切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (04) : 497 -501. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2022.04.019

临床经验

清创保留假体联合抗生素治疗膝关节置换术后急性感染
周胜虎1, 李峰2, 程永刚3, 刘浩1, 张浩强1, 甄平1, 乔永杰1,()   
  1. 1. 730050 兰州,解放军联勤保障部队第九四〇医院关节外科
    2. 733000 武威,解放军联勤保障部队第九四三医院骨科
    3. 455000 安阳地区医院
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-16 出版日期:2022-08-01
  • 通信作者: 乔永杰
  • 基金资助:
    甘肃省重点研发计划(21YF5FA154); 甘肃省青年科技基金(20JR5RA588); 甘肃省青年科技基金(21JR7RA014); 部队专项培育项目(2021YXKY014)

Debridement and implant retention combining antibiotics in treatment of acute infection following total knee arthroplasty

Shenghu Zhou1, Feng Li2, Yonggang Cheng3, Hao Liu1, Haoqiang Zhang1, Ping Zhen1, Yongjie Qiao1,()   

  1. 1. The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of PLA, Lanzhou 730050, China
    2. The 943rd Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of PLA, Wuwei 733000, China
    3. Anyang Regional Hospital 3, Anyang 455000, china
  • Received:2021-11-16 Published:2022-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Yongjie Qiao
引用本文:

周胜虎, 李峰, 程永刚, 刘浩, 张浩强, 甄平, 乔永杰. 清创保留假体联合抗生素治疗膝关节置换术后急性感染[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 497-501.

Shenghu Zhou, Feng Li, Yonggang Cheng, Hao Liu, Haoqiang Zhang, Ping Zhen, Yongjie Qiao. Debridement and implant retention combining antibiotics in treatment of acute infection following total knee arthroplasty[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(04): 497-501.

目的

探讨采用清创保留假体联合抗生素(DAIR)治疗人工膝关节置换术后急性期感染的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析解放军联勤保障部队第九四〇医院关节外科自2008年12月1日至2018年11月30日收治的,根据美国肌肉与感染协会(MSIS)诊断标准确诊为急性人工关节感染(PJI)的26例膝关节置换术后急性感染患者的临床资料。所有患者均采用一期彻底清创,更换膝关节聚乙烯衬垫,术后膝关节腔持续冲洗引流及足疗程敏感抗生素治疗。用t检验比较患膝术前、术后的膝关节疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS评分),美国特种外科医院膝关节评分(HSS评分),入院及末次随访红细胞沉降率(ESR)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)。

结果

纳入26例患者,失访3例,随访时间平均(44±28)个月。其中治愈17例,感染控制率73.9%。术后的膝关节VAS评分较术前降低(t=24.815,P<0.05),术后的HSS评分较术前升高(t=41.966,P<0.05)。末次随访ESR(t=14.140)、CRP(t=3.503)、IL-6(t=2.999)均较入院时降低(均为P<0.05)。

结论

DAIR治疗人工膝关节置换术后急性感染,严格把握手术时机及手术适应证,可有效控制感染,恢复关节功能,临床效果满意。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) in the treatment of acute infection after total knee arthroplasty.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of the joint surgery of the 940th Hospital of the Joint Service Support Force of the Chinese People's Liberation Army from December 1, 2008 to November 30, 2018, was diagnosed with acute prosthetic joint infection (PJI) cases according to the diagnostic criteria of the American Society for Musculoskeletal Infection (MSIS), a total of 26 clinical data of patients with infection after acute knee arthroplasty. All the patients were treated with one-stage thorough debridement, replacement of knee joint polyethylene pads, postoperative wound irrigation and drainage, and adequate treatment with sensitive antibiotics. The pain visual analogue scale (VAS), Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score of the knee, sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin (IL) -6 before and after the knee surgery were compared by t test.

Results

Twenty-six patients were enrolled, three cases were lost during the follow-up, and the follow-up time was (44±28) months. Among them, 17 cases were cured, the infection control rate was 73.9%.The postoperative knee joint VAS score was lower than that before surgery (t=24.815, P<0.05), and the postoperative HSS score was higher than that before surgery (t=41.966, P<0.05). ESR(t=14.140), CRP(t=3.503), and IL-6 (t=2.999)at last follow-up were all lower than those at admission (all P<0.05).

Conclusion

Controlling the timing of surgery and the indications for surgery strictly, DAIR can control the acute infections after total knee arthroplasty effectively, restore joint function, and obtain satisfactory clinical results.

