切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02) : 151 -156. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2021.02.004

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

穿桌侧位片及骨盆正位片测量髋臼杯前倾角的对比
张文辉1, 许杰1, 李登1, 孙浩1, 蔡志清1, 陈镁仪1, 马若凡1,()   
  1. 1. 510120 广州,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院关节外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-23 出版日期:2021-04-01
  • 通信作者: 马若凡
  • 基金资助:
    广州市科技计划项目(201803010011); 广东省自然科学基金项目(2018A030310231); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(18zxxt61); 广东省基础与应用基础研究基金(2019A1515011647)

Comparative study of cross-table and anteroposterior radiographs in measurement of acetabular cup anteversion after total hip arthroplasty

Wenhui Zhang1, Jie Xu1, Deng Li1, Hao Sun1, Zhiqing Cai1, Meiyi Chen1, Ruofan Ma1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Joint Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China
  • Received:2020-06-23 Published:2021-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Ruofan Ma
引用本文:

张文辉, 许杰, 李登, 孙浩, 蔡志清, 陈镁仪, 马若凡. 穿桌侧位片及骨盆正位片测量髋臼杯前倾角的对比[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 151-156.

Wenhui Zhang, Jie Xu, Deng Li, Hao Sun, Zhiqing Cai, Meiyi Chen, Ruofan Ma. Comparative study of cross-table and anteroposterior radiographs in measurement of acetabular cup anteversion after total hip arthroplasty[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(02): 151-156.

目的

分析穿桌侧位片(CL)与骨盆正位片(AP)测量髋臼假体前倾角的一致性及可靠性差异。

方法

回顾性分析2014年5月至2017年7月期间于中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院接受单侧初次全髋关节置换术并于术后第1天进行了CL及AP拍摄的患者,排除有脊柱或骨盆相关疾病或手术史及一期行双侧髋关节置换术的患者,共纳入100例,其中男46例,女54例,平均年龄(54±13)岁。3名独立的对患者资料不知情的测量者分别在CL及AP上进行髋臼杯前倾角测量,使用组内相关系数(ICC)和95%置信区间(CI)评估AP和CL测量值的可靠性,均值、标准差和95%置信区间(CI)用于对两组测量值进行统计描述。

结果

CL与AP均具有较高的组内和组间ICC,但CL相对更高。CL平均髋臼假体前倾为(17.5±5.3)°,AP为(15.9±9.7)°;CL与AP均值的ICC= 0.723[95%CI (0.588, 0.813)],差值几乎均在95%一致性界限内(-15.9 ~ 12.7),平均差值为-1.6。差值较大的26例中有17例术后30 d AP上闭孔高度及髋臼前倾角较术后1 d及术前发生较大变化。另外发现一例AP显示倾斜方向不明,而CL显示倾斜方向与CT一致。

结论

CL与AP测量髋臼杯前倾角具有良好的一致性,CL在测量可靠性、臼杯倾斜方向判定上更具有优势。两种方法测量时均需考虑到骨盆前倾角的影响。

Objective

To determine the consistency and reliability between cross-table lateral radiograph (CL) and anteroposterior radiograph (AP) in measuring acetabular cup anteversion.

Methods

Patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty and examinations of CL and AP one day after the surgery in Sun Yat Sen Memorial Hospital from May 2014 to July 2017 were eligible for inclusion in this study. Those who had spinal or pelvic diseases or surgical history and received bilateral hip arthroplasty were excluded. A total of 100 patients were evaluated. The patients comprised 46 men and 54 women with a mean age of (54±13) years. Acetabular cup anteversion was measured on CL and AP by three independent blind observers. The consistency and reliability of AP and CL measurements were evaluated using mean value, standard deviation, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

Both CL and AP had high intra-and inter-observer ICC, but relatively higher CL. The acetabular cup anteversion of the CL group was (17.5±5.3)°, and was(15.9±9.7)° of the AP group. There was good agreement [ICC= 0.723, 95% CI (0.588, 0.813)] between CL and AP, with an average difference of -1.6 and 95% limits of agreement was -15.9 to 12.7. Among 17 of 26 cases with large difference, the obturator height and acetabular anteversion on AP taken at 30 days after operation were significantly different from those at one day after operation and before operation. In another case, the version direction of the acetabular cup shown on AP was unknown, while the one shown on CL was clear and consistent with CT.

