切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (06) : 802 -807. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2023.06.007

临床论著

骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用
董红华, 郭艮春(), 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤   
  1. 224005 南通大学第六附属医院(盐城市第三人民医院)骨科
    224005 南通大学第六附属医院(盐城市第三人民医院)康复医学科
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-08 出版日期:2023-12-01
  • 通信作者: 郭艮春
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省中医药科技发展计划项目(YB201970); 盐城市重点研发计划(社会发展)指导性项目(YCBE202221)

Application of integrated orthopedic rehabilitation pathway in rapid rehabilitation of ankle fracture

Honghua Dong, Genchun Guo(), Lei Jiang, Xuefei Wu, Feixiang Ma, Haifeng Li   

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Hospital 6 of Nantong University (Yancheng Third People's Hospital), Yancheng 224005, China
    Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Hospital 6 of Nantong University (Yancheng Third People's Hospital), Yancheng 224005, China
  • Received:2023-03-08 Published:2023-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Genchun Guo
引用本文:

董红华, 郭艮春, 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤. 骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.

Honghua Dong, Genchun Guo, Lei Jiang, Xuefei Wu, Feixiang Ma, Haifeng Li. Application of integrated orthopedic rehabilitation pathway in rapid rehabilitation of ankle fracture[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.

目的

探讨骨科康复一体化模式对踝关节骨折中快速康复中的应用疗效。

方法

纳入2021年1月至2022年10月在南通大学第六附属医院就诊的83例踝关节骨折患者,排除合并肢体其他部位骨折或韧带损伤、踝关节畸形、陈旧性骨折、开放性骨折、心脑血管病患者及神经系统病变者,以随机数字表法分为一体化治疗组(n=41)和常规治疗组(n=42)。比较两组术前等待天数,住院天数,术前1 d、术后2 d、术后3 d踝关节围度,术前1 d、术后1 d和3 d疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS),术后1周、1个月、3个月踝关节(Baird-Jackson)评分及术后并发症发生率。采用独立样本t检验、重复测量方差分析、秩和检验、卡方检验进行统计学分析。

结果

一体化治疗组的术前等待天数及住院天数均短于常规治疗组(t=11.977、17.653,均为P<0.05)。术前1 d、术后2 、3 d两组患者踝围重复测量方差分析中时间、组间及交互效应均具有统计学意义(时间:F=681.232,组间:F=372.328,交互:F=9.894,均为P<0.05)。术前1 d、术后1、3 d两组患者VAS评分重复测量方差分析中时间、组间效应均具有统计学意义(时间:F =223.310,组间:F=17.532,均为P<0.05)。术后1周、1个月、3个月一体化治疗组的Baird-Jackson评分均高于常规治疗组(Z=-3.526、-5.627、-7.200,均为P<0.05);一体化治疗组并发症发生率低于常规治疗组,但差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.708,P>0.05)。

结论

骨科康复一体化模式能够明显减少术前踝关节肿胀程度,控制术后疼痛,缩短手术前等待的时间及平均住院日,提高踝关节功能的质量,优化了踝关节骨折术后快速康复路径。

Objective

To explore the effect of the integrated orthopedic rehabilitation pathway in rapid rehabilitation of ankle fracture.

Methods

From January 2021 to October 2022, 83 patients with ankle fracture in the orthopedic department of Affiliated Hospital 6 of Nantong University were enrolled. Exclusion criteria: other limb fractures or ligament injuries, ankle joint deformities, old fractures, open fractures, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, and nervous system diseases. The patients were divided into integrated treatment group (n=41) and conventional treatment group (n=42) by random number table method. The waiting days before operation, hospitalization days, ankle circumference one day before surgery, two and three days after surgery, the visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain one day before operation, one day and three days after operation, the Baird-Jackson scores of ankle joint one week, one and three months after operation, and the postoperative complications rate between the two groups were compared. Independent t test, repeated measures ANOVA, rank-sum test, and chi square test were performed for data analysis.

