加速康复外科在全膝关节置换术中的随机对照研究

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2020.05.004

目的

通过临床随机对照研究，探讨加速康复外科(ERAS)在初次单侧人工全膝关节置换术中的应用效果。

方法

2016年1月至2018年1月，将南通大学附属建湖医院骨科88例拟定行人工全膝关节置换术患者纳入研究。纳入符合膝关节骨关节炎诊断标准，初次行全膝关节置换的患者；排除不符合诊断及纳入标准者。经随机余数法分组，其中44例采用ERAS围手术期方案(实验组)，44例采用传统围手术期方案(对照组)。对其进行临床评价，包括术后24 h血红蛋白及输血比例、住院时间(LOS)、术后并发症、术后24 h、1个月、6个月、12个月疼痛视觉模拟(VAS)评分、膝关节纽约特种外科医院(HSS)评分及膝关节活动度(ROM)。两组LOS、血红蛋白比较采用成组设计资料t检验，组内手术前后血红蛋白比较采用配对设计资料t检验，VAS评分、HSS评分、膝关节ROM的比较采用重复测量资料的方差分析，计数资料采用卡方检验或Fisher确切概率法。

结果

实验组术后24 h血红蛋白明显高于对照组，实验组输血比例、术后并发症发生率明显低于对照组，实验组LOS明显短于对照组。两组VAS评分、HSS评分、膝关节ROM的重复测量方差分析差异有统计学意义(VAS评分F＝9.87，P<0.001；HSS评分F＝10.98，P<0.001；ROM F＝9.94，P<0.001)，均为实验组优于对照组。分组上，术后24 h、1个月实验组和对照组的VAS评分的差异有统计学意义(t＝7.1392、3.9855，均为P<0.05)，术后24 h、1个月及6个月实验组和对照组的HSS评分和膝关节ROM的差异有统计学意义(HSS评分t＝6.6350、5.7948、3.5763，均为P<0.05；ROM t＝7.8032、3.9390、4.7654，均为P<0.05)，术后6个月及12个月实验组和对照组的VAS评分的差异不具有统计学意义(t＝0.5688、0.5180，均为P>0.05)，术后12个月实验组和对照组的HSS评分和膝关节ROM的差异不具有统计学意义(HSS评分t＝0.7687，P>0.05；ROM t＝0.9523，P>0.05)。时间上，实验组和对照组从手术前到术后12个月VAS评分呈降低趋势，实验组和对照组从手术前到术后12个月HSS评分和膝关节ROM呈升高趋势。

结论

ERAS理念干预下，患者初次单侧人工全膝关节置换术后失血少、住院时间短、并发症发生率低、术后短期疼痛轻，康复快，利于膝关节功能的早期恢复。

关键词: 加速康复外科, 关节成形术, 置换, 膝, 前瞻性研究

Objective

To investigate the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

From January 2016 to January 2018, 88 patients who underwent primary unilateral TKA from the orthopedic department of affiliated Jianhu Hospital of Nantong University were divided into two groups by random number method: ERAS group(experimental group, n=44)and routine group (control group, n=44). Inclusion criteria: the patients meet the diagnostic criteria for knee arthritis, and undergoing total knee replacement for the first time. Those who did not meet the diagnosis and inclusion criteria were excluded. Follow-up assessment included postoperative hemoglobin at 24 h after operation, blood transfusion ratio, length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications, visual analogue scale(VAS), the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score and knee range of motion (ROM) at 24 h, one month, six months and 12 months after the operation. Group design data t test was used to compare LOS and hemoglobin between the two groups. Paired design data t test was used to compare hemoglobin before and after operation in the two groups. Analysis of variance of repeated measurement data was used to compare VAS score, HSS score and ROM of knee joint. Chi-square test or Fisher exact probability method was used for counting data.

