切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02) : 151 -156. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2021.02.004

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

穿桌侧位片及骨盆正位片测量髋臼杯前倾角的对比
张文辉1, 许杰1, 李登1, 孙浩1, 蔡志清1, 陈镁仪1, 马若凡1,()   
  1. 1. 510120 广州,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院关节外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-23 出版日期:2021-04-01
  • 通信作者: 马若凡
  • 基金资助:
    广州市科技计划项目(201803010011); 广东省自然科学基金项目(2018A030310231); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(18zxxt61); 广东省基础与应用基础研究基金(2019A1515011647)

Comparative study of cross-table and anteroposterior radiographs in measurement of acetabular cup anteversion after total hip arthroplasty

Wenhui Zhang1, Jie Xu1, Deng Li1, Hao Sun1, Zhiqing Cai1, Meiyi Chen1, Ruofan Ma1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Joint Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China
  • Received:2020-06-23 Published:2021-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Ruofan Ma
引用本文:

张文辉, 许杰, 李登, 孙浩, 蔡志清, 陈镁仪, 马若凡. 穿桌侧位片及骨盆正位片测量髋臼杯前倾角的对比[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 151-156.

Wenhui Zhang, Jie Xu, Deng Li, Hao Sun, Zhiqing Cai, Meiyi Chen, Ruofan Ma. Comparative study of cross-table and anteroposterior radiographs in measurement of acetabular cup anteversion after total hip arthroplasty[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(02): 151-156.

目的

分析穿桌侧位片(CL)与骨盆正位片(AP)测量髋臼假体前倾角的一致性及可靠性差异。

方法

回顾性分析2014年5月至2017年7月期间于中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院接受单侧初次全髋关节置换术并于术后第1天进行了CL及AP拍摄的患者,排除有脊柱或骨盆相关疾病或手术史及一期行双侧髋关节置换术的患者,共纳入100例,其中男46例,女54例,平均年龄(54±13)岁。3名独立的对患者资料不知情的测量者分别在CL及AP上进行髋臼杯前倾角测量,使用组内相关系数(ICC)和95%置信区间(CI)评估AP和CL测量值的可靠性,均值、标准差和95%置信区间(CI)用于对两组测量值进行统计描述。

结果

CL与AP均具有较高的组内和组间ICC,但CL相对更高。CL平均髋臼假体前倾为(17.5±5.3)°,AP为(15.9±9.7)°;CL与AP均值的ICC= 0.723[95%CI (0.588, 0.813)],差值几乎均在95%一致性界限内(-15.9 ~ 12.7),平均差值为-1.6。差值较大的26例中有17例术后30 d AP上闭孔高度及髋臼前倾角较术后1 d及术前发生较大变化。另外发现一例AP显示倾斜方向不明,而CL显示倾斜方向与CT一致。

结论

CL与AP测量髋臼杯前倾角具有良好的一致性,CL在测量可靠性、臼杯倾斜方向判定上更具有优势。两种方法测量时均需考虑到骨盆前倾角的影响。

Objective

To determine the consistency and reliability between cross-table lateral radiograph (CL) and anteroposterior radiograph (AP) in measuring acetabular cup anteversion.

Methods

Patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty and examinations of CL and AP one day after the surgery in Sun Yat Sen Memorial Hospital from May 2014 to July 2017 were eligible for inclusion in this study. Those who had spinal or pelvic diseases or surgical history and received bilateral hip arthroplasty were excluded. A total of 100 patients were evaluated. The patients comprised 46 men and 54 women with a mean age of (54±13) years. Acetabular cup anteversion was measured on CL and AP by three independent blind observers. The consistency and reliability of AP and CL measurements were evaluated using mean value, standard deviation, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

Both CL and AP had high intra-and inter-observer ICC, but relatively higher CL. The acetabular cup anteversion of the CL group was (17.5±5.3)°, and was(15.9±9.7)° of the AP group. There was good agreement [ICC= 0.723, 95% CI (0.588, 0.813)] between CL and AP, with an average difference of -1.6 and 95% limits of agreement was -15.9 to 12.7. Among 17 of 26 cases with large difference, the obturator height and acetabular anteversion on AP taken at 30 days after operation were significantly different from those at one day after operation and before operation. In another case, the version direction of the acetabular cup shown on AP was unknown, while the one shown on CL was clear and consistent with CT.