Results

The preoperative waiting days and hospitalization days in the integrated treatment group were significantly lower than those in the conventional treatment group (t =11.977, 17.653, both P<0.05). There were statistically significant differences in the time effect, inter group effect, and interaction effect in repeated measures ANOVA of ankle circumference with two groups of patients one day before surgery, two and three days after surgery (time: F=681.232, group: F=372.328, interaction: F=9.894, all P<0.05). There were statistically significant differences in the time effectand inter group effect in repeated measures ANOVA of VAS scores between the two groups of patients one day before surgery, one day and three days after surgery (time: F=223.310, group: F=17.532, both P<0.05). The Baird Jackson scores of the integrated treatment group were higher than those of the conventional treatment group at one week, one and three months after surgery (Z =-3.526、-5.627、-7.200, all P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the integrated treatment group was lower than that in the conventional treatment group, but the difference was not statistically significant(χ2=2.708, P>0.05).

Conclusion

The integrated orthopedic rehabilitation model can significantly reduce the degree of preoperative ankle swelling, control postoperative pain, shorten the waiting time before surgery and the average hospital stay, improve the quality of ankle function, reduce the risk of complications, and optimize the rapid rehabilitation path after ankle fracture surgery.

表1 患者一般资料
Table 1 General information of patients
表2 两组患者术前等待天数及住院天数[d,(±s)]
Table 2 Waiting days before surgery and length of hospital stay of two groups
表3 术前术后两组患者踝围[cm,(±s)]
Table 3 Ankle circumferences of two groups before and after surgery
表4 两组患者手术前后VAS评分[分,(±s)]
Table 4 VAS scores of two groups before and after surgery
表5 两组患者术后Baird-Jackson评分[分,M(P25P75)]
Table 5 Baird-Jackson scores after surgery of two groups
[1]
Egger AC, Berkowitz MJ. Operative treatment of the malunited Fibula fracture[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2018, 39(10): 1242-1252.
[2]
白求恩公益基金会创伤骨科专业委员会,中国医疗保健国际交流促进会加速康复外科学分会创伤骨科学组,李庭,等. ERAS理念下踝关节骨折诊疗方案优化的专家共识[J]. 中华骨与关节外科杂志2019, 12(1):3-12.
[3]
邱贵兴. 推出系列临床指南/专家共识推动中国骨科加速康复外科发展[J]. 中华骨与关节外科杂志2021, 14(4): 241-244.
[4]
陈强,张建明,罗振东,等. 快速康复外科理念在踝关节骨折治疗中的应用[J]. 中国中西医结合外科杂志2019, 25(1): 71-74.
[5]
王华国,邹仲兵,林伟鹏,等. 经皮螺钉内固定微创手术在踝关节骨折的短期疗效[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(2): 154-158.
[6]
Harris TG, Pyle CW. Challenges and controversies in foot and ankle trauma[J]. Instr Course Lect, 2021, 70: 139-162.
[7]
Huang Z, Zhang J, Di Z, et al. A comprehensive program for enhanced management of femoral neck fractures including an enhanced recovery after surgery program: a retrospective study[J/OL]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2021, 100(5): e24331. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024331.
[8]
Liu VX, Rosas E, Hwang J, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery program implementation in 2 surgical populations in an integrated health care delivery system[J/OL]. JAMA Surg, 2017, 152(7): e171032. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.1032.
[9]
李冉,杜巨豹,曹光磊,等. 骨科康复一体化模式对全膝关节置换术患者运动功能的效果[J]. 中国康复理论与实践2022, 28(2): 144-149.
[10]
Liu SY, Li C, Zhang PX. Enhanced recovery after surgery for hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J/OL]. Perioper Med, 2021, 10(1): 31. DOI: 10.1186/s13741-021-00201-8.
[11]
