切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (05) : 640 -642. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2020.05.022

所属专题: 文献

临床经验

利用胫骨滑移植骨进行胫距关节融合
王萌1,(), 战怀杰1, 逄增兴1   
  1. 1. 266400 青岛市黄岛区第三人民医院
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-09 出版日期:2020-10-01
  • 通信作者: 王萌

Tibiotalar arthrodesis with sliding graft of tibia

Meng Wang1,(), Huaijie Zhan1, Zengxing Pang1   

  1. 1. The Third People’s Hospital of Huangdao District, Qingdao 266400, China
  • Received:2020-03-09 Published:2020-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Meng Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Meng, Email:
引用本文:

王萌, 战怀杰, 逄增兴. 利用胫骨滑移植骨进行胫距关节融合[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(05): 640-642.

Meng Wang, Huaijie Zhan, Zengxing Pang. Tibiotalar arthrodesis with sliding graft of tibia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(05): 640-642.

目的

了解行胫骨滑移植骨的胫距关节融合效果。

方法

分析2015年1月至2018年12月在青岛市黄岛区第三人民医院骨科行胫距关节融合的病例资料。用疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS)和Mazur评分,评估踝关节融合后的疼痛及功能改善;并了解胫距关节融合情况和并发症情况。采用配对样本的Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行比较。

结果

根据纳入、排除标准,共纳入11例研究对象,术前VAS评分5~8分,术后18个月VAS评分1~3分,术后疼痛明显改善(Z=-2.684,P<0.05);术前Mazur评分21~77分,术后18个月Mazur评分69~86分,较术前明显改善(Z=-2.666,P<0.05)。术后12个月后,所有患者的胫距关节均融合,随访期间均未发现感染。有1例59岁的终末期骨关节炎患者术后出现外侧足背皮肤浅感觉减退。

结论

采用胫骨滑移植骨联合空心螺钉进行胫距关节融合对踝关节疼痛及功能改善明显,并发症少、融合率高。

Objective

To study the effect of tibiotalar arthrodesis with tibial sliding graft.

Methods

The data of patients who underwent tibiotalar arthrodesis in the orthopedics department of the Third People’s Hospital of Huangdao District from January 2015 to December 2018 were analyzed. The visual analogue scale (VAS) and Mazur score were used to evaluate the pain and functional improvement after ankle arthrodesis; and to study the incidence of tibiotalar fusion and complications, the Wilcoxon signed rank test of paired samples was used for comparison.

Results

According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 11 subjects were included. The preoperative VAS score was 5-8 and was 1-3 in 18 months after the operation, which showed significant improvement in postoperative pain (Z=-2.684, P<0.05). The Mazur score was 21-77 preoperatively while 69-86 in 18 months postoperatively, which was significantly improved (Z=-2.666, P<0.05). After 12 months of the operation, the tibiotalar joints of all the patients were fused successfully, and no infection was found during the follow-up period. A 59-year-old patient with end-stage osteoarthritis developed superficial sensation of the lateral dorsal skin after surgery.

Conclusion

The use of tibial sliding graft for tibiotalar arthrodesis can significantly improve the pain and function of the ankle joint, with fewer complications and high fusion rate.