Conclusion

There is a good agreement between CL and AP in measuring the anteversion of acetabular cup, and CL has more advantages in the reliability of measurement and the ability to distinguish anteversion and retroversion, but the effect of pelvic tilt should be taken into account in both methods.

图1 髋臼杯前倾角的测量方法。图A为骨盆正位片的测量方法,前倾角由公式[Version= arcsin(r/R)]计算得出,r为臼杯开口椭圆投影短轴长度,R为长轴长度;图B为穿桌侧位片的测量方法,前倾角为臼杯开口边缘的切线与平片垂直线之间的夹角;图C为CT的测量方法,前倾角为臼杯最大直径所在水平层面上,两侧坐骨支连线的垂线与髋臼假体前后缘连线的夹角
图2 AP组和CL组测量值的Bland-Altman图
图3 AP组及CL组测量值的散点图
图4 髋关节置换术前、术后1 d和术后30 d骨盆正位片上闭孔高度及髋臼杯前倾角的变化。图A为术前的骨盆正位X线片,示双侧闭孔高度分别为26.35 mm(左)、28.47 mm(右);图B为术后1 d的骨盆正位X线片,示双侧闭孔高度分别为26.48 mm(左)、27.85 mm(右),较术前变化不明显,测得髋臼杯前倾角为5.5°;图C为术后30 d的骨盆正位X线片,示双侧闭孔高度分别为31.20 mm(左)、35.12 mm(右),较术前和术后1 d增加明显,测得髋臼杯前倾角为9.4°,较术后1 d增加3.9°
图5 骨盆正位片与穿桌侧位片对臼杯倾斜方向判定能力的比较。图A为髋关节置换术后患者骨盆正位X线片,示右侧髋臼杯的前倾角为3.5°,但前后倾方向不能判断;图B为同一患者的穿桌侧位X线片,示右侧髋臼杯的前倾角为3.8°,髋臼杯向后倾斜;图C为该患者的CT横断面,示髋臼杯实际倾斜方向为后倾,与穿桌侧位片一致
[1]
Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, et al. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1978, 60(2): 217-220.
[2]
D′Lima DD, Urquhart AG, Buehler KO, et al. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2000, 82(3): 315-321.
[3]
Kennedy JG, Rogers WB, Soffe KE, et al. Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration[J]. J Arthroplasty, 1998, 13(5): 530-534.
[4]
Biedermann R, Tonin A, Krismer M, et al. Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: the effect of orientation of the acetabular component[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2005, 87(6): 762-769.
[5]
Ghelman B, Kepler CK, Lyman S, et al. CT outperforms radiography for determination of acetabular cup version after THA[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2009, 467(9): 2362-2370.
[6]
Komeno M, Hasegawa M, Sudo A, et al. Computed tomographic evaluation of component position on dislocation after total hip arthroplasty[J]. Orthopedics, 2006, 29(12): 1104-1108.
[7]
Ackland MK, Bourne WB, Uhthoff HK. Anteversion of the acetabular cup. Measurement of angle after total hip replacement[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1986, 68(3): 409-413.
[8]
Hassan DM, Johnston GH, Dust WN, et al. Radiographic calculation of anteversion in acetabular prostheses[J]. J Arthroplasty, 1995, 10(3): 369-372.
[9]
Pradhan R. Planar anteversion of the acetabular cup as determined from plain anteroposterior radiographs[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1999, 81(3): 431-435.
[10]
Widmer KH. A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2004, 19(3): 387-390.
[11]
Kosiyatrakul A, Luenam S, Chotanaphuti T. Measurement of acetabular cup anteversion with the circle theorem[J]. J Med Assoc Thai, 2009, 92 Suppl 6: S128-133.
[12]
Woo RY, Morrey BF. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1982, 64(9): 1295-1306.
[13]
Noback PC, Danoff JR, Herschmiller T, et al. Plain radiographs are a useful substitute for computed tomography in evaluating acetabular cup version[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2016, 31(10): 2320-2324.
[14]
Nishino H, Nakamura S, Arai N, et al. Accuracy and precision of version angle measurements of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2013, 28(9): 1644-1647.
[15]
