切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (05) : 534 -539. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2020.05.003

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

改良半硬化高分子绷带人类位固定治疗发育性髋关节脱位
严格1, 张郑1, 南国新1, 王忠良1, 宿玉玺1, 何波1, 覃佳强1,()   
  1. 1. 400016 重庆医科大学附属儿童医院渝中骨科,国家儿童健康与疾病临床医学研究中心,儿童发育疾病研究教育部重点实验室,儿科学重庆市重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-07 出版日期:2020-10-01
  • 通信作者: 覃佳强

Modified spica immobilization of semi-hardened polymer bandage for treatment of developmental dislocation of hips

Ge Yan1, Zheng Zhang1, Guoxin Nan1, Zhongliang Wang1, Yuxi Su1, Bo He1, Jiaqiang Qin1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing 400016, China
  • Received:2019-10-07 Published:2020-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Jiaqiang Qin
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Qin Jiaqiang, Email:
引用本文:

严格, 张郑, 南国新, 王忠良, 宿玉玺, 何波, 覃佳强. 改良半硬化高分子绷带人类位固定治疗发育性髋关节脱位[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(05): 534-539.

Ge Yan, Zheng Zhang, Guoxin Nan, Zhongliang Wang, Yuxi Su, Bo He, Jiaqiang Qin. Modified spica immobilization of semi-hardened polymer bandage for treatment of developmental dislocation of hips[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(05): 534-539.

目的

评估传统石膏人类位固定与改良半硬化高分子绷带人类位固定治疗发育性髋关节脱位的疗效与并发症。

方法

随访重庆医科大学附属儿童医院采取闭石膏组合复位人类位石膏固定完整资料的患儿62例共75髋,其中石膏组采用传统石膏固定方法30例共35髋,改良组采用改良半硬化高分子绷带固定方法32例共40髋。纳入标准:首次确诊为发育性髋关节脱位;年龄≤24个月;采取人类位石膏固定术治疗。排除标准:复位年龄>24个月;闭合复位失败;外院已经接受过其他治疗;临床资料不全或随访时间低于24个月。对全部患儿进行影像学检查和髋关节功能评价,统计患儿拆除石膏时发生烦躁、焦虑以及皮肤压伤的情况。男女比例、优良率、患儿烦躁、焦虑、皮肤压伤发生率及股骨头坏死发生率采用卡方检验,两组患儿年龄、体重、随访时间及髋臼指数采用独立样本t检验,T?nnis分度采用非参数检验。

结果

石膏组平均随访时间(31.2±4.2)月,改良组平均随访时间(32.2±5.5)月,组间差异无明显统计学意义(t=0.87,P>0.05)。根据周永德发育性髋关节脱位疗效评价标准,石膏组优良率88.6%,改良组优良率为87.5%,组间优良率差异并无统计学意义(χ2=0.02,P>0.05)。石膏组股骨头坏死发生率17.1%,改良组股骨头坏死发生率为12.5%,组间差异并无统计学意义(χ2=0.32,P>0.05)。在石膏并发症皮肤压伤上,石膏组与改良组差异并无统计学意义(χ2=1.40,P>0.05)。但在拆除石膏时引起患儿烦躁、焦虑的情绪上,改良组显著低于石膏组(χ2=43.75,P<0.01)。

结论

改良半硬化高分子绷带人类位固定治疗发育性髋关节脱位与传统石膏固定具有相当的治疗效果及并发症发生率,但显著降低了患儿在拆除石膏时的烦躁、焦虑,同时完全避免了石膏锯的使用与相关风险。

Objective

To evaluate the curative effect and complication of the developmental dislocation of the hips (DDH) in children with traditional spicacast immobilization and modified semi-hardened polymer bandage spica immobilization.

