活动平台膝关节单髁置换术后蹲起活动的运动生物力学

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2021.05.003

目的

对活动平台膝关节单髁置换术(UKA)后中远期患者膝关节的高载荷高屈曲度活动进行运动学特性和力矩分析，以评估UKA疗效、指导术后康复进程和预期并发症。

方法

本研究是临床队列研究。选取2016年6月至2018年6月收入西安交通大学第二附属医院行初次单侧内侧间室膝关节单髁置换手术患者，纳入经影像学诊断Kellgren & Lawrence分级1或2级)，排除下肢创伤、肿瘤、身体质量指数(BMI)≥26及有并发症(假体松动、感染、对侧骨关节炎进展)等病例，术后定期(12、18、24个月)随访复查并筛选功能康复状态稳定患者26例入组。应用VICON T40三维运动分析系统和AMTI压力反馈系统测量UKA患者自然下蹲动作模式下的运动学和力矩参数。同时入组健康人群22例作为对照组，双尾t检验比较UKA术后与健康肢体的蹲起模式差异。

结果

术后平均随访时间为(24.4±1.5)个月。术后一年期UKA患肢膝关节最大内翻角度(21.20±2.30)°，最大胫骨内旋角度(16.90±1.80)°，伸膝力矩峰值(0.310±0.040)N/kg，内旋力矩峰值(0.020±0.008)N/kg，均较健侧肢体和健康人群有明显降低(t＝2.6，P<0.05)，而内翻力矩峰值(1.220±0.050)N/kg较健侧肢体和健康人群有明显升高( t＝7.9，P<0.05)。

结论

活动平台UKA在改善患侧膝关节最大屈曲角度和伸膝力矩的同时对健侧肢体的生物力学指标无明显影响。术后早期患肢深度屈曲时伸肌力矩减少，内收肌力矩增加。随康复时间增加UKA患膝的活动度和伸肌力矩趋近于健康肢体，对中、长期理想的康复结果有积极的预测意义。

关键词: 关节成形术，置换，膝, 生物力学现象, 动力学, 功能恢复

Objective

To analyze knee kinematic and kinetic parameters after mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) during postoperative squatting-standing activity, so as to evaluate the efficacy of UKA, guide the process of postoperative rehabilitation and predict complications.

Methods

This study was a clinical cohort study. Thirty-one patients were admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University from June 2016 to June 2018 diagnosed with medial knee OA with primary UKA were followed up. After case screening, Kellgren & Lawrence stage one or two, lower limb trauma, tumor, excessive body mass index (BMI), and other complications were excluded, then 26 patients were recruited to take gait tests. Squatting-standing activities were performed under the test of Vicon T40 10-Camera Motion Analysis System and Advanced Medical Technology Incorporated (AMTI) force plates preoperatively at different stages after UKA (12, 18, 24 months). Twenty-two healthy subjects were enrolled as the control group, and the difference of squatting pattern between the healthy group and the UKA patients was compared by double-tail t test.

Results

The average duration of follow-up was (24.4±1.5)months. At one year follow-up, the peak values of varus angle (21.20±2.30) °, internal rotation angle (16.90±1.80) °, the torques of knee extension (0.310±0.040) N/kg and internal rotation (0.020±0.008) N/kg of the UKA knees were inferior to contralateral knees. The peak adductor moment (1.220±0.050) N/kg was superior to the contralateral knees.

Conclusions

Mobile UKA can improve the ROM and torques of the involved knee and don’t affect the biomechanical indicators of healthy limbs. OA knees show decreased torque of knee extension and increased torque of knee adduction during active deep flexion activity in early postoperative period. With rehabilitation time elongation, the patients can achieve better range of motion and more natural torques of knee extension and adduction, which may predict ideal functional outcome in medium and long terms.

