切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (01) : 119 -123. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2022.01.020

临床经验

比较两种假体半髋置换治疗高龄不稳定转子间骨折
唐大军1,(), 余建翔1, 马方全1   
  1. 1. 615000 渠县,凉山州第一人民医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-06 出版日期:2022-02-01
  • 通信作者: 唐大军

Comparison of cemented and cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasties for aged unstable intertrochanteric fracture

Dajun Tang1,(), Jianxiang Yu1, Fangquan Ma1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, the First People′s Hospital of Liangshan, Quxian 615000, China
  • Received:2020-03-06 Published:2022-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Dajun Tang
引用本文:

唐大军, 余建翔, 马方全. 比较两种假体半髋置换治疗高龄不稳定转子间骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 119-123.

Dajun Tang, Jianxiang Yu, Fangquan Ma. Comparison of cemented and cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasties for aged unstable intertrochanteric fracture[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(01): 119-123.

目的

比较骨水泥型与生物型双极人工股骨头置换术治疗高龄不稳定性股骨转子间骨折的临床疗效。

方法

2013年1月至2017年1月,凉山州第一人民医院共收治94例高龄不稳定性股骨转子间骨折患者,分别采用骨水泥型股骨假体(骨水泥组,51例)或生物型股骨假体(生物组,43例)行双极人工股骨头置换术。所有患者均获得随访,随访终点时间为12个月或患者死亡。采用t检验或卡方检验比较两组患者临床疗效。

结果

两组患者术前一般资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)。骨水泥组患者术后伤口引流量(t=3.964,P<0.05)及输血量(t=5.245,P<0.05)均较生物组低,而手术时间较长(t=3.535,P<0.05)。两组术中失血量、术后住院天数、术后下地活动时间、并发症、髋关节功能、及术后3个月和12个月死亡率比较,差异均无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)。所有患者均无假体松动需要翻修。

结论

采用半髋置换术治疗高龄不稳定性股骨转子间骨折,可获得满意的临床疗效;骨水泥型假体具有降低术后引流量及输血量的优点,同时增加手术时间的缺点。

Objective

To compare clinical outcomes of cemented and cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly.

Methods

From January 2013 to January 2017, 94 elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures were treated by cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty (the cemented group, n=51) or cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty (the cementless group, n=43) in the First People′s Hospital of Liangshan. All the patients were followed up for 12 months or until the death of the patients. The clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared by t test or chi-square test.

Results

There was no significant difference in preoperative characteristics between the two groups (all P>0.05). The amount of postoperative drainage(t=3.964, P<0.05) and blood transfusion(t=5.245, P<0.05) in the cemented group were significantly lower, when compared with those in the cementless group. The operative time was significantly longer in the cemented group (t=3.535, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative bedtime, postoperative complications, hip function, or postoperative mortality in three and 12 months between the two groups (all P>0.05). None of the prosthesis was loosening or needed the revision.

Conclusions

The use of hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients, can achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes. The cemented prosthesis can reduce postoperative drainage and the blood transfusion, while increasing the operation time.