Methods

Sixty-two DDH children in Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University with a total of 75 hips were enrolled in this study. In the cast group, 30 children with a total of 35 hips were treated with the traditional spica cast immobilization method. In the modified group, 32 children with a total of 40 hips were treated with modified semi-hardened polymer bandage. Inclusion criteria: the first diagnosis of developmental dislocation of the hip, age≤24 months, treatment with human plaster fixation. Exclusion criteria: reduction age>24 months, closed reduction failure, other treatments have been adopted outside the hospital, clinical data are incomplete or follow-up time is less than 24 months. All the children underwent imaging and hip function evaluation. The irritability, anxiety, and crushing of the skin occurred when the patient was removed cast. Chi-square test was used for the ratio of male to female, the excellent and good rate, irritability, anxiety, skin pressure, and femoral head necrosis. The age, weight, follow-up time and acetabular index of the two groups of children were tested by independent t-test. The T?nnis scale was analyzed by non-parameter verification.

Results

The average follow-up time of the plaster group were (31.2±4.2) months, and the average follow-up time of the modified group were (32.2±5.5) months. There was no significant difference between the groups (t=0.87, P>0.05). According to Zhou Yongde evaluation criteria of developmental dislocation of hip joint, the rate of excellent and good rank was 88.6% in cast group and 87.5% in improved group. There was no significant difference between the two groups (χ2=0.02, P>0.05). The incidence of avascular necrosis was 17.1% in the cast group and 12.5% in the modified group. There was no significant difference between the groups (χ2=0.32, P>0.05). In the cast complications of skin crush, cast group and the improvement group no significant difference (χ2=1.40, P>0.05). However, when removing cast caused irritability and anxiety in children, the modified group was significantly lower than the cast group (χ2=43.75, P<0.01).

Conclusions

Modified semi-hardened polymer bandage immobilizations for the treatment of DDH has the same therapeutic effects and complications in the development of dislocation of the hip compared with traditional cast fixation, but significantly reduce irritability, anxiety and complete anxiety in children with cast removal. The use of plaster saws and related risks are completely avoided.