Key words: Arthroplasty, replacement, knee, Biomechanical phenomena, Kinetics, Recovery of function

图1 入组患者全身外挂式步态标记(plug-in gait marker)

图2 完整蹲起动作周期模式示意图

表1 入组对象基本临床资料统计表

分组	例数	男/女(例)	患肢(左/右)	年龄[岁，(±s)]	身高(m)	体重[kg，(±s)]	BMI[kg/m²，(±s)]
UKA	26	10/16	9/17	66.00±4.00	1.63±0.11	66.40±10.10	24.70±0.80
正常组	22	10/12	-	32.00±7.00	1.68±0.12	68.20±10.60	24.30±0.90
统计值		χ²＝0.315	-	t＝21.50	t＝-1.57	t＝-0.63	t＝1.69
P值		>0.05	-	<0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05
分组	例数	下肢长度[cm，(±s]		膝宽[cm，(±s)]		有支撑蹲起动作完成时间[s，(±s)]	无支撑蹲起动作完成时间[s，(±s)]
分组	例数	健侧	患侧	健侧	患侧	有支撑蹲起动作完成时间[s，(±s)]	无支撑蹲起动作完成时间[s，(±s)]
UKA	26	78.40±2.90	77.80±3.20	10.50±4.00	10.40±5.00	4.30±0.25	4.00±0.28
正常组	22	79.60±2.40	-	10.50±5.00	-	3.20±0.18	3.90±0.22
统计值		F＝2.68	-	F＝0.39	-	t＝-17.2	t＝0.39
P值		>0.05	-	>0.05	-	<0.05	>0.05

表1 入组对象基本临床资料统计表

分组	例数	男/女(例)	患肢(左/右)	年龄[岁，(±s)]	身高(m)	体重[kg，(±s)]	BMI[kg/m²，(±s)]
UKA	26	10/16	9/17	66.00±4.00	1.63±0.11	66.40±10.10	24.70±0.80
正常组	22	10/12	-	32.00±7.00	1.68±0.12	68.20±10.60	24.30±0.90
统计值		χ²＝0.315	-	t＝21.50	t＝-1.57	t＝-0.63	t＝1.69
P值		>0.05	-	<0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05
分组	例数	下肢长度[cm，(±s]		膝宽[cm，(±s)]		有支撑蹲起动作完成时间[s，(±s)]	无支撑蹲起动作完成时间[s，(±s)]
分组	例数	健侧	患侧	健侧	患侧	有支撑蹲起动作完成时间[s，(±s)]	无支撑蹲起动作完成时间[s，(±s)]
UKA	26	78.40±2.90	77.80±3.20	10.50±4.00	10.40±5.00	4.30±0.25	4.00±0.28
正常组	22	79.60±2.40	-	10.50±5.00	-	3.20±0.18	3.90±0.22
统计值		F＝2.68	-	F＝0.39	-	t＝-17.2	t＝0.39
P值		>0.05	-	>0.05	-	<0.05	>0.05

表2 术后一年期随访各组角度峰值及达峰时间比较(±s)

组别	例数	角度峰值(°)			角度达峰值时间(s)
组别	例数	屈曲角度	内翻角度	内旋角度	屈曲峰时	内翻峰时	内旋峰时
健康人群	22	135.80±3.20	24.80±3.70	18.30±1.90	2.05±0.22	2.01±0.21	1.52±0.19
UKA患肢	26	118.60±2.70^a	21.20±2.30^a	16.90±1.80^a	1.48±0.18^a	1.75±0.20^a	1.14±0.17^a
UKA健肢	26	119.10±2.90^b	25.30±3.10^c	18.80±2.00^c	1.46±0.19^b	1.71±0.22^b	1.12±0.18^b
t值		20.2^a, 19.0^b	4.1^a，5.4^c	2.6^a，3.6^c	9.9^a，10.0^b	4.4^a，4.8^b	7.3^a，7.5^b
P值		<0.01^ab	<0.01^ac	0.012^a，<0.01^c	<0.01^ab	<0.01^ab	<0.01^ab

表2 术后一年期随访各组角度峰值及达峰时间比较(±s)

组别	例数	角度峰值(°)			角度达峰值时间(s)
组别	例数	屈曲角度	内翻角度	内旋角度	屈曲峰时	内翻峰时	内旋峰时
健康人群	22	135.80±3.20	24.80±3.70	18.30±1.90	2.05±0.22	2.01±0.21	1.52±0.19
UKA患肢	26	118.60±2.70^a	21.20±2.30^a	16.90±1.80^a	1.48±0.18^a	1.75±0.20^a	1.14±0.17^a
UKA健肢	26	119.10±2.90^b	25.30±3.10^c	18.80±2.00^c	1.46±0.19^b	1.71±0.22^b	1.12±0.18^b
t值		20.2^a, 19.0^b	4.1^a，5.4^c	2.6^a，3.6^c	9.9^a，10.0^b	4.4^a，4.8^b	7.3^a，7.5^b
P值		<0.01^ab	<0.01^ac	0.012^a，<0.01^c	<0.01^ab	<0.01^ab	<0.01^ab