Conclusion

There is a good agreement between CL and AP in measuring the anteversion of acetabular cup, and CL has more advantages in the reliability of measurement and the ability to distinguish anteversion and retroversion, but the effect of pelvic tilt should be taken into account in both methods.

图1 髋臼杯前倾角的测量方法。图A为骨盆正位片的测量方法,前倾角由公式[Version= arcsin(r/R)]计算得出,r为臼杯开口椭圆投影短轴长度,R为长轴长度;图B为穿桌侧位片的测量方法,前倾角为臼杯开口边缘的切线与平片垂直线之间的夹角;图C为CT的测量方法,前倾角为臼杯最大直径所在水平层面上,两侧坐骨支连线的垂线与髋臼假体前后缘连线的夹角
图2 AP组和CL组测量值的Bland-Altman图
图3 AP组及CL组测量值的散点图
图4 髋关节置换术前、术后1 d和术后30 d骨盆正位片上闭孔高度及髋臼杯前倾角的变化。图A为术前的骨盆正位X线片,示双侧闭孔高度分别为26.35 mm(左)、28.47 mm(右);图B为术后1 d的骨盆正位X线片,示双侧闭孔高度分别为26.48 mm(左)、27.85 mm(右),较术前变化不明显,测得髋臼杯前倾角为5.5°;图C为术后30 d的骨盆正位X线片,示双侧闭孔高度分别为31.20 mm(左)、35.12 mm(右),较术前和术后1 d增加明显,测得髋臼杯前倾角为9.4°,较术后1 d增加3.9°
图5 骨盆正位片与穿桌侧位片对臼杯倾斜方向判定能力的比较。图A为髋关节置换术后患者骨盆正位X线片,示右侧髋臼杯的前倾角为3.5°,但前后倾方向不能判断;图B为同一患者的穿桌侧位X线片,示右侧髋臼杯的前倾角为3.8°,髋臼杯向后倾斜;图C为该患者的CT横断面,示髋臼杯实际倾斜方向为后倾,与穿桌侧位片一致
[1]
Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, et al. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1978, 60(2): 217-220.
[2]
D′Lima DD, Urquhart AG, Buehler KO, et al. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2000, 82(3): 315-321.
[3]
Kennedy JG, Rogers WB, Soffe KE, et al. Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration[J]. J Arthroplasty, 1998, 13(5): 530-534.
[4]
Biedermann R, Tonin A, Krismer M, et al. Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: the effect of orientation of the acetabular component[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2005, 87(6): 762-769.
[5]
Ghelman B, Kepler CK, Lyman S, et al. CT outperforms radiography for determination of acetabular cup version after THA[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2009, 467(9): 2362-2370.
[6]
Komeno M, Hasegawa M, Sudo A, et al. Computed tomographic evaluation of component position on dislocation after total hip arthroplasty[J]. Orthopedics, 2006, 29(12): 1104-1108.
[7]
Ackland MK, Bourne WB, Uhthoff HK. Anteversion of the acetabular cup. Measurement of angle after total hip replacement[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1986, 68(3): 409-413.
[8]
Hassan DM, Johnston GH, Dust WN, et al. Radiographic calculation of anteversion in acetabular prostheses[J]. J Arthroplasty, 1995, 10(3): 369-372.
[9]
Pradhan R. Planar anteversion of the acetabular cup as determined from plain anteroposterior radiographs[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1999, 81(3): 431-435.
[10]
Widmer KH. A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2004, 19(3): 387-390.
[11]
Kosiyatrakul A, Luenam S, Chotanaphuti T. Measurement of acetabular cup anteversion with the circle theorem[J]. J Med Assoc Thai, 2009, 92 Suppl 6: S128-133.
[12]
Woo RY, Morrey BF. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1982, 64(9): 1295-1306.
[13]
Noback PC, Danoff JR, Herschmiller T, et al. Plain radiographs are a useful substitute for computed tomography in evaluating acetabular cup version[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2016, 31(10): 2320-2324.
[14]
Nishino H, Nakamura S, Arai N, et al. Accuracy and precision of version angle measurements of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2013, 28(9): 1644-1647.
[15]