表1 两组患者术前一般资料比较
表2 两组患者术中、术后临床资料比较
图1 左股骨转子间骨折行骨水泥型双极人工股骨头置换术治疗前后X线正位片。图A为术前,示左股骨转子间骨折(A2.3型);图B为术后3 d左髋关节X线片,显示假体位置良好;图C为术后12个月左髋关节X线片,显示假体在位,无下沉松动
图2 左股骨转子间骨折行生物型双极人工股骨头置换术治疗前后X线正位片。图A为术前,示左股骨转子间骨折(A2.2型);图B术后3 d左髋关节X线片,显示假体位置良好;图C为术后12个月左髋关节X线片,显示假体在位,无下沉松动
[1]
Farrow L, Hall A, Wood AD, et al. Quality of care in hip fracture patients: the relationship between adherence to national standards and improved outcomes[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2018, 100(9): 751-757.
[2]
Lee YK, Park CH, Koo KH. Fixation of trochanteric fragments in cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty of unstable intertrochanteric fracture: cerclage wiring [J]. Hip Pelvis, 2017, 29(4): 262-269.
[3]
殷勇,杨静.股骨柄假体人工半髋关节置换治疗高龄股骨转子间骨折[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),201812(2): 174-178.
[4]
Kim JT, Kim HH, Kim JH, et al. Mid-term survivals after cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2018, 33(3): 777-782.
[5]
Mansukhani SA, Tuteja SV, Kasodekar VB, et al. A comparative study of the dynamic hip screw, the cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty and the proximal femoral nail for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures[J/OL]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2017, 11(4): RC14-RC19. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/21435.9753.
[6]
Camurcu Y, Cobden A, Sofu H, et al. What are the determinants of mortality after cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients?[J]. J Arthroplasty, 201732(10): 3038-3043.
[7]
Göçer H, Coşkun S, Karaismailoğlu N. Comparison of treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fracture with different arthroplasty methods[J]. Niger Med J, 2016, 57(2): 81-85.
[8]
Thakur A, Lal M. Cemented hemiarthroplasty in elderly osteoporotic unstable trochanteric fractures using fracture window[J/OL]. Malays Orthop J, 2016, 10(1): 5-10. DOI: 10.5704/MOJ.1603.002.
[9]
Wada K, Mikami H, Oba K, et al. Cementless calcar-replacement stem with integrated greater trochanter plate for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in very elderly patients[J/OL]. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 2017, 25(1): 2309499016684749. DOI: 10.1177/2309499016684749.
[10]
Fuchs M, Sass FA, Dietze S, et al. Cemented hemiarthroplasties are associated with a higher mortality rate after femoral neck fractures in elderly patients[J]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, 2017, 84(5): 341-346.
[11]
Esen E, Dur H, Ataoğlu MB, et al. Evaluation of proximal femoral nail-antirotation and cemented, bipolar hemiarthroplasty with calcar replacement in treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures in terms of mortality and morbidity ratios[J]. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi, 2017, 28(1): 35-40.
[1] 林文, 王雨萱, 许嘉悦, 王矜群, 王睿娜, 何董源, 樊沛. 人工关节置换登记系统的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 834-841.
[2] 闫文, 谢兴文, 顾玉彪, 雷宁波, 马成, 于文霞, 高亚雄, 张磊. 微小RNA与全膝关节置换术后深静脉血栓的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 842-846.
[3] 贺敬龙, 尚宏喜, 郝敏, 谢伟, 高明宏, 孙炜, 刘安庆. 重度类风湿关节炎患者行多关节置换术的临床手术疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 860-864.
[4] 孟繁宇, 周新社, 赵志, 裴立家, 刘犇. 侧位直接前方入路髋关节置换治疗偏瘫肢体股骨颈骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 865-870.
[5] 王宏宇. 固定与活动平台假体在全膝关节置换术中的应用价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 871-876.
[6] 李善武, 叶永杰, 王兵, 王子呓, 银毅, 孙官军, 张大刚. 胫骨高位截骨与单髁置换的早期疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 882-888.
[7] 李辉, 吴奇, 张子琦, 张晗, 王仿, 许鹏. 日间全膝关节置换术早期疗效及标准化流程探索[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 889-892.
[8] 中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组, 广东省医学会骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病分会, 广东省佛山市顺德区第三人民医院. 中国髋部脆性骨折术后抗骨质疏松药物临床干预指南(2023年版)[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 751-764.
[9] 李凤仪, 李若凡, 高旭, 张超凡. 目标导向液体干预对老年胃肠道肿瘤患者术后血流动力学、胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 29-32.
[10] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[11] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[12] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[13] 单秋洁, 孙立柱, 徐宜全, 王之霞, 徐妍, 马浩, 刘田田. 中老年食管癌患者调强放射治疗期间放射性肺损伤风险模型构建及应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 388-393.
[14] 郭震天, 张宗明, 赵月, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 齐晖, 田坤. 机器学习算法预测老年急性胆囊炎术后住院时间探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 955-961.
[15] 李岩松, 李涛, 张元鸣飞, 李志鹏, 周谋望. 头戴式虚拟现实设备辅助全膝关节置换术后康复的初步研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 676-681.
阅读次数
全文


摘要