Results

The postoperative hemoglobin after 24 h in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group. The blood transfusion ratio and the incidence of complications in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group. The LOS in the experimental group was significantly shorter than that in the control group. The total difference of VAS score, HSS score, knee ROM between the two groups were statistically significant(VAS score F=9.87, HSS score F=10.98, ROM F=9.94, all P<0.001) which showed that the experimental group were better than the control group. In terms of grouping, the difference of VAS score between the experimental group and the control group was statistically significant at 24 h, and one month postoperatively(t=7.1392, 3.9855, both P<0.05). The difference of HSS score and ROM of knee joint between the experimental group and the control group was statistically significant at 24h, one month, and six months postoperatively(HSS score t=6.6350, 5.7948, 3.5763, all P<0.05; ROM t=7.8032, 3.9390, 4.7654, all P<0.05). The difference of VAS score between the experimental group and the control group was not statistically significant at six and 12 months postoperatively(t=0.5688, 0.5180, both P>0.05). The HSS score and ROM of knee joint between the experimental group and the control group was not statistically significant at 12 months postoperatively(HSS t=0.7687, ROM t=0.9523, both P>0.05). In terms of time, the VAS score of the experimental group and the control group decreased from pre-operation to 12 months after operation, and the HSS score and ROM of the knee joint of the experimental group and the control group increased from pre-operation to 12 months after operation.

Conclusion

The application of ERAS in primary unilateral TKA can reduce blood loss and the incidence of complications, shorten hospital stay, cause less short-term pain after operation, and achieve faster recovery, which is beneficial to the early recovery of knee joint function.

Key words: Enhanced recovery after surgery, Arthroplasty, replacement, knee, Prospective studies

表1 两组患者术前临床资料比较

组别	例数	男/女(例)	年龄[岁，(±s)]	左/右(例)	血红蛋白[g/L，(±s)]	VAS评分(±s)	HSS评分(±s)	ROM[°，(±s)]
实验组	44	10/34	68.7±6.0	8/36	140.9±7.3	7.2±1.1	38.3±4.1	61.9±8.8
对照组	44	12/32	70.0±5.9	10/34	140.5±6.5	7.1±1.0	38.2±3.9	61.5±9.0
统计值		χ²＝0.2424	t＝1.0248	χ²＝0.2794	t＝0.2715	t＝0.4462	t＝0.1172	t＝0.2108
P值		>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05

表1 两组患者术前临床资料比较

组别	例数	男/女(例)	年龄[岁，(±s)]	左/右(例)	血红蛋白[g/L，(±s)]	VAS评分(±s)	HSS评分(±s)	ROM[°，(±s)]
实验组	44	10/34	68.7±6.0	8/36	140.9±7.3	7.2±1.1	38.3±4.1	61.9±8.8
对照组	44	12/32	70.0±5.9	10/34	140.5±6.5	7.1±1.0	38.2±3.9	61.5±9.0
统计值		χ²＝0.2424	t＝1.0248	χ²＝0.2794	t＝0.2715	t＝0.4462	t＝0.1172	t＝0.2108
P值		>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05	>0.05

表2 两组患者手术后24 h血红蛋白、输血比例和住院时间比较

组别	例数	术后24 h血红蛋白[g/L，(±s)]	输血人数(例)	住院时间[d，(±s)]
实验组	44	114.0±12.4	2	7.6±1.5
对照组	44	101.2±18.2	8	9.6±2.0
统计值		t′＝3.8554	χ²＝4.0615	t＝5.3066
P值		<0.001	<0.05	<0.001

表2 两组患者手术后24 h血红蛋白、输血比例和住院时间比较

组别	例数	术后24 h血红蛋白[g/L，(±s)]	输血人数(例)	住院时间[d，(±s)]
实验组	44	114.0±12.4	2	7.6±1.5
对照组	44	101.2±18.2	8	9.6±2.0
统计值		t′＝3.8554	χ²＝4.0615	t＝5.3066
P值		<0.001	<0.05	<0.001

表3 两组患者手术前后VAS评分、HSS评分和ROM比较(±s)

组别	时间点	VAS评分	HSS评分	ROM(°)
	手术前	7.2±1.1	38.3±4.1	61.9±8.8
	术后24 h	4.0±1.0	59.1±6.1	80.9±5.6
实验组	术后1个月	3.4±0.9	68.2±4.9	103.4±10.4
	术后6个月	2.2±1.0	80.1±7.3	113.6±8.6
	术后12个月	1.3±0.8	90.2±6.4	122.8±6.6
	手术前	7.1±1.0	38.2±3.9	61.5±9.0
	术后24 h	5.6±1.1	50.4±6.2	71.5±5.7
对照组	术后1个月	4.4±1.4	61.5±5.9	92.94±14.3
	术后6个月	2.3±0.6	74.1±8.4	104.5±9.3
	术后12个月	1.4±1.0	89.3±4.4	121.5±6.2
	F_组间	44.29	37.43	24.23
F值	F_时间	402.60	1192.89	940.42
	F_{组间×时间}	9.87	10.98	9.94
P值		<0.001	<0.001	<0.001

