切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (01) : 73 -77. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2019.01.014

所属专题: 文献

荟萃研究

一期和二期髋关节翻修术后感染复发率的Meta分析
林丽能1, 王辉2, 孙效棠2, 张志宏2, 王万明2,()   
  1. 1. 350000 福州,福建医科大学;361101 厦门市第五医院骨关节科
    2. 350001 福州,联勤保障部队第九〇〇医院(原南京军区福州总医院)骨二科
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-19 出版日期:2019-02-01
  • 通信作者: 王万明
  • 基金资助:
    军委后勤保障重大项目(AWS16J032)

Meta analysis on re-infection following one and two stage revisions of infected total hip arthroplasty

Lineng Lin1, Hui Wang2, Xiaotang Sun2, Zhihong Zhang2, Wanming Wang2,()   

  1. 1. Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350000, China; The Fifth Hospital of Xiamen, Xiamen 361101, China
    2. 900 Hospital of the Joint Logistics Team(Fuzhou General Hospital of Nanjing military command), Fuzhou 350001, China
  • Received:2017-05-19 Published:2019-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Wanming Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Wanming, Email:
引用本文:

林丽能, 王辉, 孙效棠, 张志宏, 王万明. 一期和二期髋关节翻修术后感染复发率的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(01): 73-77.

Lineng Lin, Hui Wang, Xiaotang Sun, Zhihong Zhang, Wanming Wang. Meta analysis on re-infection following one and two stage revisions of infected total hip arthroplasty[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(01): 73-77.

目的

比较一期和二期翻修术治疗全髋关节置换术(THA)后感染的感染复发率。

方法

在Pubmed、EMBase和Medline(1988年1月到2017年1月)3个数据库进行检索。收集THA术后感染行一期和二期翻修的文章。筛选符合预先设定标准(一期翻修与二期翻修对照治疗全髋关节置换术后感染,排除非对照研究)的文章,提取手术例数及感染复发例数进行Meta分析。采用Review Manager 5.3软件统计分析感染复发率。

结果

初检1 084篇,最终纳入10篇。THA术后感染总共1 116例,其中一期翻修480例,二期翻修636例;一期和二期的感染复发率对比结果为[OR = 1.40,95%CI(0.92,2.15),P =0.12]。如果将软组织情况良好、骨缺损少、致病菌明确且对药物敏感作为一期翻修的选择条件,一期和二期翻修的感染复发率相似,结果无统计学意义[OR=0.44,95%CI(0.13,1.41),P =0.17];对于THA术后感染,如果不考虑软组织、骨缺损、致病菌的情况下行翻修手术,二期翻修的感染复发率比一期低,结果具有统计学意义[OR =1.79,95%CI(1.11,2.88),P =0.02]。

结论

对于THA术后感染的治疗,局部条件良好与否会影响一期和二期翻修术后感染复发率。

Objective

To compare the re-infection of infected total hip arthroplasty (THA) treated by one stage revision and two sate revision.

Methods

The papers about THA treated by one stage and two stage revision were searched on Pubmed、Medline and EMBase data(January, 1988 to Jananuary, 2017). The papers were selected according to the criteria(the papers about THA treated by one stage and two stage revisions, excluding treated by single treatment). The re-infection rate was analysed by meta-analysis. Review Manger 5.3 was used for data analysis.

Results

Ten articles were collected from 1 084 articles finally. 1 116 cases infected THA were studied, which 480 cases were treated by one-stage revision and 636 cases were treated by two-stage revision. Re-infection rate between the two group results shows[OR=1.40, 95%CI(0.92, 2.15), P =0.12]. If the soft tissue was healthy、the bone defect was small and the pathogen was determined, the re-infection rates were similar between one stage and two stage revisions[OR=0.44, 95%CI(0.13, 1.41), P =0.17]; If the soft tissue、bone defects and pathogens were not considered, the difference in the re-infection rate was statistically significant [OR=1.79, 95%CI(1.11, 2.88), P=0.02].

