切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 235 -238. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2020.02.019

所属专题: 文献

临床经验

不同康复途径对膝关节脱位术后康复训练的影响
双峰1, 邵银初1, 余婷1, 胡炜1, 李浩1,(), 管丽红1, 韩露1, 单记春1   
  1. 1. 330002 南昌,中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇八医院
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-05 出版日期:2020-04-01
  • 通信作者: 李浩
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81660377); 江西省自然科学基金(2017BAB205032)

Effect of different approaches on rehabilitation training after knee dislocation surgery

Feng Shuang1, Yinchu Shao1, Ting Yu1, Wei Hu1, Hao Li1,(), Lihong Guan1, Lu Han1, Jichun Shan1   

  1. 1. No.908 Hospital of Chinese PLA, Nanchang 330002, China
  • Received:2020-01-05 Published:2020-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Hao Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Hao, Email:
引用本文:

双峰, 邵银初, 余婷, 胡炜, 李浩, 管丽红, 韩露, 单记春. 不同康复途径对膝关节脱位术后康复训练的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 235-238.

Feng Shuang, Yinchu Shao, Ting Yu, Wei Hu, Hao Li, Lihong Guan, Lu Han, Jichun Shan. Effect of different approaches on rehabilitation training after knee dislocation surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(02): 235-238.

目的

了解不同康复途径对膝关节脱位手术后康复训练效果的影响。

方法

回顾性研究中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇八医院2015年10月至2018年9月膝关节脱位合并韧带损伤的患者。按照纳入、排除标准,共纳入67例研究对象,根据术后患者康复锻炼的途径,分为2组,远程指导组39人、机构康复组28人。比较术后1年2组患者膝关节Lysholm评分、国际膝关节文献委员会膝关节评估表(简称IKDC评分)、关节活动度(ROM)、术后康复训练直接花费,行t检验,记录切口感染、急性骨筋膜室综合征、手术相关血管神经损伤等并发症情况。

结果

2组患者术后1年的膝关节Lysholm评分(t=-1.722)、IKDC评分(t=-1.184)、ROM(t=-1.695)大致相当(P>0.05);但远程指导组术后康复训练直接花费(t=-73.509)比机构康复组患者明显降低(P<0.05)。远程指导组中有2例(5.12%)、机构康复组中有1例(3.57%)出现手术切口红肿,均予以抗生素抗感染、伤口换药后治愈,随访期间未发现膝关节感染;所有患者均未出现骨筋膜室综合征或手术相关血管神经损伤。

结论

膝关节脱位合并韧带损伤手术后采取远程视频指导下的康复训练,与在康复机构进行训练相比较,可以取得一致的膝关节功能恢复,但花费明显降低。

Objective

To explorethe effect of different rehabilitation approaches on rehabilitation training after knee dislocation surgery.

Methods

A retrospectively study was carried out on the patients with knee dislocation combined with ligament injury in No.908 Hospital of Chinese PLA from October 2015 to September 2018.Inclusion criteria: knee dislocation (self-reduction included), Schenck classification of KD-Ⅰ, KD-Ⅲ, unilateral injury, treated by arthroscopy. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 67 subjects were included in the study and were divided into two groups (39 in the remote guidance group and 28 in the institutional rehabilitation group) according to the way of rehabilitation exercise after surgery. The Lysholm score, the International Knee Committee (IKDC) knee evaluation score, range of motion (ROM) of knee joints and the direct cost of rehabilitation training were compared between the two groups one year after operation, and compared by t-test. Incision infection, acute compartment syndrome, surgery-related vascular nerve injury and other complications were recorded.

Results

The Lysholm score(t=-1.722), IKDC score(t=-1.184) and ROM(t=-1.695) of knee joints of the two groups at one year after operation were roughly equivalent (P>0.05), but the direct cost (t=-73.509) of rehabilitation training in the remote guidance group was significantly lower than that in the institutional rehabilitation group (P<0.05). Two patients (5.12%) in the remote guidance group and one patient (3.57%) in the institutional rehabilitation group had redness and swelling of the surgical incision, all of them were cured after the application of antibiotics and wound dressing change, and no infection of knee joint was found during the follow-up period. None of the patients had acute compartment syndrome or surgery-related vascular nerve injury.

Conclusion

Rehabilitation training guided by remote video after knee dislocation combined with ligament injury can achieve consistent knee function recovery compared with training in rehabilitation institutions, but the cost is significantly reduced.

