切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (01) : 18 -22. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2021.01.004

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

前交叉韧带MRI异常患者单髁膝关节置换随访分析
吴颖斌1, 卢伟杰1,(), 郑冲2, 李之琛1, 陈东峰1, 唐林1, 潘恩豪1   
  1. 1. 510000 广州医科大学附属第一医院关节外科
    2. 441000 襄阳,湖北文理学院附属医院,襄阳市中心医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-11 出版日期:2021-02-01
  • 通信作者: 卢伟杰
  • 基金资助:
    广州市科学技术协会科普项目(K20190202029)

Follow-up analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with abnormal anterior cruciate ligament on MRI

Yingbin Wu1, Weijie Lu1,(), Chong Zheng2, Zhichen Li1, Dongfeng Chen1, Lin Tang1, Enhao Pan1   

  1. 1. Department of Joint Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510000, China
    2. Department of Orthopedics, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei Universty of Arts, Xiangyang 441000, China
  • Received:2019-09-11 Published:2021-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Weijie Lu
引用本文:

吴颖斌, 卢伟杰, 郑冲, 李之琛, 陈东峰, 唐林, 潘恩豪. 前交叉韧带MRI异常患者单髁膝关节置换随访分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 18-22.

Yingbin Wu, Weijie Lu, Chong Zheng, Zhichen Li, Dongfeng Chen, Lin Tang, Enhao Pan. Follow-up analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with abnormal anterior cruciate ligament on MRI[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(01): 18-22.

目的

探讨术前膝关节核磁共振(MRI)前交叉韧带(ACL)异常结果对单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)疗效影响。

方法

本研究采用t检验、秩和检验、方差分析等统计方法,回顾性分析广州医科大学附属第一医院关节外科2014年5月至2019年5月收治的单髁膝关节置换术治疗膝前内侧骨关节炎患者。纳入标准:确诊膝关节前内侧骨关节炎、膝关节MRI提示除内侧间室软骨磨损、ACL异常外结构正常、术中直视下仅前内侧软骨磨损且ACL功能完整。排除标准:多间室骨关节炎、类风湿关节炎、感染性关节炎。通过术前膝关节MRI结果上显示ACL的情况,分为ACL-MRI正常组、ACL-MRI异常组。共55例患者(61膝),其中26例(30膝)ACL完整,29例(31膝)ACL异常。对两组分别采用美国特种外科医院膝关节评分(HSS)、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)及膝关节活动度(ROM)对术前及末次随访时膝关节功能进行评估,并观察两组术后有无假体的松动、感染,垫片有无磨损、脱位等并发症。

结果

所有患者获得随访,随访最长时间5年,平均随访(21±17)个月。术后ACL-MRI正常组末次随访时HSS评分平均(75.9±7.6)分、VAS评分平均1.0(0.7,1.3)分、ROM平均(109.9±9.9)°;术后ACL-MRI异常组末次随访时HSS评分平均(77.7 ± 6.6)分、VAS平均0.8(0.6,1.1)分、ROM平均(108.0±10.6)°均较术前有明显改善。两组在膝关节活动度、膝关节HSS评分及疼痛评分上差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组在术后并发症上均未出现假体感染、松动、脂肪栓塞,垫片磨损、脱位等并发症。

结论

术前MRI显示ACL异常但术中未见ACL断裂、其功能良好者UKA术后短中期疗效好,长期结果尚需随访。

Objective

To investigate the incluence of abnormal anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) MRI on the efficacy of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

Methods

This study used statistical methods such as t test, rank sum test, and analysis of variance to retrospectively analyse the patients with anterior medial knee osteoarthritis treated by UKA admitted from May 2014 to May 2019 in the department of joint surgery of The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University.Inclusion criteria: diagnosed anteromedial knee osteoarthritis, knee MRI showed only medial compartment cartilage wear and ACL abnormality, intra-operative findings showed only anterior medial cartilage wear while ACL function was normal. Exclusion criteria: multi-compartment osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, infectious arthritis. The MRI results showed ACL conditions, which were divided into ACL-MRI normal group and ACL-MRI abnormal group. A total of 55 patients (61 knees), of which 26 cases (30 knees) had complete ACLs, and 29 cases (31 knees) had abnormal ACLs. For the two groups, the Hospital for Special Surgery knee score (HSS), visual analogue scale (VAS) and range of motion (ROM) were used to evaluate the knee joint functions before operation and the last follow-up situation after operation respectively.Whether the prosthesis was loosening or infected after the operation, and whether the gasket had abrasion, dislocation or other complications, were also observed.