表1 患者术前及术后VAS评分、膝关节HSS评分比较[n=26,(±s)]
表2 患者术前及术后血清炎性标志物比较[n=26,(±s)]
图1 典型病例患者左膝骨关节炎行膝关节表面置换术前后情况。图A为术前左膝关节正侧位X线片,示假体在位,无松动表现;图B为术后复查左膝关节正侧位X线片,示假体在位,无松动表现;图C为术后2周左膝关节外观,示局部肿胀伴活动受限;图D术中情况,可见大量坏死组织,感染严重;图E~F为假体周围病变组织病理HE染色(×100),示化脓性炎症;图G为术后6个月复查膝关节正侧位X线片,示假体在位,无松动表现
[1]
Ting NT, Della Valle CJ. Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection-an algorithm-based approach[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2017, 32(7): 2047-2050.
[2]
谢川江,石岭,朱纪峰,等.全膝关节置换术后假体周围感染的治疗策略[J].重庆医学202150(1):100-104.
[3]
Koh CK, Zeng I, Ravi S, et al. Periprosthetic joint infection is the main cause of failure for modern knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 11,134 knees[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2017, 475(9): 2194-2201.
[4]
Breznicky J, Hlavac M, Novak M, et al. Risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection of the hip and knee[J]. Med Glas (Zenica), 2020, 17(1): 92-97.
[5]
Kkb A, Mk B, Dcl A, et al. Utilization of debridement,antibiotics,and implant retention for infection after total joint arthroplasty over a decade in the United States-Science Direct[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2020, 35(8): 2210-2216.
[6]
Ahmed SS, Begum F, Kayani B, et al. Risk factors, diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty[J]. Expert Rev Med Devices, 2019, 16(12): 1063-1070.
[7]
程永刚,周胜虎,刘军,等.人工髋膝关节置换术后感染治疗进展[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版)202115(3):329-333.
[8]
Pansu N, Hamoui M, Manna F, et al. Implant retention and high rate of treatment failure in hematogenous acute knee and hip prosthetic joint infections[J]. Med Mal Infect, 2020, 50(8): 702-708.
[9]
Baker JF, Dilworth B, Bhimani SJ, et al. Risk of reinfection after irrigation and debridement of acute periprosthetic joint infection following TKA[J]. J Knee Surg, 2020, 33(7): 623-628.
[10]
Grammatopoulos G, Kendrick B, Mcnally M, et al. Outcome following debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention in hip periprosthetic joint infection-an 18-year experience[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2017, 32(7): 2248-2255.
[11]
Argenson JN, Arndt M, Babis G, et al. Hip and knee section, treatment, debridement and retention of implant: proceedings of international consensus on orthopedic infections[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2019, 34(2S): S399-S419.
[12]
Arvieux C, Common H. New diagnostic tools for prosthetic joint infection[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2019, 105(1S): S23-S30.
[13]
Signore A, Sconfienza LM, Borens OA, et al. Consensus document for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections: a joint paper by the EANM, EBJIS, and ESR (with ESCMID endorsement)[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2019, 46(4): 971-988.
[14]
Joulie D, Girard J, Mares O, et al. Factors governing the healing of Staphylococcus aureus infections following hip and knee prosthesis implantation: a retrospective study of 95 patients[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2011, 97(7): 685-692.
[1] 邓华梅, 袁札根, 曾德荣, 潘珊珊, 张葆青, 欧爱华, 曹学伟. 全膝关节置换术中气压止血带应用效果与影响因素分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 788-794.
[2] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[3] 李培杰, 乔永杰, 张浩强, 曾健康, 谭飞, 李嘉欢, 王静, 周胜虎. 细菌培养阴性的假体周围感染诊治的最新进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 827-833.
[4] 闫文, 谢兴文, 顾玉彪, 雷宁波, 马成, 于文霞, 高亚雄, 张磊. 微小RNA与全膝关节置换术后深静脉血栓的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 842-846.
[5] 王宏宇. 固定与活动平台假体在全膝关节置换术中的应用价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 871-876.
[6] 李善武, 叶永杰, 王兵, 王子呓, 银毅, 孙官军, 张大刚. 胫骨高位截骨与单髁置换的早期疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 882-888.
[7] 李辉, 吴奇, 张子琦, 张晗, 王仿, 许鹏. 日间全膝关节置换术早期疗效及标准化流程探索[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 889-892.
[8] 涂家金, 廖武强, 刘金晶, 涂志鹏, 毛远桂. 严重烧伤患者鲍曼不动杆菌血流感染的危险因素及预后分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 491-497.
[9] 李秉林, 吕少诚, 潘飞, 姜涛, 樊华, 寇建涛, 贺强, 郎韧. 供肝灌注液病原菌与肝移植术后早期感染的相关性分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 656-660.
[10] 卓少宏, 林秀玲, 周翠梅, 熊卫莲, 马兴灶. CD64指数、SAA/CRP、PCT联合检测在小儿消化道感染性疾病鉴别诊断中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 505-509.
[11] 李达, 张大涯, 陈润祥, 张晓冬, 黄士美, 陈晨, 曾凡, 陈世锔, 白飞虎. 海南省东方市幽门螺杆菌感染现状的调查与相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 858-864.
[12] 卓徐鹏, 刘颖, 任菁菁. 感染性疾病与老年人低蛋白血症的相关性研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 896-899.
[13] 李静静, 翟蕾, 赵海平, 郑波. 多囊肾合并囊肿的多重耐药菌感染一例并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 920-923.
[14] 李琪, 黄钟莹, 袁平, 关振鹏. 基于某三级医院的ICU多重耐药菌医院感染影响因素的分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 777-782.
[15] 杨艳丽, 陈昱, 赵若辰, 杜伟, 马海娟, 许珂, 张莉芸. 系统性红斑狼疮合并血流感染的危险因素及细菌学分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 694-699.
阅读次数
全文


摘要