Conclusion

In the treatment of the infected total hip arthroplasty, the local condition may influence the re-infection rate of one-stage and two stage revision surgery.

图1 发表偏倚漏斗图
表1 纳入文献基本信息
图2 髋关节置换术后感染一期和二期翻修感染复发率对比。亚组分析,亚组A按软组织好、骨缺损少、病原体明确作为一期翻修的选择依据,亚组B未对翻修病例进行选择
[1]
陶庆梅,徐荣彬,杨俊等. 人工髋关节置换术主要不良事件发生率的Meta分析[J]. 药物流行病学杂志,2016(5):275-280.
[2]
Kliushin NM, Ermakov AM, Malkova TA. Chronic periprosthetic hip infection:micro-organisms responsible for infection and re-infection[J]. Int Orthop, 2016:1-7.
[3]
Mah TF, Pitts B, Pellock B, et al. A genetic basis for pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm antibiotic resistance[J]. Nature, 2003, 426(6964): 306-310.
[4]
Schwarzkopf R, Mikhael B, Wright E, et al. Treatment failure among infected periprosthetic total hip arthroplasty patients[J]. Open Orthop J, 2014, 8(1):118-124.
[5]
Fink B. Revision of late periprosthetic infections of total hip endoprostheses: pros and cons of different concepts[J]. Int J Med Scis, 2009, 6(5):287-295.
[6]
Berend KR, Jr LA, Morris MJ, et al. Two-stage treatment of hip periprosthetic joint infection is associated with a high rate of infection control but high mortality[J]. Clin Orthop Relat R, 2013, 471(2):510-518.
[7]
Zeller V, Lhotellier L, Marmor S, et al. One-stage exchange arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic hip infection: results of a large prospective cohort study[J]. J Bone Joint Surg, 2014, 96(1):e1(1-9).
[8]
Ilchmann T, Zimmerli W, Ochsner PE, et al. One-stage revision of infected hip arthroplasty: outcome of 39 consecutive hips[J]. Int Orthop, 2016, 40(5):913-918.
[9]
George D A, Konan S, Haddad F S. single-stage hip and knee exchange for periprosthetic joint infection[J]. J Arthrop, 2015, 30(12):2264-2270.
[10]
郑明华. Meta分析软件应用与实例解析[M]. 人民卫生出版社,第1版,2013, 77-78.
[11]
Wells GA, Shea BJ, O’Connell D, et al. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of non-randomized studies in meta-analysis[J]. Appl Eng Agric, 2000, 18(6):727-734.
[12]
Born P, Ilchmann T, Zimmerli W, et al. Eradication of infection, survival, and radiological results of uncemented revision stems in infected total hip arthroplasties: 28 one-stage and 53 two-stage exchanges with a mean follow-up of 7 years[J].Acta Orthop, 2016, 87(6):637-643.
[13]
Choi HR, Kwon YM, Freiberg AA, et al. Comparison of one-stage revision with antibiotic cement versus two-stage revision results for infected total hip arthroplasty[J]. J Arthrop, 2013, 28(8):66-70.
[14]
De Man FH, Sendi P, Zimmerli W, et al. Infectiological, functional, and radiographic outcome after revision for prosthetic hip infection according to a strict algorithm.[J]. Acta Orthop, 2011, 82(1):27-34.
[15]
Engesater LB, Dale H, Schrama JC, et al. Surgical procedures in the treatment of 784 infected THAs reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register[J]. Acta Orthop, 2011, 82(5):530-537.
[16]
Giulieri SG, Graber P, Ochsner PE, et al. Management of infection associated with total hip arthroplasty according to a treatment algorithm[J]. Infection, 2004, 32(4):222-228.
[17]
Hope PG, Kristinsson KG, Norman P, et al. Deep infection of cemented total hip arthroplasties caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci[J]. J Bone Joint Surg, 1989, 71(5):851-855.