Nunley RM, Keeney JA, Zhu J, et al. The reliability and variation of acetabular component anteversion measurements from cross-table lateral radiographs[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2011, 26(6 Suppl): 84-87.
[16]
Nomura T, Naito M, Nakamura Y, et al. An analysis of the best method for evaluating anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip replacement on plain radiographs[J]. Bone Joint J, 2014, 96-b(5): 597-603.
[17]
Yao L, Yao J, Gold RH. Measurement of acetabular version on the axiolateral radiograph[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1995, 316: 106-111.
[18]
Grammatopoulos G, Thomas GE, Pandit H, et al. The effect of orientation of the acetabular component on outcome following total hip arthroplasty with small diameter hard-on-soft bearings[J]. Bone Joint J, 2015, 97-b(2): 164-172.
[19]
Lazennec JY, Thauront F, Robbins CB, et al. Acetabular and femoral anteversions in standing position are outside the proposed safe zone after total hip arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2017, 32(11): 3550-3556.
[20]
Yun H, Murphy WS, Ward DM, et al. Effect of pelvic tilt and rotation on cup orientation in both supine and standing positions[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2018, 33(5): 1442-1448.
[21]
Kanazawa M, Nakashima Y, Arai T, et al. Quantification of pelvic tilt and rotation by width/height ratio of obturator foramina on anteroposterior radiographs[J]. Hip Int, 2016, 26(5): 462-467.
[22]
许杰,马若凡,丁悦,等. 骨盆体位性角度变化三维监测对髋关节置换的临床意义[J]. 岭南现代临床外科,2008, 8(6): 460-462.
[1] 刘涛, 樊保佑, 史仲举, 刘德荣, 王沛. 股骨距是一个容易被误解的人体结构[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 626-629.
[2] 李焕玺, 何淳诺, 田志敏, 周胜虎, 吴昊越, 张浩强. 全膝关节置换术后股骨远端假体周围骨折治疗现状[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 630-637.
[3] 王相迎, 杨长生, 曲铁兵. 固定平台单髁置换假体合适位置的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 638-645.
[4] 苏介茂, 齐岩松, 王永祥, 魏宝刚, 马秉贤, 张鹏飞, 魏兴华, 徐永胜. 关节镜手术在早中期膝骨关节炎治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 646-652.
[5] 郭艳波, 马亮, 李刚, 阎伟, 骆帝, 岳亮, 吴伟山. 全膝关节置换术后胫股关节脱位的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 658-671.
[6] 陈翠萍, 李佩君, 杜景榕, 谢青梅, 许一宁, 卓姝妤, 李晓芳. 互联网联合上门护理在老年全髋关节置换术后的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 676-681.
[7] 许银峰, 盛璞义, 余世明, 张阳春. 偏心性髋臼旋转截骨术治疗发育性髋关节发育不良[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 568-574.
[8] 陈晓玲, 钟永洌, 刘巧梨, 李娜, 张志奇, 廖威明, 黄桂武. 超高龄髋膝关节术后谵妄及心血管并发症风险预测[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 575-584.
[9] 马桥桥, 张传开, 郭开今, 蒋涛, 王子豪, 刘勇, 郝亮. 可降解止血粉减少初次全膝关节置换术失血量的研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 585-589.
[10] 丁莹莹, 宋恺, 金姬延, 田华. 机器人辅助膝髋关节置换术后精细化临床护理[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 553-557.
[11] 孔德铭, 刘铮, 李睿, 钱文伟, 王飞, 蔡道章, 柴伟. 人工智能辅助全髋关节置换三维术前规划准确性评价[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 431-438.
[12] 谢江燕, 王亚菲, 贺芳. 妊娠合并血栓性血小板减少性紫癜2例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 556-563.
[13] 房桂彬, 肖进, 傅光涛, 郑秋坚. 老年髋部骨折患者术后1年行走能力的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 273-280.
[14] 茹江英, 廖启宇, 温国洪, 潘思华, 刘栋, 张皓琛, 牛云飞. 直接前方入路和后外侧入路半髋关节置换治疗老年痴呆股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 287-293.
[15] 王松雷, 张贻良, 孟浩, 宋威, 白林晨, 袁心, 张辉. 股骨前髁预截骨髓外定位技术在全膝关节置换术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 811-819.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?