Results

All the patients were followed up for the longest time of five years, with an average follow-up time of (21±17) months. At the last follow-up of normal ACL-MRI group after surgery, the average HSS score was(75.9 ± 7.6). The average VAS score was 1.0(0.7, 1.3), and the average ROM was (109.9±9.9)°. Postoperative ACL-MRI was abnormal at the last follow-up of the group. The average HSS score was(77.7 ± 6.6). The average VAS score was 0.8(0.6, 1.1), and the average ROM was(108.0±10.6)°. All the data were significantly improved compared with the preoperative scores. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in knee range of motion, knee HSS score and pain score (P>0.05). No complication such as prosthesis infection, loosening, fat embolism, gasket wear, or dislocation occurred in the two groups.

Conclusion

The patients with preoperative abnormal ACL MRI but the ACL is confirmed unbroken and good function during operation may have good short-term and mid-term effects after UKA, which still needs follow-up for the long-term results.

图1 左侧膝关节3.0T MRI平扫图像截图,可见ACL增粗、信号增高但未见松弛,符合ACL变性诊断
表1 两组患者术前临床指标比较(±s)
表2 两组患者手术前后各临床评分比较
[1]
Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill HS, et al. Unnecessary contraindications for mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacement[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2011, 93(5): 622-628.
[2]
Price AJ, Svard U. A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011, 469(1): 174-179.
[3]
Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill HS, et al. Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2011, 93(2): 198-204.
[4]
Sharpe I, Tyrrell PN, White SH. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment for unicompartmental knee replacement: a limited role[J]. Knee, 2001, 8(3): 213-218.
[5]
Disler DG, Mccauley TR, Kelman CG, et al. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo Mr imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard Mr imaging and arthroscopy[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1996, 167(1): 127-132.
[6]
Pandit H, Jenkins C, Barker K, et al. The Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement using a minimally-invasive approach[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2006, 88(1): 54-60.
[7]
马童,凃意辉.前交叉韧带在膝关节单髁置换术中作用的研究进展[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2012,6(4):612-616.
[8]
李显,赵力,王淑丽,等.前交叉韧带损伤的关节镜与MRI诊断分级研究[J/CD].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2011,3(1):61-65.
[9]
李润根,方小东,郭佑民.前交叉韧带黏液变性的研究现状[J].磁共振成像,2013,4(6):468-470.
[10]
Franklin JL, Rosenberg TD, Paulos LE, et al. Radiographic assessment of instability of the knee due to rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. A quadriceps-contraction technique[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1991, 73(3): 365-372.
[11]
Hurst JM, Berend KR, Morris MJ, et al. Abnormal preoperative MRI does not correlate with failure of UKA[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2013, 28(9, Supplement): 184-186.
[12]
Schultz RA, Miller DC, Kerr CS, et al. Mechanoreceptors in human cruciate ligaments. A histological study[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1984, 66(7): 1072-1076.
[13]
Ward TR, Burns AW, Gillespie MJ, et al. Bicruciate-stabilised total knee replacements produce more normal sagittal plane kinematics than posterior-stabilised designs[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2011, 93B(7): 907-913.