[18]
Klouche S, Leonard P, Zeller V, et al. Infected total hip arthroplasty revision: one-or two-stage procedure?[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg R, 2012, 98(2):144-150.
[19]
Morscher E, Babst R, Jenny H. Treatment of infected joint arthroplasty[J]. Int Orthop, 1990, 14(2):161-165.
[20]
Oussedik SI, Dodd MB, Haddad FS. Outcomes of revision total hip replacement for infection after grading according to a standard protocol[J]. J Bone Joint Surg, 2010, 92(9):1222-1226.
[21]
Wolf M, Clar H, Leithner A, et al. Prosthetic joint infection following total hip replacement[J]. Int Orthop, 2014, 38(11):1363–1368.
[22]
Buchholz HW, Elson RA, Heinert K. Antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement: current concepts[J]. Clin Orthop Relat R, 1984, 190:96-108.
[23]
Cohen JC, Hozack WJ, Cuckler JM, et al. Two-stage reimplantation of septic total knee arthroplasty. Report of three cases using an antibiotic-PMMA spacer block[J]. J Arthrop, 1988, 3(4):369-377.
[24]
Azzam K, Parvizi J, Jungkind D, et al. Microbiological, clinical, and surgical features of fungal prosthetic joint infections: a multi-institutional experience[J]. J Bone Joint Surg, 2009, 91 Suppl 6(6):142-149.
[25]
Whiteside LA, Roy ME. One-stage revision with catheter infusion of intra-articular antibiotics successfully treats infected THA[J]. Clin Orthop Relat R, 2017, 475(2):419-429.
[26]
Tsukayama DT, Estrada R, Gustilo RB. Infection after total hip arthroplasty. A study of the treatment of one hundred and six infections[J]. J Bone Joint Surg, 1996, 78(4):512-523.
[1] 孟繁宇, 周新社, 赵志, 裴立家, 刘犇. 侧位直接前方入路髋关节置换治疗偏瘫肢体股骨颈骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 865-870.
[2] 金鑫, 谢卯, 刘芸, 杨操, 杨述华, 许伟华. 个性化股骨导向器辅助初次全髋关节置换的随机对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 780-787.
[3] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[4] 罗旺林, 杨传军, 许国星, 俞建国, 孙伟东, 颜文娟, 冯志. 开放性楔形胫骨高位截骨术不同植入材料的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 818-826.
[5] 李培杰, 乔永杰, 张浩强, 曾健康, 谭飞, 李嘉欢, 王静, 周胜虎. 细菌培养阴性的假体周围感染诊治的最新进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 827-833.
[6] 杨瑞洲, 李国栋, 吴向阳. 腹股沟疝术后感染的治疗方法探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 715-719.
[7] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[8] 李静如, 王江玲, 吴向阳. 简易负压引流在腹股沟疝术后浅部感染中的疗效分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 745-749.
[9] 段文忠, 白延霞, 徐文亭, 祁虹霞, 吕志坚. 七氟烷和丙泊酚在肝切除术中麻醉效果比较Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 640-645.
[10] 李秉林, 吕少诚, 潘飞, 姜涛, 樊华, 寇建涛, 贺强, 郎韧. 供肝灌注液病原菌与肝移植术后早期感染的相关性分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 656-660.
[11] 李达, 张大涯, 陈润祥, 张晓冬, 黄士美, 陈晨, 曾凡, 陈世锔, 白飞虎. 海南省东方市幽门螺杆菌感染现状的调查与相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 858-864.
[12] 卓徐鹏, 刘颖, 任菁菁. 感染性疾病与老年人低蛋白血症的相关性研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 896-899.
[13] 李静静, 翟蕾, 赵海平, 郑波. 多囊肾合并囊肿的多重耐药菌感染一例并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 920-923.
[14] 李琪, 黄钟莹, 袁平, 关振鹏. 基于某三级医院的ICU多重耐药菌医院感染影响因素的分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 777-782.
[15] 杨艳丽, 陈昱, 赵若辰, 杜伟, 马海娟, 许珂, 张莉芸. 系统性红斑狼疮合并血流感染的危险因素及细菌学分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 694-699.
阅读次数
全文


摘要