表3 术后1年期随访各组力矩峰值及达峰时间比较(±s)

组别	例数	标准化力矩峰值(N/kg)			力矩达峰值时间(s)
组别	例数	伸膝力矩	内翻力矩	内旋力矩	伸膝力矩	内翻力矩	内旋力矩
健康人群	22	0.450±0.040	1.160±0.040	0.100±0.009	2.480±0.290	2.100±0.250	1.740±0.230
UKA患肢	26	0.310±0.040^a	1.220±0.050	0.020±0.008	2.720±0.300	1.780±0.240	1.110±0.200
UKA健肢	26	0.360±0.050^b	1.130±0.030^bc	0.070±0.010^bc	3.180±0.270^bc	1.750±0.290^b	1.300±0.180^bc
t值		12.1^a，6.8^b	3.0^b，7.9^c	10.8^b，19.9^c	8.7^b，5.8^c	4.4^b	7.4^b，3.8^c
P值		<0.01^ab	<0.01^bc	<0.01^bc	<0.01^ab	<0.01^b	<0.01^bc

表3 术后1年期随访各组力矩峰值及达峰时间比较(±s)

组别	例数	标准化力矩峰值(N/kg)			力矩达峰值时间(s)
组别	例数	伸膝力矩	内翻力矩	内旋力矩	伸膝力矩	内翻力矩	内旋力矩
健康人群	22	0.450±0.040	1.160±0.040	0.100±0.009	2.480±0.290	2.100±0.250	1.740±0.230
UKA患肢	26	0.310±0.040^a	1.220±0.050	0.020±0.008	2.720±0.300	1.780±0.240	1.110±0.200
UKA健肢	26	0.360±0.050^b	1.130±0.030^bc	0.070±0.010^bc	3.180±0.270^bc	1.750±0.290^b	1.300±0.180^bc
t值		12.1^a，6.8^b	3.0^b，7.9^c	10.8^b，19.9^c	8.7^b，5.8^c	4.4^b	7.4^b，3.8^c
P值		<0.01^ab	<0.01^bc	<0.01^bc	<0.01^ab	<0.01^b	<0.01^bc

图3 各组角度和力矩的蹲起动作时相图。图A~C分别为屈曲、内翻、内旋角度的蹲起动作时相图；图D~F分别为屈曲、内翻、内旋力矩的蹲起动作时相图

图4 术后各阶段无支撑下蹲膝关节屈曲角度和伸膝力矩变化。图A为屈伸力矩随康复时间变化箱形图；图B为屈伸力矩随康复时间变化相关分析；图C为屈曲角度随康复时间变化的箱形图；图D为屈曲角度随康复时间变化的相关分析