[14]
Kuipers BM, Kollen BJ, Bots PC, et al. Factors associated with reduced early survival in the Oxford phase III medial unicompartment knee replacement[J]. Knee, 2010, 17(1): 48-52.
[15]
Goodfellow JW, Kershaw CJ, Benson MK, et al. The Oxford knee for unicompartmental osteoarthritis. the first 103 cases[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1988, 70(5): 692-701.
[16]
Engh GA, Ammeen DJ. Unicondylar arthroplasty in knees with deficient anterior cruciate ligaments[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014, 472(1): 73-77.
[17]
Boissonneault A, Pandit H, Pegg E, et al. No difference in survivorship after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with or without an intact anterior cruciate ligament[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2013, 21(11): 2480-2486.
[18]
Volpin A, Kini SG, Meuffels DE. Satisfactory outcomes following combined unicompartmental knee replacement and anterior cruciate ligament Reconstruction[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2018, 26(9): 2594-2601.
[19]
张小林,李学坤,陈维亮,等.高场磁共振扫描前交叉韧带损伤分析[J].实用医学影像杂志,2015,16(1):84-85.
[20]
Trompeter AJ, Gill K, Appleton M, et al. Predicting anterior cruciate ligament integrity in patients with osteoarthritis[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2009, 17(6): 595-599.
[21]
Ghasem HM, Momen GM, Jaffari GR, et al. Diagnostic value of oblique coronal and oblique sagittal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears[J]. J Med Life, 2018, 11(4): 281-285.
[1] 丁建民, 秦正义, 张翔, 周燕, 周洪雨, 王彦冬, 经翔. 超声造影与普美显磁共振成像对具有高危因素的≤3 cm肝结节进行LI-RADS分类诊断的前瞻性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 930-938.
[2] 张莲莲, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳. 颈部血管超声在粥样硬化斑块易损性评估中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 816-821.
[3] 金鑫, 谢卯, 刘芸, 杨操, 杨述华, 许伟华. 个性化股骨导向器辅助初次全髋关节置换的随机对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 780-787.
[4] 邓华梅, 袁札根, 曾德荣, 潘珊珊, 张葆青, 欧爱华, 曹学伟. 全膝关节置换术中气压止血带应用效果与影响因素分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 788-794.
[5] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[6] 李培杰, 乔永杰, 张浩强, 曾健康, 谭飞, 李嘉欢, 王静, 周胜虎. 细菌培养阴性的假体周围感染诊治的最新进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 827-833.
[7] 林文, 王雨萱, 许嘉悦, 王矜群, 王睿娜, 何董源, 樊沛. 人工关节置换登记系统的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 834-841.
[8] 闫文, 谢兴文, 顾玉彪, 雷宁波, 马成, 于文霞, 高亚雄, 张磊. 微小RNA与全膝关节置换术后深静脉血栓的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 842-846.
[9] 吴香敏, 吴鹏. 超声引导下收肌管阻滞联合腘动脉与膝关节后囊间隙阻滞在老年患者全膝关节置换术中的应用效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 516-522.
[10] 韩宇, 张武, 李安琪, 陈文颖, 谢斯栋. MRI肝脏影像报告和数据系统对非肝硬化乙肝患者肝细胞癌的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 669-673.
[11] 中华医学会骨科分会关节学组. 中国髋、膝关节置换日间手术围手术期管理专家共识[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 321-332.
[12] 邱红生, 林树体, 梁朝莹, 劳世高, 何荷. 模拟现实步态训练对膝关节前交叉韧带损伤的功能恢复及对跌倒恐惧的影响[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 343-350.
[13] 钟广俊, 刘春华, 朱万森, 徐晓雷, 王兆军. MRI联合不同扫描序列在胃癌术前分期诊断及化疗效果和预后的评估[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 378-382.
[14] 付庆鹏, 邓晓强, 高伟, 姜福民, 范永峰, 吴海贺, 齐岩松, 包呼日查, 徐永胜. 新型股骨测量定位器在全膝关节置换术中的临床应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 980-987.
[15] 李岩松, 李涛, 张元鸣飞, 李志鹏, 周谋望. 头戴式虚拟现实设备辅助全膝关节置换术后康复的初步研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 676-681.
阅读次数
全文


摘要