表3 两组患者手术前后VAS评分、HSS评分和ROM比较(±s)

组别	时间点	VAS评分	HSS评分	ROM(°)
	手术前	7.2±1.1	38.3±4.1	61.9±8.8
	术后24 h	4.0±1.0	59.1±6.1	80.9±5.6
实验组	术后1个月	3.4±0.9	68.2±4.9	103.4±10.4
	术后6个月	2.2±1.0	80.1±7.3	113.6±8.6
	术后12个月	1.3±0.8	90.2±6.4	122.8±6.6
	手术前	7.1±1.0	38.2±3.9	61.5±9.0
	术后24 h	5.6±1.1	50.4±6.2	71.5±5.7
对照组	术后1个月	4.4±1.4	61.5±5.9	92.94±14.3
	术后6个月	2.3±0.6	74.1±8.4	104.5±9.3
	术后12个月	1.4±1.0	89.3±4.4	121.5±6.2
	F_组间	44.29	37.43	24.23
F值	F_时间	402.60	1192.89	940.42
	F_{组间×时间}	9.87	10.98	9.94
P值		<0.001	<0.001	<0.001

表4 两组术后并发症比较(例)

组别	例数	恶性呕吐	下肢深静脉血栓	肺部感染	切口红肿
实验组	44	2	1	1	0
对照组	44	8	8	2	1
χ²值		4.0615	4.4557	0	-
P值		<0.05	<0.05	>0.05	>0.05^*

表4 两组术后并发症比较(例)

组别	例数	恶性呕吐	下肢深静脉血栓	肺部感染	切口红肿
实验组	44	2	1	1	0
对照组	44	8	8	2	1
χ²值		4.0615	4.4557	0	-
P值		<0.05	<0.05	>0.05	>0.05^*

[1]	董佩龙，唐晓波，王健，等．富血小板血浆凝胶在人工全膝关节置换手术中的应用研究[J]．中华外科杂志，2014，52(11)：851-855.
[2]	Stowers MD, Manuopangai L, Hill AG, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery in elective hip and knee arthroplasty reduces length of hospital stay[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2016, 86(6): 475-479.
[3]	中国加速康复外科专家组．中国加速康复外科围手术期管理专家共识(2016)[J]．中华外科杂志，2016，54(6)：413-418.
[4]	Senavongse W, Farahmand F, Jones J, et al. Quantitative measurement of patellofemoral joint stability: force-displacement behavior of the human patella in vitro[J]. J Orthop Res, 2003, 21(5): 780-786.
[5]	赵栋，马信龙，王文良，等．加速康复外科与传统治疗在单侧全膝关节置换术中的应用效果[J]．中华医学杂志，2018，98(7)：519-523.
[6]	Jorgensen CC, Kehlet H, Lundbeck Foundation Centre Fast-Track Hip and Knee Replacement Collaborative Group. Outcomes in smokers and alcohol users after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2013, 57(5): 631-638.
[7]	涂晓晴，宁宁，陈忠兰，等．快速康复流程模式下全膝关节置换术后延迟出院原因分析[J]．华西医学，2016，31(4)：739-742.
[8]	苏曼曼，周阳，曾必云，等．加速康复外科理念在全膝关节置换患者疼痛管理中的应用[J]．华西医学，2017，32(9)：1328-1332.
[9]	Kehlet H. Fast-track surgery-an update on physiological care principles to enhance recovery[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2011, 396(5): 585-590.
[10]	Stambough JB, Nunley RM, Curry MC, et al. Rapid recovery protocols for primary total hip arthroplasty can safely reduce length of stay without increasing readmissions[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2015, 30(4): 521-526.
[11]	谢小伟，岳辰，康鹏德，等．加速康复模式下初次全膝关节置换术后急性疼痛的相关因素分析[J]．中华骨与关节外科杂志，2016，9(6)：489-492.
[12]	雷一霆，黄强，曹国瑞，等．促红细胞生成素联合应用铁剂和氨甲环酸对减少全膝关节置换术围术期失血效果的研究[J]．中国骨与关节杂志，2017，6(12)：894-898.
[13]	Myles P, Bellomo R, Corcoran T, et al. Restrictive versus liberal fluid therapy in major abdominal surgery (RELIEF): rationale and design for a multicentre randomised trial [J/OL]. BMJ Open, 2017, 7(3): e015358. doi：10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015358.
[14]	Pang O, Liu H, Chen B, et al. Restrictive and Liberal fluid administration in major abdominal surgery[J]. Saudi Med I, 2017, 38(21): 123-131.
[15]	张少云，黄强，曹国瑞，等．加速康复外科模式下全膝关节置换术后围术期限制性输液的临床研究[J]．中国矫形外科杂志，2017，25(17)：1567-1571.
[16]	赵健，江志伟．加速康复外科与围术期营养管理[J]．中华医学信息导报，2017，32(21)：18.
[17]	Mathiesen O, Dahl B, Thomsen BA, et al. A comprehensive multimodal pain treatment reduces opioid consumption after multilevel spine surgery[J]. Eur Spine J, 2013, 22(9): 2089-2096.
[18]	Bruhn J, Gj S, Van Geffen GJ. Clinical application of perioperative multimodal analgesia[J]. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care, 2017, 11(2): 106-111.
[19]	Dong P, Tang X, Cheng R, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of different analgesia treatments for total knee arthroplasty: a network Meta-Analysis[J]. Clin J Pain, 2018, 34(11): 1047-1060.
[20]	Buvanendran A, Kroin JS, Tuman KJ, et al. Effects of perioperative administration of a selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitor on pain management and recovery of function after knee replacement: a randomized controlled trial[J]. JAMA, 2003, 290(18): 2411-2418.