Chung MMT, Ng JKF, Ng FY, et al. Effects of enhanced recovery after surgery practices on postoperative recovery and length of stay after unilateral primary total hip or knee arthroplasty in a private hospital[J]. Hong Kong Med J, 2021, 27(6): 437-443.
[12]
张强,宋强,梁钰琪,等. 加速康复理念在全膝关节置换术中的应用研究[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(3): 295-300.
[13]
Li T, Sun ZJ, Zhou Y, et al. Perioperative protocol of ankle fracture and distal radius fracture based on enhanced recovery after surgery program: amulticenter prospective clinical controlled study[J/OL]. Pain Res Manag, 2022, 2022: 3458056. DOI: 10.1155/2022/3458056.
[14]
孙志坚,孙旭,孙伟桐,等. 加速康复外科理念下踝关节骨折与桡骨远端骨折诊疗方案优化的专家调查[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志2019, 21(10): 864-868.
[15]
Lu J, Xue M, Fu P, et al. Evaluation of open reduction of distal humerus fractures in children after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery program[J/OL]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2022, 23(1): 705. DOI:10.1186/s12891-022-05675-1.
[16]
Gelman D, Gelmanas A, Urbanaitė D, et al. Role of Multimodal Analgesia in the Evolving Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathways[J]. Medicina (Kaunas), 2018, 54(2): 20. DOI:10.3390/medicina54020020.
[17]
吴剑,陈俊,刘艳西,等. 快速康复外科理念在关节镜下治疗肩袖损伤中的应用[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(1): 102-106.
[18]
Kolaczko JG, McMellen CJ, Magister SJ, et al. Comparison of time to healing and major complications after surgical fixation of nondisplaced femoral neck stress fractures: a systematic review[J]. Injury, 2021, 52(4): 647-652.
[19]
Keene DJ, Costa ML, Tutton E, et al. Progressive functional exercise versus best practice advice for adults aged 50 years or over after ankle fracture: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial in the UK-the Ankle Fracture Treatment: enhancing Rehabilitation (AFTER) study[J/OL]. BMJ Open, 2019, 9(11): e030877. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030877.
[20]
Kaye AD, Urman RD, Cornett EM, et al. Enhanced recovery pathways in orthopedic surgery[J/OL]. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol, 2019, 35(Suppl 1): S35-S39. DOI:10.4103/joacp.JOACP_35_18.
[1] 刘嘉嘉, 王承华, 陈绪娇, 刘瑗玲, 王善钰, 屈海花, 张莉. 经阴道子宫-输卵管实时三维超声造影中患者疼痛发生情况及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 959-965.
[2] 吴畏, 吴永哲, 李宗倍, 崔宏力, 李华志, 许臣. 轻质大网孔补片腹腔镜下疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的疗效及炎症因子的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 70-73.
[3] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[4] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[5] 王敏, 蒋家斌, 李茂新. 预警宣教联合个性化疼痛管理对腹股沟疝手术患者的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 764-767.
[6] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[7] 朱青青, 卫贞祺. 腹股沟疝患者围手术期自我能效管理探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-777.
[8] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[9] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[10] 朱迪, 欧阳钒, 杨丹, 华敏, 吴倩. 双轨护理在老年腹股沟疝无张力修补术围手术期的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 630-634.
[11] 张汪, 徐淑英, 张爱华, 夏芬荣, 汪露. 手术室体温护理结合细节护理干预在老年腹股沟疝围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 635-638.
[12] 董玉花, 魏红花, 孔荷香, 周莉, 孙小花. 主动性个性化心理干预在成人腹股沟疝围手术期患者护理中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 652-656.
[13] 蓝冰, 王怀明, 王辉, 马波. 局部晚期结肠癌膀胱浸润的研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 505-511.
[14] 中华医学会骨科分会关节学组. 中国髋、膝关节置换日间手术围手术期管理专家共识[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 321-332.
[15] 付强, 秦丽媛, 李全波. 神经病理性疼痛患者血清miR-15a水平及意义分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 293-298.
阅读次数
全文


摘要