[1]	Englund M, Turkiewicz A. Osteoarthritis increasingly common public disease[J]. Lakartidningen, 2014, 111(21):930-931.
[2]	Giwnewer U, Rubin G, Orbach H, et al. Treatment for osteoarthritis of the knee[J]. Harefuah, 2016, 155(7):403-406.
[3]	Schindler OS, Scott WN, Scuderi GR. The practice of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the United Kingdom[J]. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 2010, 18(3):312-319.
[4]	Halawi MJ, Barsoum WK. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty: key concepts[J]. J Clin Orthop Trauma, 2017, 8(1):11-13.
[5]	Iacono F, Raspugli GF, Akkawi I, et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients over 75 years: a definitive solution？[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2016, 136(1):117-123.
[6]	Biazzo A, Manzotti A, Confalonieri N. Bi-unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty: long term results[J]. Acta Orthop Belg, 2018, 84(3):237-244.
[7]	Fuchs S, Tibesku CO, Frisse D, et al. Quality of life and gait after unicondylar knee prosthesis are inferior to age-matched control subjects[J]. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2003, 82(6):441-446.
[8]	Webster KE, Wittwer JE, Feller JA. Quantitative gait analysis after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2003, 18(6):751-759.
[9]	Xue H, Tu Y, Ma T, et al. Up to twelve year follow-up of the Oxford phase three unicompartmental knee replacement in China: seven hundred and eight knees from an independent centre[J]. Int Orthop, 2017, 41(8):1571-1577.
[10]	Jones GG, Kotti M, Wiik AV, et al. Gait comparison of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasties with healthy controls[J]. Bone Joint J, 2016, 98-B(10 Supple B):16-21.
[11]	Garner A, Dandridge O, Amis AA, et al. The extensor efficiency of unicompartmental, bicompartmental, and total knee arthroplasty[J]. Bone Joint Res, 2021, 10(1):1-9.
[12]	Simpson D J, Gray H, D’lima D, et al. The effect of bearing congruency, thickness and alignment on the stresses in unicompartmental knee replacements[J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2008, 23(9):1148-1157.
[13]	Favre J, Jolles BM. Gait analysis of patients with knee osteoarthritis highlights a pathological mechanical pathway and provides a basis for therapeutic interventions[J]. EFORT Open Rev, 2016, 1(10):368-374.
[14]	Catani F, Benedetti MG, Bianchi L, et al. Muscle activity around the knee and gait performance in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty patients: a comparative study on fixed-and mobile-bearing designs[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2012, 20(6):1042-1048.
[15]	Fu YC, Simpson KJ, Brown C, et al. Knee moments after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty during stair ascent[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014, 472(1):78-85.
[16]	Li Y, Kakar RS, Fu YC, et al. Knee strength, power and stair performance of the elderly 5 years after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2018, 28(7):1411-1416.
[17]	Wiik AV, Aqil A, Tankard S, et al. Downhill walking gait pattern discriminates between types of knee arthroplasty: improved physiological knee functionality in UKA versus TKA[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2015, 23(6):1748-1755.
[18]	Heyse TJ, Tucker SM, Rajak Y, et al. Frontal plane stability following UKA in a biomechanical study[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2015, 135(6):857-865.
[19]	Fry AC, Smith JC, Schilling BK. Effect of knee position on hip and knee torques during the barbell squat[J]. J Strength Cond Res, 2003, 17(4):629-633.
[20]	Saragaglia D, Bonnin M, Dejour D, et al. Results of a French multicentre retrospective experience with four hundred and eighteen failed unicondylar knee arthroplasties[J]. Int Orthop, 2013, 37(7):1273-1278.

[1]	魏淑婕, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 张白, 颜燕红, 周鹏, 黄亚波. 单侧颈内动脉闭塞患者行颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥术的脑血流动力学评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(10): 1046-1055.
[2]	闫文, 谢兴文, 顾玉彪, 雷宁波, 马成, 于文霞, 高亚雄, 张磊. 微小RNA与全膝关节置换术后深静脉血栓的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 842-846.
[3]	王宏宇. 固定与活动平台假体在全膝关节置换术中的应用价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 871-876.
[4]	李善武, 叶永杰, 王兵, 王子呓, 银毅, 孙官军, 张大刚. 胫骨高位截骨与单髁置换的早期疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 882-888.
[5]	李辉, 吴奇, 张子琦, 张晗, 王仿, 许鹏. 日间全膝关节置换术早期疗效及标准化流程探索[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 889-892.
[6]	邓华梅, 袁札根, 曾德荣, 潘珊珊, 张葆青, 欧爱华, 曹学伟. 全膝关节置换术中气压止血带应用效果与影响因素分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 788-794.
[7]	董红华, 郭艮春, 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤. 骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.
[8]	张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[9]	姚轶超, 张麒, 滕海茂, 黄攀, 吴雷涛, 韩哲. 膝关节置换术后恐动症与康复效果及社会支持的相关性[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 613-618.
[10]	樊绪国, 赵永刚. 全膝关节置换术中髌骨轨迹的研究进展及处理策略[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 701-707.
[11]	刘伦, 王云鹭, 李锡勇, 韩鹏飞, 张鹏, 李晓东. 机器人辅助膝关节单髁置换术的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 715-721.
[12]	王桂冠, 徐杰. 运动学对线在全膝关节置换术中的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 726-731.
[13]	杨依琴, 何敏仪, 杜桂菊, 刘欣, 詹文英. 膝关节置换术后康复应用基于保护动机理论的健康教育[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 741-746.
[14]	李凤仪, 李若凡, 高旭, 张超凡. 目标导向液体干预对老年胃肠道肿瘤患者术后血流动力学、胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 29-32.
[15]	李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Biomechanical properties of knee after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty during squatting and standing up

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Biomechanical properties of knee after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty during squatting and standing up