表1 骨关节炎患者胫距关节融合术前与术后18个月评分比较[n=11, M(P25P75)]
[1]
Veljkovic A, Daniels TR, Glazebrook M, et al. Outcomes of total ankle replacement, arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis, and open ankle arthrodesis for isolated non-deformed end-stage ankle arthritis[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2019, 101(17): 1523-1529.
[2]
王旭,马昕,张超,等.踝关节置换术与踝关节融合术的临床应用趋势进展[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2014,8(4):524-526.
[3]
Klein SE, Putnam RM, Mccormick JJ, et al. The slot graft technique for foot and ankle arthrodesis in a high-risk patient group[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2011, 32(7): 686-692.
[4]
Whitehouse MR, Lankester BJ, Winson IG, et al. Bone graft harvest from the proximal tibia in foot and ankle arthrodesis surgery[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2006, 27(11): 913-916.
[5]
Patterson BM, Inglis AE, Moeckel BH. Anterior sliding graft for tibiotalar arthrodesis[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 1997, 18(6): 330-334.
[6]
Mazur JM, Schwartz E, Simon SR. Ankle arthrodesis. Long-term follow-up with gait analysis[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1979, 61(7):964-975.
[7]
王玉光,陆芸.踝关节骨关节炎治疗方法的临床回顾[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2016,10(1):77-80.
[8]
Alsayel F, Valderrabano V. Arthrodesis of a varus ankle[J]. Foot Ankle Clin, 2019, 24(2): 265-280.
[9]
Ferguson Z, Anugraha A, Janghir N, et al. Ankle arthrodesis: A long term review of the literature[J]. J Orthop, 2019, 16(5): 430-433.
[10]
Quayle J, Shafafy R, Khan MA, et al. Arthroscopic versus open ankle arthrodesis[J]. Foot Ankle Surg, 2018, 24(2): 137-142.
[11]
Jones CR, Wong E, Applegate GR, et al. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis: a 2-15 year follow-up study[J]. Arthroscopy, 2018, 34(5): 1641-1649.
[12]
武勇,孙宁,李莹,等.机器人辅助下胫距跟关节融合术治疗踝关节、距下关节骨关节炎一例报告[J].中华骨科杂志,2018,38(12):760-762.
[13]
Morash J, Walton DM, Glazebrook M. Ankle arthrodesis versus total ankle arthroplasty[J]. Foot Ankle Clin, 2017, 22(2): 251-266.
[14]
Abdo RV, Wasilewski S. Ankle arthrodesis: a long-term study[J]. Foot Ankle, 1992, 13(6): 307-312.
[1] 梁晓宗, 江吉勇, 李曼丹, 林海彬, 王昌义. 阔筋膜游离股前外侧穿支皮瓣修复足踝组织缺损[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 672-675.
[2] 杨占宇, 黄艳华, 马小迪, 冯安莹, 王旼娴, 龙青燕. 本体感觉训练对踝关节周围骨折患者步行能力的改善[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 477-483.
[3] 肖志满, 庄锡琪, 龚煜. 关节镜下Lasso-loop Gould术式治疗踝关节外侧不稳定的早期疗效[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 280-284.
[4] 刘瀚忠, 黄生辉, 万俊明, 李家春, 舒涛. 髌上入路和髌旁外侧入路髓内钉治疗胫骨骨折疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 795-801.
[5] 董红华, 郭艮春, 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤. 骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.
[6] 罗旺林, 杨传军, 许国星, 俞建国, 孙伟东, 颜文娟, 冯志. 开放性楔形胫骨高位截骨术不同植入材料的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 818-826.
[7] 夏传龙, 迟健, 丛强, 连杰, 崔峻, 陈彦玲. 富血小板血浆联合关节镜治疗半月板损伤的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 877-881.
[8] 郭杰坤, 王楹, 杨轩, 晏欢欣, 钟豪. Ilizarov 骨搬移技术在急诊一期修复GustiloⅢB 型胫骨长段开放粉碎性骨折的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 507-510.
[9] 贾杰, 王阳, 车凯薇, 高俊峰, 王聪, 李泽阳, 梁虎. 梭形针线扣技术与Krackow缝合法对跟腱止点或近止点断裂跟腱功能恢复的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 307-313.
[10] 苏永涛, 王春雷, 徐广琪, 关中正, 焦伟, 隋颖. 胫骨骨膜牵张术联合富血小板血浆对治疗糖尿病足溃疡的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(03): 238-244.
[11] 郭昆, 杨晓峰, 李传明. 双切口双钢板内固定治疗SchatzkerⅣ型以上复杂胫骨平台骨折的安全性及中远期预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 159-164.
[12] 陈博, 王庆帅, 张智乘, 李颖智. 外侧半月板后根修复对前交叉韧带重建后膝关节稳定性的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 19-27.
[13] 刘家伦, 连晓东, 王博, 周汇霖, 潘晓光, 李涛, 赵亮, 常恒瑞, 陈伟, 郑占乐. 应力分散角和SchatzkerⅡ、Ⅲ型胫骨平台骨折的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 28-32.
[14] 喻蓉, 周伟力, 雷青, 陈松, 陈立, 刘峰, 丁州, 阳宏奇, 王康, 王大鹏. 改良的内外侧环抱锁定钢板在复杂胫骨平台骨折治疗中的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 764-770.
[15] 赵峰, 邓默. 纤维蛋白原水平、踝肱指数与外周血管支架治疗下肢动脉硬化闭塞症后再狭窄的关系[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 144-151.
阅读次数
全文


摘要