切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 495 -499. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2020.04.018

所属专题: 文献

临床经验

关节镜辅助复位内固定术治疗膝关节内骨折的疗效
谭希鹏1, 黄建国1,(), 陈志荣1, 郭浩辉1   
  1. 1. 750004 银川,宁夏医科大学总医院骨三科
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-06 出版日期:2020-08-01
  • 通信作者: 黄建国

Arthroscope assisted reduction and internal fixation in treatment of intra-articular knee fractures

Xipeng Tan1, Jianguo Huang1,(), Zhirong Chen1, Haohui Guo1   

  1. 1. Department of orthopedics, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China
  • Received:2018-12-06 Published:2020-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Jianguo Huang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Huang Jianguo, Email:
引用本文:

谭希鹏, 黄建国, 陈志荣, 郭浩辉. 关节镜辅助复位内固定术治疗膝关节内骨折的疗效[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 495-499.

Xipeng Tan, Jianguo Huang, Zhirong Chen, Haohui Guo. Arthroscope assisted reduction and internal fixation in treatment of intra-articular knee fractures[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(04): 495-499.

目的

探究关节镜辅助复位内固定术治疗膝关节内骨折的短期临床效果。

方法

回顾性分析2017年5月至2018年5月在宁夏医科大学总医院骨三科接受手术治疗的膝关节内骨折患者。共纳入120例,其中行关节镜辅助复位内固定术者纳入观察组,行切开复位内固定术者纳入对照组,每组60例。随访至骨折完全愈合。采用t检验比较2组术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间、骨折愈合时间、术后即刻血清炎症指标、术后1个月的生活质量评分(SF-36评分)、关节活动度(ROM)和美国特种外科医院膝关节评分(HSS)。通过ROM计算优良率,行卡方检验。

结果

优良率观察组为98.3%,对照组为85.0%(χ2=6.982,P<0.05)。观察组住院时间、手术时间都短于对照组(t=12.619、23.351,均为P<0.05),术中出血量少于对照组(t=11.249,P<0.05)。术后1个月,观察组SF-36评分、ROM、HSS评分均高于对照组(SF-36评分t=25.10,ROM t=25.25, HSS评分t=12.25,均为P<0.05)。两组的术前CRP、IL-6、TNF-α水平对比差异无统计学意义(t=0.756、1.100、0.702,均为P>0.05);观察组CRP、IL-6、TNF-α水平低于对照组(t=4.389、3.828、7.902,均为P <0.05),观察组的骨折愈合时间短于对照组(t=11.345,P <0.05)。

结论

关节镜辅助复位内固定术治疗膝关节内骨折效果肯定,且有创伤小,恢复快等优点,临床中可以选择性使用,但需严格把握适应症。

Objective

To explore the short-term clinical effect of arthroscopically assisted reduction and internal fixation(ARIF) in the treatment of intra-articular knee fractures.

Methods

From May 2017 to May 2018, the patients with intra-articular knee fractures who undergone surgical treatment in Department of orthopedics, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University were retrospectively analyzed. One hundred and twenty patients were reviewed. The patients treated by ARIF were in the observation group (n=60), and the patients treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) were in the control group (n=60). All the patients were followed up until the fractures healed completely. Intraoperative blood loss, operative time, hospitalization time, fracture healing time, postoperative serum inflammatory biomarkers, hospital for special surgery knee score (HSS), range of motion (ROM) and quality of life scores (SF-36 scores) in one month were compared by t test. The good rate was calculated by ROM and was compared by chi-square test.

Results

The good rate was 98.3% in the observation group and 85.0% in the control group (χ2 =6.982, P<0.05). Length of hospital stay and operation time in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (t=12.619, 23.351, both P<0.05). The intraoperative blood loss was significantly less than that of the control group (t=11.249, P<0.05). One month after surgery, SF-36 scores, ROM and HSS scores of the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group (SF-36 t=25.10, ROM t=25.25, HSS t=12.25, all P <0.05). There was no significant difference in preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6) or tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) levels between the two groups (t=0.756, 1.100, 0.702, all P >0.05). The levels of CRP, IL-6 and TNF-α in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (t=4.389, 3.828 and 7.902, all P <0.05). The fracture healing time of observation group was significantly shorter than that of control group (t=11.345, P <0.05).

Conclusion

Arthroscope assisted reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of intra-articular knee fractures is effective and has the advantages of small trauma and quick recovery, which can be used selectively in clinical practice, but the indications should be strictly controlled.

