切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 491 -494. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2020.04.017

所属专题: 文献

临床经验

锚钉缝合术修复治疗副韧带前束撕脱的疗效
何伟平1, 严炜彦1, 钟克宣1, 杨耿华1, 莫济贤1, 邓寿华1, 何值芬1, 叶沃权1, 叶建勋1,()   
  1. 1. 523820 东莞市中西医结合医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-19 出版日期:2020-08-01
  • 通信作者: 叶建勋

Efficacy of anchor suture on anterior bundle avulsion of meidal collateral ligament

Weiping He1, Weiyan Yan1, Kexuan Zhong1, Genghua Yang1, Jixian Mo1, Shouhua Deng1, Zhifen He1, Woquan Ye1, Jianxun Ye1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Dongguan Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Dongguan 523820, China
  • Received:2019-12-19 Published:2020-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Jianxun Ye
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ye Jianxun, Email:
引用本文:

何伟平, 严炜彦, 钟克宣, 杨耿华, 莫济贤, 邓寿华, 何值芬, 叶沃权, 叶建勋. 锚钉缝合术修复治疗副韧带前束撕脱的疗效[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 491-494.

Weiping He, Weiyan Yan, Kexuan Zhong, Genghua Yang, Jixian Mo, Shouhua Deng, Zhifen He, Woquan Ye, Jianxun Ye. Efficacy of anchor suture on anterior bundle avulsion of meidal collateral ligament[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(04): 491-494.

目的

评价锚钉缝合术对于全膝关节置换术(TKA)术中膝关节内侧副韧带(MCL)前束撕脱屈膝位不稳的临床效果。

方法

回顾性分析了2011年1月至2017年12月在东莞市中西医结合医院骨科接受TKA的患者3 922例,确定术中MCL前束撕脱屈膝位不稳的病例48例(1.2%),所有患者接受锚钉缝合术。所有患者在术后6周内使用铰链式护膝,术后每次随访时,测量膝关节的运动范围。在术后6周、3个月、1年,及之后每年接受1次X线检查,以评估美国特种外科医院(HSS)膝关节评分,并以t检验行统计学分析。

结果

在3 922例全膝关节置换术中,48例(1.2%)发生术中MCL损伤。其中,1例患者术后两年内死亡,2例患者失访,共有45例患者纳入了本研究。其中24例MCL中段撕裂,21例MCL附着点断裂。35例发生在十字韧带保留的TKA术中和10例发生在后稳定型TKA术中。患者末次随访时最大屈膝(111.2±18.8)°、最大伸膝(1.5±1.5)°以及活动范围(110.2±30.2)°明显高于治疗前(107.5±22.5)°、(5.5±4.5)°、(102.2±27.8)°(t = 2.822、5.026、3.670,均为P<0.05)。平均随访时间(99.2±5.7)个月,没有1例患者发生膝关节不稳定。其中5例患者因为膝关节僵硬而接受了干预(4例手法推拿和1例翻修术),2例患者因为人工膝关节无菌性松动接受了翻修术。

结论

TKA术中MCL前束撕脱可以通过锚钉缝合术修复治疗,然后进行铰链式护膝支撑。膝关节僵硬是一种常见的并发症。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical effect of anchor suture on anterior MCL anterior bundle avulsion and knee instability during TKA operation.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 3 922 patients who received TKA in the Department of Orthopaedics, Department of Orthopedics, Dongguan Hospital from January 2011 to December 2017 was performed, and 48 cases (1.2%) of MCL anterior bundle avulsion and knee instability were determined during operation All the patients underwent anchor suture. All the patients used hinged knee braces within six weeks after surgery. At each follow-up visit, the range of motion of the knee joint was measured. X-ray examination was performed at six weeks, three months, and one year after the surgery (then once a year) to evaluate the HSS knee score. The results were analyzed by t test.

Results

In 3 922 cases of total knee arthroplasty, 48 cases (1.2%) had intraoperative MCL injury. Among them, one patient died within two years after the operation, two patients were lost for follow-up. A total of 45 patients were included. Among them, MCLs of 24 cases were torn, and MCLs of 21 cases were broken. Thirty-five cases occurred in TKA with cruciate ligament retention and 10 cases occurred in post-stable TKA. At the last follow-up, the maximum knee flexion (111.2±18.8) °, maximum knee extension (1.5±1.5) °, and range of motion (110.2±30.2) ° were all significantly higher than those before the treatment [ (107.5±22.5) °, (5.5±4.5) °, (102.2±27.8) °] (t =2.822, 5.026, 3.670, all P <0.05). The average follow-up time was (99.2±5.7) months. None of the patient had knee instability. Five patients received intervention for stiff knees (four manual manipulations and one revision), and two patients received revision for aseptic loosening of the artificial knee.

Conclusions

MCL anterior bundle avulsion can be repaired and treated by anchor suture during TKA, and then hinged knee brace is applied. Knee stiffness is a common complication.