表1 2组患者一般情况比较
表2 两组患者1年后膝关节恢复及花费比较(±s)
[1]
Westermann R, Cook S, Glass N, et al. Factors associated with knee stiffness following surgical management of multiligament knee injuries[J]. J Knee Surg, 2017, 30(6): 549-554.
[2]
Skendzel JG, Sekiya JK, Edward MW. Diagnosis and management of the multiligament-injured knee[J]. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2012, 42(3): 234-242.
[3]
Daniele C, Tsukamoto H, Granata G, et al. Fibular nerve damage in knee dislocation: spectrum of ultrasound patterns[J]. Muscle Nerve, 2015, 51(6): 859-863.
[4]
Mir SM, Talebian S, Naseri N, et al. Assessment of knee proprioception in the anterior cruciate ligament injury risk position in healthy subjects: a cross-sectional study[J]. J Phys Ther Sci, 2014, 26(10): 1515-1518.
[5]
刘忠堂,吴海山.急性膝关节脱位的评估和治疗原则[J].中华骨科杂志,2007,27(5): 378-380.
[6]
Fanelli GC. Multiple ligament injured knee: initial assessment and treatment[J]. Clin Sports Med, 2019, 38(2): 193-198.
[7]
钱利海,梁清宇,陈先进,等.膝关节脱位合并多发韧带损伤的治疗策略及疗效分析[J].中华解剖与临床杂志,2016,21(6): 552-557.
[8]
Gregory CF. Knee dislocation and multiple ligament injuries of the knee[J]. Sports Med Arthrosc, 2018, 26(4): 150-152.
[9]
Ridley TJ, Cook S, Bollier M, et al. Effect of body mass index on patients with multiligamentous knee injuries[J]. Arthroscopy, 2014, 30(11): 1447-1452.
[10]
Peltola EK, Lindahl J, Harri H, et al. Knee dislocation in overweight patients[J]. Am J Roentgenol, 2009, 192(1): 101-106.
[11]
Fanelli D, Fanelli G. Multiple ligament knee injuries[J]. J Knee Surg, 2018, 31(5): 399-409.
[12]
成人体重判定:WS/T 428-2013 [S].北京,中华人民共和国卫生和计划生育委员会,2013.
[13]
Hohmann E, Glatt V, Tetsworth K. Early or delayed Reconstruction in multi-ligament knee injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Knee, 2017, 24(5): 909-916.
[14]
席刚,张民,王祥猛.膝关节多韧带损伤研究进展[J].实用骨科杂志,2015,21(6): 525-529.
[15]
李静,周凯,李鹏程,等.医护技一体化加速康复模式促进前交叉韧带重建术后早期功能康复[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志(电子版),2018,12(4): 501-507.
[1] 刘冰茹, 刘皓希, 陈莹, 赖世伟, 陈蓉. 疑似乳腺癌的韧带样纤维瘤病一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 314-317.
[2] 董红华, 郭艮春, 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤. 骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.
[3] 黄子荣, 罗渝鑫, 杨文瀚, 陈小虎, 谢环宇, 朱伟民. 前交叉韧带重建对膝关节稳定性影响的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 847-854.
[4] 夏传龙, 迟健, 丛强, 连杰, 崔峻, 陈彦玲. 富血小板血浆联合关节镜治疗半月板损伤的临床疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 877-881.
[5] 肖志满, 龚煜, 谢景凌, 刘斌伟. 上下肢关节镜手术后患者下肢深静脉血栓发生的对比研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 601-606.
[6] 杨国栋, 张辉, 郭珈, 曲迪, 张静, 戚超. 外侧半月板后角撕裂是否修复的术后疗效对比[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 619-624.
[7] 马鹏程, 刘伟, 张思平. 股骨髋臼撞击综合征关节镜手术中闭合关节囊的疗效影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 653-662.
[8] 梁家敏, 黄子荣, 崔家鸣, 钟名金, 冯文哲, 陈康, 胡艳, 欧阳侃, 杨雷, 王大平, 王满宜, 朱伟民. 前交叉韧带保留残端重建促进膝关节功能的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 708-714.
[9] 吴俊贤, 曾俊杰, 许有银, 苑博. 体外冲击波疗法辅助治疗肩袖修补术后关节僵硬[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 571-576.
[10] 邢阳, 何爱珊, 康焱, 杨子波, 孟繁钢, 邬培慧. 前交叉韧带单束联合前外侧结构重建的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 508-519.
[11] 郭春花, 徐晓燕, 何劼, 刘晓洁, 孟庆芳, 杨曦, 江珉, 刘铁成. 反重力跑台系统在前交叉韧带重建术后步行训练的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 485-491.
[12] 王旭, 李彦林, 王国梁, 赵正吕, 贾笛, 宁梓文, 施政良, 何璐, 王坤. 关节镜下带线锚钉缝合修复前交叉韧带部分损伤的疗效分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 326-333.
[13] 邬春虎, 马玉海, 陈长松, 尹华东, 朱晓峰, 何剑星, 刘彧. 冲击波联合富血小板血浆对骨关节炎软骨损伤的疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 334-339.
[14] 刘雪峰, 韩海峰, 杨硕, 逯景辉. 腹腔镜腹壁侵袭性纤维瘤病切除联合腹壁重建:单中心经验总结[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 374-379.
[15] 邱红生, 林树体, 梁朝莹, 劳世高, 何荷. 模拟现实步态训练对膝关节前交叉韧带损伤的功能恢复及对跌倒恐惧的影响[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 343-350.
阅读次数
全文


摘要