Nunley RM, Keeney JA, Zhu J, et al. The reliability and variation of acetabular component anteversion measurements from cross-table lateral radiographs[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2011, 26(6 Suppl): 84-87.
[16]
Nomura T, Naito M, Nakamura Y, et al. An analysis of the best method for evaluating anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip replacement on plain radiographs[J]. Bone Joint J, 2014, 96-b(5): 597-603.
[17]
Yao L, Yao J, Gold RH. Measurement of acetabular version on the axiolateral radiograph[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1995, 316: 106-111.
[18]
Grammatopoulos G, Thomas GE, Pandit H, et al. The effect of orientation of the acetabular component on outcome following total hip arthroplasty with small diameter hard-on-soft bearings[J]. Bone Joint J, 2015, 97-b(2): 164-172.
[19]
Lazennec JY, Thauront F, Robbins CB, et al. Acetabular and femoral anteversions in standing position are outside the proposed safe zone after total hip arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2017, 32(11): 3550-3556.
[20]
Yun H, Murphy WS, Ward DM, et al. Effect of pelvic tilt and rotation on cup orientation in both supine and standing positions[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2018, 33(5): 1442-1448.
[21]
Kanazawa M, Nakashima Y, Arai T, et al. Quantification of pelvic tilt and rotation by width/height ratio of obturator foramina on anteroposterior radiographs[J]. Hip Int, 2016, 26(5): 462-467.
[22]
许杰,马若凡,丁悦,等. 骨盆体位性角度变化三维监测对髋关节置换的临床意义[J]. 岭南现代临床外科,2008, 8(6): 460-462.
[1] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[2] 林文, 王雨萱, 许嘉悦, 王矜群, 王睿娜, 何董源, 樊沛. 人工关节置换登记系统的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 834-841.
[3] 闫文, 谢兴文, 顾玉彪, 雷宁波, 马成, 于文霞, 高亚雄, 张磊. 微小RNA与全膝关节置换术后深静脉血栓的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 842-846.
[4] 贺敬龙, 尚宏喜, 郝敏, 谢伟, 高明宏, 孙炜, 刘安庆. 重度类风湿关节炎患者行多关节置换术的临床手术疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 860-864.
[5] 孟繁宇, 周新社, 赵志, 裴立家, 刘犇. 侧位直接前方入路髋关节置换治疗偏瘫肢体股骨颈骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 865-870.
[6] 王宏宇. 固定与活动平台假体在全膝关节置换术中的应用价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 871-876.
[7] 李善武, 叶永杰, 王兵, 王子呓, 银毅, 孙官军, 张大刚. 胫骨高位截骨与单髁置换的早期疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 882-888.
[8] 李辉, 吴奇, 张子琦, 张晗, 王仿, 许鹏. 日间全膝关节置换术早期疗效及标准化流程探索[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 889-892.
[9] 中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组, 广东省医学会骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病分会, 广东省佛山市顺德区第三人民医院. 中国髋部脆性骨折术后抗骨质疏松药物临床干预指南(2023年版)[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 751-764.
[10] 陈山林, 魏绮珮, 刘畅. 腕关节假体:路在何方?[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 469-475.
[11] 吴香敏, 吴鹏. 超声引导下收肌管阻滞联合腘动脉与膝关节后囊间隙阻滞在老年患者全膝关节置换术中的应用效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 516-522.
[12] 中华医学会骨科分会关节学组. 中国髋、膝关节置换日间手术围手术期管理专家共识[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 321-332.
[13] 丁晨梦, 胡雪慧, 闫沛, 程乔. 髋部骨折术后患者居家康复体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 365-372.
[14] 付庆鹏, 邓晓强, 高伟, 姜福民, 范永峰, 吴海贺, 齐岩松, 包呼日查, 徐永胜. 新型股骨测量定位器在全膝关节置换术中的临床应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 980-987.
[15] 李岩松, 李涛, 张元鸣飞, 李志鹏, 周谋望. 头戴式虚拟现实设备辅助全膝关节置换术后康复的初步研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 676-681.
阅读次数
全文


摘要