表1 两组一般资料比较
表2 两组优良率[例(%)]
表3 两组住院时间、手术时间、术中出血量、骨折愈合时间比较(±s)
表4 两组SF-36评分、ROM、HSS评分比较(±s)
表5 血清炎症指标比较(±s)
[1]
Dei G L, Di Muzio F, Bottegoni C, et al.The role of arthroscopy in articular fracture management: the lower limb[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2015, 25: 807-813.
[2]
Budoff JE.Treatment of acute lunate and perilunate dislocations[J]. J Hand Surg Am, 2008, 33: 1424-1432.
[3]
马志锋,贺宪,直彦亮,等.股骨髁间粉碎性骨折术后膝关节强直的治疗经验[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2017,11(3):308-311.
[4]
Ranawat CS, Insall J, Shine J. Duo-condylar knee arthroplasty: hospital for special surgery design[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1976, (120): 76-82.
[5]
Le BM, Cermolacce M, Flecher X, et al. Tibial plateau fracture management: ARIF versus ORIF-clinical and radiological comparison[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2019, 105(1): 101-106.
[6]
Beaudart C, Biver E, Bruyère O, et al. Quality of Life assessment in musculo-skeletal health[J]. Aging Clin Exp Res, 2018, 30(5): 413-418.
[7]
甄平,李旭升,田琦,等.膝关节侧方移位失稳的膝关节置换[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2018,12(2):179-184.
[8]
陈砚平.关节镜辅助治疗胫骨平台骨折并前交叉韧带撕脱的效果观察[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2016,10(2):91-95.
[9]
Reynders P, Reynders K, Broos P. Pediatric and adolescent tibial eminence fractures: arthroscopic cannulated screw fixation[J]. J Trauma, 2002, 53(1): 49-54.
[10]
Chiang CC, Chen WM, Jeff Lin CF, et al. Comparison of a minimally invasive technique with open tension band wiring for displaced transverse patellar fractures[J]. J Chin Med Assoc, 2011, 74(7): 316-321.
[11]
Jiao J, Wang JW, Xiao F, et al. The association between the levels of CRP, IL-10, PLA2, Fbg and prognosis in traumatic fracture of lower limb[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2016, 12(5): 3209-3212.
[12]
Burdin G. Arthroscopic management of tibial plateau fractures: surgical technique[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2013, 99(1, S): S208-S218.
[1] 郭杰坤, 王楹, 杨轩, 晏欢欣, 钟豪. Ilizarov 骨搬移技术在急诊一期修复GustiloⅢB 型胫骨长段开放粉碎性骨折的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 507-510.
[2] 赵磊, 刘文志, 林峰, 于剑, 孙铭骏, 崔佑刚, 张旭, 衣宇鹏, 于宝胜, 冯宁. 深部热疗在改善结直肠癌术后辅助化疗副反应及生活质量中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 488-493.
[3] 宋庆成, 郑占乐, 王天瑞, 王宇钏, 张凯旋, 纳静, 蔚佳昊, 杨思繁, 宋九宏, 张英泽. “人老膝不老”:膝关节健康管理的全方位探索与实践[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 321-324.
[4] 郑占乐, 王宇钏, 蔚佳昊, 宋庆成, 张凯旋, 纳静, 王天瑞, 宋九宏, 张英泽, 王娟. 保膝须“开膝”——“开膝”在膝骨关节炎中的临床应用价值[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 325-330.
[5] 于同, 矫健航, 姜炜博, 王中汉, 王洋, 伍旭辉, 吴敏飞. 体位复位与椎板切除减压内固定术治疗胸腰段爆裂性骨折的对比性研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 331-339.
[6] 黄韬, 杨晓华, 薛天森, 肖睿. 改良“蛋壳”技术治疗老年OVCF及对脊柱矢状面平衡参数、预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 340-348.
[7] 谭明明, 战世强, 侯宏涛, 曾翔硕. 经皮微创椎弓根螺钉内固定术对骨质疏松脊柱压缩性骨折患者临床研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 349-354.
[8] 王贝贝, 崔振义, 王静, 王晗妍, 吕红芝, 李秀婷. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后贫血预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 355-362.
[9] 张峻, 赵建民, 姚晓克, 吉浩宇, 越瑞祥. 增加CT对桡骨远端骨折分型的可靠性及可重复性评价[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 264-272.
[10] 房桂彬, 肖进, 傅光涛, 郑秋坚. 老年髋部骨折患者术后1年行走能力的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 273-280.
[11] 张于, 程亮亮, 王峰, 赵德伟. 2枚与3枚空心钉治疗无移位股骨颈骨折的疗效对比[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 281-286.
[12] 茹江英, 廖启宇, 温国洪, 潘思华, 刘栋, 张皓琛, 牛云飞. 直接前方入路和后外侧入路半髋关节置换治疗老年痴呆股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 287-293.
[13] 单良, 刘怡, 于涛, 徐丽. 老年股骨颈骨折术后患者心理弹性现状及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 294-300.
[14] 周锐, 罗飞. 骨质疏松椎体骨折的分型进展[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 315-320.
[15] 喻蓉, 周伟力, 雷青, 陈松, 陈立, 刘峰, 丁州, 阳宏奇, 王康, 王大鹏. 改良的内外侧环抱锁定钢板在复杂胫骨平台骨折治疗中的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 764-770.
阅读次数
全文


摘要