图6 石膏锯于会阴部开窗
图7 拆除半硬化高分子绷带
图8 拆除硬化高分子绷带
表1 石膏组与改良组一般资料
表2 石膏组与改良组T?nnis分度例数比较 (例)
表3 石膏组与改良组固定疗效等级对比
表4 石膏组与改良组股骨头坏死发生率的对比
[1]
中华医学会小儿外科分会骨科学组,中华医学会骨科学分会小儿创伤矫形学组. 发育性髋关节发育不良临床诊疗指南(O~2岁)[J]. 中华骨科杂志,2017, 37(11): 641-650.
[2]
孙玉华.287用石膏锯拆除石膏固定引起患儿焦虑致死1例[J].国外医学:护理学分册,2002,21(9):425-425.
[3]
Cai Z, Li LY, Zhang LJ, et al. Dynamic long leg casting fixation for treating 12-to 18-month-old infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip[J]. J Int Med Res, 2017, 45(1): 272-281.
[4]
Salter RB, Kostuik J, Dallas S. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head as a complication of treatment for congenital dislocation of the hip in young children: a clinical and experimental investigation[J]. Can J Surg, 1969, 12(1): 44-61.
[5]
Rebello G, Joseph B, Chincholkar A. Connecting bar for hip spica reinforcement: does it help?[J]. J Pediatr Orthop B, 2004, 13(5): 345-346; author reply 346.
[6]
周永德,吉士俊. 先天性髋脱位疗效评定标准及说明[J]. 中华骨科杂志,1994,14 (1): 55.
[7]
Kalamchi A, Macewen GD. Avascular necrosis following treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1980, 62(6): 876-888.
[8]
Gage JR, Winter RB. Avascular necrosis of the capital femoral epiphysis as a complication of closed reduction of congenital dislocation of the hip. A critical review of twenty years' experience at Gillette Children's Hospital[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1972, 54(2): 373-388.
[9]
Severin E. Contribution to the knowledge of congenital dislocation of the hip joint: late results of closed reduction and arthrographic studies of recent cases[J]. JAMA, 1942, 118(7): 565-566.
[10]
Schur MD, Lee C, Arkader A, et al. Risk factors for avascular necrosis after closed reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip[J]. J Child Orthop, 2016, 10(3): 185-192.
[11]
Patel H. Canadian task force on preventive health C.preventive health care,2001 update:screening and management of developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns[J]. CMAJ, 2001, 164(12): 1669-1677.
[12]
Walton S, Schaeffer E, Mulpuri K, et al. Evaluating the role of prereduction hip traction in the management of infants and children with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH): protocol for a systematic review and planned meta-analysis[J/OL]. BMJ Open, 2018, 8(1): e019599. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019599.
[13]
Omeroglu H, Kose N, Akceylan A. Success of pavlik harness treatment decreases in patients>/=4 months and in ultrasonographically dislocated Hips in developmental dysplasia of the hip[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2016, 474(5): 1146-1152.
[14]
Tomlinson J. O′Dowd D,fernandesJA.managing developmental dysplasia of the hip[J]. Indian J Pediatr, 2016, 83(11): 1275-1279.
[15]
Kotlarsky P, Haber R, Bialik V, et al. Developmental dysplasia of the hip: what has changed in the last 20 years?[J]. World J Orthop, 2015, 6(11): 886-901.
[16]
Li Y, Guo Y, Li M, et al. Acetabular index is the best predictor of late residual acetabular dysplasia after closed reduction in developmental dysplasia of the hip[J]. Int Orthop, 2018, 42(3): 631-640.
[17]
Murphy RF, Kim YJ. Surgical management of pediatric developmental dysplasia of the hip[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2016, 24(9): 615-624.
[18]
沙佳,严亚波,徐会法,等.不同年龄组大龄发育性髋关节脱位患儿手术疗效的临床研究[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2017,25(9):775-780.
[19]
宋猛.发育性髋脱位闭合复位3种石膏固定方式术后股骨头缺血坏死发生率的比较[J].骨科临床与研究杂志,2017,2(1):37-41.
[20]
Omeroglu H. Treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip with the Pavlik harness in children under six months of age: indications, results and failures[J]. J Child Orthop, 2018, 12(4): 308-316.
[21]
Tibrewal S, Gulati V, Ramachandran M. The Pavlik method: a systematic review of current concepts[J]. J Pediatr Orthop B, 2013, 22(6): 516-520.
[1] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[2] 张宝富, 俞劲, 叶菁菁, 俞建根, 马晓辉, 刘喜旺. 先天性原发隔异位型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1074-1080.
[3] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[4] 刘婷婷, 林妍冰, 汪珊, 陈幕荣, 唐子鉴, 代东伶, 夏焙. 超声衰减参数成像评价儿童代谢相关脂肪性肝病的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 787-794.
[5] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[6] 李婷婷, 崔翔, 刘静, 吴鑫, 杨汐, 陈莉. 新型脐周按钮式切口在横向腹直肌肌瓣乳房重建中的应用[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 347-352.
[7] 李辉, 吴奇, 张子琦, 张晗, 王仿, 许鹏. 日间全膝关节置换术早期疗效及标准化流程探索[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 889-892.
[8] 王竟楠, 赵吉宏. 从微创到功能:牙槽外科的必由之路[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 381-385.
[9] 彭旭, 邵永孚, 李铎, 邹瑞, 邢贞明. 结肠肝曲癌的诊断和外科治疗[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 108-110.
[10] 栗霞, 孟丽, 高康, 白敏娜, 张美芬. 泌尿外科专科护士培训核心知识体系构建与应用效果[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 621-626.
[11] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[12] 卓少宏, 林秀玲, 周翠梅, 熊卫莲, 马兴灶. CD64指数、SAA/CRP、PCT联合检测在小儿消化道感染性疾病鉴别诊断中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 505-509.
[13] 程相阵. 腹茧症9例诊治分析并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 968-971.
[14] 刘笑笑, 张小杉, 刘群, 马岚, 段莎莎, 施依璐, 张敏洁, 王雅晳. 中国学龄前儿童先天性心脏病流行病学研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1021-1024.
[15] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
阅读次数
全文


摘要