[1]	林文, 王雨萱, 许嘉悦, 王矜群, 王睿娜, 何董源, 樊沛. 人工关节置换登记系统的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 834-841.
[2]	闫文, 谢兴文, 顾玉彪, 雷宁波, 马成, 于文霞, 高亚雄, 张磊. 微小RNA与全膝关节置换术后深静脉血栓的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 842-846.
[3]	黄子荣, 罗渝鑫, 杨文瀚, 陈小虎, 谢环宇, 朱伟民. 前交叉韧带重建对膝关节稳定性影响的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 847-854.
[4]	樊绪国, 赵永刚, 杨砚伟. 腓骨在膝骨关节炎作用的研究观点[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 855-859.
[5]	贺敬龙, 尚宏喜, 郝敏, 谢伟, 高明宏, 孙炜, 刘安庆. 重度类风湿关节炎患者行多关节置换术的临床手术疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 860-864.
[6]	孟繁宇, 周新社, 赵志, 裴立家, 刘犇. 侧位直接前方入路髋关节置换治疗偏瘫肢体股骨颈骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 865-870.
[7]	王宏宇. 固定与活动平台假体在全膝关节置换术中的应用价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 871-876.
[8]	夏传龙, 迟健, 丛强, 连杰, 崔峻, 陈彦玲. 富血小板血浆联合关节镜治疗半月板损伤的临床疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 877-881.
[9]	李善武, 叶永杰, 王兵, 王子呓, 银毅, 孙官军, 张大刚. 胫骨高位截骨与单髁置换的早期疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 882-888.
[10]	陈山林, 魏绮珮, 刘畅. 腕关节假体：路在何方？[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 469-475.
[11]	吴香敏, 吴鹏. 超声引导下收肌管阻滞联合腘动脉与膝关节后囊间隙阻滞在老年患者全膝关节置换术中的应用效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 516-522.
[12]	中华医学会骨科分会关节学组. 中国髋、膝关节置换日间手术围手术期管理专家共识[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 321-332.
[13]	邱红生, 林树体, 梁朝莹, 劳世高, 何荷. 模拟现实步态训练对膝关节前交叉韧带损伤的功能恢复及对跌倒恐惧的影响[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 343-350.
[14]	付庆鹏, 邓晓强, 高伟, 姜福民, 范永峰, 吴海贺, 齐岩松, 包呼日查, 徐永胜. 新型股骨测量定位器在全膝关节置换术中的临床应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 980-987.
[15]	李岩松, 李涛, 张元鸣飞, 李志鹏, 周谋望. 头戴式虚拟现实设备辅助全膝关节置换术后康复的初步研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 676-681.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Clinical study of enhanced recovery after surgery in total knee arthroplasty

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Clinical study of enhanced recovery after surgery in total knee arthroplasty