图4 术后缝合
表2 手术前后患者膝关节活动范围比较[n=45,°,(± s)]
表3 患者末次随访HSS评分(± s)
[1]
Donaldson WF 3rd, Sculco TP, Insall JN, et al. Total Condylar III knee prosthesis. Long-term follow-up study[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1988, 226(2):21-28.
[2]
Hartford JM, Goodman SB, Schurman DJ, et al. Complex primary and revisiontotal knee arthroplasty using the condylar constrained prosthesis: an average 5-year follow-up[J]. J Arthroplasty, 1998, 13(4): 380-387.
[3]
Lachiewicz PF, Stephen PF. Clinical and radiographic results of the total condylar III and constrained condylar total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 1996, 11(8): 916-922.
[4]
Sculco TP. Total condylar III prosthesis in ligament instability[J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 1989, 20(2): 221-226.
[5]
Leopold SS, Mcstay C, Klafeta K, et al. Primary repair of intraoperative disruption of the medial collateral ligament during total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2001, 83(1): 86-91.
[6]
Siqueira MB, Haller K, Mulder A, et al. Outcomes of medial collateral ligament injuries during total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Knee Surg, 2016, 29(1): 68-73.
[7]
Lee GC, Lotke PA. Management of intraoperative medial collateral ligament injury during TKA[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011, 469(1): 64-68.
[8]
Raz W, Patrick B, Paul L. Total knee arthroplasty in morbidly obese patients[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1998, 80(12): 1770-1774.
[9]
Whiteside LA. Correction of ligament and bone defects in total arthroplasty of the severely valgus knee[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1993, (288): 234-245.
[10]
Rosenberg AG, Verner JJ, Galante JO. Clinical results of total knee revision using the total condylar III prosthesis[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1991, (273): 83-90.
[11]
Stephens S, Politi J, Backes J, et al. Repair of medial collateral ligament injury during total knee arthoplasty[J]. Orthopedics, 2012, 35(2): e154-e159.
[12]
Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, et al. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1976, 58(6): 754-765.
[13]
Callaghan JJ, O′rourke Mr, Liu SS. The role of implant constraint in revisiontotal knee arthroplasty: not too little, not too much[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2005, 20(Suppl 2): 41-43.
[14]
Shahi A, Tan TL, Tarabichi S, et al. Primary repair of iatrogenic medial collateral ligament injury during TKA: a modified technique[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2015, 30(5): 854-857.
[1] 刘鹏, 罗天, 许珂媛, 邓红美, 李瑄, 唐翠萍. 八段锦对膝关节炎疗效的初步步态分析[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 590-595.
[2] 李焕玺, 何淳诺, 田志敏, 周胜虎, 吴昊越, 张浩强. 全膝关节置换术后股骨远端假体周围骨折治疗现状[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 630-637.
[3] 王相迎, 杨长生, 曲铁兵. 固定平台单髁置换假体合适位置的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 638-645.
[4] 苏介茂, 齐岩松, 王永祥, 魏宝刚, 马秉贤, 张鹏飞, 魏兴华, 徐永胜. 关节镜手术在早中期膝骨关节炎治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 646-652.
[5] 谢佳乐, 李琦, 芦升升, 姜劲松. 内侧膝骨关节炎伴胫股关节冠状半脱位的手术治疗[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 653-657.
[6] 郭艳波, 马亮, 李刚, 阎伟, 骆帝, 岳亮, 吴伟山. 全膝关节置换术后胫股关节脱位的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 658-671.
[7] 陈翠萍, 李佩君, 杜景榕, 谢青梅, 许一宁, 卓姝妤, 李晓芳. 互联网联合上门护理在老年全髋关节置换术后的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 676-681.
[8] 陈晓玲, 钟永洌, 刘巧梨, 李娜, 张志奇, 廖威明, 黄桂武. 超高龄髋膝关节术后谵妄及心血管并发症风险预测[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 575-584.
[9] 谢江燕, 王亚菲, 贺芳. 妊娠合并血栓性血小板减少性紫癜2例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 556-563.
[10] 王振宇, 张洪美, 荆琳, 何名江, 闫奇. 膝骨关节炎相关炎症因子与血浆代谢物间的因果关系及中介效应[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 467-473.
[11] 宋庆成, 郑占乐, 王天瑞, 王宇钏, 张凯旋, 纳静, 蔚佳昊, 杨思繁, 宋九宏, 张英泽. “人老膝不老”:膝关节健康管理的全方位探索与实践[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 321-324.
[12] 郑占乐, 王宇钏, 蔚佳昊, 宋庆成, 张凯旋, 纳静, 王天瑞, 宋九宏, 张英泽, 王娟. 保膝须“开膝”——“开膝”在膝骨关节炎中的临床应用价值[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 325-330.
[13] 茹江英, 廖启宇, 温国洪, 潘思华, 刘栋, 张皓琛, 牛云飞. 直接前方入路和后外侧入路半髋关节置换治疗老年痴呆股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 287-293.
[14] 高广涵, 张耀南, 石磊, 王林, 王飞, 郑子天, 王鸿禹, 郭民政, 薛庆云. 膝骨关节炎患者前交叉韧带功能影像学影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 301-307.
[15] 王松雷, 张贻良, 孟浩, 宋威, 白林晨, 袁心, 张辉. 股骨前髁预截骨髓外定位技术在全膝关节置换术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 811-819.
阅读次数
全文


摘要