, et al. Microfracture versus autologous chondrocyte implantation for articular cartilage lesions in the knee: a systematic review of 5-year outcomes[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2018, 46(4): 995-999.
[3]
李文哲,孙建华,刘斌,等. 关节镜下微骨折术治疗膝关节软骨损伤的近期疗效分析[J]. 重庆医学2018, 47(24): 3177-3180.
[4]
Røtterud JH, Sivertsen EA, Forssblad M, et al. Effect on patient-reported outcomes of debridement or microfracture of concomitant full-thickness cartilage lesions in anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees: a nationwide cohort study from Norway and Sweden of 357 patients with 2-year follow-up[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2016, 44(2): 337-344.
[5]
苏柯,白玉明,王军,等. 关节腔内联合软骨下骨松质骨内注射富血小板血浆治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效观察[J]. 山东医药2017, 57(13): 83-85.
[6]
刘义,徐丽丽,党红胜,等. 微创手术联合关节腔内注射富血小板血浆治疗膝关节骨性关节炎疗效观察[J]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志2018, 32(9): 890-892.
[7]
Angoorani H, Mazaherinezhad A, Marjomaki O, et al. Treatment of knee osteoarthritis with platelet-rich plasma in comparison with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation plus exercise: a randomized clinical trial[J/OL]. Med J Islam Repub Iran, 2015, 29: 223.PMCID:PMC4606945
[8]
刘亚波,高延伟,张文生,等. 关节镜微骨折术治疗膝关节软骨损伤患者2年随访结果分析[J]. 西部医学2017, 29(10): 1417-1420.
[9]
鄢志辉,杨柳,王富友,等. 外侧半月板撕裂合并软骨不同程度损伤的关节镜疗效对比分析[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志2014, 22(24): 2229-2232.
[10]
Oussedik S, Tsitskaris K, Parker D. Treatment of articular cartilage lesions of the knee by microfracture or autologous chondrocyte implantation: a systematic review[J]. Arthroscopy, 2015, 31(4): 732-744.
[11]
刘冰川,任辉辉,祝腾蛟,等. 可注射生物活性玻璃支架修复兔膝关节软骨缺损[J]. 中华骨科杂志2019, 39(10): 613-621.
[12]
刘军,吴凯,刘宝应. 关节镜下微骨折术后早期CPM对膝关节软骨损伤修复效果的影响研究[J]. 临床误诊误治2020, 33(1): 79-83.
[13]
林春博,罗道明,蔡金宏,等. 关节镜下微骨折术联合富血小板血浆治疗膝关节软骨损伤的临床效果[J]. 广西医学2018, 40(17): 1921-1924.
[14]
叶颂霖,刘海亮. 微骨折术联合玻璃酸钠注射修复膝关节软骨损伤的效果分析[J]. 泰山医学院学报2018, 39(2):214-215.
[15]
鲁鹏,鲁晓波. 富血小板血浆应用于关节软骨修复治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的研究进展[J]. 西南军医2017, 19(1): 59-62.
[1] 苏介茂, 齐岩松, 王永祥, 魏宝刚, 马秉贤, 张鹏飞, 魏兴华, 徐永胜. 关节镜手术在早中期膝骨关节炎治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 646-652.
[2] 陈松, 黄玲巧, 余清卿, 魏志鑫, 付琰. 单细胞RNA测序技术在骨关节炎软骨中的研究应用[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 363-371.
[3] 李朋, 苗立帅, 朱智奇. 四氢嘧啶对大鼠关节软骨细胞的保护作用[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 69-77.
[4] 李亚龙, 王星童, 申传安. 异体富血小板血浆在创面修复中的临床应用进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 541-545.
[5] 王振宇, 张洪美, 荆琳, 何名江, 闫奇. 膝骨关节炎相关炎症因子与血浆代谢物间的因果关系及中介效应[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 467-473.
[6] 赵芊, 李亚坤, 李智. 同种异体富血小板血浆临床应用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 364-367.
[7] 苏永涛, 王春雷, 徐广琪, 关中正, 焦伟, 隋颖. 胫骨骨膜牵张术联合富血小板血浆对治疗糖尿病足溃疡的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(03): 238-244.
[8] 庹晓晔, 冯光. 复杂胸壁重建策略[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(03): 276-276.
[9] 朱苗娟, 杜聃, 廖慧斌, 陈毅斐, 杨炯. 以呼吸道症状为首发表现的复发性多软骨炎一例[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 335-337.
[10] 万周程, 钟章锋, 钟侨霖, 王景浩, 刘婷, 王华军, 郑小飞. 中药有效成分结合生物材料在骨组织工程中作用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 249-253.
[11] 刘家伦, 连晓东, 王博, 周汇霖, 潘晓光, 李涛, 赵亮, 常恒瑞, 陈伟, 郑占乐. 应力分散角和SchatzkerⅡ、Ⅲ型胫骨平台骨折的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 28-32.
[12] 李玺, 蔡芸莹, 张永红, 苏恒. 假性软骨发育不全合并1型糖尿病一例[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 518-520.
[13] 魏贤杰, 黄河溯源, 张克石, 关振鹏. 山奈素通过抑制NF-κB减弱类风湿关节炎大鼠模型软骨细胞炎症及基质降解[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 375-382.
[14] 薛伟, 康少英, 郭洪生, 高庆亮, 张英民, 高彦平. 电针联合富血小板血浆治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 13-17.
[15] 郭楠, 徐学俊. 富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯在慢性乙型肝炎患者中诱导的范科尼综合征并低磷软骨病一例[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 173-177.
阅读次数
全文


摘要